Leave PhD after one year or finish it to the end?Job market after PhD in Human Computer Interaction (HCI)How well is “I want to do research at a big company” received during a PhD application?Is a PhD useful if you are interested in a career as a staff researcher, not leader of your own research lab?Will a 2-year post-doc in deep-learning harm me in the long-term?What are the chances of getting an academic position year after completion of PhD?Job search advice for possible PhD dropoutHow to leave a PhD without angering my academic references?Is it possible to complete a PhD program early to leave it with a masters?Advice on career move - from industry to academiaIs it tough to apply for a CS PHD degree after several years in industry?

Keep milk (or milk alternative) for a day without a fridge

Is anyone advocating the promotion of homosexuality in UK schools?

Managing and organizing the massively increased number of classes after switching to SOLID?

How did the hit man miss?

What explains 9 speed cassettes price differences?

Why do Americans say "less than five people"?

How to achieve this rough borders and stippled illustration look?

How to disable wifi in Raspberry Pi 4

Do you know your 'KVZ's?

I wrote two alternate fugue expositions for one subject do both follow good harmonic conventions?

If the railway suggests a 5-min connection window for changing trains in the Netherlands, does that mean it's definitely doable?

Is there a word for a message that is intended to be intercepted by an adversary?

How can an advanced civilization forget how to manufacture its technology?

Why didn't Thanos kill all the Dwarves on Nidavellir?

Was the Ford Model T black because of the speed black paint dries?

What is this welding tool I found in my attic?

Can fluent English speakers distinguish “steel”, “still” and “steal”?

Does throwing a penny at a train stop the train?

Single word for "refusing to move to next activity unless present one is completed."

Was lunar module "pilot" Harrison Schmitt legally a "pilot" at the time?

Why did my rum cake turn black?

Extract an attribute value from XML

Matchmaker, Matchmaker, make me a match

Are neural networks prone to catastrophic forgetting?



Leave PhD after one year or finish it to the end?


Job market after PhD in Human Computer Interaction (HCI)How well is “I want to do research at a big company” received during a PhD application?Is a PhD useful if you are interested in a career as a staff researcher, not leader of your own research lab?Will a 2-year post-doc in deep-learning harm me in the long-term?What are the chances of getting an academic position year after completion of PhD?Job search advice for possible PhD dropoutHow to leave a PhD without angering my academic references?Is it possible to complete a PhD program early to leave it with a masters?Advice on career move - from industry to academiaIs it tough to apply for a CS PHD degree after several years in industry?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I am a UK student, 23 years old, and started a PhD in theoretical physics last October 2018 at a top 15-20 university (my undergrad Maths degree was at a top 5 uni where I got a First Class Honours 1:1), I have since come to realise that I do not want to pursue a career in academia but want to go into industry - the idea of chasing postdocs around the world and then groping for a permanent position (by which time I would be at least 32 years old!) is simply incompatible with having a stable relationship and establishing a family, unless you want your poor wife (and maybe even kids) to tag along with you, staying in different countries for 1-3 years at a time whilst sacrificing her own career and then finally (if you're lucky!) getting a permanent position in a city you didn't choose to live in - doesn't sound too ideal to me. I would much rather a higher paying and more secure career in a city where my family and friends live.



My question is this: should I start applying for jobs in industry (data scientist, software engineer, consultant, quant, analyst, etc.) right now then leave my PhD once I have a job offer (since it can take quite a few months from application to interview to offer I don't want to leave right now), or finish my PhD to the end (I'll be 26) whilst training skills relevant to industry (learning several programming languages, etc.) and doing placements in industry, and then applying for relevant jobs?



Any advise, especially from STEM PhDs and PhD dropouts who later went into industry, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2





    Only you can evaluate your priorities. Pick one that seems to meet your goals and work toward it. Keep a bit of flexibility as you go.

    – Buffy
    8 hours ago











  • @Buffy Thank you. I am swayed to drop out since a full PhD cannot make up for 3 years of experience in industry, and regardless of missed time, many companies have several more reasons to prefer a graduate to a postgraduate (work ethic, team skills, etc.). It has only been a year since graduation so I may apply for some grad jobs and reach out to my friends who have landed jobs as quants, data scientists, analysts, etc.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    It depends on a lot of factors, but I will say that 3-4 years is a LONG time to spend doing a difficult task that you're not motivated for. Even people who really want to go into academia have a hard time motivating themselves to finish their dissertation.

    – ekl
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    While you do have something in mind you don't want, you are vague on what you do want. That's reasonable and normal - but you'll need to clear that up as a first job so you can decide whether a PhD is a necessity, aid, or impediment to getting what you do want. Reaching out to peers who've got something you are more interested in is a great way to start that! Just beware that the evils of the alternatives may not be so clear to you as the evil you know - one or the other can be easily inflated, and you cannot know which is which. A PhD is the least common path to most things, but not all.

    – BrianH
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @BrianH This is true, I am really searching for something that resonates with me. Time isn't on my side though as I'm going to have to compete with this years graduates for jobs, however, at least I know that I am taking control of my life.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    7 hours ago

















4















I am a UK student, 23 years old, and started a PhD in theoretical physics last October 2018 at a top 15-20 university (my undergrad Maths degree was at a top 5 uni where I got a First Class Honours 1:1), I have since come to realise that I do not want to pursue a career in academia but want to go into industry - the idea of chasing postdocs around the world and then groping for a permanent position (by which time I would be at least 32 years old!) is simply incompatible with having a stable relationship and establishing a family, unless you want your poor wife (and maybe even kids) to tag along with you, staying in different countries for 1-3 years at a time whilst sacrificing her own career and then finally (if you're lucky!) getting a permanent position in a city you didn't choose to live in - doesn't sound too ideal to me. I would much rather a higher paying and more secure career in a city where my family and friends live.



My question is this: should I start applying for jobs in industry (data scientist, software engineer, consultant, quant, analyst, etc.) right now then leave my PhD once I have a job offer (since it can take quite a few months from application to interview to offer I don't want to leave right now), or finish my PhD to the end (I'll be 26) whilst training skills relevant to industry (learning several programming languages, etc.) and doing placements in industry, and then applying for relevant jobs?



Any advise, especially from STEM PhDs and PhD dropouts who later went into industry, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2





    Only you can evaluate your priorities. Pick one that seems to meet your goals and work toward it. Keep a bit of flexibility as you go.

    – Buffy
    8 hours ago











  • @Buffy Thank you. I am swayed to drop out since a full PhD cannot make up for 3 years of experience in industry, and regardless of missed time, many companies have several more reasons to prefer a graduate to a postgraduate (work ethic, team skills, etc.). It has only been a year since graduation so I may apply for some grad jobs and reach out to my friends who have landed jobs as quants, data scientists, analysts, etc.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    It depends on a lot of factors, but I will say that 3-4 years is a LONG time to spend doing a difficult task that you're not motivated for. Even people who really want to go into academia have a hard time motivating themselves to finish their dissertation.

    – ekl
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    While you do have something in mind you don't want, you are vague on what you do want. That's reasonable and normal - but you'll need to clear that up as a first job so you can decide whether a PhD is a necessity, aid, or impediment to getting what you do want. Reaching out to peers who've got something you are more interested in is a great way to start that! Just beware that the evils of the alternatives may not be so clear to you as the evil you know - one or the other can be easily inflated, and you cannot know which is which. A PhD is the least common path to most things, but not all.

    – BrianH
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @BrianH This is true, I am really searching for something that resonates with me. Time isn't on my side though as I'm going to have to compete with this years graduates for jobs, however, at least I know that I am taking control of my life.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    7 hours ago













4












4








4








I am a UK student, 23 years old, and started a PhD in theoretical physics last October 2018 at a top 15-20 university (my undergrad Maths degree was at a top 5 uni where I got a First Class Honours 1:1), I have since come to realise that I do not want to pursue a career in academia but want to go into industry - the idea of chasing postdocs around the world and then groping for a permanent position (by which time I would be at least 32 years old!) is simply incompatible with having a stable relationship and establishing a family, unless you want your poor wife (and maybe even kids) to tag along with you, staying in different countries for 1-3 years at a time whilst sacrificing her own career and then finally (if you're lucky!) getting a permanent position in a city you didn't choose to live in - doesn't sound too ideal to me. I would much rather a higher paying and more secure career in a city where my family and friends live.



My question is this: should I start applying for jobs in industry (data scientist, software engineer, consultant, quant, analyst, etc.) right now then leave my PhD once I have a job offer (since it can take quite a few months from application to interview to offer I don't want to leave right now), or finish my PhD to the end (I'll be 26) whilst training skills relevant to industry (learning several programming languages, etc.) and doing placements in industry, and then applying for relevant jobs?



Any advise, especially from STEM PhDs and PhD dropouts who later went into industry, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am a UK student, 23 years old, and started a PhD in theoretical physics last October 2018 at a top 15-20 university (my undergrad Maths degree was at a top 5 uni where I got a First Class Honours 1:1), I have since come to realise that I do not want to pursue a career in academia but want to go into industry - the idea of chasing postdocs around the world and then groping for a permanent position (by which time I would be at least 32 years old!) is simply incompatible with having a stable relationship and establishing a family, unless you want your poor wife (and maybe even kids) to tag along with you, staying in different countries for 1-3 years at a time whilst sacrificing her own career and then finally (if you're lucky!) getting a permanent position in a city you didn't choose to live in - doesn't sound too ideal to me. I would much rather a higher paying and more secure career in a city where my family and friends live.



My question is this: should I start applying for jobs in industry (data scientist, software engineer, consultant, quant, analyst, etc.) right now then leave my PhD once I have a job offer (since it can take quite a few months from application to interview to offer I don't want to leave right now), or finish my PhD to the end (I'll be 26) whilst training skills relevant to industry (learning several programming languages, etc.) and doing placements in industry, and then applying for relevant jobs?



Any advise, especially from STEM PhDs and PhD dropouts who later went into industry, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!







phd career-path job-search industry quitting






share|improve this question









New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







Thomas Gibbons













New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









Thomas GibbonsThomas Gibbons

243 bronze badges




243 bronze badges




New contributor



Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 2





    Only you can evaluate your priorities. Pick one that seems to meet your goals and work toward it. Keep a bit of flexibility as you go.

    – Buffy
    8 hours ago











  • @Buffy Thank you. I am swayed to drop out since a full PhD cannot make up for 3 years of experience in industry, and regardless of missed time, many companies have several more reasons to prefer a graduate to a postgraduate (work ethic, team skills, etc.). It has only been a year since graduation so I may apply for some grad jobs and reach out to my friends who have landed jobs as quants, data scientists, analysts, etc.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    It depends on a lot of factors, but I will say that 3-4 years is a LONG time to spend doing a difficult task that you're not motivated for. Even people who really want to go into academia have a hard time motivating themselves to finish their dissertation.

    – ekl
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    While you do have something in mind you don't want, you are vague on what you do want. That's reasonable and normal - but you'll need to clear that up as a first job so you can decide whether a PhD is a necessity, aid, or impediment to getting what you do want. Reaching out to peers who've got something you are more interested in is a great way to start that! Just beware that the evils of the alternatives may not be so clear to you as the evil you know - one or the other can be easily inflated, and you cannot know which is which. A PhD is the least common path to most things, but not all.

    – BrianH
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @BrianH This is true, I am really searching for something that resonates with me. Time isn't on my side though as I'm going to have to compete with this years graduates for jobs, however, at least I know that I am taking control of my life.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    Only you can evaluate your priorities. Pick one that seems to meet your goals and work toward it. Keep a bit of flexibility as you go.

    – Buffy
    8 hours ago











  • @Buffy Thank you. I am swayed to drop out since a full PhD cannot make up for 3 years of experience in industry, and regardless of missed time, many companies have several more reasons to prefer a graduate to a postgraduate (work ethic, team skills, etc.). It has only been a year since graduation so I may apply for some grad jobs and reach out to my friends who have landed jobs as quants, data scientists, analysts, etc.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    It depends on a lot of factors, but I will say that 3-4 years is a LONG time to spend doing a difficult task that you're not motivated for. Even people who really want to go into academia have a hard time motivating themselves to finish their dissertation.

    – ekl
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    While you do have something in mind you don't want, you are vague on what you do want. That's reasonable and normal - but you'll need to clear that up as a first job so you can decide whether a PhD is a necessity, aid, or impediment to getting what you do want. Reaching out to peers who've got something you are more interested in is a great way to start that! Just beware that the evils of the alternatives may not be so clear to you as the evil you know - one or the other can be easily inflated, and you cannot know which is which. A PhD is the least common path to most things, but not all.

    – BrianH
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @BrianH This is true, I am really searching for something that resonates with me. Time isn't on my side though as I'm going to have to compete with this years graduates for jobs, however, at least I know that I am taking control of my life.

    – Thomas Gibbons
    7 hours ago







2




2





Only you can evaluate your priorities. Pick one that seems to meet your goals and work toward it. Keep a bit of flexibility as you go.

– Buffy
8 hours ago





Only you can evaluate your priorities. Pick one that seems to meet your goals and work toward it. Keep a bit of flexibility as you go.

– Buffy
8 hours ago













@Buffy Thank you. I am swayed to drop out since a full PhD cannot make up for 3 years of experience in industry, and regardless of missed time, many companies have several more reasons to prefer a graduate to a postgraduate (work ethic, team skills, etc.). It has only been a year since graduation so I may apply for some grad jobs and reach out to my friends who have landed jobs as quants, data scientists, analysts, etc.

– Thomas Gibbons
8 hours ago





@Buffy Thank you. I am swayed to drop out since a full PhD cannot make up for 3 years of experience in industry, and regardless of missed time, many companies have several more reasons to prefer a graduate to a postgraduate (work ethic, team skills, etc.). It has only been a year since graduation so I may apply for some grad jobs and reach out to my friends who have landed jobs as quants, data scientists, analysts, etc.

– Thomas Gibbons
8 hours ago




3




3





It depends on a lot of factors, but I will say that 3-4 years is a LONG time to spend doing a difficult task that you're not motivated for. Even people who really want to go into academia have a hard time motivating themselves to finish their dissertation.

– ekl
8 hours ago





It depends on a lot of factors, but I will say that 3-4 years is a LONG time to spend doing a difficult task that you're not motivated for. Even people who really want to go into academia have a hard time motivating themselves to finish their dissertation.

– ekl
8 hours ago




1




1





While you do have something in mind you don't want, you are vague on what you do want. That's reasonable and normal - but you'll need to clear that up as a first job so you can decide whether a PhD is a necessity, aid, or impediment to getting what you do want. Reaching out to peers who've got something you are more interested in is a great way to start that! Just beware that the evils of the alternatives may not be so clear to you as the evil you know - one or the other can be easily inflated, and you cannot know which is which. A PhD is the least common path to most things, but not all.

– BrianH
7 hours ago





While you do have something in mind you don't want, you are vague on what you do want. That's reasonable and normal - but you'll need to clear that up as a first job so you can decide whether a PhD is a necessity, aid, or impediment to getting what you do want. Reaching out to peers who've got something you are more interested in is a great way to start that! Just beware that the evils of the alternatives may not be so clear to you as the evil you know - one or the other can be easily inflated, and you cannot know which is which. A PhD is the least common path to most things, but not all.

– BrianH
7 hours ago




1




1





@BrianH This is true, I am really searching for something that resonates with me. Time isn't on my side though as I'm going to have to compete with this years graduates for jobs, however, at least I know that I am taking control of my life.

– Thomas Gibbons
7 hours ago





@BrianH This is true, I am really searching for something that resonates with me. Time isn't on my side though as I'm going to have to compete with this years graduates for jobs, however, at least I know that I am taking control of my life.

– Thomas Gibbons
7 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














You do not want to pursue a career in academia. It is good that you have worked this out early enough to do something about it.



Was "the next step in the career" the only reason for doing your PhD? Or is it a genuine delight to you to be learning and to be looking forward to making a contribution to knowledge?



  • If there is no delight then if I were you I'd drop it at once. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


  • If there is delight then if I were you I would pursue that wholeheartedly. There is little enough delight in the world as it is and we shouldn't throw away what we have. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


  • If you are half way between the two - it is always possible to start a doctorate at 60. A friend of mine did. So bear that in mind.


But here at last is some genuine advice. It comes in two stages.




  1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to abandon all your academic pretensions and go straight for business. No second thoughts, no looking back, that is what you are going to do.

Live with that decision for a week. But do it seriously. Remember that you are not trying to decide, you have decided. That is the key.




  1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to complete your PhD and only go into business after that. As before: no second thoughts, no looking back.

Live with that decision for a week.




The reason why this exercise in self-deception works so well is that it frees all the important parts of your psyche to engage with a definite and unambiguous future and not some sort of vague undecided limbo. And they are able to tell you what you feel.



At the end of those two weeks, look back on how you felt. When did you have regrets over what you had decided, and what were they? When did the choice feel righter? In which week were you most looking forward to life?






share|improve this answer






























    1














    Having interviewed (on both sides of the desk) for most of the positions you list (albeit in the US), I should maybe answer.



    A PhD will be useful. Most of these jobs will prefer a PhD, or at least give you credit for years spent pursuing a PhD. Many people start their career and say they will go back to get a PhD, but this rarely happens.



    Physics is a good PhD to have. "Physicists and Physicians" are notorious for having very low unemployment rates (compared to biologists or chemists). But, physics is a big place. If you are doing data analysis on the computer, it should be easy to continually learn new skills (even having awesome Python and BASH skills is a good start). Other subfields might be less useful.



    So, I would lean toward finishing. But of course, there are several factors that I don't know about:



    • whether your advisor is supportive about letting you do your research in ways that develop marketable skills

    • whether your advisor is likely to let you graduate on time

    • whether you are still interested in your research

    • your family and personal situation





    share|improve this answer























    • I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

      – Spark
      56 mins ago


















    0














    First things first, figure out how useful a PhD is going to be. Without knowing this you can't make an informed decision.



    Go to your local jobs portal and search for jobs that require a PhD in theoretical physics vs. those that only require an Honors degree. How much more attractive are those jobs? Are they more attractive at all? How much better-paying are they? Can you imagine doing those jobs? It's natural that jobs that require PhDs will have a more difficult job scope. You'll be asked to do things that you wouldn't be tasked with - at least initially - if you only have an Honors degree. That also means you'll be paid more (again, at least initially).



    Once you've assessed that, then you can make an informed decision. For example you might get reach a conclusion that if you leave now, you'll earn $X/year, while if you finish, it'll cost you two more years as a PhD student but you can earn $2X/year upon graduating. That's a 100% increase, and likely means that if money is the only thing that matters to you, you should finish. Alternatively, you might find that although you'll only earn $1.1X/year after graduating, the job scope for Honors holders is dull and uninteresting. In that case you might want to finish as well.



    One more thing: talk to your former classmates - the people who did undergraduate studies with you but didn't go on to PhD studies. What are they doing now? How much do they earn? Do they work in places that also employ PhD graduates, and if so, what do those PhD graduates do that they don't?



    If you have the answers to all these questions, you'll be able to make a decision much more comfortably.






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133254%2fleave-phd-after-one-year-or-finish-it-to-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      You do not want to pursue a career in academia. It is good that you have worked this out early enough to do something about it.



      Was "the next step in the career" the only reason for doing your PhD? Or is it a genuine delight to you to be learning and to be looking forward to making a contribution to knowledge?



      • If there is no delight then if I were you I'd drop it at once. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


      • If there is delight then if I were you I would pursue that wholeheartedly. There is little enough delight in the world as it is and we shouldn't throw away what we have. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


      • If you are half way between the two - it is always possible to start a doctorate at 60. A friend of mine did. So bear that in mind.


      But here at last is some genuine advice. It comes in two stages.




      1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to abandon all your academic pretensions and go straight for business. No second thoughts, no looking back, that is what you are going to do.

      Live with that decision for a week. But do it seriously. Remember that you are not trying to decide, you have decided. That is the key.




      1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to complete your PhD and only go into business after that. As before: no second thoughts, no looking back.

      Live with that decision for a week.




      The reason why this exercise in self-deception works so well is that it frees all the important parts of your psyche to engage with a definite and unambiguous future and not some sort of vague undecided limbo. And they are able to tell you what you feel.



      At the end of those two weeks, look back on how you felt. When did you have regrets over what you had decided, and what were they? When did the choice feel righter? In which week were you most looking forward to life?






      share|improve this answer



























        6














        You do not want to pursue a career in academia. It is good that you have worked this out early enough to do something about it.



        Was "the next step in the career" the only reason for doing your PhD? Or is it a genuine delight to you to be learning and to be looking forward to making a contribution to knowledge?



        • If there is no delight then if I were you I'd drop it at once. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


        • If there is delight then if I were you I would pursue that wholeheartedly. There is little enough delight in the world as it is and we shouldn't throw away what we have. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


        • If you are half way between the two - it is always possible to start a doctorate at 60. A friend of mine did. So bear that in mind.


        But here at last is some genuine advice. It comes in two stages.




        1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to abandon all your academic pretensions and go straight for business. No second thoughts, no looking back, that is what you are going to do.

        Live with that decision for a week. But do it seriously. Remember that you are not trying to decide, you have decided. That is the key.




        1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to complete your PhD and only go into business after that. As before: no second thoughts, no looking back.

        Live with that decision for a week.




        The reason why this exercise in self-deception works so well is that it frees all the important parts of your psyche to engage with a definite and unambiguous future and not some sort of vague undecided limbo. And they are able to tell you what you feel.



        At the end of those two weeks, look back on how you felt. When did you have regrets over what you had decided, and what were they? When did the choice feel righter? In which week were you most looking forward to life?






        share|improve this answer

























          6












          6








          6







          You do not want to pursue a career in academia. It is good that you have worked this out early enough to do something about it.



          Was "the next step in the career" the only reason for doing your PhD? Or is it a genuine delight to you to be learning and to be looking forward to making a contribution to knowledge?



          • If there is no delight then if I were you I'd drop it at once. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


          • If there is delight then if I were you I would pursue that wholeheartedly. There is little enough delight in the world as it is and we shouldn't throw away what we have. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


          • If you are half way between the two - it is always possible to start a doctorate at 60. A friend of mine did. So bear that in mind.


          But here at last is some genuine advice. It comes in two stages.




          1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to abandon all your academic pretensions and go straight for business. No second thoughts, no looking back, that is what you are going to do.

          Live with that decision for a week. But do it seriously. Remember that you are not trying to decide, you have decided. That is the key.




          1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to complete your PhD and only go into business after that. As before: no second thoughts, no looking back.

          Live with that decision for a week.




          The reason why this exercise in self-deception works so well is that it frees all the important parts of your psyche to engage with a definite and unambiguous future and not some sort of vague undecided limbo. And they are able to tell you what you feel.



          At the end of those two weeks, look back on how you felt. When did you have regrets over what you had decided, and what were they? When did the choice feel righter? In which week were you most looking forward to life?






          share|improve this answer













          You do not want to pursue a career in academia. It is good that you have worked this out early enough to do something about it.



          Was "the next step in the career" the only reason for doing your PhD? Or is it a genuine delight to you to be learning and to be looking forward to making a contribution to knowledge?



          • If there is no delight then if I were you I'd drop it at once. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


          • If there is delight then if I were you I would pursue that wholeheartedly. There is little enough delight in the world as it is and we shouldn't throw away what we have. But I am not you, and that is not advice.


          • If you are half way between the two - it is always possible to start a doctorate at 60. A friend of mine did. So bear that in mind.


          But here at last is some genuine advice. It comes in two stages.




          1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to abandon all your academic pretensions and go straight for business. No second thoughts, no looking back, that is what you are going to do.

          Live with that decision for a week. But do it seriously. Remember that you are not trying to decide, you have decided. That is the key.




          1. Take a total and irrevocable decision to complete your PhD and only go into business after that. As before: no second thoughts, no looking back.

          Live with that decision for a week.




          The reason why this exercise in self-deception works so well is that it frees all the important parts of your psyche to engage with a definite and unambiguous future and not some sort of vague undecided limbo. And they are able to tell you what you feel.



          At the end of those two weeks, look back on how you felt. When did you have regrets over what you had decided, and what were they? When did the choice feel righter? In which week were you most looking forward to life?







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Martin KochanskiMartin Kochanski

          1,2747 silver badges7 bronze badges




          1,2747 silver badges7 bronze badges























              1














              Having interviewed (on both sides of the desk) for most of the positions you list (albeit in the US), I should maybe answer.



              A PhD will be useful. Most of these jobs will prefer a PhD, or at least give you credit for years spent pursuing a PhD. Many people start their career and say they will go back to get a PhD, but this rarely happens.



              Physics is a good PhD to have. "Physicists and Physicians" are notorious for having very low unemployment rates (compared to biologists or chemists). But, physics is a big place. If you are doing data analysis on the computer, it should be easy to continually learn new skills (even having awesome Python and BASH skills is a good start). Other subfields might be less useful.



              So, I would lean toward finishing. But of course, there are several factors that I don't know about:



              • whether your advisor is supportive about letting you do your research in ways that develop marketable skills

              • whether your advisor is likely to let you graduate on time

              • whether you are still interested in your research

              • your family and personal situation





              share|improve this answer























              • I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

                – Spark
                56 mins ago















              1














              Having interviewed (on both sides of the desk) for most of the positions you list (albeit in the US), I should maybe answer.



              A PhD will be useful. Most of these jobs will prefer a PhD, or at least give you credit for years spent pursuing a PhD. Many people start their career and say they will go back to get a PhD, but this rarely happens.



              Physics is a good PhD to have. "Physicists and Physicians" are notorious for having very low unemployment rates (compared to biologists or chemists). But, physics is a big place. If you are doing data analysis on the computer, it should be easy to continually learn new skills (even having awesome Python and BASH skills is a good start). Other subfields might be less useful.



              So, I would lean toward finishing. But of course, there are several factors that I don't know about:



              • whether your advisor is supportive about letting you do your research in ways that develop marketable skills

              • whether your advisor is likely to let you graduate on time

              • whether you are still interested in your research

              • your family and personal situation





              share|improve this answer























              • I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

                – Spark
                56 mins ago













              1












              1








              1







              Having interviewed (on both sides of the desk) for most of the positions you list (albeit in the US), I should maybe answer.



              A PhD will be useful. Most of these jobs will prefer a PhD, or at least give you credit for years spent pursuing a PhD. Many people start their career and say they will go back to get a PhD, but this rarely happens.



              Physics is a good PhD to have. "Physicists and Physicians" are notorious for having very low unemployment rates (compared to biologists or chemists). But, physics is a big place. If you are doing data analysis on the computer, it should be easy to continually learn new skills (even having awesome Python and BASH skills is a good start). Other subfields might be less useful.



              So, I would lean toward finishing. But of course, there are several factors that I don't know about:



              • whether your advisor is supportive about letting you do your research in ways that develop marketable skills

              • whether your advisor is likely to let you graduate on time

              • whether you are still interested in your research

              • your family and personal situation





              share|improve this answer













              Having interviewed (on both sides of the desk) for most of the positions you list (albeit in the US), I should maybe answer.



              A PhD will be useful. Most of these jobs will prefer a PhD, or at least give you credit for years spent pursuing a PhD. Many people start their career and say they will go back to get a PhD, but this rarely happens.



              Physics is a good PhD to have. "Physicists and Physicians" are notorious for having very low unemployment rates (compared to biologists or chemists). But, physics is a big place. If you are doing data analysis on the computer, it should be easy to continually learn new skills (even having awesome Python and BASH skills is a good start). Other subfields might be less useful.



              So, I would lean toward finishing. But of course, there are several factors that I don't know about:



              • whether your advisor is supportive about letting you do your research in ways that develop marketable skills

              • whether your advisor is likely to let you graduate on time

              • whether you are still interested in your research

              • your family and personal situation






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 hours ago









              cag51cag51

              21.8k9 gold badges49 silver badges83 bronze badges




              21.8k9 gold badges49 silver badges83 bronze badges












              • I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

                – Spark
                56 mins ago

















              • I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

                – Spark
                56 mins ago
















              I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

              – Spark
              56 mins ago





              I’m not sure that 4 years in academia beat 4 years in industry. Speaking with people in industry, a lot prefer the latter.

              – Spark
              56 mins ago











              0














              First things first, figure out how useful a PhD is going to be. Without knowing this you can't make an informed decision.



              Go to your local jobs portal and search for jobs that require a PhD in theoretical physics vs. those that only require an Honors degree. How much more attractive are those jobs? Are they more attractive at all? How much better-paying are they? Can you imagine doing those jobs? It's natural that jobs that require PhDs will have a more difficult job scope. You'll be asked to do things that you wouldn't be tasked with - at least initially - if you only have an Honors degree. That also means you'll be paid more (again, at least initially).



              Once you've assessed that, then you can make an informed decision. For example you might get reach a conclusion that if you leave now, you'll earn $X/year, while if you finish, it'll cost you two more years as a PhD student but you can earn $2X/year upon graduating. That's a 100% increase, and likely means that if money is the only thing that matters to you, you should finish. Alternatively, you might find that although you'll only earn $1.1X/year after graduating, the job scope for Honors holders is dull and uninteresting. In that case you might want to finish as well.



              One more thing: talk to your former classmates - the people who did undergraduate studies with you but didn't go on to PhD studies. What are they doing now? How much do they earn? Do they work in places that also employ PhD graduates, and if so, what do those PhD graduates do that they don't?



              If you have the answers to all these questions, you'll be able to make a decision much more comfortably.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                First things first, figure out how useful a PhD is going to be. Without knowing this you can't make an informed decision.



                Go to your local jobs portal and search for jobs that require a PhD in theoretical physics vs. those that only require an Honors degree. How much more attractive are those jobs? Are they more attractive at all? How much better-paying are they? Can you imagine doing those jobs? It's natural that jobs that require PhDs will have a more difficult job scope. You'll be asked to do things that you wouldn't be tasked with - at least initially - if you only have an Honors degree. That also means you'll be paid more (again, at least initially).



                Once you've assessed that, then you can make an informed decision. For example you might get reach a conclusion that if you leave now, you'll earn $X/year, while if you finish, it'll cost you two more years as a PhD student but you can earn $2X/year upon graduating. That's a 100% increase, and likely means that if money is the only thing that matters to you, you should finish. Alternatively, you might find that although you'll only earn $1.1X/year after graduating, the job scope for Honors holders is dull and uninteresting. In that case you might want to finish as well.



                One more thing: talk to your former classmates - the people who did undergraduate studies with you but didn't go on to PhD studies. What are they doing now? How much do they earn? Do they work in places that also employ PhD graduates, and if so, what do those PhD graduates do that they don't?



                If you have the answers to all these questions, you'll be able to make a decision much more comfortably.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  First things first, figure out how useful a PhD is going to be. Without knowing this you can't make an informed decision.



                  Go to your local jobs portal and search for jobs that require a PhD in theoretical physics vs. those that only require an Honors degree. How much more attractive are those jobs? Are they more attractive at all? How much better-paying are they? Can you imagine doing those jobs? It's natural that jobs that require PhDs will have a more difficult job scope. You'll be asked to do things that you wouldn't be tasked with - at least initially - if you only have an Honors degree. That also means you'll be paid more (again, at least initially).



                  Once you've assessed that, then you can make an informed decision. For example you might get reach a conclusion that if you leave now, you'll earn $X/year, while if you finish, it'll cost you two more years as a PhD student but you can earn $2X/year upon graduating. That's a 100% increase, and likely means that if money is the only thing that matters to you, you should finish. Alternatively, you might find that although you'll only earn $1.1X/year after graduating, the job scope for Honors holders is dull and uninteresting. In that case you might want to finish as well.



                  One more thing: talk to your former classmates - the people who did undergraduate studies with you but didn't go on to PhD studies. What are they doing now? How much do they earn? Do they work in places that also employ PhD graduates, and if so, what do those PhD graduates do that they don't?



                  If you have the answers to all these questions, you'll be able to make a decision much more comfortably.






                  share|improve this answer













                  First things first, figure out how useful a PhD is going to be. Without knowing this you can't make an informed decision.



                  Go to your local jobs portal and search for jobs that require a PhD in theoretical physics vs. those that only require an Honors degree. How much more attractive are those jobs? Are they more attractive at all? How much better-paying are they? Can you imagine doing those jobs? It's natural that jobs that require PhDs will have a more difficult job scope. You'll be asked to do things that you wouldn't be tasked with - at least initially - if you only have an Honors degree. That also means you'll be paid more (again, at least initially).



                  Once you've assessed that, then you can make an informed decision. For example you might get reach a conclusion that if you leave now, you'll earn $X/year, while if you finish, it'll cost you two more years as a PhD student but you can earn $2X/year upon graduating. That's a 100% increase, and likely means that if money is the only thing that matters to you, you should finish. Alternatively, you might find that although you'll only earn $1.1X/year after graduating, the job scope for Honors holders is dull and uninteresting. In that case you might want to finish as well.



                  One more thing: talk to your former classmates - the people who did undergraduate studies with you but didn't go on to PhD studies. What are they doing now? How much do they earn? Do they work in places that also employ PhD graduates, and if so, what do those PhD graduates do that they don't?



                  If you have the answers to all these questions, you'll be able to make a decision much more comfortably.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  AllureAllure

                  41k20 gold badges124 silver badges182 bronze badges




                  41k20 gold badges124 silver badges182 bronze badges




















                      Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Thomas Gibbons is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133254%2fleave-phd-after-one-year-or-finish-it-to-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її