Can a Beholder face its Antimagic Cone behind itself?What furniture does a beholder have in its personal quarters?Can an animated cannon fire itself?Effects of Haste on a BeholderCan an intelligent clockwork creature wind itself?How often can an Imp Familiar cast Invisibility on itself?Does Fog Cloud render a Beholder's eyestalks ineffective?Can a Beholder use rays in melee range?Can a non-magical “Detect Magic”-type trait sense magic when used within an Antimagic Field?What happens if a Beholder places its Antimagic Cone on a target that has been affected by its eye rays?Does Antimagic Field suppress or prevent petrification from a creature ability?

co-son-in-law or co-brother

How to run a command 1 out of N times in Bash

What exactly is a softlock?

Why don't they build airplanes from 3D printer plastic?

Solve this icositetragram

Remove ads in Viber for PC

How do I stop making people jump at home and at work?

Tiny image scraper for xkcd.com

How is total raw calculated for Science Pack 2?

Why do we need explainable AI?

properties that real numbers hold but complex numbers does not

Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?

In mathematics is there a substitution that is "different" from Vieta's substitution to solve the cubic equation?

How to use multiple criteria for -find

Can an intercepting fighter jet force a small propeller aircraft down without completely destroying it?

Are there any writings by blinded and/or exiled Byzantine emperors?

What is this red bug infesting some trees in southern Germany?

What is the significance of 104%?

How does Harry wear the invisibility cloak?

Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware

Would there be balance issues if I allowed opportunity attacks against any creature, not just hostile ones?

Can a Beholder face its Antimagic Cone behind itself?

Why are Latin and Sanskrit called dead languages?

Using font to highlight a god's speech in dialogue



Can a Beholder face its Antimagic Cone behind itself?


What furniture does a beholder have in its personal quarters?Can an animated cannon fire itself?Effects of Haste on a BeholderCan an intelligent clockwork creature wind itself?How often can an Imp Familiar cast Invisibility on itself?Does Fog Cloud render a Beholder's eyestalks ineffective?Can a Beholder use rays in melee range?Can a non-magical “Detect Magic”-type trait sense magic when used within an Antimagic Field?What happens if a Beholder places its Antimagic Cone on a target that has been affected by its eye rays?Does Antimagic Field suppress or prevent petrification from a creature ability?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):




The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.




The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?










share|improve this question









New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    20 hours ago

















1












$begingroup$


The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):




The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.




The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?










share|improve this question









New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    20 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):




The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.




The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?










share|improve this question









New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):




The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.




The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?







dnd-5e monsters facing






share|improve this question









New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 20 hours ago









V2Blast

34.2k5 gold badges123 silver badges213 bronze badges




34.2k5 gold badges123 silver badges213 bronze badges






New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 20 hours ago









KaielOfThothKaielOfThoth

987 bronze badges




987 bronze badges




New contributor



KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




KaielOfThoth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • $begingroup$
    Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    20 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    20 hours ago















$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
20 hours ago




$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
20 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8













$begingroup$

A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.



The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.



But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.



A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.



In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.



It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    5













    $begingroup$

    It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."



    From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).



    The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.



    It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154589%2fcan-a-beholder-face-its-antimagic-cone-behind-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8













      $begingroup$

      A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.



      The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.



      But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.



      A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.



      In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.



      It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        8













        $begingroup$

        A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.



        The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.



        But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.



        A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.



        In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.



        It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          8














          8










          8







          $begingroup$

          A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.



          The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.



          But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.



          A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.



          In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.



          It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.



          The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.



          But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.



          A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.



          In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.



          It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 20 hours ago









          TheikTheik

          19.9k82 silver badges106 bronze badges




          19.9k82 silver badges106 bronze badges


























              5













              $begingroup$

              It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."



              From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).



              The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.



              It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



















                5













                $begingroup$

                It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."



                From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).



                The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.



                It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  5














                  5










                  5







                  $begingroup$

                  It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."



                  From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).



                  The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.



                  It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."



                  From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).



                  The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.



                  It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 20 hours ago









                  AceCalhoonAceCalhoon

                  39.2k10 gold badges129 silver badges190 bronze badges




                  39.2k10 gold badges129 silver badges190 bronze badges























                      KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154589%2fcan-a-beholder-face-its-antimagic-cone-behind-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單