Plotting level sets of the form f(x,y,c)==0ContourPlot is slow and unwieldy and generates a large-data graphicInteractive level sets of polynomialsHow to ListContourPlot a functional eigenvalue spectrum?REAL Roots of a 2 variable PolynomialPlotting level curves in 3D ParametricPlotsPlotting the expression in 2D formLevel sets of a parametric plot (3D)Plotting three sets of points
Design of 50 ohms RF trace for 2.4GHz...Double layer FR-4 PCB
Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware
Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?
Map a function that takes arguments in different levels of a list
Heuristic argument for the Riemann Hypothesis
How can I design a magically-induced coma?
What is the significance of 104%?
Why are Latin and Sanskrit called dead languages?
How does Harry wear the invisibility cloak?
Can there be plants on the dark side of a tidally locked world?
Why do we need explainable AI?
Why do old games use flashing as means of showing damage?
Are manifolds admitting a circle foliation covered by manifolds with a (non-trivial) circle action?
Can a country avoid prosecution for crimes against humanity by denying it happened?
co-son-in-law or co-brother
Why does this syntax outputs an error under METAFUN/METAPOST?
Why is k-means used for non normally distributed data?
properties that real numbers hold but complex numbers does not
Do we know the problems the University of Manchester's Transistor Computer was intended to solve?
Is there anything in the universe that cannot be compressed?
How to find better food in airports
Advisor suggesting a change in the PhD research direction resulting in less theoretically intensive thesis. I am worrying about the implications
How Total raw is calculated for Science pack 2?
Strange LockTime values in Electrum transactions?
Plotting level sets of the form f(x,y,c)==0
ContourPlot is slow and unwieldy and generates a large-data graphicInteractive level sets of polynomialsHow to ListContourPlot a functional eigenvalue spectrum?REAL Roots of a 2 variable PolynomialPlotting level curves in 3D ParametricPlotsPlotting the expression in 2D formLevel sets of a parametric plot (3D)Plotting three sets of points
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves
ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:
ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
The best I could do is the following:
lemniscates =
Table[
RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
BoundaryStyle -> None,
PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
5]
Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]
but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot
of the circles example?
Thank you!
EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:
ContourPlot[
Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?
plotting
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves
ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:
ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
The best I could do is the following:
lemniscates =
Table[
RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
BoundaryStyle -> None,
PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
5]
Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]
but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot
of the circles example?
Thank you!
EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:
ContourPlot[
Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?
plotting
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves
ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:
ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
The best I could do is the following:
lemniscates =
Table[
RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
BoundaryStyle -> None,
PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
5]
Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]
but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot
of the circles example?
Thank you!
EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:
ContourPlot[
Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?
plotting
$endgroup$
I have a problem with making contour plots of the form $f(x,y,c)=0$ work well with Mathematica, where c defines the levelset. For example the lemniscate $(x^2 + y^2)^2 - c (x^2 - y^2) =0$. Obviously rewriting this as $frac(x^2 + y^2)^2(x^2 - y^2) =c$ is going to cause some problems for anywhere $x^2=y^2$. If I try to plot multiple curves
ContourPlot[Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,4],
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
this works but I lose the nice shading in between curves and hover over information about the level sets as seen in this example:
ContourPlot[x^2 + y^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
The best I could do is the following:
lemniscates =
Table[
RegionPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) < 0, x, -2,
2, y, -2, 2, PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
BoundaryStyle -> None,
PlotStyle -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][m]], m, 0,
5]
Show[Reverse@lemniscates,
Prolog -> ColorData["RedBlueTones", 0, 7][7],
Rectangle[Scaled[0, 0], Scaled[1, 1]]]
but this looks awful compared to the default contour plotting and I still lose the level set information. How do I get my lemniscate plots to look like the ContourPlot
of the circles example?
Thank you!
EDIT: It seems I used a bit too simple an example with the lemniscates to illustrate my problem. Here is another similar function:
ContourPlot[
Evaluate@Table[(x^2 + m y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, m, 0,
4], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2]
But now solving for m gives you two roots so this will not be easy to put in the required form. What can be done?
plotting
plotting
edited 9 hours ago
Takoda
asked 10 hours ago
TakodaTakoda
3268 bronze badges
3268 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Generate separate ContourPlot
for each m
with contour 0
and change the tooltip label to m
and combine all with Show
:
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]
Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:
colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
m, 4, 0, -1]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:
ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]
Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D
which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:
ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4,
PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To get ContourPlot
to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:
ContourPlot[
(x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
RegionFunction ->
Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204685%2fplotting-level-sets-of-the-form-fx-y-c-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Generate separate ContourPlot
for each m
with contour 0
and change the tooltip label to m
and combine all with Show
:
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]
Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:
colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
m, 4, 0, -1]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generate separate ContourPlot
for each m
with contour 0
and change the tooltip label to m
and combine all with Show
:
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]
Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:
colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
m, 4, 0, -1]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generate separate ContourPlot
for each m
with contour 0
and change the tooltip label to m
and combine all with Show
:
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]
Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:
colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
m, 4, 0, -1]
$endgroup$
Generate separate ContourPlot
for each m
with contour 0
and change the tooltip label to m
and combine all with Show
:
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[Evaluate[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2)], x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, ColorData[63][m]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[.2, ColorData[63][m]], White,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m], m, 0, 4]
Generate the plots in the opposite order to get opaque colors without blending:
colors = Cyan, Red, Blue, Orange, Green;
Show @ Table[ContourPlot[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) , x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
ContourStyle -> Directive[Thick, Darker@Darker@colors[[m + 1]]],
ContourShading -> Opacity[1, colors[[m + 1]]], None,
Contours -> 0] /. Tooltip[a_, _] :> Tooltip[a, m],
m, 4, 0, -1]
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
kglrkglr
215k10 gold badges245 silver badges490 bronze badges
215k10 gold badges245 silver badges490 bronze badges
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
This looks the most promising! I did not know about Tooltips. It even works with the update to my question! The only problem is the hover over only works for the contour m=4 on my Mathematica. Do you know whats the matter?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, I see all 4 tooltips when I hover over the contour lines both in v9 (windows10) and v12 (wolfram cloud).
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok its probably just a problem on my system. Thanks for the excellent answer!
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Takoda, my pleasure. Thank you for the accept.
$endgroup$
– kglr
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:
ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]
Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D
which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:
ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4,
PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:
ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]
Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D
which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:
ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4,
PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:
ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]
Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D
which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:
ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4,
PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]
$endgroup$
If you can tolerate solving for $1/m$ rather than $m$ (as $m=0$ doesn't given you real numbers), you could use the following:
ContourPlot[(x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^2, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, PlotRange -> All,
ContourShading -> White, Red, Blue, Green, Cyan]
Maybe a more interesting display might be with ContourPlot3D
which also allows your actual form of $f(x,y,c)=0$:
ContourPlot3D[(x^2 + y^2)^2 - m (x^2 - y^2) == 0, x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2, m, 0, 4,
PlotRange -> All, PlotPoints -> 100]
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
JimBJimB
20.6k1 gold badge29 silver badges70 bronze badges
20.6k1 gold badge29 silver badges70 bronze badges
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is again a very smart answer and I like it, except that the problem I'm really interested in has a very complicated $f(x,y,c)=0$ that cannot be put in the form $g(x,y)=c$. I used the lemniscates as a minimum non-working example but obviously it was a bit too minimum non-working.
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Even for your "a bit too minimal" example, wouldn't `ContourPlot3D be more interesting?
$endgroup$
– JimB
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To get ContourPlot
to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:
ContourPlot[
(x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
RegionFunction ->
Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To get ContourPlot
to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:
ContourPlot[
(x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
RegionFunction ->
Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To get ContourPlot
to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:
ContourPlot[
(x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
RegionFunction ->
Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]
$endgroup$
To get ContourPlot
to do what you seek you need to solve for the parameter in the form $m = F(x,y)$; then plot $F(x,y)$ with the desired contours $m$. However, in this OP's case, this causes some numerical problems, which can be alleviated with the following dodge:
ContourPlot[
(x^2 + y^2)^2/($MachineEpsilon + Abs[x^2 - y^2]),
x, -2, 2, y, -2, 2,
Contours -> Table[m, m, 0, 4],
RegionFunction ->
Function[x, y, z, x^2 != y^2 && 0 <= (x^2 + y^2)^2/(x^2 - y^2) < 5],
MaxRecursion -> 3, PlotPoints -> 25]
answered 9 hours ago
Michael E2Michael E2
159k13 gold badges216 silver badges516 bronze badges
159k13 gold badges216 silver badges516 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer, unfortunately this dodge is very specific to the exact case of the lemniscate. My actual problem is much more complicated with basically no hope of putting it in the form $f(x,y)=c$. I put the leminscate down as a minimal non-working example. Is there any hope?
$endgroup$
– Takoda
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204685%2fplotting-level-sets-of-the-form-fx-y-c-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown