Availability Groups automatic failover is not so automaticQuorum for 3 nodes AlwaysOn Availability GroupHow Automatic Failover Works (AlwaysOn)AlwaysOn Availability Groups go to Resolving statusNeed to configure Availability Groups between three different SQL failover instanceAvailability groups taking time to change statesMigrate from SQL 2016 Failover Cluster to Availability GroupsAlways On Failover Clustering vs Always On Availability GroupsAutomatic Failover on SQL Server Always On Availability Groups is not triggered when primary replica becomes offline
Book featuring a child learning from a crowdsourced AI book
What are the IPSE’s, the ASPE’s, the FRIPSE’s and the GRIPSE’s?
Dual of a bimodule
Does NASA use any type of office/groupware software and which is that?
Does the Reduce option from the Enlarge/Reduce spell cause a critical hit to do 2d4 less damage?
To what extent should we fear giving offense?
According to UK government, Parliament cannot stop a no-deal Brexit: Could this also be used to push through the agreement agreed by Theresa May?
How to pass 2>/dev/null as a variable?
Is it unusual for a math department not to have a mail/web server?
Using a JoeBlow Sport pump on a presta valve
Can a DM change an item given by another DM?
Find most "academic" implementation of doubly linked list
How to say "I only speak one which is English." in French?
What is the name of this plot that has rows with two connected dots?
Counting the triangles that can be formed from segments of given lengths
Why did James Cameron decide to give Alita big eyes?
How to emphasise the insignificance of someone/thing – besides using "klein"
If I said I had $100 when asked, but I actually had $200, would I be lying by omission?
Was a star-crossed lover
Fill NaN based on previous value of row
Can MuseScore be used programmatically?
What is Soda Fountain Etiquette?
Is there a word or phrase that means "use other people's wifi or Internet service without consent"?
Why did Lucius make a deal out of Buckbeak hurting Draco but not about Draco being turned into a ferret?
Availability Groups automatic failover is not so automatic
Quorum for 3 nodes AlwaysOn Availability GroupHow Automatic Failover Works (AlwaysOn)AlwaysOn Availability Groups go to Resolving statusNeed to configure Availability Groups between three different SQL failover instanceAvailability groups taking time to change statesMigrate from SQL 2016 Failover Cluster to Availability GroupsAlways On Failover Clustering vs Always On Availability GroupsAutomatic Failover on SQL Server Always On Availability Groups is not triggered when primary replica becomes offline
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Behavior when I stop SQL Server Service :
The availability group fails (resolving on SECONDARY SQL SERVER and fail state on Cluster management).
SQL Server does not connect with the Cluster ip (I'm using a fixed cluster ip inside the software for it to connect on both SQL1 and SQL2. using
x.x.x.10should connect me on bothx.x.x.9(SQL1) andx.x.x.8(SQL2) because of thewindows failover cluster.- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
right click > failover).
- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
To return everything as it was, I need to start
SQL1 SERVICEmanually, connect onSQL1 SSMSandright click > failovermanually. Stop NODE2 service on cluster management so it turns SQL1 node primary again.
Behavior when I stop the primary cluster node:
The availability group goes to SQL2/NODE 2 (Secondary is now primary).
Primary AG is not Resolving...
SQL Server connect with the cluster ip ( I'm talking about SSMS . connecting with ip
X.x.x.10, connects me withx.x.x.8that is the secondary node, after killing nodex.x.x.9( Primary ).When I start the cluster node (primary) again, it doenst automatically returns do SQL1 (primary). connecting with
x.x.x.10still connects me with the secondary node.If I want to make SQL1 primary again, I need to
**stop** node2 cluster serviceand start it again. this way, SQL1 (primary) is primary again connecting with Cluster IP.
This is totally not the automatically I think I would have. I thought that if SQL Server dies, all connections goes to the secondary automatically, but it just failover if the primary NODE is down (not sql server service). and then to return to the primary, I need to STOP SQL2 cluster service, so the primary becomes primary again.
Is there something that I'm missing?
We are not using a Failover Cluster with shared storage. There are 2 servers with their own disks.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups clustering failover
add a comment |
Behavior when I stop SQL Server Service :
The availability group fails (resolving on SECONDARY SQL SERVER and fail state on Cluster management).
SQL Server does not connect with the Cluster ip (I'm using a fixed cluster ip inside the software for it to connect on both SQL1 and SQL2. using
x.x.x.10should connect me on bothx.x.x.9(SQL1) andx.x.x.8(SQL2) because of thewindows failover cluster.- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
right click > failover).
- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
To return everything as it was, I need to start
SQL1 SERVICEmanually, connect onSQL1 SSMSandright click > failovermanually. Stop NODE2 service on cluster management so it turns SQL1 node primary again.
Behavior when I stop the primary cluster node:
The availability group goes to SQL2/NODE 2 (Secondary is now primary).
Primary AG is not Resolving...
SQL Server connect with the cluster ip ( I'm talking about SSMS . connecting with ip
X.x.x.10, connects me withx.x.x.8that is the secondary node, after killing nodex.x.x.9( Primary ).When I start the cluster node (primary) again, it doenst automatically returns do SQL1 (primary). connecting with
x.x.x.10still connects me with the secondary node.If I want to make SQL1 primary again, I need to
**stop** node2 cluster serviceand start it again. this way, SQL1 (primary) is primary again connecting with Cluster IP.
This is totally not the automatically I think I would have. I thought that if SQL Server dies, all connections goes to the secondary automatically, but it just failover if the primary NODE is down (not sql server service). and then to return to the primary, I need to STOP SQL2 cluster service, so the primary becomes primary again.
Is there something that I'm missing?
We are not using a Failover Cluster with shared storage. There are 2 servers with their own disks.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups clustering failover
add a comment |
Behavior when I stop SQL Server Service :
The availability group fails (resolving on SECONDARY SQL SERVER and fail state on Cluster management).
SQL Server does not connect with the Cluster ip (I'm using a fixed cluster ip inside the software for it to connect on both SQL1 and SQL2. using
x.x.x.10should connect me on bothx.x.x.9(SQL1) andx.x.x.8(SQL2) because of thewindows failover cluster.- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
right click > failover).
- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
To return everything as it was, I need to start
SQL1 SERVICEmanually, connect onSQL1 SSMSandright click > failovermanually. Stop NODE2 service on cluster management so it turns SQL1 node primary again.
Behavior when I stop the primary cluster node:
The availability group goes to SQL2/NODE 2 (Secondary is now primary).
Primary AG is not Resolving...
SQL Server connect with the cluster ip ( I'm talking about SSMS . connecting with ip
X.x.x.10, connects me withx.x.x.8that is the secondary node, after killing nodex.x.x.9( Primary ).When I start the cluster node (primary) again, it doenst automatically returns do SQL1 (primary). connecting with
x.x.x.10still connects me with the secondary node.If I want to make SQL1 primary again, I need to
**stop** node2 cluster serviceand start it again. this way, SQL1 (primary) is primary again connecting with Cluster IP.
This is totally not the automatically I think I would have. I thought that if SQL Server dies, all connections goes to the secondary automatically, but it just failover if the primary NODE is down (not sql server service). and then to return to the primary, I need to STOP SQL2 cluster service, so the primary becomes primary again.
Is there something that I'm missing?
We are not using a Failover Cluster with shared storage. There are 2 servers with their own disks.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups clustering failover
Behavior when I stop SQL Server Service :
The availability group fails (resolving on SECONDARY SQL SERVER and fail state on Cluster management).
SQL Server does not connect with the Cluster ip (I'm using a fixed cluster ip inside the software for it to connect on both SQL1 and SQL2. using
x.x.x.10should connect me on bothx.x.x.9(SQL1) andx.x.x.8(SQL2) because of thewindows failover cluster.- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
right click > failover).
- I need to manually move AG to secondary ( I connect on SQL2 and
To return everything as it was, I need to start
SQL1 SERVICEmanually, connect onSQL1 SSMSandright click > failovermanually. Stop NODE2 service on cluster management so it turns SQL1 node primary again.
Behavior when I stop the primary cluster node:
The availability group goes to SQL2/NODE 2 (Secondary is now primary).
Primary AG is not Resolving...
SQL Server connect with the cluster ip ( I'm talking about SSMS . connecting with ip
X.x.x.10, connects me withx.x.x.8that is the secondary node, after killing nodex.x.x.9( Primary ).When I start the cluster node (primary) again, it doenst automatically returns do SQL1 (primary). connecting with
x.x.x.10still connects me with the secondary node.If I want to make SQL1 primary again, I need to
**stop** node2 cluster serviceand start it again. this way, SQL1 (primary) is primary again connecting with Cluster IP.
This is totally not the automatically I think I would have. I thought that if SQL Server dies, all connections goes to the secondary automatically, but it just failover if the primary NODE is down (not sql server service). and then to return to the primary, I need to STOP SQL2 cluster service, so the primary becomes primary again.
Is there something that I'm missing?
We are not using a Failover Cluster with shared storage. There are 2 servers with their own disks.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups clustering failover
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups clustering failover
edited 3 hours ago
Josh Darnell
11.7k3 gold badges27 silver badges59 bronze badges
11.7k3 gold badges27 silver badges59 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
Racer SQLRacer SQL
3,4764 gold badges30 silver badges73 bronze badges
3,4764 gold badges30 silver badges73 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You have a quorum issue in this setup. There are only two participants in the cluster:
- SQL1
- SQL2
If SQL1 goes down, there's no way for SQL2 to know that it should be the primary. For all SQL2 knows, the network has gone down and SQL1 is still operating as the primary. Thus, SQL2 goes to the RESOLVING state (it's not sure what to do). This is to prevent a "split brain" scenario.
For a two-node cluster, generally you need to add a File Share Witness as a resource in the WSFC cluster. This will allow the remaining instance, SQL2, to establish quorum with the FSW, and take over as the primary.
Additionally, the behavior of AGs is not to automatically fail back to the "original primary" as soon as it's back up. Automatic failover is only in the case of an outage on the current primary, it's not intended to "automatically fail back."
Note that the other scenario you described, stopping the primary cluster node, is not how you want your AGs to failover. Don't do that:
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to manipulate availability groups, for example:
Do not add or remove resources in the clustered service (resource group) for the availability group.
Do not change any availability group properties, such as the possible owners and preferred owners. These properties are set automatically by the availability group.
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to move availability groups to different nodes or to fail over availability groups. The Failover Cluster Manager is not aware of the synchronization status of the availability replicas, and doing so can lead to extended downtime. You must use Transact-SQL or SQL Server Management Studio.
I'm really trying to understandQuorumandListeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I canselect @@servernameand the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of thelistener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand thisvotes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.
– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f246360%2favailability-groups-automatic-failover-is-not-so-automatic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have a quorum issue in this setup. There are only two participants in the cluster:
- SQL1
- SQL2
If SQL1 goes down, there's no way for SQL2 to know that it should be the primary. For all SQL2 knows, the network has gone down and SQL1 is still operating as the primary. Thus, SQL2 goes to the RESOLVING state (it's not sure what to do). This is to prevent a "split brain" scenario.
For a two-node cluster, generally you need to add a File Share Witness as a resource in the WSFC cluster. This will allow the remaining instance, SQL2, to establish quorum with the FSW, and take over as the primary.
Additionally, the behavior of AGs is not to automatically fail back to the "original primary" as soon as it's back up. Automatic failover is only in the case of an outage on the current primary, it's not intended to "automatically fail back."
Note that the other scenario you described, stopping the primary cluster node, is not how you want your AGs to failover. Don't do that:
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to manipulate availability groups, for example:
Do not add or remove resources in the clustered service (resource group) for the availability group.
Do not change any availability group properties, such as the possible owners and preferred owners. These properties are set automatically by the availability group.
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to move availability groups to different nodes or to fail over availability groups. The Failover Cluster Manager is not aware of the synchronization status of the availability replicas, and doing so can lead to extended downtime. You must use Transact-SQL or SQL Server Management Studio.
I'm really trying to understandQuorumandListeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I canselect @@servernameand the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of thelistener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand thisvotes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.
– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
add a comment |
You have a quorum issue in this setup. There are only two participants in the cluster:
- SQL1
- SQL2
If SQL1 goes down, there's no way for SQL2 to know that it should be the primary. For all SQL2 knows, the network has gone down and SQL1 is still operating as the primary. Thus, SQL2 goes to the RESOLVING state (it's not sure what to do). This is to prevent a "split brain" scenario.
For a two-node cluster, generally you need to add a File Share Witness as a resource in the WSFC cluster. This will allow the remaining instance, SQL2, to establish quorum with the FSW, and take over as the primary.
Additionally, the behavior of AGs is not to automatically fail back to the "original primary" as soon as it's back up. Automatic failover is only in the case of an outage on the current primary, it's not intended to "automatically fail back."
Note that the other scenario you described, stopping the primary cluster node, is not how you want your AGs to failover. Don't do that:
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to manipulate availability groups, for example:
Do not add or remove resources in the clustered service (resource group) for the availability group.
Do not change any availability group properties, such as the possible owners and preferred owners. These properties are set automatically by the availability group.
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to move availability groups to different nodes or to fail over availability groups. The Failover Cluster Manager is not aware of the synchronization status of the availability replicas, and doing so can lead to extended downtime. You must use Transact-SQL or SQL Server Management Studio.
I'm really trying to understandQuorumandListeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I canselect @@servernameand the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of thelistener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand thisvotes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.
– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
add a comment |
You have a quorum issue in this setup. There are only two participants in the cluster:
- SQL1
- SQL2
If SQL1 goes down, there's no way for SQL2 to know that it should be the primary. For all SQL2 knows, the network has gone down and SQL1 is still operating as the primary. Thus, SQL2 goes to the RESOLVING state (it's not sure what to do). This is to prevent a "split brain" scenario.
For a two-node cluster, generally you need to add a File Share Witness as a resource in the WSFC cluster. This will allow the remaining instance, SQL2, to establish quorum with the FSW, and take over as the primary.
Additionally, the behavior of AGs is not to automatically fail back to the "original primary" as soon as it's back up. Automatic failover is only in the case of an outage on the current primary, it's not intended to "automatically fail back."
Note that the other scenario you described, stopping the primary cluster node, is not how you want your AGs to failover. Don't do that:
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to manipulate availability groups, for example:
Do not add or remove resources in the clustered service (resource group) for the availability group.
Do not change any availability group properties, such as the possible owners and preferred owners. These properties are set automatically by the availability group.
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to move availability groups to different nodes or to fail over availability groups. The Failover Cluster Manager is not aware of the synchronization status of the availability replicas, and doing so can lead to extended downtime. You must use Transact-SQL or SQL Server Management Studio.
You have a quorum issue in this setup. There are only two participants in the cluster:
- SQL1
- SQL2
If SQL1 goes down, there's no way for SQL2 to know that it should be the primary. For all SQL2 knows, the network has gone down and SQL1 is still operating as the primary. Thus, SQL2 goes to the RESOLVING state (it's not sure what to do). This is to prevent a "split brain" scenario.
For a two-node cluster, generally you need to add a File Share Witness as a resource in the WSFC cluster. This will allow the remaining instance, SQL2, to establish quorum with the FSW, and take over as the primary.
Additionally, the behavior of AGs is not to automatically fail back to the "original primary" as soon as it's back up. Automatic failover is only in the case of an outage on the current primary, it's not intended to "automatically fail back."
Note that the other scenario you described, stopping the primary cluster node, is not how you want your AGs to failover. Don't do that:
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to manipulate availability groups, for example:
Do not add or remove resources in the clustered service (resource group) for the availability group.
Do not change any availability group properties, such as the possible owners and preferred owners. These properties are set automatically by the availability group.
Do not use the Failover Cluster Manager to move availability groups to different nodes or to fail over availability groups. The Failover Cluster Manager is not aware of the synchronization status of the availability replicas, and doing so can lead to extended downtime. You must use Transact-SQL or SQL Server Management Studio.
answered 9 hours ago
Josh DarnellJosh Darnell
11.7k3 gold badges27 silver badges59 bronze badges
11.7k3 gold badges27 silver badges59 bronze badges
I'm really trying to understandQuorumandListeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I canselect @@servernameand the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of thelistener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand thisvotes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.
– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm really trying to understandQuorumandListeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I canselect @@servernameand the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of thelistener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand thisvotes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.
– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I'm really trying to understand
Quorum and Listeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I can select @@servername and the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of the listener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand this votes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
I'm really trying to understand
Quorum and Listeners. I set up this test environment and everything is ok. I don't think I have configured a quorum and a listener. When I stop node1,automatically when I'm on SSMS,I can select @@servername and the connection changes from SQL1 to SQL2 using the same cluster IP.Isnt this the role of the listener?do I NEED to have a listener? because It seems the failover is doing great transfering from one server to another. and about quorum,I can't understand this votes.Can a cluster works with no quorum? because again,I could failover with no problem.– Racer SQL
5 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL What do you mean by "when I stop node 1"? Regarding the listener, Microsoft recommends that you use a listener to connect, and they specifically advise against using the cluster IP. I believe this has to do with how SQL client's negotiate the connection. The WSFC always establishes quorum. Check out that answer and the linked docs article.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
I mean "Cluster manager > Right click on NODE1 > Stop service". Or in a real environment it would be to shut down the entire server. Thank you Josh I'm reading more about this tonight.
– Racer SQL
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
@RacerSQL You're welcome, I'm glad to help! I'd be wary about shutting down cluster nodes and triggering failovers from the cluster manager. As the last bullet in my answer states, this could lead to downtime and data loss.
– Josh Darnell
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f246360%2favailability-groups-automatic-failover-is-not-so-automatic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown