Can a Beholder face its Antimagic Cone behind itself?What furniture does a beholder have in its personal quarters?Can an animated cannon fire itself?Effects of Haste on a BeholderCan an intelligent clockwork creature wind itself?How often can an Imp Familiar cast Invisibility on itself?Does Fog Cloud render a Beholder's eyestalks ineffective?Can a Beholder use rays in melee range?Can a non-magical “Detect Magic”-type trait sense magic when used within an Antimagic Field?What happens if a Beholder places its Antimagic Cone on a target that has been affected by its eye rays?Does Antimagic Field suppress or prevent petrification from a creature ability?
co-son-in-law or co-brother
How to run a command 1 out of N times in Bash
What exactly is a softlock?
Why don't they build airplanes from 3D printer plastic?
Solve this icositetragram
Remove ads in Viber for PC
How do I stop making people jump at home and at work?
Tiny image scraper for xkcd.com
How is total raw calculated for Science Pack 2?
Why do we need explainable AI?
properties that real numbers hold but complex numbers does not
Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?
In mathematics is there a substitution that is "different" from Vieta's substitution to solve the cubic equation?
How to use multiple criteria for -find
Can an intercepting fighter jet force a small propeller aircraft down without completely destroying it?
Are there any writings by blinded and/or exiled Byzantine emperors?
What is this red bug infesting some trees in southern Germany?
What is the significance of 104%?
How does Harry wear the invisibility cloak?
Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware
Would there be balance issues if I allowed opportunity attacks against any creature, not just hostile ones?
Can a Beholder face its Antimagic Cone behind itself?
Why are Latin and Sanskrit called dead languages?
Using font to highlight a god's speech in dialogue
Can a Beholder face its Antimagic Cone behind itself?
What furniture does a beholder have in its personal quarters?Can an animated cannon fire itself?Effects of Haste on a BeholderCan an intelligent clockwork creature wind itself?How often can an Imp Familiar cast Invisibility on itself?Does Fog Cloud render a Beholder's eyestalks ineffective?Can a Beholder use rays in melee range?Can a non-magical “Detect Magic”-type trait sense magic when used within an Antimagic Field?What happens if a Beholder places its Antimagic Cone on a target that has been affected by its eye rays?Does Antimagic Field suppress or prevent petrification from a creature ability?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):
The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.
The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?
dnd-5e monsters facing
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):
The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.
The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?
dnd-5e monsters facing
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
20 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):
The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.
The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?
dnd-5e monsters facing
New contributor
$endgroup$
The text for a Beholder's Antimagic Cone ability reads as follows (MM, pg. 28):
The beholder's central eye creates an area of antimagic, as in the antimagic field spell, in a 150-foot cone. At the start of each of its turns, the beholder decides which way the cone faces and whether the cone is active. The area works against the beholder's own eye rays.
The ability states the beholder decides which way the cone faces, and provides no limitations, so would the Beholder be able to face the cone directly behind itself?
dnd-5e monsters facing
dnd-5e monsters facing
New contributor
New contributor
edited 20 hours ago
V2Blast♦
34.2k5 gold badges123 silver badges213 bronze badges
34.2k5 gold badges123 silver badges213 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 20 hours ago
KaielOfThothKaielOfThoth
987 bronze badges
987 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
20 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
20 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.
The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.
But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.
A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.
In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.
It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."
From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).
The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.
It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154589%2fcan-a-beholder-face-its-antimagic-cone-behind-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.
The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.
But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.
A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.
In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.
It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.
The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.
But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.
A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.
In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.
It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.
The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.
But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.
A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.
In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.
It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.
$endgroup$
A Beholder has no 'behind itself'.
The Beholder creates the anti-magic field with its central eye, so if you consider the location of the central eye 'front' and the other side 'back', then no, it can only ever project its anti-magic field to its front side.
But for all purposes, a Beholder doesn't really have a front or a back, because it's not limited to only being able to see in one direction. You and I have (presumably) two eyes, set in the front of our head, which creates a vulnerable back side, which is where our conception of a 'infront' and 'behind' comes from.
A Beholder on the other hand has lots of eyes that can all move independently of one-another. It has 360 vision and is not limited to a front or a back, it can see and disintegrate you even if you're below, above or 'behind' him.
In fact, this has to be how Beholders operate, because its own anti-magic cone will also cancel its own eyerays, so a Beholder can't even keep its intended ray-targets in its 'front'.
It has a side where food goes in and a lot of sides where deadly rays come out.
answered 20 hours ago
TheikTheik
19.9k82 silver badges106 bronze badges
19.9k82 silver badges106 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."
From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).
The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.
It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."
From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).
The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.
It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."
From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).
The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.
It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.
$endgroup$
It depends on what you mean by "behind itself."
From a narrative standpoint, the cone is emitted from the Beholder's central eye. So it extends forwards from the front of the creature. If the DM has described that the Beholder is facing north, and you are to the south of it, you should be out of the cone (unless the Beholder physically turns around).
The text comes from a tactical standpoint. If the Beholder has previously had the cone facing north, they can redirect it to the south ("behind them") at the start of their turn. They aren't restricted or bound by their previous facing.
It's basically just a cheap way of dealing with a creature whose facing is very important in a game that otherwise ignores facing in combat.
answered 20 hours ago
AceCalhoonAceCalhoon
39.2k10 gold badges129 silver badges190 bronze badges
39.2k10 gold badges129 silver badges190 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
KaielOfThoth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154589%2fcan-a-beholder-face-its-antimagic-cone-behind-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Could you clarify the reason why you're asking? Are you trying to anticipate whether a certain exploit is possible? If you ask about the underlying problem directly, answers are more likely to be able to help you.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast♦
20 hours ago