How can I oppose my advisor granting gift authorship to a collaborator?Editor's mail with no reviewer's commentWhat to do after I was named as co-author on a paper, without my consent?If a student's work has been substantially (>80%) revised, is s/he still qualified as the first author?Decision letter: disagreed with few commentsCo-authorship for a revised but relatively new article?How to deal with an unreasonable reviewer asking to cite irrelevant articles?Withdraw manuscript from peer review after finding a major errorResolving a dispute for first authorship where the value and demarcations of individual contributions are hard to identifyQuestion on whether I have committed plagiarism (modifying paragraphs from an unpublished document sent as email attachment for PhD thesis)Authorship crisis

When making yogurt, why doesn't bad bacteria grow as well?

What happens if you just start drawing from the Deck of Many Things without declaring any number of cards?

What is the most likely cause of short, quick, and useless reviews?

Using font to highlight a god's speech in dialogue

What is a "fat pointer" in Rust?

Calculate Landau's function

Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .Net Core?

Why would a Intel 8080 chip be destroyed if +12 V is connected before -5 V?

Why didn't Thatcher give Hong Kong to Taiwan?

Playing boules... IN SPACE!

Meaning of "educating the ice"

Some questions about Lightning and Tor

FHE: What is the difference between multiplicative depth and multiplicative level?

Why do modes sound so different, although they are basically the same as a mode of another scale?

Divide Numbers by 0

How did Gollum know Sauron was gathering the Haradrim to make war?

Initializing a std::array with a constant value

Why is k-means used for non normally distributed data?

To which country did MiGs in Top Gun belong?

In Toy Story, are toys the only inanimate objects that become alive? And if so, why?

What is the definition of Product

When do we use "no women" instead of "no woman"?

Why don't they build airplanes from 3D printer plastic?

Updating multiple vector points at once with vertex editor in QGIS?



How can I oppose my advisor granting gift authorship to a collaborator?


Editor's mail with no reviewer's commentWhat to do after I was named as co-author on a paper, without my consent?If a student's work has been substantially (>80%) revised, is s/he still qualified as the first author?Decision letter: disagreed with few commentsCo-authorship for a revised but relatively new article?How to deal with an unreasonable reviewer asking to cite irrelevant articles?Withdraw manuscript from peer review after finding a major errorResolving a dispute for first authorship where the value and demarcations of individual contributions are hard to identifyQuestion on whether I have committed plagiarism (modifying paragraphs from an unpublished document sent as email attachment for PhD thesis)Authorship crisis






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















I am a master student. I have written an article. This was my first article. After I handed it over to my professor, it was highly commended. But after a while I realized that my professor had given my paper to a colleague for submision. This is a theft. How can I tell the journal that this article was written by me alone and that someone else's name, except me and my professor, should not be written as a autor? Can my reporting to the journal prevent this theft? Meanwhile, my article has been approved by the referees and has reached the revision stage.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    This is called "plagiarism", not theft, but you are correct that it is a big deal. I suggest you first make sure that this is what happened and it is not a misunderstanding (are you sure that the paper has been submitted?) before you escalate this.

    – Federico Poloni
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    You have done the work and are not a co-author? Why did your professor tell you that? Are you sure all ideas are yours and you were not already done by the others with you, as MSc student, just asked to verify them? I am not saying this is the case, but many people do not give MSc students original studies to work on. In which case it is (very) frustrating, but neither plagiarism nor "idea theft". Make sure you understand the whole picture before you undertake anything.

    – Captain Emacs
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Could you please clarify two things? 1) Are they publishing the paper with or without your name? 2) Did they submit the paper exactly as you wrote it, or did they make any changes or additions? If the paper needed some significant edits before publication (and it probably did), it would make sense to add the person doing them as a co-author (as long as your name is still on there as well).

    – Inquisitive Lurker
    10 hours ago







  • 3





    OK, then it's not plagiarism but "gift authorship", it seems. Still unethical, but a different matter.

    – Federico Poloni
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Another clarification, who is the 3rd author now? Did he advise you in some way? Do you use his work or something like that? Maybe the article will only be published as it is presented by an author at the conference. This is often the case. But the attendance is costly, so maybe the professor can only pay for his associates and therefore the other one has to be on there to present it. So that could be the reason. Without the 3rd name, there might be no article at all... But there is no theft.

    – Sango
    8 hours ago


















8















I am a master student. I have written an article. This was my first article. After I handed it over to my professor, it was highly commended. But after a while I realized that my professor had given my paper to a colleague for submision. This is a theft. How can I tell the journal that this article was written by me alone and that someone else's name, except me and my professor, should not be written as a autor? Can my reporting to the journal prevent this theft? Meanwhile, my article has been approved by the referees and has reached the revision stage.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    This is called "plagiarism", not theft, but you are correct that it is a big deal. I suggest you first make sure that this is what happened and it is not a misunderstanding (are you sure that the paper has been submitted?) before you escalate this.

    – Federico Poloni
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    You have done the work and are not a co-author? Why did your professor tell you that? Are you sure all ideas are yours and you were not already done by the others with you, as MSc student, just asked to verify them? I am not saying this is the case, but many people do not give MSc students original studies to work on. In which case it is (very) frustrating, but neither plagiarism nor "idea theft". Make sure you understand the whole picture before you undertake anything.

    – Captain Emacs
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Could you please clarify two things? 1) Are they publishing the paper with or without your name? 2) Did they submit the paper exactly as you wrote it, or did they make any changes or additions? If the paper needed some significant edits before publication (and it probably did), it would make sense to add the person doing them as a co-author (as long as your name is still on there as well).

    – Inquisitive Lurker
    10 hours ago







  • 3





    OK, then it's not plagiarism but "gift authorship", it seems. Still unethical, but a different matter.

    – Federico Poloni
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Another clarification, who is the 3rd author now? Did he advise you in some way? Do you use his work or something like that? Maybe the article will only be published as it is presented by an author at the conference. This is often the case. But the attendance is costly, so maybe the professor can only pay for his associates and therefore the other one has to be on there to present it. So that could be the reason. Without the 3rd name, there might be no article at all... But there is no theft.

    – Sango
    8 hours ago














8












8








8








I am a master student. I have written an article. This was my first article. After I handed it over to my professor, it was highly commended. But after a while I realized that my professor had given my paper to a colleague for submision. This is a theft. How can I tell the journal that this article was written by me alone and that someone else's name, except me and my professor, should not be written as a autor? Can my reporting to the journal prevent this theft? Meanwhile, my article has been approved by the referees and has reached the revision stage.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am a master student. I have written an article. This was my first article. After I handed it over to my professor, it was highly commended. But after a while I realized that my professor had given my paper to a colleague for submision. This is a theft. How can I tell the journal that this article was written by me alone and that someone else's name, except me and my professor, should not be written as a autor? Can my reporting to the journal prevent this theft? Meanwhile, my article has been approved by the referees and has reached the revision stage.







publications authorship plagiarism






share|improve this question









New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Wrzlprmft

37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges195 bronze badges




37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges195 bronze badges






New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 11 hours ago









RojaRoja

411 bronze badge




411 bronze badge




New contributor



Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Roja is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 6





    This is called "plagiarism", not theft, but you are correct that it is a big deal. I suggest you first make sure that this is what happened and it is not a misunderstanding (are you sure that the paper has been submitted?) before you escalate this.

    – Federico Poloni
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    You have done the work and are not a co-author? Why did your professor tell you that? Are you sure all ideas are yours and you were not already done by the others with you, as MSc student, just asked to verify them? I am not saying this is the case, but many people do not give MSc students original studies to work on. In which case it is (very) frustrating, but neither plagiarism nor "idea theft". Make sure you understand the whole picture before you undertake anything.

    – Captain Emacs
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Could you please clarify two things? 1) Are they publishing the paper with or without your name? 2) Did they submit the paper exactly as you wrote it, or did they make any changes or additions? If the paper needed some significant edits before publication (and it probably did), it would make sense to add the person doing them as a co-author (as long as your name is still on there as well).

    – Inquisitive Lurker
    10 hours ago







  • 3





    OK, then it's not plagiarism but "gift authorship", it seems. Still unethical, but a different matter.

    – Federico Poloni
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Another clarification, who is the 3rd author now? Did he advise you in some way? Do you use his work or something like that? Maybe the article will only be published as it is presented by an author at the conference. This is often the case. But the attendance is costly, so maybe the professor can only pay for his associates and therefore the other one has to be on there to present it. So that could be the reason. Without the 3rd name, there might be no article at all... But there is no theft.

    – Sango
    8 hours ago













  • 6





    This is called "plagiarism", not theft, but you are correct that it is a big deal. I suggest you first make sure that this is what happened and it is not a misunderstanding (are you sure that the paper has been submitted?) before you escalate this.

    – Federico Poloni
    11 hours ago






  • 2





    You have done the work and are not a co-author? Why did your professor tell you that? Are you sure all ideas are yours and you were not already done by the others with you, as MSc student, just asked to verify them? I am not saying this is the case, but many people do not give MSc students original studies to work on. In which case it is (very) frustrating, but neither plagiarism nor "idea theft". Make sure you understand the whole picture before you undertake anything.

    – Captain Emacs
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    Could you please clarify two things? 1) Are they publishing the paper with or without your name? 2) Did they submit the paper exactly as you wrote it, or did they make any changes or additions? If the paper needed some significant edits before publication (and it probably did), it would make sense to add the person doing them as a co-author (as long as your name is still on there as well).

    – Inquisitive Lurker
    10 hours ago







  • 3





    OK, then it's not plagiarism but "gift authorship", it seems. Still unethical, but a different matter.

    – Federico Poloni
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    Another clarification, who is the 3rd author now? Did he advise you in some way? Do you use his work or something like that? Maybe the article will only be published as it is presented by an author at the conference. This is often the case. But the attendance is costly, so maybe the professor can only pay for his associates and therefore the other one has to be on there to present it. So that could be the reason. Without the 3rd name, there might be no article at all... But there is no theft.

    – Sango
    8 hours ago








6




6





This is called "plagiarism", not theft, but you are correct that it is a big deal. I suggest you first make sure that this is what happened and it is not a misunderstanding (are you sure that the paper has been submitted?) before you escalate this.

– Federico Poloni
11 hours ago





This is called "plagiarism", not theft, but you are correct that it is a big deal. I suggest you first make sure that this is what happened and it is not a misunderstanding (are you sure that the paper has been submitted?) before you escalate this.

– Federico Poloni
11 hours ago




2




2





You have done the work and are not a co-author? Why did your professor tell you that? Are you sure all ideas are yours and you were not already done by the others with you, as MSc student, just asked to verify them? I am not saying this is the case, but many people do not give MSc students original studies to work on. In which case it is (very) frustrating, but neither plagiarism nor "idea theft". Make sure you understand the whole picture before you undertake anything.

– Captain Emacs
10 hours ago





You have done the work and are not a co-author? Why did your professor tell you that? Are you sure all ideas are yours and you were not already done by the others with you, as MSc student, just asked to verify them? I am not saying this is the case, but many people do not give MSc students original studies to work on. In which case it is (very) frustrating, but neither plagiarism nor "idea theft". Make sure you understand the whole picture before you undertake anything.

– Captain Emacs
10 hours ago




4




4





Could you please clarify two things? 1) Are they publishing the paper with or without your name? 2) Did they submit the paper exactly as you wrote it, or did they make any changes or additions? If the paper needed some significant edits before publication (and it probably did), it would make sense to add the person doing them as a co-author (as long as your name is still on there as well).

– Inquisitive Lurker
10 hours ago






Could you please clarify two things? 1) Are they publishing the paper with or without your name? 2) Did they submit the paper exactly as you wrote it, or did they make any changes or additions? If the paper needed some significant edits before publication (and it probably did), it would make sense to add the person doing them as a co-author (as long as your name is still on there as well).

– Inquisitive Lurker
10 hours ago





3




3





OK, then it's not plagiarism but "gift authorship", it seems. Still unethical, but a different matter.

– Federico Poloni
9 hours ago





OK, then it's not plagiarism but "gift authorship", it seems. Still unethical, but a different matter.

– Federico Poloni
9 hours ago




2




2





Another clarification, who is the 3rd author now? Did he advise you in some way? Do you use his work or something like that? Maybe the article will only be published as it is presented by an author at the conference. This is often the case. But the attendance is costly, so maybe the professor can only pay for his associates and therefore the other one has to be on there to present it. So that could be the reason. Without the 3rd name, there might be no article at all... But there is no theft.

– Sango
8 hours ago






Another clarification, who is the 3rd author now? Did he advise you in some way? Do you use his work or something like that? Maybe the article will only be published as it is presented by an author at the conference. This is often the case. But the attendance is costly, so maybe the professor can only pay for his associates and therefore the other one has to be on there to present it. So that could be the reason. Without the 3rd name, there might be no article at all... But there is no theft.

– Sango
8 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6















I would start by asking your professor, in a non-confrontational way, why he did this. Perhaps there is some reason that is not obvious to us. Maybe he felt that the paper had a better chance of being published if this third person was involved. (Not saying that he was right to do this, just that he may have had some reason.) You might say something like this:



"Professor X, as you know, I'm pretty new to academic publishing, and I'm trying to understand the process better. I was under the impression that only people who contributed to the research should be listed as authors. I'm curious why Joe Smith was added as an author. Did he make a contribution I don't know about?"



If you think you may publish more papers with this professor, discuss your expectations about authorship with him and come to an agreement.






share|improve this answer
































    0















    Sadly, I'm going to give you advice that you will find unsatisfying as would many others. It can be dangerous to your future career to push too hard against an advisor who is behaving badly but has power over you and your future.



    No matter what you do, you aren't going to change "the system." You might be able to force an editor to correct authorship to your liking, but it could be at the cost of poor, even negative, recommendations from the advisor and others in his sphere.



    Make it your goal to graduate successfully and move on to another position in which you have some control over your future. This is what you lack at the moment, so I advise not making it worse. Don't think of this one paper as the only one you will ever write or that your whole future depends on it. Especially don't think that your whole future depends on getting sole authorship for this paper. You could win that battle and lose the war.



    As we see in other questions here, students get stuck in such situations all too often. But the system doesn't change when it is dysfunctional and has a lot of momentum. Find a way to look to the long term and not the short. In particular, that means getting a good letter of recommendation, even if you have to bite your tongue.



    Sorry that this feels wrong. But you have little power and no authority to change it.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

      – mhwombat
      2 hours ago











    • I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

      – Roja
      1 hour ago











    • @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

      – Bryan Krause
      52 mins ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Roja is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135565%2fhow-can-i-oppose-my-advisor-granting-gift-authorship-to-a-collaborator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6















    I would start by asking your professor, in a non-confrontational way, why he did this. Perhaps there is some reason that is not obvious to us. Maybe he felt that the paper had a better chance of being published if this third person was involved. (Not saying that he was right to do this, just that he may have had some reason.) You might say something like this:



    "Professor X, as you know, I'm pretty new to academic publishing, and I'm trying to understand the process better. I was under the impression that only people who contributed to the research should be listed as authors. I'm curious why Joe Smith was added as an author. Did he make a contribution I don't know about?"



    If you think you may publish more papers with this professor, discuss your expectations about authorship with him and come to an agreement.






    share|improve this answer





























      6















      I would start by asking your professor, in a non-confrontational way, why he did this. Perhaps there is some reason that is not obvious to us. Maybe he felt that the paper had a better chance of being published if this third person was involved. (Not saying that he was right to do this, just that he may have had some reason.) You might say something like this:



      "Professor X, as you know, I'm pretty new to academic publishing, and I'm trying to understand the process better. I was under the impression that only people who contributed to the research should be listed as authors. I'm curious why Joe Smith was added as an author. Did he make a contribution I don't know about?"



      If you think you may publish more papers with this professor, discuss your expectations about authorship with him and come to an agreement.






      share|improve this answer



























        6














        6










        6









        I would start by asking your professor, in a non-confrontational way, why he did this. Perhaps there is some reason that is not obvious to us. Maybe he felt that the paper had a better chance of being published if this third person was involved. (Not saying that he was right to do this, just that he may have had some reason.) You might say something like this:



        "Professor X, as you know, I'm pretty new to academic publishing, and I'm trying to understand the process better. I was under the impression that only people who contributed to the research should be listed as authors. I'm curious why Joe Smith was added as an author. Did he make a contribution I don't know about?"



        If you think you may publish more papers with this professor, discuss your expectations about authorship with him and come to an agreement.






        share|improve this answer













        I would start by asking your professor, in a non-confrontational way, why he did this. Perhaps there is some reason that is not obvious to us. Maybe he felt that the paper had a better chance of being published if this third person was involved. (Not saying that he was right to do this, just that he may have had some reason.) You might say something like this:



        "Professor X, as you know, I'm pretty new to academic publishing, and I'm trying to understand the process better. I was under the impression that only people who contributed to the research should be listed as authors. I'm curious why Joe Smith was added as an author. Did he make a contribution I don't know about?"



        If you think you may publish more papers with this professor, discuss your expectations about authorship with him and come to an agreement.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        mhwombatmhwombat

        10.1k2 gold badges36 silver badges54 bronze badges




        10.1k2 gold badges36 silver badges54 bronze badges


























            0















            Sadly, I'm going to give you advice that you will find unsatisfying as would many others. It can be dangerous to your future career to push too hard against an advisor who is behaving badly but has power over you and your future.



            No matter what you do, you aren't going to change "the system." You might be able to force an editor to correct authorship to your liking, but it could be at the cost of poor, even negative, recommendations from the advisor and others in his sphere.



            Make it your goal to graduate successfully and move on to another position in which you have some control over your future. This is what you lack at the moment, so I advise not making it worse. Don't think of this one paper as the only one you will ever write or that your whole future depends on it. Especially don't think that your whole future depends on getting sole authorship for this paper. You could win that battle and lose the war.



            As we see in other questions here, students get stuck in such situations all too often. But the system doesn't change when it is dysfunctional and has a lot of momentum. Find a way to look to the long term and not the short. In particular, that means getting a good letter of recommendation, even if you have to bite your tongue.



            Sorry that this feels wrong. But you have little power and no authority to change it.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

              – mhwombat
              2 hours ago











            • I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

              – Roja
              1 hour ago











            • @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

              – Bryan Krause
              52 mins ago















            0















            Sadly, I'm going to give you advice that you will find unsatisfying as would many others. It can be dangerous to your future career to push too hard against an advisor who is behaving badly but has power over you and your future.



            No matter what you do, you aren't going to change "the system." You might be able to force an editor to correct authorship to your liking, but it could be at the cost of poor, even negative, recommendations from the advisor and others in his sphere.



            Make it your goal to graduate successfully and move on to another position in which you have some control over your future. This is what you lack at the moment, so I advise not making it worse. Don't think of this one paper as the only one you will ever write or that your whole future depends on it. Especially don't think that your whole future depends on getting sole authorship for this paper. You could win that battle and lose the war.



            As we see in other questions here, students get stuck in such situations all too often. But the system doesn't change when it is dysfunctional and has a lot of momentum. Find a way to look to the long term and not the short. In particular, that means getting a good letter of recommendation, even if you have to bite your tongue.



            Sorry that this feels wrong. But you have little power and no authority to change it.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

              – mhwombat
              2 hours ago











            • I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

              – Roja
              1 hour ago











            • @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

              – Bryan Krause
              52 mins ago













            0














            0










            0









            Sadly, I'm going to give you advice that you will find unsatisfying as would many others. It can be dangerous to your future career to push too hard against an advisor who is behaving badly but has power over you and your future.



            No matter what you do, you aren't going to change "the system." You might be able to force an editor to correct authorship to your liking, but it could be at the cost of poor, even negative, recommendations from the advisor and others in his sphere.



            Make it your goal to graduate successfully and move on to another position in which you have some control over your future. This is what you lack at the moment, so I advise not making it worse. Don't think of this one paper as the only one you will ever write or that your whole future depends on it. Especially don't think that your whole future depends on getting sole authorship for this paper. You could win that battle and lose the war.



            As we see in other questions here, students get stuck in such situations all too often. But the system doesn't change when it is dysfunctional and has a lot of momentum. Find a way to look to the long term and not the short. In particular, that means getting a good letter of recommendation, even if you have to bite your tongue.



            Sorry that this feels wrong. But you have little power and no authority to change it.






            share|improve this answer













            Sadly, I'm going to give you advice that you will find unsatisfying as would many others. It can be dangerous to your future career to push too hard against an advisor who is behaving badly but has power over you and your future.



            No matter what you do, you aren't going to change "the system." You might be able to force an editor to correct authorship to your liking, but it could be at the cost of poor, even negative, recommendations from the advisor and others in his sphere.



            Make it your goal to graduate successfully and move on to another position in which you have some control over your future. This is what you lack at the moment, so I advise not making it worse. Don't think of this one paper as the only one you will ever write or that your whole future depends on it. Especially don't think that your whole future depends on getting sole authorship for this paper. You could win that battle and lose the war.



            As we see in other questions here, students get stuck in such situations all too often. But the system doesn't change when it is dysfunctional and has a lot of momentum. Find a way to look to the long term and not the short. In particular, that means getting a good letter of recommendation, even if you have to bite your tongue.



            Sorry that this feels wrong. But you have little power and no authority to change it.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            BuffyBuffy

            80.5k21 gold badges246 silver badges354 bronze badges




            80.5k21 gold badges246 silver badges354 bronze badges










            • 1





              +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

              – mhwombat
              2 hours ago











            • I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

              – Roja
              1 hour ago











            • @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

              – Bryan Krause
              52 mins ago












            • 1





              +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

              – mhwombat
              2 hours ago











            • I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

              – Roja
              1 hour ago











            • @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

              – Bryan Krause
              52 mins ago







            1




            1





            +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

            – mhwombat
            2 hours ago





            +1 Also, the "corresponding author" is just the person who handles the communication with the editor. There's no status involved in being, or not being, the corresponding author.

            – mhwombat
            2 hours ago













            I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

            – Roja
            1 hour ago





            I sincerely appreciate your advice. Yes you are right. I use them.

            – Roja
            1 hour ago













            @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

            – Bryan Krause
            52 mins ago





            @mhwombat Agreed about corresponding authors... importantly a masters student would rarely be a corresponding author in my field because they likely wouldn't even be at the same institution by the time a manuscript is published... Though order might matter, depending on field.

            – Bryan Krause
            52 mins ago










            Roja is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Roja is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Roja is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Roja is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135565%2fhow-can-i-oppose-my-advisor-granting-gift-authorship-to-a-collaborator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480