How long until two planets become one?Could gas giants exist as a contact binary?Could it be possible for two planets to collide and not kill everything?What is the Roche limit for these two planets?What would the effects be of two tidal locked planets have on each other's geography?How Close Are These Two Planets?How would this tidally locked planet be affected by its moon and would the moon have a deaccelerated orbit?Could two binary planets become habitable under these conditions?Can two adjacent, life-sustaining planets orbit a star such that they are rarely near each other?Would it be possible to have three planets merge but still allow some life survive?A pair of similar celestial bodies coming near each other

(3 of 11: Akari) What is Pyramid Cult's Favorite Car?

Anti-cheating: should there be a limit to a number of toilet breaks per game per player?

Why would anyone ever invest in a cash-only etf?

Sci-fi change: Too much or Not enough

Introducing Tetronogram!

Incrementing add under condition in pandas

How did the Axis intend to hold the Caucasus?

Exploiting the delay when a festival ticket is scanned

Why did I lose on time with 3 pawns vs Knight. Shouldn't it be a draw?

What do I do with a party that is much stronger than their level?

Why did some Apollo missions carry a grenade launcher?

Is there an antonym for "spicy" or "hot" regarding food (NOT "seasoned" but "spicy")?

Where can I find a clear explanation (brief derivation) of N(d1) and N(d2)?

To find islands of 1 and 0 in matrix

How long until two planets become one?

Summoning A Technology Based Demon

What container to use to store developer concentrate?

Are there any unpublished Iain M. Banks short stories?

Why didn’t Christianity spread southwards from Ethiopia in the Middle Ages?

An easy decision when to use a spline or a polynomial

Why is the Apollo LEM ladder so far from the ground?

Is this photo showing a woman standing in the nude before teenagers real?

ECDSA: Why is SigningKey shorter than VerifyingKey

Increasing labelling size in a ListPointPlot3D



How long until two planets become one?


Could gas giants exist as a contact binary?Could it be possible for two planets to collide and not kill everything?What is the Roche limit for these two planets?What would the effects be of two tidal locked planets have on each other's geography?How Close Are These Two Planets?How would this tidally locked planet be affected by its moon and would the moon have a deaccelerated orbit?Could two binary planets become habitable under these conditions?Can two adjacent, life-sustaining planets orbit a star such that they are rarely near each other?Would it be possible to have three planets merge but still allow some life survive?A pair of similar celestial bodies coming near each other






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10












$begingroup$


Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.



1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.



2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.



3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.



My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.



Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmery
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago

















10












$begingroup$


Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.



1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.



2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.



3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.



My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.



Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmery
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago













10












10








10





$begingroup$


Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.



1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.



2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.



3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.



My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.



Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.



1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.



2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.



3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.



My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.



Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?







science-based planets






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







Jimmery

















asked 8 hours ago









JimmeryJimmery

2,9153 gold badges20 silver badges41 bronze badges




2,9153 gold badges20 silver badges41 bronze badges










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmery
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
    $endgroup$
    – Jimmery
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    8 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago





3




3




$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

We're talking hours to days.



A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).



The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.



Other things to consider:



  • It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.

  • Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.

  • There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.

  • The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    3












    $begingroup$

    Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.



    In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.



    A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.



    Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.



    I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.



    Helpful links:



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
    http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor



    cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$










    • 6




      $begingroup$
      It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
      $endgroup$
      – Alexander
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
      $endgroup$
      – puppetsock
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
      $endgroup$
      – HDE 226868
      21 mins ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151856%2fhow-long-until-two-planets-become-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    We're talking hours to days.



    A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).



    The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.



    Other things to consider:



    • It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.

    • Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.

    • There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.

    • The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      5












      $begingroup$

      We're talking hours to days.



      A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).



      The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.



      Other things to consider:



      • It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.

      • Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.

      • There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.

      • The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        We're talking hours to days.



        A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).



        The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.



        Other things to consider:



        • It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.

        • Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.

        • There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.

        • The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        We're talking hours to days.



        A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).



        The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.



        Other things to consider:



        • It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.

        • Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.

        • There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.

        • The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 5 hours ago









        HDE 226868HDE 226868

        69k15 gold badges244 silver badges448 bronze badges




        69k15 gold badges244 silver badges448 bronze badges


























            3












            $begingroup$

            Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.



            In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.



            A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.



            Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.



            I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.



            Helpful links:



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
            http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$










            • 6




              $begingroup$
              It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
              $endgroup$
              – Alexander
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
              $endgroup$
              – puppetsock
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
              $endgroup$
              – HDE 226868
              21 mins ago















            3












            $begingroup$

            Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.



            In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.



            A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.



            Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.



            I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.



            Helpful links:



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
            http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$










            • 6




              $begingroup$
              It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
              $endgroup$
              – Alexander
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
              $endgroup$
              – puppetsock
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
              $endgroup$
              – HDE 226868
              21 mins ago













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.



            In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.



            A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.



            Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.



            I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.



            Helpful links:



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
            http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$



            Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.



            In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.



            A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.



            Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.



            I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.



            Helpful links:



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
            http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago





















            New contributor



            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            answered 6 hours ago









            cyber101cyber101

            694 bronze badges




            694 bronze badges




            New contributor



            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




            New contributor




            cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.












            • 6




              $begingroup$
              It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
              $endgroup$
              – Alexander
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
              $endgroup$
              – puppetsock
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
              $endgroup$
              – HDE 226868
              21 mins ago












            • 6




              $begingroup$
              It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
              $endgroup$
              – Alexander
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
              $endgroup$
              – puppetsock
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
              $endgroup$
              – HDE 226868
              21 mins ago







            6




            6




            $begingroup$
            It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
            $endgroup$
            – Alexander
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
            $endgroup$
            – Alexander
            6 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
            $endgroup$
            – puppetsock
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
            $endgroup$
            – puppetsock
            5 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
            $endgroup$
            – HDE 226868
            21 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
            $endgroup$
            – HDE 226868
            21 mins ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151856%2fhow-long-until-two-planets-become-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480