How to hide what's behind an object in a non destructive way / give it an “invisibility cloak”Set a stroke to knockout a fill behind it with live text in IllustratorWhy can I only see a path when it's not white?Illustrator: Cannot select text behind “Place” ObjectNon-destructive transformation + effects IllustratorHow to bend a rectangle along a path?Arrange one object specifically behind another object?Subtract a path from a shape in Illustrator CC 2015how to give transparent border around an object in illustrator?Is there a way to place an object of higher layer behind an object in a lower layer?blur every object behind itselfHow to give a solid motion trail to an object
What's the maximum time an interrupt service routine can take to execute on atmega328p?
Referring to different instances of the same character in time travel
Professor falsely accusing me of cheating in a class he does not teach, two months after end of the class. What precautions should I take?
Who has taken "my" Managed package namespace? Can we find out?
CentOS 7 -> find: missing Argument for "-exec"
How do Windows version numbers work?
What's an appropriate title for a person who deals with conflicts of an Empire?
Who Can Help Retag This?
How to find the shape parameters of of a beta distribution given the position of two quantiles?
How to achieve this rough borders and stippled illustration look?
When casting Eldritch Blast with the Agonizing Blast eldritch invocation, what do I add to my damage roll?
Should disabled buttons give feedback when clicked?
Print the last, middle and first character of your code
Is anyone advocating the promotion of homosexuality in UK schools?
Can fluent English speakers distinguish “steel”, “still” and “steal”?
Does Google Maps take into account hills/inclines for route times?
Is purchasing foreign currency before going abroad a losing proposition?
references on the empirical study on the practice of OR
How is angular momentum conserved for the orbiting body if the centripetal force disappears?
Setting MAC field to all-zero to indicate unencrypted data
Is lack of functional requirements agile?
Managing and organizing the massively increased number of classes after switching to SOLID?
ESTA: "Is your travel to the US occurring in transit to another country?" when going on a cruise
Why are Hobbits so fond of mushrooms?
How to hide what's behind an object in a non destructive way / give it an “invisibility cloak”
Set a stroke to knockout a fill behind it with live text in IllustratorWhy can I only see a path when it's not white?Illustrator: Cannot select text behind “Place” ObjectNon-destructive transformation + effects IllustratorHow to bend a rectangle along a path?Arrange one object specifically behind another object?Subtract a path from a shape in Illustrator CC 2015how to give transparent border around an object in illustrator?Is there a way to place an object of higher layer behind an object in a lower layer?blur every object behind itselfHow to give a solid motion trail to an object
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
is there a way to design a linked graphic in Illustrator with some kind of invisibility cloak in the layers.
Let me explain.
Let's say I want to reuse a sketch like this
Where in fact, the rectangle fill color is transparent, and I don't really want to have a purple fill color for the ellipse, but I want it to hide the path of the rectangle.
Then, I want to be able to reuse it on some backgrounds like this:
In order to reach the final result 
The thing is: I don't want the ellipse to really be purple in the image that I save in my Illustrator Cloud library, I just want it to adapt its color to whatever is beneath the rectangle layer
That way, if I have an orange background, I want to immediately (without modification of the link) reach the following result
instead of this (my current achievement) 
Is it possible without embedding the image nor destroying the shapes?
Really, as if the ellipse was acting as an invisibility cloak for the rectangle.
adobe-illustrator
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
is there a way to design a linked graphic in Illustrator with some kind of invisibility cloak in the layers.
Let me explain.
Let's say I want to reuse a sketch like this
Where in fact, the rectangle fill color is transparent, and I don't really want to have a purple fill color for the ellipse, but I want it to hide the path of the rectangle.
Then, I want to be able to reuse it on some backgrounds like this:
In order to reach the final result
The thing is: I don't want the ellipse to really be purple in the image that I save in my Illustrator Cloud library, I just want it to adapt its color to whatever is beneath the rectangle layer
That way, if I have an orange background, I want to immediately (without modification of the link) reach the following result
instead of this (my current achievement)
Is it possible without embedding the image nor destroying the shapes?
Really, as if the ellipse was acting as an invisibility cloak for the rectangle.
adobe-illustrator
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
is there a way to design a linked graphic in Illustrator with some kind of invisibility cloak in the layers.
Let me explain.
Let's say I want to reuse a sketch like this
Where in fact, the rectangle fill color is transparent, and I don't really want to have a purple fill color for the ellipse, but I want it to hide the path of the rectangle.
Then, I want to be able to reuse it on some backgrounds like this:
In order to reach the final result
The thing is: I don't want the ellipse to really be purple in the image that I save in my Illustrator Cloud library, I just want it to adapt its color to whatever is beneath the rectangle layer
That way, if I have an orange background, I want to immediately (without modification of the link) reach the following result
instead of this (my current achievement)
Is it possible without embedding the image nor destroying the shapes?
Really, as if the ellipse was acting as an invisibility cloak for the rectangle.
adobe-illustrator
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
is there a way to design a linked graphic in Illustrator with some kind of invisibility cloak in the layers.
Let me explain.
Let's say I want to reuse a sketch like this
Where in fact, the rectangle fill color is transparent, and I don't really want to have a purple fill color for the ellipse, but I want it to hide the path of the rectangle.
Then, I want to be able to reuse it on some backgrounds like this:
In order to reach the final result
The thing is: I don't want the ellipse to really be purple in the image that I save in my Illustrator Cloud library, I just want it to adapt its color to whatever is beneath the rectangle layer
That way, if I have an orange background, I want to immediately (without modification of the link) reach the following result
instead of this (my current achievement)
Is it possible without embedding the image nor destroying the shapes?
Really, as if the ellipse was acting as an invisibility cloak for the rectangle.
adobe-illustrator
adobe-illustrator
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Emilie♦
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
6,9532 gold badges25 silver badges68 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
MyochMyoch
1183 bronze badges
1183 bronze badges
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Myoch is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Use knockout groups. The benefit being that knockout groups is that you can not just hide pained areas you can also partially hide things, and you get to affect exactly how deep in the stack the effect knocks out and whether it knocks out fill or stroke or BOTH. It is also usable inside effects which makes it far more flexible than shaper.
To use knockout groups you need two things
- a group marked as knockout in the transparency panel.
- any transparency applied in that group now eats out of the group. So if set a fill 100% transparent then you get the effect you described.
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
It certainly is possible. Try this method.
Ensure that both the objects (the rectangle and ellipse) have a stroke, but no fill.
Select both objects, and choose the Shaper Tool in the toolbox (or shift+N)
Draw a zig zag line across the line you wish to delete
Move the Shaper Group over a rectangle filled with the colour of your choice
The nice thing about this method is that it's non-destructive. You can double click the Shaper Group to enter it in isolation mode, and move the ellipse or rectangle around. Double click outside the group to exit isolation mode.
I think Adobe should have probably called this the "Invisibility Cloaking Device" instead of the Shaper Tool. It would have been so much cooler!
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
2
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
1
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "174"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Myoch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126521%2fhow-to-hide-whats-behind-an-object-in-a-non-destructive-way-give-it-an-invis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Use knockout groups. The benefit being that knockout groups is that you can not just hide pained areas you can also partially hide things, and you get to affect exactly how deep in the stack the effect knocks out and whether it knocks out fill or stroke or BOTH. It is also usable inside effects which makes it far more flexible than shaper.
To use knockout groups you need two things
- a group marked as knockout in the transparency panel.
- any transparency applied in that group now eats out of the group. So if set a fill 100% transparent then you get the effect you described.
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Use knockout groups. The benefit being that knockout groups is that you can not just hide pained areas you can also partially hide things, and you get to affect exactly how deep in the stack the effect knocks out and whether it knocks out fill or stroke or BOTH. It is also usable inside effects which makes it far more flexible than shaper.
To use knockout groups you need two things
- a group marked as knockout in the transparency panel.
- any transparency applied in that group now eats out of the group. So if set a fill 100% transparent then you get the effect you described.
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Use knockout groups. The benefit being that knockout groups is that you can not just hide pained areas you can also partially hide things, and you get to affect exactly how deep in the stack the effect knocks out and whether it knocks out fill or stroke or BOTH. It is also usable inside effects which makes it far more flexible than shaper.
To use knockout groups you need two things
- a group marked as knockout in the transparency panel.
- any transparency applied in that group now eats out of the group. So if set a fill 100% transparent then you get the effect you described.
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
Use knockout groups. The benefit being that knockout groups is that you can not just hide pained areas you can also partially hide things, and you get to affect exactly how deep in the stack the effect knocks out and whether it knocks out fill or stroke or BOTH. It is also usable inside effects which makes it far more flexible than shaper.
To use knockout groups you need two things
- a group marked as knockout in the transparency panel.
- any transparency applied in that group now eats out of the group. So if set a fill 100% transparent then you get the effect you described.
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
43.2k6 gold badges68 silver badges125 bronze badges
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
Thanks, indeed, it is better. Maybe "0% opacity" is better suited than "100% transparency" in Illustrator language, but this solution works way more easily for me, and is more compatible with collaborative work using Creative Cloud.
– Myoch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
It certainly is possible. Try this method.
Ensure that both the objects (the rectangle and ellipse) have a stroke, but no fill.
Select both objects, and choose the Shaper Tool in the toolbox (or shift+N)
Draw a zig zag line across the line you wish to delete
Move the Shaper Group over a rectangle filled with the colour of your choice
The nice thing about this method is that it's non-destructive. You can double click the Shaper Group to enter it in isolation mode, and move the ellipse or rectangle around. Double click outside the group to exit isolation mode.
I think Adobe should have probably called this the "Invisibility Cloaking Device" instead of the Shaper Tool. It would have been so much cooler!
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
2
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
1
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
It certainly is possible. Try this method.
Ensure that both the objects (the rectangle and ellipse) have a stroke, but no fill.
Select both objects, and choose the Shaper Tool in the toolbox (or shift+N)
Draw a zig zag line across the line you wish to delete
Move the Shaper Group over a rectangle filled with the colour of your choice
The nice thing about this method is that it's non-destructive. You can double click the Shaper Group to enter it in isolation mode, and move the ellipse or rectangle around. Double click outside the group to exit isolation mode.
I think Adobe should have probably called this the "Invisibility Cloaking Device" instead of the Shaper Tool. It would have been so much cooler!
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
2
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
1
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
It certainly is possible. Try this method.
Ensure that both the objects (the rectangle and ellipse) have a stroke, but no fill.
Select both objects, and choose the Shaper Tool in the toolbox (or shift+N)
Draw a zig zag line across the line you wish to delete
Move the Shaper Group over a rectangle filled with the colour of your choice
The nice thing about this method is that it's non-destructive. You can double click the Shaper Group to enter it in isolation mode, and move the ellipse or rectangle around. Double click outside the group to exit isolation mode.
I think Adobe should have probably called this the "Invisibility Cloaking Device" instead of the Shaper Tool. It would have been so much cooler!
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
It certainly is possible. Try this method.
Ensure that both the objects (the rectangle and ellipse) have a stroke, but no fill.
Select both objects, and choose the Shaper Tool in the toolbox (or shift+N)
Draw a zig zag line across the line you wish to delete
Move the Shaper Group over a rectangle filled with the colour of your choice
The nice thing about this method is that it's non-destructive. You can double click the Shaper Group to enter it in isolation mode, and move the ellipse or rectangle around. Double click outside the group to exit isolation mode.
I think Adobe should have probably called this the "Invisibility Cloaking Device" instead of the Shaper Tool. It would have been so much cooler!
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Scott
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
154k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
Billy KerrBilly Kerr
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
31k2 gold badges25 silver badges63 bronze badges
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
2
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
1
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
2
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
1
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
that's super interesting, I never saw this tool before :)
– Luciano
9 hours ago
2
2
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
Learn something new every day. I was about to say no and explain the whole minus front method but hell, this is perfect. Thanks for sharing.
– ErickP
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@Luciano it's fairly new, in Illustrator CC 2018 and later. Not sure when they first released the functionality though. Might have been the 2017 release.
– Billy Kerr
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
@ErickP you can also do this with knockout groups as early as illustrator CS 2
– joojaa
9 hours ago
1
1
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
@ErickP not shape builder tool, shaper tool
– joojaa
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Myoch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Myoch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Myoch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Myoch is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Graphic Design Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126521%2fhow-to-hide-whats-behind-an-object-in-a-non-destructive-way-give-it-an-invis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
