What are the advantages and disadvantages of tail wheels that cause modern airplanes to not use them?Is there a good reason why modern airliners can't have conventional landing gears (vs. tricycle landing gears)?What are the effects of a rejected takeoff?Why tail wheel rather than tricycle?What effect would there be if the brakes were locked at touchdown?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having landing gear doors?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a single castor wheel as compared to 2 wheels in an airship?What are the advantages and disadvantages of ruddervators?Are STOL kits that use leading edge slats available for 'typical' GA aircraft?What are the advantages and disadvantages of autogyro aircraft?Why does the B-52 have such a tiny rudder?
Impossible Scrabble Words
What makes a smart phone "kosher"?
Wrong Schengen Visa exit stamp on my passport, who can I complain to?
Test to know when to use GLM over Linear Regression?
Reordering of matrix multiplication
Can a character with good/neutral alignment attune to a sentient magic item with evil alignment?
Is it possible to format a USB from a live USB?
How can I say "I want to" as a short response, omitting the main verb?
Divisibility and number theory in terms of a and b
Asked to Not Use Transactions and to Use A Workaround to Simulate One
What is the source of "You can achieve a lot with hate, but even more with love" (Shakespeare?)
Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register
Make 1998 using the least possible digits 8
How to control the output voltage of a solid state relay
Building Truncatable Primes using Nest(List), While, Fold
What is this gigantic dish at Ben Gurion airport?
Are there objective criteria for classifying consonance v. dissonance?
Is it possible to determine the index of a bip32 address?
How To Make Earth's Oceans as Brackish as Lyr's
Access parent controller attribute from Visual force component
Difference between system uptime and last boot time in windows
Insight into cavity resonators
Why don't Wizards use wrist straps to protect against disarming charms?
Make 2019 with single digits
What are the advantages and disadvantages of tail wheels that cause modern airplanes to not use them?
Is there a good reason why modern airliners can't have conventional landing gears (vs. tricycle landing gears)?What are the effects of a rejected takeoff?Why tail wheel rather than tricycle?What effect would there be if the brakes were locked at touchdown?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having landing gear doors?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a single castor wheel as compared to 2 wheels in an airship?What are the advantages and disadvantages of ruddervators?Are STOL kits that use leading edge slats available for 'typical' GA aircraft?What are the advantages and disadvantages of autogyro aircraft?Why does the B-52 have such a tiny rudder?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$


Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.
According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.
Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?
Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.
aircraft-design aircraft-performance landing-gear
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$


Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.
According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.
Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?
Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.
aircraft-design aircraft-performance landing-gear
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$


Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.
According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.
Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?
Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.
aircraft-design aircraft-performance landing-gear
$endgroup$


Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.
According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.
Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?
Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.
aircraft-design aircraft-performance landing-gear
aircraft-design aircraft-performance landing-gear
edited 1 hour ago
Sean
8,7035 gold badges44 silver badges115 bronze badges
8,7035 gold badges44 silver badges115 bronze badges
asked 17 hours ago
AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover
1,0381 gold badge4 silver badges20 bronze badges
1,0381 gold badge4 silver badges20 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.
On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.
To summarise the reasons given in this answer:
- A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.
- A tricycle gear allows full brake application.
- A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.
- A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.
Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.
A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.
Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.
However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.
AOPA article on STOL contests
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69704%2fwhat-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-tail-wheels-that-cause-modern-airpl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.
On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.
To summarise the reasons given in this answer:
- A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.
- A tricycle gear allows full brake application.
- A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.
- A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.
Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.
On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.
To summarise the reasons given in this answer:
- A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.
- A tricycle gear allows full brake application.
- A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.
- A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.
Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.
On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.
To summarise the reasons given in this answer:
- A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.
- A tricycle gear allows full brake application.
- A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.
- A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.
Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.
$endgroup$
A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.
On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.
To summarise the reasons given in this answer:
- A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.
- A tricycle gear allows full brake application.
- A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.
- A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.
Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
Peter KämpfPeter Kämpf
172k14 gold badges435 silver badges700 bronze badges
172k14 gold badges435 silver badges700 bronze badges
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
$begingroup$
40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
$endgroup$
– Harper
14 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.
A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.
Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.
However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.
A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.
Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.
However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.
A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.
Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.
However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.
$endgroup$
A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.
A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.
Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.
However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.
answered 15 hours ago
niels nielsenniels nielsen
3,5721 gold badge5 silver badges17 bronze badges
3,5721 gold badge5 silver badges17 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.
AOPA article on STOL contests
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.
AOPA article on STOL contests
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.
AOPA article on STOL contests
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.
AOPA article on STOL contests
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 7 hours ago
DeannaDeanna
312 bronze badges
312 bronze badges
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69704%2fwhat-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-tail-wheels-that-cause-modern-airpl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago