What was the point of “Substance”?Why was the banding ability 'removed' from MTG? What was so complicated about it?Is there any strategic reason to skip a turn to untap Time Vault?Where/how does the Magic: the Gathering Quick Start Guide booklet actually get distributed in the physical world?What pauper cards are legal in MTGO but not paper?If I can't “win the game” in multiplayer, do my opponents still lose?Is there a functional reason for Ghostfire not having the Devoid keyword?Which dual lands count as having the name of their respective basic land types for certain effects?Change in “can't be countered” wordingWhy is Modern Affinity called “Affinity”?Was it ever possible to target a zone?
To what extent should we fear giving offense?
Dotted background on a flowchart
Is there any problem with a full installation on a USB drive?
Book featuring a child learning from a crowdsourced AI book
What to do about my 1-month-old boy peeing through diapers?
Can I use coax outlets for cable modem?
Is there an in-universe explanation given to the senior Imperial Navy Officers as to why Darth Vader serves Emperor Palpatine?
Grep contents before a colon
Find feasible point in polynomial time in linear programming
What is Soda Fountain Etiquette?
Why is explainability not one of the criteria for publication?
Can a paladin prepare more spells if they didn't cast any the previous day?
Force SQL Server to use fragmented indexes?
Number of Fingers for a Math Oriented Race
Why did the population of Bhutan drop by 70% between 2007 and 2008?
Why does Windows store Wi-Fi passwords in a reversible format?
Are strlen optimizations really needed in glibc?
Should I use the words "pyromancy" and "necromancy" even if they don't mean what people think they do?
Did anybody find out it was Anakin who blew up the command center?
Why did Lucius make a deal out of Buckbeak hurting Draco but not about Draco being turned into a ferret?
Biological refrigeration?
Are (c#) dictionaries an Anti Pattern?
Can I get a PhD for developing an educational software?
How do solar inverter systems easily add AC power sources together?
What was the point of “Substance”?
Why was the banding ability 'removed' from MTG? What was so complicated about it?Is there any strategic reason to skip a turn to untap Time Vault?Where/how does the Magic: the Gathering Quick Start Guide booklet actually get distributed in the physical world?What pauper cards are legal in MTGO but not paper?If I can't “win the game” in multiplayer, do my opponents still lose?Is there a functional reason for Ghostfire not having the Devoid keyword?Which dual lands count as having the name of their respective basic land types for certain effects?Change in “can't be countered” wordingWhy is Modern Affinity called “Affinity”?Was it ever possible to target a zone?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I've heard people mention the "Substance" keyword ability before, as an ability that has never been printed and does nothing. This seems…strange, to say the least. And searching Gatherer turns up nothing on it.
What is/was the point of Substance, if it has never been printed and does nothing? Did it ever actually exist? And if so, why?
magic-the-gathering
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
add a comment |
I've heard people mention the "Substance" keyword ability before, as an ability that has never been printed and does nothing. This seems…strange, to say the least. And searching Gatherer turns up nothing on it.
What is/was the point of Substance, if it has never been printed and does nothing? Did it ever actually exist? And if so, why?
magic-the-gathering
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
Is there a reason the wiki doesn't answer your question? mtg.gamepedia.com/Substance
– John
8 hours ago
@John Mostly I'm confused as to why adding "Substance" makes it any better. You still have a triggered ability that goes off at the start of the cleanup step; why is it easier to remove Substance at that point and destroy the permanent when Substance is removed, rather than just removing it outright?
– Draconis
5 hours ago
(…which Gendolkari explained in his answer: "until end of turn" isn't the same as "at end of turn", so "gains Substance until end of turn" makes everything work out better.)
– Draconis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
I've heard people mention the "Substance" keyword ability before, as an ability that has never been printed and does nothing. This seems…strange, to say the least. And searching Gatherer turns up nothing on it.
What is/was the point of Substance, if it has never been printed and does nothing? Did it ever actually exist? And if so, why?
magic-the-gathering
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
I've heard people mention the "Substance" keyword ability before, as an ability that has never been printed and does nothing. This seems…strange, to say the least. And searching Gatherer turns up nothing on it.
What is/was the point of Substance, if it has never been printed and does nothing? Did it ever actually exist? And if so, why?
magic-the-gathering
magic-the-gathering
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
2391 silver badge6 bronze badges
Is there a reason the wiki doesn't answer your question? mtg.gamepedia.com/Substance
– John
8 hours ago
@John Mostly I'm confused as to why adding "Substance" makes it any better. You still have a triggered ability that goes off at the start of the cleanup step; why is it easier to remove Substance at that point and destroy the permanent when Substance is removed, rather than just removing it outright?
– Draconis
5 hours ago
(…which Gendolkari explained in his answer: "until end of turn" isn't the same as "at end of turn", so "gains Substance until end of turn" makes everything work out better.)
– Draconis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Is there a reason the wiki doesn't answer your question? mtg.gamepedia.com/Substance
– John
8 hours ago
@John Mostly I'm confused as to why adding "Substance" makes it any better. You still have a triggered ability that goes off at the start of the cleanup step; why is it easier to remove Substance at that point and destroy the permanent when Substance is removed, rather than just removing it outright?
– Draconis
5 hours ago
(…which Gendolkari explained in his answer: "until end of turn" isn't the same as "at end of turn", so "gains Substance until end of turn" makes everything work out better.)
– Draconis
5 hours ago
Is there a reason the wiki doesn't answer your question? mtg.gamepedia.com/Substance
– John
8 hours ago
Is there a reason the wiki doesn't answer your question? mtg.gamepedia.com/Substance
– John
8 hours ago
@John Mostly I'm confused as to why adding "Substance" makes it any better. You still have a triggered ability that goes off at the start of the cleanup step; why is it easier to remove Substance at that point and destroy the permanent when Substance is removed, rather than just removing it outright?
– Draconis
5 hours ago
@John Mostly I'm confused as to why adding "Substance" makes it any better. You still have a triggered ability that goes off at the start of the cleanup step; why is it easier to remove Substance at that point and destroy the permanent when Substance is removed, rather than just removing it outright?
– Draconis
5 hours ago
(…which Gendolkari explained in his answer: "until end of turn" isn't the same as "at end of turn", so "gains Substance until end of turn" makes everything work out better.)
– Draconis
5 hours ago
(…which Gendolkari explained in his answer: "until end of turn" isn't the same as "at end of turn", so "gains Substance until end of turn" makes everything work out better.)
– Draconis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Substance existed at one point in time in the Oracle wording of twelve cards, but it was never printed on a card.
It was created to get around an issue caused when they changed the timing rules for end of turn effects, but wanted to keep the functionality on certain cards the same.
The idea was to give a card substance until the end of turn, and then have a triggered ability that would trigger when the card lost substance. This would allow effects to wear off at the end of turn when they wanted it to. Now, they use "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" to achieve the same thing.
This article discusses the change where they removed the substance keyword.
Twelve cards (Waylay, Thawing Glaciers, and the ten-card Armor of Thorns cycle) had "at end of turn" triggers back when that truly referred to the very end of the turn. To preserve their functionality (especially because some of them were practically nonsensical if they were sacrificed before damage clears), they were given a wording that allowed their delayed triggered abilities to trigger during the cleanup step (a time when nothing normally triggers). To achieve this, the relevant permanents gained substance (a static ability with no effect) until end of turn, then triggered when they lost substance—because "until end of turn" effects wear off at the same time that damage does.
These cards will now have a more straightforward "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" trigger, and the rules have been adjusted accordingly. Note that this new wording is somewhat misleading, since it's not the first thing that happens in the cleanup step (just like "at the beginning of your draw step" triggers aren't the first thing that happen during your draw step—you draw a card first). In the cleanup step, the player whose turn it is will discard down to seven cards, then "until end of turn" effects will end and damage will be cleared, then these abilities will trigger.
This article discusses more details around how substance worked.
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "147"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48407%2fwhat-was-the-point-of-substance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Substance existed at one point in time in the Oracle wording of twelve cards, but it was never printed on a card.
It was created to get around an issue caused when they changed the timing rules for end of turn effects, but wanted to keep the functionality on certain cards the same.
The idea was to give a card substance until the end of turn, and then have a triggered ability that would trigger when the card lost substance. This would allow effects to wear off at the end of turn when they wanted it to. Now, they use "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" to achieve the same thing.
This article discusses the change where they removed the substance keyword.
Twelve cards (Waylay, Thawing Glaciers, and the ten-card Armor of Thorns cycle) had "at end of turn" triggers back when that truly referred to the very end of the turn. To preserve their functionality (especially because some of them were practically nonsensical if they were sacrificed before damage clears), they were given a wording that allowed their delayed triggered abilities to trigger during the cleanup step (a time when nothing normally triggers). To achieve this, the relevant permanents gained substance (a static ability with no effect) until end of turn, then triggered when they lost substance—because "until end of turn" effects wear off at the same time that damage does.
These cards will now have a more straightforward "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" trigger, and the rules have been adjusted accordingly. Note that this new wording is somewhat misleading, since it's not the first thing that happens in the cleanup step (just like "at the beginning of your draw step" triggers aren't the first thing that happen during your draw step—you draw a card first). In the cleanup step, the player whose turn it is will discard down to seven cards, then "until end of turn" effects will end and damage will be cleared, then these abilities will trigger.
This article discusses more details around how substance worked.
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Substance existed at one point in time in the Oracle wording of twelve cards, but it was never printed on a card.
It was created to get around an issue caused when they changed the timing rules for end of turn effects, but wanted to keep the functionality on certain cards the same.
The idea was to give a card substance until the end of turn, and then have a triggered ability that would trigger when the card lost substance. This would allow effects to wear off at the end of turn when they wanted it to. Now, they use "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" to achieve the same thing.
This article discusses the change where they removed the substance keyword.
Twelve cards (Waylay, Thawing Glaciers, and the ten-card Armor of Thorns cycle) had "at end of turn" triggers back when that truly referred to the very end of the turn. To preserve their functionality (especially because some of them were practically nonsensical if they were sacrificed before damage clears), they were given a wording that allowed their delayed triggered abilities to trigger during the cleanup step (a time when nothing normally triggers). To achieve this, the relevant permanents gained substance (a static ability with no effect) until end of turn, then triggered when they lost substance—because "until end of turn" effects wear off at the same time that damage does.
These cards will now have a more straightforward "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" trigger, and the rules have been adjusted accordingly. Note that this new wording is somewhat misleading, since it's not the first thing that happens in the cleanup step (just like "at the beginning of your draw step" triggers aren't the first thing that happen during your draw step—you draw a card first). In the cleanup step, the player whose turn it is will discard down to seven cards, then "until end of turn" effects will end and damage will be cleared, then these abilities will trigger.
This article discusses more details around how substance worked.
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Substance existed at one point in time in the Oracle wording of twelve cards, but it was never printed on a card.
It was created to get around an issue caused when they changed the timing rules for end of turn effects, but wanted to keep the functionality on certain cards the same.
The idea was to give a card substance until the end of turn, and then have a triggered ability that would trigger when the card lost substance. This would allow effects to wear off at the end of turn when they wanted it to. Now, they use "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" to achieve the same thing.
This article discusses the change where they removed the substance keyword.
Twelve cards (Waylay, Thawing Glaciers, and the ten-card Armor of Thorns cycle) had "at end of turn" triggers back when that truly referred to the very end of the turn. To preserve their functionality (especially because some of them were practically nonsensical if they were sacrificed before damage clears), they were given a wording that allowed their delayed triggered abilities to trigger during the cleanup step (a time when nothing normally triggers). To achieve this, the relevant permanents gained substance (a static ability with no effect) until end of turn, then triggered when they lost substance—because "until end of turn" effects wear off at the same time that damage does.
These cards will now have a more straightforward "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" trigger, and the rules have been adjusted accordingly. Note that this new wording is somewhat misleading, since it's not the first thing that happens in the cleanup step (just like "at the beginning of your draw step" triggers aren't the first thing that happen during your draw step—you draw a card first). In the cleanup step, the player whose turn it is will discard down to seven cards, then "until end of turn" effects will end and damage will be cleared, then these abilities will trigger.
This article discusses more details around how substance worked.
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
Substance existed at one point in time in the Oracle wording of twelve cards, but it was never printed on a card.
It was created to get around an issue caused when they changed the timing rules for end of turn effects, but wanted to keep the functionality on certain cards the same.
The idea was to give a card substance until the end of turn, and then have a triggered ability that would trigger when the card lost substance. This would allow effects to wear off at the end of turn when they wanted it to. Now, they use "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" to achieve the same thing.
This article discusses the change where they removed the substance keyword.
Twelve cards (Waylay, Thawing Glaciers, and the ten-card Armor of Thorns cycle) had "at end of turn" triggers back when that truly referred to the very end of the turn. To preserve their functionality (especially because some of them were practically nonsensical if they were sacrificed before damage clears), they were given a wording that allowed their delayed triggered abilities to trigger during the cleanup step (a time when nothing normally triggers). To achieve this, the relevant permanents gained substance (a static ability with no effect) until end of turn, then triggered when they lost substance—because "until end of turn" effects wear off at the same time that damage does.
These cards will now have a more straightforward "at the beginning of the next cleanup step" trigger, and the rules have been adjusted accordingly. Note that this new wording is somewhat misleading, since it's not the first thing that happens in the cleanup step (just like "at the beginning of your draw step" triggers aren't the first thing that happen during your draw step—you draw a card first). In the cleanup step, the player whose turn it is will discard down to seven cards, then "until end of turn" effects will end and damage will be cleared, then these abilities will trigger.
This article discusses more details around how substance worked.
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
GendoIkariGendoIkari
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
48.4k3 gold badges104 silver badges199 bronze badges
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
Should "end" in "at the beginning of the next end step" be "cleanup" instead?
– Benjamin Cosman
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
@BenjaminCosman Fixed, thank you! The change from end step to cleanup step is exactly what caused the problem that they used substance to address!
– GendoIkari
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48407%2fwhat-was-the-point-of-substance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is there a reason the wiki doesn't answer your question? mtg.gamepedia.com/Substance
– John
8 hours ago
@John Mostly I'm confused as to why adding "Substance" makes it any better. You still have a triggered ability that goes off at the start of the cleanup step; why is it easier to remove Substance at that point and destroy the permanent when Substance is removed, rather than just removing it outright?
– Draconis
5 hours ago
(…which Gendolkari explained in his answer: "until end of turn" isn't the same as "at end of turn", so "gains Substance until end of turn" makes everything work out better.)
– Draconis
5 hours ago