Plotting level sets of the form f(x,y,c)==0ContourPlot is slow and unwieldy and generates a large-data graphicInteractive level sets of polynomialsHow to ListContourPlot a functional eigenvalue spectrum?REAL Roots of a 2 variable PolynomialPlotting level curves in 3D ParametricPlotsPlotting the expression in 2D formLevel sets of a parametric plot (3D)Plotting three sets of points

Design of 50 ohms RF trace for 2.4GHz...Double layer FR-4 PCB

Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware

Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?

Map a function that takes arguments in different levels of a list

Heuristic argument for the Riemann Hypothesis

How can I design a magically-induced coma?

What is the significance of 104%?

Why are Latin and Sanskrit called dead languages?

How does Harry wear the invisibility cloak?

Can there be plants on the dark side of a tidally locked world?

Why do we need explainable AI?

Why do old games use flashing as means of showing damage?

Are manifolds admitting a circle foliation covered by manifolds with a (non-trivial) circle action?

Can a country avoid prosecution for crimes against humanity by denying it happened?

co-son-in-law or co-brother

Why does this syntax outputs an error under METAFUN/METAPOST?

Why is k-means used for non normally distributed data?

properties that real numbers hold but complex numbers does not

Do we know the problems the University of Manchester's Transistor Computer was intended to solve?

Is there anything in the universe that cannot be compressed?

How to find better food in airports

Advisor suggesting a change in the PhD research direction resulting in less theoretically intensive thesis. I am worrying about the implications

How Total raw is calculated for Science pack 2?

Strange LockTime values in Electrum transactions?



Plotting level sets of the form f(x,y,c)==0


ContourPlot is slow and unwieldy and generates a large-data graphicInteractive level sets of polynomialsHow to ListContourPlot a functional eigenvalue spectrum?REAL Roots of a 2 variable PolynomialPlotting level curves in 3D ParametricPlotsPlotting the expression in 2D formLevel sets of a parametric plot (3D)Plotting three sets of points






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves



ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:



ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


The best I could do is the following:



lemniscates = 
Table[
RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
BoundaryStyle -> None,
PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
5]
Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]


but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot of the circles example?



Thank you!



EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:



ContourPlot[
Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$


    I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves



    ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
    x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


    this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:



    ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


    The best I could do is the following:



    lemniscates = 
    Table[
    RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
    2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
    BoundaryStyle -> None,
    PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
    5]
    Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
    Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
    Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]


    but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot of the circles example?



    Thank you!



    EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:



    ContourPlot[
    Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
    4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


    But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves



      ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
      x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


      this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:



      ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


      The best I could do is the following:



      lemniscates = 
      Table[
      RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
      2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
      BoundaryStyle -> None,
      PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
      5]
      Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
      Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
      Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]


      but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot of the circles example?



      Thank you!



      EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:



      ContourPlot[
      Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
      4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


      But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves



      ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
      x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


      this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:



      ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


      The best I could do is the following:



      lemniscates = 
      Table[
      RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
      2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
      BoundaryStyle -> None,
      PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
      5]
      Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
      Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
      Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]


      but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot of the circles example?



      Thank you!



      EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:



      ContourPlot[
      Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
      4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]


      But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?







      plotting






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 9 hours ago







      Takoda

















      asked 10 hours ago









      TakodaTakoda

      3268 bronze badges




      3268 bronze badges























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5













          $begingroup$

          Generate separate ContourPlot for each m with contour 0 and change the tooltip label to m and combine all with Show:



          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, 
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]


          enter image description here



          Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:



          colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
          m, 4, 0, -1]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago


















          3













          $begingroup$

          If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:



          ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
          ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]


          Contours



          Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:



          ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4, 
          PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]


          ContourPlot3D example






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
            $endgroup$
            – JimB
            8 hours ago


















          2













          $begingroup$

          To get ContourPlot to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:



          ContourPlot[
          (x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
          x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
          RegionFunction ->
          Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
          MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "387"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204685%2fplotting-level-sets-of-the-form-fx-y-c-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5













          $begingroup$

          Generate separate ContourPlot for each m with contour 0 and change the tooltip label to m and combine all with Show:



          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, 
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]


          enter image description here



          Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:



          colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
          m, 4, 0, -1]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago















          5













          $begingroup$

          Generate separate ContourPlot for each m with contour 0 and change the tooltip label to m and combine all with Show:



          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, 
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]


          enter image description here



          Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:



          colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
          m, 4, 0, -1]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago













          5














          5










          5







          $begingroup$

          Generate separate ContourPlot for each m with contour 0 and change the tooltip label to m and combine all with Show:



          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, 
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]


          enter image description here



          Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:



          colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
          m, 4, 0, -1]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Generate separate ContourPlot for each m with contour 0 and change the tooltip label to m and combine all with Show:



          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, 
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]


          enter image description here



          Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:



          colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
          Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
          ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
          Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
          m, 4, 0, -1]


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 9 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          kglrkglr

          215k10 gold badges245 silver badges490 bronze badges




          215k10 gold badges245 silver badges490 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
            $endgroup$
            – kglr
            9 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
          $endgroup$
          – kglr
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
          $endgroup$
          – kglr
          9 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
          $endgroup$
          – kglr
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
          $endgroup$
          – kglr
          9 hours ago













          3













          $begingroup$

          If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:



          ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
          ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]


          Contours



          Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:



          ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4, 
          PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]


          ContourPlot3D example






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
            $endgroup$
            – JimB
            8 hours ago















          3













          $begingroup$

          If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:



          ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
          ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]


          Contours



          Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:



          ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4, 
          PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]


          ContourPlot3D example






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
            $endgroup$
            – JimB
            8 hours ago













          3














          3










          3







          $begingroup$

          If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:



          ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
          ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]


          Contours



          Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:



          ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4, 
          PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]


          ContourPlot3D example






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:



          ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
          ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]


          Contours



          Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:



          ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4, 
          PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]


          ContourPlot3D example







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          JimBJimB

          20.6k1 gold badge29 silver badges70 bronze badges




          20.6k1 gold badge29 silver badges70 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
            $endgroup$
            – JimB
            8 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
            $endgroup$
            – JimB
            8 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
          $endgroup$
          – JimB
          8 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
          $endgroup$
          – JimB
          8 hours ago











          2













          $begingroup$

          To get ContourPlot to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:



          ContourPlot[
          (x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
          x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
          RegionFunction ->
          Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
          MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago















          2













          $begingroup$

          To get ContourPlot to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:



          ContourPlot[
          (x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
          x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
          RegionFunction ->
          Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
          MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago













          2














          2










          2







          $begingroup$

          To get ContourPlot to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:



          ContourPlot[
          (x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
          x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
          RegionFunction ->
          Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
          MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          To get ContourPlot to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:



          ContourPlot[
          (x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
          x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
          Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
          RegionFunction ->
          Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
          MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 9 hours ago









          Michael E2Michael E2

          159k13 gold badges216 silver badges516 bronze badges




          159k13 gold badges216 silver badges516 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
            $endgroup$
            – Takoda
            9 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
          $endgroup$
          – Takoda
          9 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204685%2fplotting-level-sets-of-the-form-fx-y-c-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її