Good notation to require that z ≠ 0, -1, -2, -3, …What are some good examples for suggestive notation?Why does the logarithm require a special notation?Good example that enumerating notation of sets is not uniqueGood confusion-avoiding notation for iterated commutators?What is a good notation for an “even falling factorial”?“Good” notation for $hom$-functorsNotation question: Does $inf$ require a subscript?Is Modular Arithmetic Notation Good?
How does a simple logistic regression model achieve a 92% classification accuracy on MNIST?
Python web-scraper to download table of transistor counts from Wikipedia
Why is the UK still pressing on with Brexit?
Shouldn't countries like Russia and Canada support global warming?
What does the Free Recovery sign (UK) actually mean?
Does a feasible high thrust high specific impulse engine exist using current non space technology?
Is my sink P-trap too low?
How to give my students a straightedge instead of a ruler
Nurikabe minicubes: the Headache, the Panache, the Apache
Can Brexit be undone in an emergency?
How can I use expandafter the expand the definition of this control sequence?
Can an infinite series be thought of as adding up "infinitely many" terms?
Finding partition with maximum number of edges between sets
What was the ultimate objective of The Party in 1984?
Calculate the limit without l'Hopital rule
Answer Not A Fool, or Answer A Fool?
Planar regular languages
Make 2019 with single digits
Does a large scratch in an ND filter affect image quality?
Teleport everything in a large zone; or teleport all living things and make a lot of equipment disappear
Ethernet, Wifi and a little human psychology
Output a Super Mario Image
Why is belonging not transitive?
Why don't Wizards use wrist straps to protect against disarming charms?
Good notation to require that z ≠ 0, -1, -2, -3, …
What are some good examples for suggestive notation?Why does the logarithm require a special notation?Good example that enumerating notation of sets is not uniqueGood confusion-avoiding notation for iterated commutators?What is a good notation for an “even falling factorial”?“Good” notation for $hom$-functorsNotation question: Does $inf$ require a subscript?Is Modular Arithmetic Notation Good?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0$$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z $$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z le 0$$ Or even this? $$z notin mathbb Z le 0$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?
The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.
soft-question notation
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0$$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z $$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z le 0$$ Or even this? $$z notin mathbb Z le 0$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?
The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.
soft-question notation
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbbC$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0$$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z $$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z le 0$$ Or even this? $$z notin mathbb Z le 0$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?
The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.
soft-question notation
$endgroup$
An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0$$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z $$ Or is this better? $$z notin n in mathbb Z le 0$$ Or even this? $$z notin mathbb Z le 0$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?
The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.
soft-question notation
soft-question notation
edited 8 hours ago
thb
asked 8 hours ago
thbthb
2471 silver badge10 bronze badges
2471 silver badge10 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbbC$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbbC$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbbC$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbbC$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $zinmathbbC$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
beginalign*
zinmathbbCsetminus0,-1,-2,ldots
endalign*
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Personally, I would say $znotin mathbbZ^leq 0$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbbC$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."
Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbbN$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbbN$ to be the set of positive integers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3356638%2fgood-notation-to-require-that-z-%25e2%2589%25a0-0-1-2-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $zinmathbbC$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
beginalign*
zinmathbbCsetminus0,-1,-2,ldots
endalign*
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Since $zinmathbbC$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
beginalign*
zinmathbbCsetminus0,-1,-2,ldots
endalign*
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Since $zinmathbbC$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
beginalign*
zinmathbbCsetminus0,-1,-2,ldots
endalign*
$endgroup$
Since $zinmathbbC$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
beginalign*
zinmathbbCsetminus0,-1,-2,ldots
endalign*
answered 7 hours ago
Markus ScheuerMarkus Scheuer
68.5k4 gold badges65 silver badges164 bronze badges
68.5k4 gold badges65 silver badges164 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Personally, I would say $znotin mathbbZ^leq 0$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Personally, I would say $znotin mathbbZ^leq 0$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Personally, I would say $znotin mathbbZ^leq 0$.
$endgroup$
Personally, I would say $znotin mathbbZ^leq 0$.
answered 8 hours ago
LaarzLaarz
4212 silver badges11 bronze badges
4212 silver badges11 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin nin mathbbZmid nleq 0$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbbZ$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbbCsetminus mathbbZ^leq 0 = zinmathbbC$.
$endgroup$
– Laarz
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbbC$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."
Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbbN$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbbN$ to be the set of positive integers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbbC$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."
Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbbN$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbbN$ to be the set of positive integers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbbC$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."
Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbbN$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbbN$ to be the set of positive integers.
$endgroup$
I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbbC$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."
Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbbN$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbbN$ to be the set of positive integers.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Rylee LymanRylee Lyman
2,2443 silver badges20 bronze badges
2,2443 silver badges20 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have edited my question to clarify.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
+1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbbN$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3356638%2fgood-notation-to-require-that-z-%25e2%2589%25a0-0-1-2-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbbC$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago