Are manifolds admitting a circle foliation covered by manifolds with a (non-trivial) circle action?An example of a complex manifold without a finite open coverDoes there exist smooth circle action on manifolds M^4n with exactly three fixed points such that nneq 1a question about the isotropy subgroup of circle action on manifolds with isolated fixed pointNontrivial examples of non-trivial principal circle bundlesManifolds with prescribed fundamental group and finitely many trivial homotopy groupsCompact Lie group action on non-Hausdorff (but CGWH) space with Hausdorff quotient6-manifolds admitting SO(3) action with 2 orbit typesObstruction to a general S^1-action

Are manifolds admitting a circle foliation covered by manifolds with a (non-trivial) circle action?


An example of a complex manifold without a finite open coverDoes there exist smooth circle action on manifolds M^4n with exactly three fixed points such that nneq 1a question about the isotropy subgroup of circle action on manifolds with isolated fixed pointNontrivial examples of non-trivial principal circle bundlesManifolds with prescribed fundamental group and finitely many trivial homotopy groupsCompact Lie group action on non-Hausdorff (but CGWH) space with Hausdorff quotient6-manifolds admitting SO(3) action with 2 orbit typesObstruction to a general S^1-action













8












$begingroup$


More precisely, is there a criterion that decides the above question?



I am particularly interested in the smooth setting: is a smooth manifold with a smooth regular foliation by circles covered by a smooth manifold with a smooth non-trivial circle action?



I am mostly interested in finite covers.










share|cite







New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the action to be free?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Rot
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe look at simply connected $4$-manifolds, by a result of Fintushel if there is circle action their topology is very restricted (just connect sums of $ mathbbCP^2$, $ barmathbbCP^2$,$S^2 times S^2$ and $S^4$). It could be that circle foliations aren't as retricted- I don't know.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    10 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the leaves of the circle action to project to the leaves of the initial foliation by circles ?
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action does not necessarily need to be free. Also the orbits of the circle action do not need to be the lifted leaves of the original foliation. Thanks a lot for your answers till now!
    $endgroup$
    – Caterina C.
    4 hours ago
















8












$begingroup$


More precisely, is there a criterion that decides the above question?



I am particularly interested in the smooth setting: is a smooth manifold with a smooth regular foliation by circles covered by a smooth manifold with a smooth non-trivial circle action?



I am mostly interested in finite covers.










share|cite







New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the action to be free?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Rot
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe look at simply connected $4$-manifolds, by a result of Fintushel if there is circle action their topology is very restricted (just connect sums of $ mathbbCP^2$, $ barmathbbCP^2$,$S^2 times S^2$ and $S^4$). It could be that circle foliations aren't as retricted- I don't know.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    10 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the leaves of the circle action to project to the leaves of the initial foliation by circles ?
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action does not necessarily need to be free. Also the orbits of the circle action do not need to be the lifted leaves of the original foliation. Thanks a lot for your answers till now!
    $endgroup$
    – Caterina C.
    4 hours ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$


More precisely, is there a criterion that decides the above question?



I am particularly interested in the smooth setting: is a smooth manifold with a smooth regular foliation by circles covered by a smooth manifold with a smooth non-trivial circle action?



I am mostly interested in finite covers.










share|cite







New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




More precisely, is there a criterion that decides the above question?



I am particularly interested in the smooth setting: is a smooth manifold with a smooth regular foliation by circles covered by a smooth manifold with a smooth non-trivial circle action?



I am mostly interested in finite covers.







dg.differential-geometry at.algebraic-topology






share|cite







New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite







New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite




share|cite






New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 11 hours ago









Caterina C.Caterina C.

412 bronze badges




412 bronze badges




New contributor



Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Caterina C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the action to be free?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Rot
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe look at simply connected $4$-manifolds, by a result of Fintushel if there is circle action their topology is very restricted (just connect sums of $ mathbbCP^2$, $ barmathbbCP^2$,$S^2 times S^2$ and $S^4$). It could be that circle foliations aren't as retricted- I don't know.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    10 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the leaves of the circle action to project to the leaves of the initial foliation by circles ?
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action does not necessarily need to be free. Also the orbits of the circle action do not need to be the lifted leaves of the original foliation. Thanks a lot for your answers till now!
    $endgroup$
    – Caterina C.
    4 hours ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the action to be free?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Rot
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe look at simply connected $4$-manifolds, by a result of Fintushel if there is circle action their topology is very restricted (just connect sums of $ mathbbCP^2$, $ barmathbbCP^2$,$S^2 times S^2$ and $S^4$). It could be that circle foliations aren't as retricted- I don't know.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    10 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want the leaves of the circle action to project to the leaves of the initial foliation by circles ?
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The action does not necessarily need to be free. Also the orbits of the circle action do not need to be the lifted leaves of the original foliation. Thanks a lot for your answers till now!
    $endgroup$
    – Caterina C.
    4 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Do you want the action to be free?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Rot
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do you want the action to be free?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Rot
10 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Maybe look at simply connected $4$-manifolds, by a result of Fintushel if there is circle action their topology is very restricted (just connect sums of $ mathbbCP^2$, $ barmathbbCP^2$,$S^2 times S^2$ and $S^4$). It could be that circle foliations aren't as retricted- I don't know.
$endgroup$
– Nick L
10 hours ago





$begingroup$
Maybe look at simply connected $4$-manifolds, by a result of Fintushel if there is circle action their topology is very restricted (just connect sums of $ mathbbCP^2$, $ barmathbbCP^2$,$S^2 times S^2$ and $S^4$). It could be that circle foliations aren't as retricted- I don't know.
$endgroup$
– Nick L
10 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
Do you want the leaves of the circle action to project to the leaves of the initial foliation by circles ?
$endgroup$
– BS.
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do you want the leaves of the circle action to project to the leaves of the initial foliation by circles ?
$endgroup$
– BS.
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
The action does not necessarily need to be free. Also the orbits of the circle action do not need to be the lifted leaves of the original foliation. Thanks a lot for your answers till now!
$endgroup$
– Caterina C.
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
The action does not necessarily need to be free. Also the orbits of the circle action do not need to be the lifted leaves of the original foliation. Thanks a lot for your answers till now!
$endgroup$
– Caterina C.
4 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9













$begingroup$

Dennis Sullivan constructed a non-vanishing Lispschitz vector field on a closed $5$-manifold such that all orbits are periodic but they amazingly have unbounded lengths (!). An addendum by Nicholas Kuiper shows that the flow can be chosen smooth, and another by William Thurston gives another construction which is real analytic.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago



















7













$begingroup$

For circle foliations of compact $3$-manifolds, this is essentially answered by a theorem of Epstein: every such foliation is a Seifert fibration. Most Seifert fibrations are finitely covered by a product (surface)x(circle), and in these cases one of course has a free circle action.



One of the exceptional cases of Seifert fibrations not covered by a product is the fibration of $S^3$ obtained as follows. Take the linear foliation of slope p/q on a solid torus (completed by the core of the solid torus as another leaf), the linear foliation of slope q/p on another solid torus (again with the core as another leaf), and glue the two solid tori along their boundaries by sending one meridian to the longitude to the other and one longitude to the meridian of the other. The result is $S^3$ with a circle foliation, which does not seem to come from a free circle action if p and q are bigger than 1.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Caterina C. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f339684%2fare-manifolds-admitting-a-circle-foliation-covered-by-manifolds-with-a-non-triv%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9













    $begingroup$

    Dennis Sullivan constructed a non-vanishing Lispschitz vector field on a closed $5$-manifold such that all orbits are periodic but they amazingly have unbounded lengths (!). An addendum by Nicholas Kuiper shows that the flow can be chosen smooth, and another by William Thurston gives another construction which is real analytic.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
      $endgroup$
      – Nick L
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
      $endgroup$
      – BS.
      8 hours ago
















    9













    $begingroup$

    Dennis Sullivan constructed a non-vanishing Lispschitz vector field on a closed $5$-manifold such that all orbits are periodic but they amazingly have unbounded lengths (!). An addendum by Nicholas Kuiper shows that the flow can be chosen smooth, and another by William Thurston gives another construction which is real analytic.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
      $endgroup$
      – Nick L
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
      $endgroup$
      – BS.
      8 hours ago














    9














    9










    9







    $begingroup$

    Dennis Sullivan constructed a non-vanishing Lispschitz vector field on a closed $5$-manifold such that all orbits are periodic but they amazingly have unbounded lengths (!). An addendum by Nicholas Kuiper shows that the flow can be chosen smooth, and another by William Thurston gives another construction which is real analytic.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Dennis Sullivan constructed a non-vanishing Lispschitz vector field on a closed $5$-manifold such that all orbits are periodic but they amazingly have unbounded lengths (!). An addendum by Nicholas Kuiper shows that the flow can be chosen smooth, and another by William Thurston gives another construction which is real analytic.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 9 hours ago









    BS.BS.

    8,1992 gold badges30 silver badges45 bronze badges




    8,1992 gold badges30 silver badges45 bronze badges










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
      $endgroup$
      – Nick L
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
      $endgroup$
      – BS.
      8 hours ago













    • 2




      $begingroup$
      It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
      $endgroup$
      – Nick L
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
      $endgroup$
      – BS.
      8 hours ago








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me how this answers the question. Why can't this manifold be covered by a manifold with a circle action?
    $endgroup$
    – Nick L
    9 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @Nick L : I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the OP asked for the circle action to have orbits the leaves of the lifted foliation.
    $endgroup$
    – BS.
    8 hours ago












    7













    $begingroup$

    For circle foliations of compact $3$-manifolds, this is essentially answered by a theorem of Epstein: every such foliation is a Seifert fibration. Most Seifert fibrations are finitely covered by a product (surface)x(circle), and in these cases one of course has a free circle action.



    One of the exceptional cases of Seifert fibrations not covered by a product is the fibration of $S^3$ obtained as follows. Take the linear foliation of slope p/q on a solid torus (completed by the core of the solid torus as another leaf), the linear foliation of slope q/p on another solid torus (again with the core as another leaf), and glue the two solid tori along their boundaries by sending one meridian to the longitude to the other and one longitude to the meridian of the other. The result is $S^3$ with a circle foliation, which does not seem to come from a free circle action if p and q are bigger than 1.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      7













      $begingroup$

      For circle foliations of compact $3$-manifolds, this is essentially answered by a theorem of Epstein: every such foliation is a Seifert fibration. Most Seifert fibrations are finitely covered by a product (surface)x(circle), and in these cases one of course has a free circle action.



      One of the exceptional cases of Seifert fibrations not covered by a product is the fibration of $S^3$ obtained as follows. Take the linear foliation of slope p/q on a solid torus (completed by the core of the solid torus as another leaf), the linear foliation of slope q/p on another solid torus (again with the core as another leaf), and glue the two solid tori along their boundaries by sending one meridian to the longitude to the other and one longitude to the meridian of the other. The result is $S^3$ with a circle foliation, which does not seem to come from a free circle action if p and q are bigger than 1.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        7














        7










        7







        $begingroup$

        For circle foliations of compact $3$-manifolds, this is essentially answered by a theorem of Epstein: every such foliation is a Seifert fibration. Most Seifert fibrations are finitely covered by a product (surface)x(circle), and in these cases one of course has a free circle action.



        One of the exceptional cases of Seifert fibrations not covered by a product is the fibration of $S^3$ obtained as follows. Take the linear foliation of slope p/q on a solid torus (completed by the core of the solid torus as another leaf), the linear foliation of slope q/p on another solid torus (again with the core as another leaf), and glue the two solid tori along their boundaries by sending one meridian to the longitude to the other and one longitude to the meridian of the other. The result is $S^3$ with a circle foliation, which does not seem to come from a free circle action if p and q are bigger than 1.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For circle foliations of compact $3$-manifolds, this is essentially answered by a theorem of Epstein: every such foliation is a Seifert fibration. Most Seifert fibrations are finitely covered by a product (surface)x(circle), and in these cases one of course has a free circle action.



        One of the exceptional cases of Seifert fibrations not covered by a product is the fibration of $S^3$ obtained as follows. Take the linear foliation of slope p/q on a solid torus (completed by the core of the solid torus as another leaf), the linear foliation of slope q/p on another solid torus (again with the core as another leaf), and glue the two solid tori along their boundaries by sending one meridian to the longitude to the other and one longitude to the meridian of the other. The result is $S^3$ with a circle foliation, which does not seem to come from a free circle action if p and q are bigger than 1.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 10 hours ago









        ThiKuThiKu

        6,7931 gold badge24 silver badges42 bronze badges




        6,7931 gold badge24 silver badges42 bronze badges























            Caterina C. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Caterina C. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Caterina C. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Caterina C. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f339684%2fare-manifolds-admitting-a-circle-foliation-covered-by-manifolds-with-a-non-triv%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її