Are there any extinct phonemes in Russian?What are the rationale of people speaking/teaching Esperanto?What are the Proto-Germanic words for sea, lake and a couple of others?English words which are both verbs and adjectivesHow did a logographic orthography like Chinese organize its word-stock before any type of phonetic notation?What was the most usual and most recent system of writing Korean without any hangul at all?Are there systematic studies on HOW language features/characteristics are formed?Have there ever been (serious) attempts to replace alphabets with phonetic alphabets?How are proto-languages dated?Is there any relationship between the Hungarian long s sound and the long s in some European languages?

Data normalization before or after train-test split?

Should I cheat if the majority does it?

Explain how 'Sharing the burden' puzzle from Professor Layton and the Miracle Mask should be solved

How did Einstein know the speed of light was constant?

What's the big deal about the Nazgûl losing their horses?

Why is there paternal, for fatherly, fraternal, for brotherly, but no similar word for sons?

How can I effectively map a multi-level dungeon?

Who pays for increased security measures on flights to the US?

Are there advantages in writing by hand over typing out a story?

What/Where usage English vs Japanese

Advice for making/keeping shredded chicken moist?

Contributing to a candidate as a Foreign National US Resident?

Bypass with wrong cvv of debit card and getting OTP

What does the ash content of broken wheat really mean?

Why do we need a bootloader separate than our application program in MCU's?

Taking advantage when the HR forgets to communicate the rules

Why would "dead languages" be the only languages that spells could be written in?

How can I define a very large matrix efficiently?

Implementing absolute value function in c

Are "confidant" and "confident" homophones?

How would an Amulet of Proof Against Detection and Location interact with the Comprehend Languages spell?

What is the difference between a historical drama and a period drama?

What does it mean for a bass player to play "on the one"?

Recursive conversion from ExpandoObject to Dictionary<string, object>



Are there any extinct phonemes in Russian?


What are the rationale of people speaking/teaching Esperanto?What are the Proto-Germanic words for sea, lake and a couple of others?English words which are both verbs and adjectivesHow did a logographic orthography like Chinese organize its word-stock before any type of phonetic notation?What was the most usual and most recent system of writing Korean without any hangul at all?Are there systematic studies on HOW language features/characteristics are formed?Have there ever been (serious) attempts to replace alphabets with phonetic alphabets?How are proto-languages dated?Is there any relationship between the Hungarian long s sound and the long s in some European languages?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















Your language and mine have something in common - they are very rich and nuanced lexically, but not rich phonetically at all. There are even numerous parodies making fun of the Russian phonology because of that (e.g., this one).



I am curious as to whether the Russian language has always been that poor phonetically or got phonetically simplified over time. Languages indeed can get phonetically simplified: for example, the Turkish language had the voiced counterpart of the 'h' sound and has the corresponding letter, ğ, which nowadays has no own sound, and the English language is predicted to lose the 'th' sound by 2066.



My question is this: Are there any extinct Russian phonetic sounds? If so, what are some examples?



I will now make a few remarks to make my question more specific.



First of all, I am interested in sounds that ceased to exist rather than changed over time to survive as modified variants. For example, if people stopped pronouncing a certain sound in all words containing it, as happened with the Turkish ğ, then it is an extinct sound. Also, a sound is extinct if it got replaced in all words containing it by a different sound that had already been existing in the language as a separate sound. But if a sound just evolved, always staying as a separate sound and not becoming indistinguishable from any other sound of the language, then what it was in the past is not an extinct sound for the purposes of my question.



In other words, please consider sounds as evolutionists consider animal species. If an animal species evolved into something existing today, it is not extinct, even if it now looks very differently from how it looked before. But if it truly ceased to exist at a certain point of time, then it is extinct.



Second, I feel I need to define the Russian language, because there have been various Slavic ethnic groups living in what is now Russia. For the purposes of my question, let us define the Russian language as the language spoken by people who formed a linguistically uniform group living in the past thousand years in and around what is now Moscow, as well as by their ancestors, wherever they migrated to what is now Moscow from. In other words, just consider the Muscovite version of the language and trace back its history.



Third, I feel I should specify the history time frame, but instead I would like to ask you to just trace things back to the point at which you can find extinct sounds. My question is thus not a broad request for all extinct sounds; I just want some examples. The later the sound disappeared the better.



Finally, to illustrate what I am looking for, I would like to give a few examples of sounds absent in the Russian language:



  • th in English as well as dh and th in Albanian, i.e., voiced and voiceless interdental consonants,


  • ğ in Old Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of h (звонкая аналогия русского звука х),


  • c in Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of the Russian sound ч.


I want something like this, that is, something absent in modern Russian (albeit not necessarily sounding like any of the sounds listed above), but with evidence of previous existence in Russian.










share|improve this question















migrated from russian.stackexchange.com 8 hours ago


This question came from our site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Russian language.













  • 2





    I don't understand why you say that Russian is "not rich phonetically at all" - typically it's analyzed as having 5 vowels and 34 consonants.

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    A good overview of the phonological history of Russian can be found at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    a lot of things has changed phonetically, this question is too broad in my opinion (and also provides no evidence of research of any kind) - but let's see what linguistics mods will say. also, honestly, avoid groundless and opinionated claims like "language X is not rich phonetically at all" - while some languages indeed have smaller set of phonemes compared to others - Russian is hardly phonetically simple.

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    @Mitsuko this is first time when I feel bad that there's no down-vote option for comments )

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Regarding the relative richness of phonemic inventories, I encourage you to check out the World Atlas of Language Structures, wals.info. That is an excellent resource where language features can be compared statistically based on real-world data. For example, WALS Feature 1a is "Consonant inventories", where Russian is rated as "Moderately large" and Turkish as "Average". Feature 2 is "Vowel quality inventories", where Russian is rated as "Average" and Turkish as "Large". So, looking across languages as a whole, both Turkish and Russian have above average-sized phonetic "richness".

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago

















2















Your language and mine have something in common - they are very rich and nuanced lexically, but not rich phonetically at all. There are even numerous parodies making fun of the Russian phonology because of that (e.g., this one).



I am curious as to whether the Russian language has always been that poor phonetically or got phonetically simplified over time. Languages indeed can get phonetically simplified: for example, the Turkish language had the voiced counterpart of the 'h' sound and has the corresponding letter, ğ, which nowadays has no own sound, and the English language is predicted to lose the 'th' sound by 2066.



My question is this: Are there any extinct Russian phonetic sounds? If so, what are some examples?



I will now make a few remarks to make my question more specific.



First of all, I am interested in sounds that ceased to exist rather than changed over time to survive as modified variants. For example, if people stopped pronouncing a certain sound in all words containing it, as happened with the Turkish ğ, then it is an extinct sound. Also, a sound is extinct if it got replaced in all words containing it by a different sound that had already been existing in the language as a separate sound. But if a sound just evolved, always staying as a separate sound and not becoming indistinguishable from any other sound of the language, then what it was in the past is not an extinct sound for the purposes of my question.



In other words, please consider sounds as evolutionists consider animal species. If an animal species evolved into something existing today, it is not extinct, even if it now looks very differently from how it looked before. But if it truly ceased to exist at a certain point of time, then it is extinct.



Second, I feel I need to define the Russian language, because there have been various Slavic ethnic groups living in what is now Russia. For the purposes of my question, let us define the Russian language as the language spoken by people who formed a linguistically uniform group living in the past thousand years in and around what is now Moscow, as well as by their ancestors, wherever they migrated to what is now Moscow from. In other words, just consider the Muscovite version of the language and trace back its history.



Third, I feel I should specify the history time frame, but instead I would like to ask you to just trace things back to the point at which you can find extinct sounds. My question is thus not a broad request for all extinct sounds; I just want some examples. The later the sound disappeared the better.



Finally, to illustrate what I am looking for, I would like to give a few examples of sounds absent in the Russian language:



  • th in English as well as dh and th in Albanian, i.e., voiced and voiceless interdental consonants,


  • ğ in Old Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of h (звонкая аналогия русского звука х),


  • c in Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of the Russian sound ч.


I want something like this, that is, something absent in modern Russian (albeit not necessarily sounding like any of the sounds listed above), but with evidence of previous existence in Russian.










share|improve this question















migrated from russian.stackexchange.com 8 hours ago


This question came from our site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Russian language.













  • 2





    I don't understand why you say that Russian is "not rich phonetically at all" - typically it's analyzed as having 5 vowels and 34 consonants.

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    A good overview of the phonological history of Russian can be found at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    a lot of things has changed phonetically, this question is too broad in my opinion (and also provides no evidence of research of any kind) - but let's see what linguistics mods will say. also, honestly, avoid groundless and opinionated claims like "language X is not rich phonetically at all" - while some languages indeed have smaller set of phonemes compared to others - Russian is hardly phonetically simple.

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    @Mitsuko this is first time when I feel bad that there's no down-vote option for comments )

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Regarding the relative richness of phonemic inventories, I encourage you to check out the World Atlas of Language Structures, wals.info. That is an excellent resource where language features can be compared statistically based on real-world data. For example, WALS Feature 1a is "Consonant inventories", where Russian is rated as "Moderately large" and Turkish as "Average". Feature 2 is "Vowel quality inventories", where Russian is rated as "Average" and Turkish as "Large". So, looking across languages as a whole, both Turkish and Russian have above average-sized phonetic "richness".

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago













2












2








2








Your language and mine have something in common - they are very rich and nuanced lexically, but not rich phonetically at all. There are even numerous parodies making fun of the Russian phonology because of that (e.g., this one).



I am curious as to whether the Russian language has always been that poor phonetically or got phonetically simplified over time. Languages indeed can get phonetically simplified: for example, the Turkish language had the voiced counterpart of the 'h' sound and has the corresponding letter, ğ, which nowadays has no own sound, and the English language is predicted to lose the 'th' sound by 2066.



My question is this: Are there any extinct Russian phonetic sounds? If so, what are some examples?



I will now make a few remarks to make my question more specific.



First of all, I am interested in sounds that ceased to exist rather than changed over time to survive as modified variants. For example, if people stopped pronouncing a certain sound in all words containing it, as happened with the Turkish ğ, then it is an extinct sound. Also, a sound is extinct if it got replaced in all words containing it by a different sound that had already been existing in the language as a separate sound. But if a sound just evolved, always staying as a separate sound and not becoming indistinguishable from any other sound of the language, then what it was in the past is not an extinct sound for the purposes of my question.



In other words, please consider sounds as evolutionists consider animal species. If an animal species evolved into something existing today, it is not extinct, even if it now looks very differently from how it looked before. But if it truly ceased to exist at a certain point of time, then it is extinct.



Second, I feel I need to define the Russian language, because there have been various Slavic ethnic groups living in what is now Russia. For the purposes of my question, let us define the Russian language as the language spoken by people who formed a linguistically uniform group living in the past thousand years in and around what is now Moscow, as well as by their ancestors, wherever they migrated to what is now Moscow from. In other words, just consider the Muscovite version of the language and trace back its history.



Third, I feel I should specify the history time frame, but instead I would like to ask you to just trace things back to the point at which you can find extinct sounds. My question is thus not a broad request for all extinct sounds; I just want some examples. The later the sound disappeared the better.



Finally, to illustrate what I am looking for, I would like to give a few examples of sounds absent in the Russian language:



  • th in English as well as dh and th in Albanian, i.e., voiced and voiceless interdental consonants,


  • ğ in Old Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of h (звонкая аналогия русского звука х),


  • c in Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of the Russian sound ч.


I want something like this, that is, something absent in modern Russian (albeit not necessarily sounding like any of the sounds listed above), but with evidence of previous existence in Russian.










share|improve this question
















Your language and mine have something in common - they are very rich and nuanced lexically, but not rich phonetically at all. There are even numerous parodies making fun of the Russian phonology because of that (e.g., this one).



I am curious as to whether the Russian language has always been that poor phonetically or got phonetically simplified over time. Languages indeed can get phonetically simplified: for example, the Turkish language had the voiced counterpart of the 'h' sound and has the corresponding letter, ğ, which nowadays has no own sound, and the English language is predicted to lose the 'th' sound by 2066.



My question is this: Are there any extinct Russian phonetic sounds? If so, what are some examples?



I will now make a few remarks to make my question more specific.



First of all, I am interested in sounds that ceased to exist rather than changed over time to survive as modified variants. For example, if people stopped pronouncing a certain sound in all words containing it, as happened with the Turkish ğ, then it is an extinct sound. Also, a sound is extinct if it got replaced in all words containing it by a different sound that had already been existing in the language as a separate sound. But if a sound just evolved, always staying as a separate sound and not becoming indistinguishable from any other sound of the language, then what it was in the past is not an extinct sound for the purposes of my question.



In other words, please consider sounds as evolutionists consider animal species. If an animal species evolved into something existing today, it is not extinct, even if it now looks very differently from how it looked before. But if it truly ceased to exist at a certain point of time, then it is extinct.



Second, I feel I need to define the Russian language, because there have been various Slavic ethnic groups living in what is now Russia. For the purposes of my question, let us define the Russian language as the language spoken by people who formed a linguistically uniform group living in the past thousand years in and around what is now Moscow, as well as by their ancestors, wherever they migrated to what is now Moscow from. In other words, just consider the Muscovite version of the language and trace back its history.



Third, I feel I should specify the history time frame, but instead I would like to ask you to just trace things back to the point at which you can find extinct sounds. My question is thus not a broad request for all extinct sounds; I just want some examples. The later the sound disappeared the better.



Finally, to illustrate what I am looking for, I would like to give a few examples of sounds absent in the Russian language:



  • th in English as well as dh and th in Albanian, i.e., voiced and voiceless interdental consonants,


  • ğ in Old Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of h (звонкая аналогия русского звука х),


  • c in Turkish, i.e., the voiced counterpart of the Russian sound ч.


I want something like this, that is, something absent in modern Russian (albeit not necessarily sounding like any of the sounds listed above), but with evidence of previous existence in Russian.







history






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







Mitsuko

















asked 8 hours ago









MitsukoMitsuko

1113 bronze badges




1113 bronze badges




migrated from russian.stackexchange.com 8 hours ago


This question came from our site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Russian language.









migrated from russian.stackexchange.com 8 hours ago


This question came from our site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Russian language.









  • 2





    I don't understand why you say that Russian is "not rich phonetically at all" - typically it's analyzed as having 5 vowels and 34 consonants.

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    A good overview of the phonological history of Russian can be found at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    a lot of things has changed phonetically, this question is too broad in my opinion (and also provides no evidence of research of any kind) - but let's see what linguistics mods will say. also, honestly, avoid groundless and opinionated claims like "language X is not rich phonetically at all" - while some languages indeed have smaller set of phonemes compared to others - Russian is hardly phonetically simple.

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    @Mitsuko this is first time when I feel bad that there's no down-vote option for comments )

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Regarding the relative richness of phonemic inventories, I encourage you to check out the World Atlas of Language Structures, wals.info. That is an excellent resource where language features can be compared statistically based on real-world data. For example, WALS Feature 1a is "Consonant inventories", where Russian is rated as "Moderately large" and Turkish as "Average". Feature 2 is "Vowel quality inventories", where Russian is rated as "Average" and Turkish as "Large". So, looking across languages as a whole, both Turkish and Russian have above average-sized phonetic "richness".

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    I don't understand why you say that Russian is "not rich phonetically at all" - typically it's analyzed as having 5 vowels and 34 consonants.

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    A good overview of the phonological history of Russian can be found at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Mark Beadles
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    a lot of things has changed phonetically, this question is too broad in my opinion (and also provides no evidence of research of any kind) - but let's see what linguistics mods will say. also, honestly, avoid groundless and opinionated claims like "language X is not rich phonetically at all" - while some languages indeed have smaller set of phonemes compared to others - Russian is hardly phonetically simple.

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    @Mitsuko this is first time when I feel bad that there's no down-vote option for comments )

    – shabunc
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    Regarding the relative richness of phonemic inventories, I encourage you to check out the World Atlas of Language Structures, wals.info. That is an excellent resource where language features can be compared statistically based on real-world data. For example, WALS Feature 1a is "Consonant inventories", where Russian is rated as "Moderately large" and Turkish as "Average". Feature 2 is "Vowel quality inventories", where Russian is rated as "Average" and Turkish as "Large". So, looking across languages as a whole, both Turkish and Russian have above average-sized phonetic "richness".

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago







2




2





I don't understand why you say that Russian is "not rich phonetically at all" - typically it's analyzed as having 5 vowels and 34 consonants.

– Mark Beadles
8 hours ago





I don't understand why you say that Russian is "not rich phonetically at all" - typically it's analyzed as having 5 vowels and 34 consonants.

– Mark Beadles
8 hours ago




2




2





A good overview of the phonological history of Russian can be found at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

– Mark Beadles
8 hours ago





A good overview of the phonological history of Russian can be found at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

– Mark Beadles
8 hours ago




2




2





a lot of things has changed phonetically, this question is too broad in my opinion (and also provides no evidence of research of any kind) - but let's see what linguistics mods will say. also, honestly, avoid groundless and opinionated claims like "language X is not rich phonetically at all" - while some languages indeed have smaller set of phonemes compared to others - Russian is hardly phonetically simple.

– shabunc
8 hours ago





a lot of things has changed phonetically, this question is too broad in my opinion (and also provides no evidence of research of any kind) - but let's see what linguistics mods will say. also, honestly, avoid groundless and opinionated claims like "language X is not rich phonetically at all" - while some languages indeed have smaller set of phonemes compared to others - Russian is hardly phonetically simple.

– shabunc
8 hours ago




2




2





@Mitsuko this is first time when I feel bad that there's no down-vote option for comments )

– shabunc
8 hours ago





@Mitsuko this is first time when I feel bad that there's no down-vote option for comments )

– shabunc
8 hours ago




3




3





Regarding the relative richness of phonemic inventories, I encourage you to check out the World Atlas of Language Structures, wals.info. That is an excellent resource where language features can be compared statistically based on real-world data. For example, WALS Feature 1a is "Consonant inventories", where Russian is rated as "Moderately large" and Turkish as "Average". Feature 2 is "Vowel quality inventories", where Russian is rated as "Average" and Turkish as "Large". So, looking across languages as a whole, both Turkish and Russian have above average-sized phonetic "richness".

– Mark Beadles
7 hours ago





Regarding the relative richness of phonemic inventories, I encourage you to check out the World Atlas of Language Structures, wals.info. That is an excellent resource where language features can be compared statistically based on real-world data. For example, WALS Feature 1a is "Consonant inventories", where Russian is rated as "Moderately large" and Turkish as "Average". Feature 2 is "Vowel quality inventories", where Russian is rated as "Average" and Turkish as "Large". So, looking across languages as a whole, both Turkish and Russian have above average-sized phonetic "richness".

– Mark Beadles
7 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Two phonological changes that reduced the phoneme inventory in Russian were the loss of yers (ultra-short vowels) and yuses (nasal vowels). None of these sounds occur in the modern language.



The yers were ъ = *[ŭ] and ь = *[ĭ]. The symbols are still used today but no longer indicate a vowel.



The yuses were ѧ = *[ɛ̃], ѫ = *[ɔ̃], ѩ = *[jɛ̃], ѭ = *[jɔ̃]. These symbols are no longer used, and nasal vowels no longer are found in Russian.



Additionally, there was a vowel ѣ = *[e] which was higher than е = *[ɛ], but those vowels have merged into modern е.



In the consonants, ц may have had a palatalized form [t͡sʲ] (still a marginal phoneme), and double consonants have generally degeminated: [t] < *[tt], [f] < *[ff].






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

    – shabunc
    7 hours ago











  • @shabunc Good points, I will add.

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago


















1














There are plenty of phonemes in the historical antecedent languages, such as Proto-Slavic and Proto-Indo-European, which are not found in modern Russian. Establishing a more recent loss of phoneme which is specifically within Russian is much harder to do. For example, there was an East Slavic ʒ/dʒ contrast, and while dʒ is missing in Russian, I don't know of any evidence that it existed in earlier Russian – it may be assumed that it was lost before Russian emerged as a distinct language. The case of *[æ] ("yat") is also unclear, that is, was there still a vowel pronounced something like [æ ~ ɛ] in earlier Russian, distinct from [e]? Is [æ] really extinct (the vowel in пять is pretty much [æ])?



The other problem is that there are dialects of Russian. Southern Russian has [γ] for [g], so [g] is "extinct", but that's not a feature of Russian in general.






share|improve this answer























  • What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

    – vectory
    6 hours ago











  • The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago


















0














Perhaps the most Russian phonemes as well the most Russian phonemic oppositions are




ш /ʂ/ vs. щ /ɕː/



ж /ʐ/ vs. жж /ʑː/




[ɕː] and [ʑː] are correspndingly a voiceless and voiced long (geminated) alveolo-palatal sibilant fricative. It seems like no other Slavic language has such phonemes, neither do other European languages. Well, the Italian /ʃ/ is geminated word-internally, but it does not have a non-geminated contrasting phoneme. In Russian, the pairs are really contrasted:




чаша [ˈtɕäʂə] 'cup' vs. чаща [ˈtɕäɕːə] 'dense forest'



дрожи [ˈdroʐɨ] 'of shivering' (Gen. case) vs. дрожжи [ˈdroʑːi] 'yeast'




The phoneme /ʑː/ is rarely pronounced as alveolo-palatal nowadays, most Russian speakers pronounced it as retroflex [ʐː], but it's still geminated, and it's still a distinct and unique Russian phoneme hardly found in other languages.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

    – Mark Beadles
    5 hours ago











  • @MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31851%2fare-there-any-extinct-phonemes-in-russian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














Two phonological changes that reduced the phoneme inventory in Russian were the loss of yers (ultra-short vowels) and yuses (nasal vowels). None of these sounds occur in the modern language.



The yers were ъ = *[ŭ] and ь = *[ĭ]. The symbols are still used today but no longer indicate a vowel.



The yuses were ѧ = *[ɛ̃], ѫ = *[ɔ̃], ѩ = *[jɛ̃], ѭ = *[jɔ̃]. These symbols are no longer used, and nasal vowels no longer are found in Russian.



Additionally, there was a vowel ѣ = *[e] which was higher than е = *[ɛ], but those vowels have merged into modern е.



In the consonants, ц may have had a palatalized form [t͡sʲ] (still a marginal phoneme), and double consonants have generally degeminated: [t] < *[tt], [f] < *[ff].






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

    – shabunc
    7 hours ago











  • @shabunc Good points, I will add.

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago















4














Two phonological changes that reduced the phoneme inventory in Russian were the loss of yers (ultra-short vowels) and yuses (nasal vowels). None of these sounds occur in the modern language.



The yers were ъ = *[ŭ] and ь = *[ĭ]. The symbols are still used today but no longer indicate a vowel.



The yuses were ѧ = *[ɛ̃], ѫ = *[ɔ̃], ѩ = *[jɛ̃], ѭ = *[jɔ̃]. These symbols are no longer used, and nasal vowels no longer are found in Russian.



Additionally, there was a vowel ѣ = *[e] which was higher than е = *[ɛ], but those vowels have merged into modern е.



In the consonants, ц may have had a palatalized form [t͡sʲ] (still a marginal phoneme), and double consonants have generally degeminated: [t] < *[tt], [f] < *[ff].






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

    – shabunc
    7 hours ago











  • @shabunc Good points, I will add.

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago













4












4








4







Two phonological changes that reduced the phoneme inventory in Russian were the loss of yers (ultra-short vowels) and yuses (nasal vowels). None of these sounds occur in the modern language.



The yers were ъ = *[ŭ] and ь = *[ĭ]. The symbols are still used today but no longer indicate a vowel.



The yuses were ѧ = *[ɛ̃], ѫ = *[ɔ̃], ѩ = *[jɛ̃], ѭ = *[jɔ̃]. These symbols are no longer used, and nasal vowels no longer are found in Russian.



Additionally, there was a vowel ѣ = *[e] which was higher than е = *[ɛ], but those vowels have merged into modern е.



In the consonants, ц may have had a palatalized form [t͡sʲ] (still a marginal phoneme), and double consonants have generally degeminated: [t] < *[tt], [f] < *[ff].






share|improve this answer















Two phonological changes that reduced the phoneme inventory in Russian were the loss of yers (ultra-short vowels) and yuses (nasal vowels). None of these sounds occur in the modern language.



The yers were ъ = *[ŭ] and ь = *[ĭ]. The symbols are still used today but no longer indicate a vowel.



The yuses were ѧ = *[ɛ̃], ѫ = *[ɔ̃], ѩ = *[jɛ̃], ѭ = *[jɔ̃]. These symbols are no longer used, and nasal vowels no longer are found in Russian.



Additionally, there was a vowel ѣ = *[e] which was higher than е = *[ɛ], but those vowels have merged into modern е.



In the consonants, ц may have had a palatalized form [t͡sʲ] (still a marginal phoneme), and double consonants have generally degeminated: [t] < *[tt], [f] < *[ff].







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Mark BeadlesMark Beadles

5,8652 gold badges19 silver badges43 bronze badges




5,8652 gold badges19 silver badges43 bronze badges







  • 2





    also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

    – shabunc
    7 hours ago











  • @shabunc Good points, I will add.

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

    – shabunc
    7 hours ago











  • @shabunc Good points, I will add.

    – Mark Beadles
    7 hours ago







2




2





also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

– shabunc
7 hours ago





also, the ѣ sound, also - loss of palatalized ц

– shabunc
7 hours ago













@shabunc Good points, I will add.

– Mark Beadles
7 hours ago





@shabunc Good points, I will add.

– Mark Beadles
7 hours ago













1














There are plenty of phonemes in the historical antecedent languages, such as Proto-Slavic and Proto-Indo-European, which are not found in modern Russian. Establishing a more recent loss of phoneme which is specifically within Russian is much harder to do. For example, there was an East Slavic ʒ/dʒ contrast, and while dʒ is missing in Russian, I don't know of any evidence that it existed in earlier Russian – it may be assumed that it was lost before Russian emerged as a distinct language. The case of *[æ] ("yat") is also unclear, that is, was there still a vowel pronounced something like [æ ~ ɛ] in earlier Russian, distinct from [e]? Is [æ] really extinct (the vowel in пять is pretty much [æ])?



The other problem is that there are dialects of Russian. Southern Russian has [γ] for [g], so [g] is "extinct", but that's not a feature of Russian in general.






share|improve this answer























  • What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

    – vectory
    6 hours ago











  • The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago















1














There are plenty of phonemes in the historical antecedent languages, such as Proto-Slavic and Proto-Indo-European, which are not found in modern Russian. Establishing a more recent loss of phoneme which is specifically within Russian is much harder to do. For example, there was an East Slavic ʒ/dʒ contrast, and while dʒ is missing in Russian, I don't know of any evidence that it existed in earlier Russian – it may be assumed that it was lost before Russian emerged as a distinct language. The case of *[æ] ("yat") is also unclear, that is, was there still a vowel pronounced something like [æ ~ ɛ] in earlier Russian, distinct from [e]? Is [æ] really extinct (the vowel in пять is pretty much [æ])?



The other problem is that there are dialects of Russian. Southern Russian has [γ] for [g], so [g] is "extinct", but that's not a feature of Russian in general.






share|improve this answer























  • What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

    – vectory
    6 hours ago











  • The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago













1












1








1







There are plenty of phonemes in the historical antecedent languages, such as Proto-Slavic and Proto-Indo-European, which are not found in modern Russian. Establishing a more recent loss of phoneme which is specifically within Russian is much harder to do. For example, there was an East Slavic ʒ/dʒ contrast, and while dʒ is missing in Russian, I don't know of any evidence that it existed in earlier Russian – it may be assumed that it was lost before Russian emerged as a distinct language. The case of *[æ] ("yat") is also unclear, that is, was there still a vowel pronounced something like [æ ~ ɛ] in earlier Russian, distinct from [e]? Is [æ] really extinct (the vowel in пять is pretty much [æ])?



The other problem is that there are dialects of Russian. Southern Russian has [γ] for [g], so [g] is "extinct", but that's not a feature of Russian in general.






share|improve this answer













There are plenty of phonemes in the historical antecedent languages, such as Proto-Slavic and Proto-Indo-European, which are not found in modern Russian. Establishing a more recent loss of phoneme which is specifically within Russian is much harder to do. For example, there was an East Slavic ʒ/dʒ contrast, and while dʒ is missing in Russian, I don't know of any evidence that it existed in earlier Russian – it may be assumed that it was lost before Russian emerged as a distinct language. The case of *[æ] ("yat") is also unclear, that is, was there still a vowel pronounced something like [æ ~ ɛ] in earlier Russian, distinct from [e]? Is [æ] really extinct (the vowel in пять is pretty much [æ])?



The other problem is that there are dialects of Russian. Southern Russian has [γ] for [g], so [g] is "extinct", but that's not a feature of Russian in general.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









user6726user6726

36.8k1 gold badge24 silver badges71 bronze badges




36.8k1 gold badge24 silver badges71 bronze badges












  • What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

    – vectory
    6 hours ago











  • The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago

















  • What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

    – vectory
    6 hours ago











  • The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago
















What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

– vectory
6 hours ago





What about /h/, notoriously hard for Russians, did it ever exist in the language? And why does Russian have two j letters, ya and yu?

– vectory
6 hours ago













The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

– Yellow Sky
5 hours ago





The distinction between "yat" and E was lost by the 19th century only, in Moscow "yat" used to be pronounced as a kind of /ieː/.

– Yellow Sky
5 hours ago











0














Perhaps the most Russian phonemes as well the most Russian phonemic oppositions are




ш /ʂ/ vs. щ /ɕː/



ж /ʐ/ vs. жж /ʑː/




[ɕː] and [ʑː] are correspndingly a voiceless and voiced long (geminated) alveolo-palatal sibilant fricative. It seems like no other Slavic language has such phonemes, neither do other European languages. Well, the Italian /ʃ/ is geminated word-internally, but it does not have a non-geminated contrasting phoneme. In Russian, the pairs are really contrasted:




чаша [ˈtɕäʂə] 'cup' vs. чаща [ˈtɕäɕːə] 'dense forest'



дрожи [ˈdroʐɨ] 'of shivering' (Gen. case) vs. дрожжи [ˈdroʑːi] 'yeast'




The phoneme /ʑː/ is rarely pronounced as alveolo-palatal nowadays, most Russian speakers pronounced it as retroflex [ʐː], but it's still geminated, and it's still a distinct and unique Russian phoneme hardly found in other languages.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

    – Mark Beadles
    5 hours ago











  • @MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago















0














Perhaps the most Russian phonemes as well the most Russian phonemic oppositions are




ш /ʂ/ vs. щ /ɕː/



ж /ʐ/ vs. жж /ʑː/




[ɕː] and [ʑː] are correspndingly a voiceless and voiced long (geminated) alveolo-palatal sibilant fricative. It seems like no other Slavic language has such phonemes, neither do other European languages. Well, the Italian /ʃ/ is geminated word-internally, but it does not have a non-geminated contrasting phoneme. In Russian, the pairs are really contrasted:




чаша [ˈtɕäʂə] 'cup' vs. чаща [ˈtɕäɕːə] 'dense forest'



дрожи [ˈdroʐɨ] 'of shivering' (Gen. case) vs. дрожжи [ˈdroʑːi] 'yeast'




The phoneme /ʑː/ is rarely pronounced as alveolo-palatal nowadays, most Russian speakers pronounced it as retroflex [ʐː], but it's still geminated, and it's still a distinct and unique Russian phoneme hardly found in other languages.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

    – Mark Beadles
    5 hours ago











  • @MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago













0












0








0







Perhaps the most Russian phonemes as well the most Russian phonemic oppositions are




ш /ʂ/ vs. щ /ɕː/



ж /ʐ/ vs. жж /ʑː/




[ɕː] and [ʑː] are correspndingly a voiceless and voiced long (geminated) alveolo-palatal sibilant fricative. It seems like no other Slavic language has such phonemes, neither do other European languages. Well, the Italian /ʃ/ is geminated word-internally, but it does not have a non-geminated contrasting phoneme. In Russian, the pairs are really contrasted:




чаша [ˈtɕäʂə] 'cup' vs. чаща [ˈtɕäɕːə] 'dense forest'



дрожи [ˈdroʐɨ] 'of shivering' (Gen. case) vs. дрожжи [ˈdroʑːi] 'yeast'




The phoneme /ʑː/ is rarely pronounced as alveolo-palatal nowadays, most Russian speakers pronounced it as retroflex [ʐː], but it's still geminated, and it's still a distinct and unique Russian phoneme hardly found in other languages.






share|improve this answer













Perhaps the most Russian phonemes as well the most Russian phonemic oppositions are




ш /ʂ/ vs. щ /ɕː/



ж /ʐ/ vs. жж /ʑː/




[ɕː] and [ʑː] are correspndingly a voiceless and voiced long (geminated) alveolo-palatal sibilant fricative. It seems like no other Slavic language has such phonemes, neither do other European languages. Well, the Italian /ʃ/ is geminated word-internally, but it does not have a non-geminated contrasting phoneme. In Russian, the pairs are really contrasted:




чаша [ˈtɕäʂə] 'cup' vs. чаща [ˈtɕäɕːə] 'dense forest'



дрожи [ˈdroʐɨ] 'of shivering' (Gen. case) vs. дрожжи [ˈdroʑːi] 'yeast'




The phoneme /ʑː/ is rarely pronounced as alveolo-palatal nowadays, most Russian speakers pronounced it as retroflex [ʐː], but it's still geminated, and it's still a distinct and unique Russian phoneme hardly found in other languages.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Yellow SkyYellow Sky

8,44722 silver badges37 bronze badges




8,44722 silver badges37 bronze badges







  • 1





    I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

    – Mark Beadles
    5 hours ago











  • @MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago












  • 1





    I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

    – Mark Beadles
    5 hours ago











  • @MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

    – Yellow Sky
    5 hours ago







1




1





I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

– Mark Beadles
5 hours ago





I think OP is asking the opposite question - are there sounds that aren't found in Russian, but used to be?

– Mark Beadles
5 hours ago













@MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

– Yellow Sky
5 hours ago





@MarkBeadles - /ʑː/ is such a sound.

– Yellow Sky
5 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31851%2fare-there-any-extinct-phonemes-in-russian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її