What are the advantages and disadvantages of tail wheels that cause modern airplanes to not use them?Is there a good reason why modern airliners can't have conventional landing gears (vs. tricycle landing gears)?What are the effects of a rejected takeoff?Why tail wheel rather than tricycle?What effect would there be if the brakes were locked at touchdown?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having landing gear doors?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a single castor wheel as compared to 2 wheels in an airship?What are the advantages and disadvantages of ruddervators?Are STOL kits that use leading edge slats available for 'typical' GA aircraft?What are the advantages and disadvantages of autogyro aircraft?Why does the B-52 have such a tiny rudder?

Impossible Scrabble Words

What makes a smart phone "kosher"?

Wrong Schengen Visa exit stamp on my passport, who can I complain to?

Test to know when to use GLM over Linear Regression?

Reordering of matrix multiplication

Can a character with good/neutral alignment attune to a sentient magic item with evil alignment?

Is it possible to format a USB from a live USB?

How can I say "I want to" as a short response, omitting the main verb?

Divisibility and number theory in terms of a and b

Asked to Not Use Transactions and to Use A Workaround to Simulate One

What is the source of "You can achieve a lot with hate, but even more with love" (Shakespeare?)

Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register

Make 1998 using the least possible digits 8

How to control the output voltage of a solid state relay

Building Truncatable Primes using Nest(List), While, Fold

What is this gigantic dish at Ben Gurion airport?

Are there objective criteria for classifying consonance v. dissonance?

Is it possible to determine the index of a bip32 address?

How To Make Earth's Oceans as Brackish as Lyr's

Access parent controller attribute from Visual force component

Difference between system uptime and last boot time in windows

Insight into cavity resonators

Why don't Wizards use wrist straps to protect against disarming charms?

Make 2019 with single digits



What are the advantages and disadvantages of tail wheels that cause modern airplanes to not use them?


Is there a good reason why modern airliners can't have conventional landing gears (vs. tricycle landing gears)?What are the effects of a rejected takeoff?Why tail wheel rather than tricycle?What effect would there be if the brakes were locked at touchdown?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having landing gear doors?What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a single castor wheel as compared to 2 wheels in an airship?What are the advantages and disadvantages of ruddervators?Are STOL kits that use leading edge slats available for 'typical' GA aircraft?What are the advantages and disadvantages of autogyro aircraft?Why does the B-52 have such a tiny rudder?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


Cessna 140 tail wheelCessna 150 tricycle gear



Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.



According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.



Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?



Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    7 mins ago

















5












$begingroup$


Cessna 140 tail wheelCessna 150 tricycle gear



Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.



According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.



Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?



Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    7 mins ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


Cessna 140 tail wheelCessna 150 tricycle gear



Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.



According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.



Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?



Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Cessna 140 tail wheelCessna 150 tricycle gear



Photos' source: Cessna 140 and Cessna 150.



According to Wikipedia here, the Cessna 150 is successor of Cessna 140. Both have two-seat capacity and a single engine.



Why was the Cessna 150 changed to tricycle landing gear from the "old school" tail wheel? If we consider that the two airplane models have the same weight and capacity, then what are the advantages/disadvantages of tail wheels vs. tricycle landing gear? Why are so few new tailwheel aircraft produced?



Note:
I mentioned the Cessnas here solely because I knew their story better, so I can more easily compare them. This question should not be considered specific to only Cessna's products.







aircraft-design aircraft-performance landing-gear






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Sean

8,7035 gold badges44 silver badges115 bronze badges




8,7035 gold badges44 silver badges115 bronze badges










asked 17 hours ago









AirCraft LoverAirCraft Lover

1,0381 gold badge4 silver badges20 bronze badges




1,0381 gold badge4 silver badges20 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    7 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
    $endgroup$
    – Criggie
    7 mins ago















$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago




$begingroup$
Clarification please - do you intend to aim this question at light aircraft like the Cessnas pictured?
$endgroup$
– Criggie
7 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9














$begingroup$

A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.



On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.



To summarise the reasons given in this answer:



  • A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.

  • A tricycle gear allows full brake application.

  • A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.

  • A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.

Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    14 mins ago


















4














$begingroup$

A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.



A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.



Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.



However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    3














    $begingroup$

    Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.



    AOPA article on STOL contests






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "528"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69704%2fwhat-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-tail-wheels-that-cause-modern-airpl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      9














      $begingroup$

      A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.



      On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.



      To summarise the reasons given in this answer:



      • A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.

      • A tricycle gear allows full brake application.

      • A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.

      • A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.

      Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        14 mins ago















      9














      $begingroup$

      A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.



      On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.



      To summarise the reasons given in this answer:



      • A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.

      • A tricycle gear allows full brake application.

      • A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.

      • A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.

      Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        14 mins ago













      9














      9










      9







      $begingroup$

      A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.



      On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.



      To summarise the reasons given in this answer:



      • A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.

      • A tricycle gear allows full brake application.

      • A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.

      • A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.

      Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      A tailwheel is a good choice for operation on unprepared surfaces with aircraft that have low wing loading and need to be as light as possible. Two main wheels and a small tail wheel weigh less and cause less drag than a tricycle gear, especially if they cannot be retracted. On the Bo-209 Monsun only the nose gear was made retractable because, being positioned right behind the prop, it caused 40% of gear drag all by itself.



      On the other hand, high wing loading aircraft with their high landing speed would need very long landing runs due to their inability to brake hard. A rejected take-off close to the decision speed would be impossible without crashing through the airfield perimeter. Braking too hard with a tailwheel configuration will cause a headstand.



      To summarise the reasons given in this answer:



      • A tricycle gear offers better visibility on the ground.

      • A tricycle gear allows full brake application.

      • A tricycle gear makes loading and unloading easier because the fuselage is horizontal.

      • A tricycle gear has less drag during the initial stage of a take-off run.

      Cessna simply shifted priorities between the 140 and the 150.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 15 hours ago

























      answered 15 hours ago









      Peter KämpfPeter Kämpf

      172k14 gold badges435 silver badges700 bronze badges




      172k14 gold badges435 silver badges700 bronze badges














      • $begingroup$
        40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        14 mins ago
















      • $begingroup$
        40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        14 mins ago















      $begingroup$
      40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
      $endgroup$
      – Harper
      14 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      40% isn't excessive when if balanced, it would cause 33%...
      $endgroup$
      – Harper
      14 mins ago













      4














      $begingroup$

      A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.



      A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.



      Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.



      However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        4














        $begingroup$

        A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.



        A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.



        Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.



        However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          4














          4










          4







          $begingroup$

          A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.



          A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.



          Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.



          However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          A tailwheel aircraft is particularly susceptible to a dynamic instability during landing which causes the plane to violently spin around, point backwards, and skid off the runway. This is called a ground loop and is one of the leading causes of landing accidents in tailwheel aircraft. Avoiding ground loops requires good reflexes, good training, and lots of practice.



          A tricycle gear aircraft is immune to ground looping, making it easier to handle on the runway during landings.



          Because the tailwheel aircraft has no nose gear, it will weigh less and experience less drag during flight than the same airframe with a nose wheel, so it can fly a little faster and a little farther on the same fuel.



          However, the cost to insure the tailwheel aircraft against landing accidents is greater than the cost to insure the tricycle-gear plane, which wipes out any savings on fuel burn.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 15 hours ago









          niels nielsenniels nielsen

          3,5721 gold badge5 silver badges17 bronze badges




          3,5721 gold badge5 silver badges17 bronze badges
























              3














              $begingroup$

              Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.



              AOPA article on STOL contests






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor



              Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              $endgroup$



















                3














                $begingroup$

                Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.



                AOPA article on STOL contests






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor



                Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                $endgroup$

















                  3














                  3










                  3







                  $begingroup$

                  Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.



                  AOPA article on STOL contests






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  $endgroup$



                  Already some excellent answers here, but to add to Peter's response, in spite of the challenges, some folks prefer tail wheel planes because they are better for back country type flying - landing on unpaved surfaces, etc. If you take a look at any of the short take off and landing (STOL) contests around the country, you see almost exclusively tail wheel planes competing.



                  AOPA article on STOL contests







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor



                  Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 7 hours ago









                  DeannaDeanna

                  312 bronze badges




                  312 bronze badges




                  New contributor



                  Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  Deanna is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.

































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69704%2fwhat-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-tail-wheels-that-cause-modern-airpl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480