How long until two planets become one?Could gas giants exist as a contact binary?Could it be possible for two planets to collide and not kill everything?What is the Roche limit for these two planets?What would the effects be of two tidal locked planets have on each other's geography?How Close Are These Two Planets?How would this tidally locked planet be affected by its moon and would the moon have a deaccelerated orbit?Could two binary planets become habitable under these conditions?Can two adjacent, life-sustaining planets orbit a star such that they are rarely near each other?Would it be possible to have three planets merge but still allow some life survive?A pair of similar celestial bodies coming near each other
(3 of 11: Akari) What is Pyramid Cult's Favorite Car?
Anti-cheating: should there be a limit to a number of toilet breaks per game per player?
Why would anyone ever invest in a cash-only etf?
Sci-fi change: Too much or Not enough
Introducing Tetronogram!
Incrementing add under condition in pandas
How did the Axis intend to hold the Caucasus?
Exploiting the delay when a festival ticket is scanned
Why did I lose on time with 3 pawns vs Knight. Shouldn't it be a draw?
What do I do with a party that is much stronger than their level?
Why did some Apollo missions carry a grenade launcher?
Is there an antonym for "spicy" or "hot" regarding food (NOT "seasoned" but "spicy")?
Where can I find a clear explanation (brief derivation) of N(d1) and N(d2)?
To find islands of 1 and 0 in matrix
How long until two planets become one?
Summoning A Technology Based Demon
What container to use to store developer concentrate?
Are there any unpublished Iain M. Banks short stories?
Why didn’t Christianity spread southwards from Ethiopia in the Middle Ages?
An easy decision when to use a spline or a polynomial
Why is the Apollo LEM ladder so far from the ground?
Is this photo showing a woman standing in the nude before teenagers real?
ECDSA: Why is SigningKey shorter than VerifyingKey
Increasing labelling size in a ListPointPlot3D
How long until two planets become one?
Could gas giants exist as a contact binary?Could it be possible for two planets to collide and not kill everything?What is the Roche limit for these two planets?What would the effects be of two tidal locked planets have on each other's geography?How Close Are These Two Planets?How would this tidally locked planet be affected by its moon and would the moon have a deaccelerated orbit?Could two binary planets become habitable under these conditions?Can two adjacent, life-sustaining planets orbit a star such that they are rarely near each other?Would it be possible to have three planets merge but still allow some life survive?A pair of similar celestial bodies coming near each other
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.
1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.
2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.
3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.
My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.
Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?
science-based planets
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.
1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.
2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.
3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.
My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.
Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?
science-based planets
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.
1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.
2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.
3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.
My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.
Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?
science-based planets
$endgroup$
Two Earth-like planets collide at a (relatively slow) speed of about 1,000 kph. For all questions regarding the size and composition of these planets, just think about Earth - and these two planets are moving towards each other at the same speed.
1) First, they would begin to rip each other apart due to roche limits.
2) Then the two planets (what remained of them, that hadnt been ripped apart) would connect with each other.
3) Eventually, they would merge together and form one larger planet.
My question is, roughly what kind of time span would there be between stages 2 and 3? Stage 2 being the planets connecting with each other, and Stage 3 being one single spherical planet. So I want to know roughly how quickly gravity would act upon these two planets whilst it is forming them into one (mostly) spherical planet.
Are we talking hours/days or are we talking years/centuries?
science-based planets
science-based planets
edited 8 hours ago
Jimmery
asked 8 hours ago
JimmeryJimmery
2,9153 gold badges20 silver badges41 bronze badges
2,9153 gold badges20 silver badges41 bronze badges
3
$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3
$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We're talking hours to days.
A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).
The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.
Other things to consider:
- It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.
- Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.
- There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.
- The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.
In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.
A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.
Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.
I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.
Helpful links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151856%2fhow-long-until-two-planets-become-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We're talking hours to days.
A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).
The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.
Other things to consider:
- It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.
- Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.
- There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.
- The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We're talking hours to days.
A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).
The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.
Other things to consider:
- It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.
- Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.
- There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.
- The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We're talking hours to days.
A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).
The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.
Other things to consider:
- It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.
- Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.
- There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.
- The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.
$endgroup$
We're talking hours to days.
A good deal of work has been done on protoplanet-protoplanet collisions, mainly focused on testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis for the formation of the Moon. A number of fluid simulations (many smoothed-particle hydrodynamics) have been performed, for varying angles of attack and initial relative velocities (see e.g. Canup 2012, Eiland et al. 2013).
The takeaway from those simulations is that the planets initially coalesce within half a day to a day. However, the resulting body isn't round; it's somewhat elliptical, even a bit pointy at the ends. Some models have tails of matter (typically one or two) attached at the ends, which, though tenuous, may form another body, i.e. the Moon. By the end of about 24 hours, there is a clear central body surrounded by this excess material, but it may take up to a month for it to regain its spherical shape - a key characteristic of a planet.
Other things to consider:
- It may take time for the interior of the planet to become differentiated, i.e. for it to take on a traditional planet-like structure. Even after coalescence, the cores may still be separated.
- Glancing, indirect collisions tend to produce more ellipsoidal shapes than direct collisions, even if there's a merger.
- There will still be debris orbiting for quite some time after the merger - again, perhaps weeks or months.
- The final body will remain quite hot for some time, with surface temperatures of perhaps up to 6000 K in the day or so immediately following the collision.
answered 5 hours ago
HDE 226868♦HDE 226868
69k15 gold badges244 silver badges448 bronze badges
69k15 gold badges244 silver badges448 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.
In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.
A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.
Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.
I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.
Helpful links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.
In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.
A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.
Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.
I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.
Helpful links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.
In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.
A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.
Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.
I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.
Helpful links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Please check out this link in case you find it interesting. It's about how the moon formed from a similar impact.
In the link above, it is assumed that there was an explosive collision (moderate at celestial standards) between Earth and Theia at an oblique angle. Despite such a collision, it is thought that it took 0.1 billion years to form the moon. A corresponding collision between your two planets would likely take longer, as the creation of the Earth itself (normally) took hundreds of millions of years.
A point about Roche limits: Roche limit takes effect 2.5 radii away from the larger planet. If these planets are equal in mass, they would merge into a central mass between them. This would basically be the same as forming a brand new planet from scratch.
Edit: I forgot to give you an actual answer - sorry lol. With little-to-no actual science to back this up (we don't know much about the formation of planets) I'm going to say between 0.5-1 billion Earth years. That's assuming that these two planets don't just turn into an asteroid belt or something, and that nothing else gets in the way. I'm also not accounting for bombardment of debris from the collision of these two planets, or the possibility of smaller moons forming.
I'd also like to point out that the probability of 2 celestial objects 'only' crashing into each other at 1000 km/h wouldn't be much of a collision. Is this being done deliberately? If not, incredible luck.
Helpful links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth#Solar_System_formation
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/roche_limit.html
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 6 hours ago
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 6 hours ago
cyber101cyber101
694 bronze badges
694 bronze badges
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
cyber101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
6
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
6
6
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's not 0.1 billion years to form the Moon, it's 0.1 billion years to produce Earth-Theia collision. Moon had formed astonishingly fast after the collision: "The material in orbits around the Earth quickly coalesced into the Moon (possibly within less than a month, but in no more than a century)"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
After such a collision the result will certainly be hot enough to melt rock. How long that takes to cool enough to form a rocky surface cool enough for liquid water is above my pay grade. But it will certainly be more than the time scale the OP suggested. Maybe 100,000 years is starting to get there.
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
$begingroup$
Hi, cyber101. Given @Alexander's correction, I would highly recommend editing your answer; I think you've misinterpreted what timescale Jimmery is looking to determine.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868♦
21 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151856%2fhow-long-until-two-planets-become-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
I would be curious to understand how you would go and arrange for two planets to collide at such a ridiculously low speed. Very curious. I just don't see how this could be possible. (Hint: when the planets are 100,000 km apart they are well within each other's gravitational field. What speed does an object get falling in Earth's gravitational field from 100,000 km?)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
technically the moment they collide they are one large planet. There's a long step in the middle, where the Earth is a giant ball of magma and debris circling the sun for a few million years.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TrevorD you are right - I have edited this question to make it clearer - I am interested in the long step in the middle, would it really take millions of years?
$endgroup$
– Jimmery
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Millions of years" is a very short span in geological time. Just cooling the huge ball of molten rock down to where water can exist as a liquid will take quite a bit of time.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also realize the new super Earth will orbit every few years back into its own debris field, getting bombarded by continent sized meteors, refueling the molten ball of magma.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
8 hours ago