How Can I Tell The Difference Between Unmarked Sugar and Stevia?

Why is the relationship between frequency and pitch exponential?

Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?

Does there exist a word to express a male who behaves as a female?

When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision

How do photons get into the eyes?

Can you really not move between grapples/shoves?

Is any name of Vishnu Siva?

Proof that shortest path with negative cycles is NP hard

Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?

Where does this pattern of naming products come from?

Average spam confidence

Why does Kathryn say this in 12 Monkeys?

How would a aircraft visually signal in distress?

How to generate random points without duplication?

Payment instructions from HomeAway look fishy to me

Trapping Rain Water

What's the correct term for a waitress in the Middle Ages?

My coworkers think I had a long honeymoon. Actually I was diagnosed with cancer. How do I talk about it?

Russian equivalent of the French expression "broyer du noir"

Etymology of 'calcit(r)are'?

Incremental Ranges!

How is it possible that Gollum speaks Westron?

How many pairs of subsets can be formed?

2.8 is missing the Carve option in the Boolean Modifier



How Can I Tell The Difference Between Unmarked Sugar and Stevia?







.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6















My wife just started back on her doctor-recommended Ketogenic diet. She's to have reduced Carbohydrates and Sugars, and to use artificial sweeteners for anything she does add sugar to.



While making our morning coffee, I found a clear plastic container with what looks like Stevia stored away - a taste confirms that it has a slightly different taste than the sugar I have on hand.



But I want to be absolutely sure before I recommend she use it in her baking - is there any surefire way to tell if this is Stevia and not sugar?



(Note: It may also possibly be Truvia.))










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Throw it away & buy a labelled container.

    – Tetsujin
    8 hours ago











  • Alternative suggestion. Don't sweeten things. [these are not random trolls, these are real, valid suggestions. I would rather have no sugar than some nasty chemical substitute.]

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin I may just wind up using it on my cocoa powder and getting some store labels to start properly labeling white powdery things in the kitchen - though if it IS Stevia, I'd like my wife to be able to use it, as she just got into Ketogenic baking with almond flour

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin: I've been on a low-carb keto diet for 6 years, and have lost 80 lbs (and kept it off), lowered my blood pressure and cholesterol, reversed my fatty liver disease, and staved off type 2 diabetes which runs in my family. My grandma had both legs amputated from gangrene caused by diabetes. I know a Vietnam vet who lost both his legs — not in the war, mind you — but from T2D. Some of us look at sugar with the same disgust you have for "artificial" sweeteners. To many, sugar is a "poison", if you will, it simply takes 30 - 50 years to show its effects. Please try to keep an open mind.

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago











  • BTW, a Stevia leaf extract + maltodextrin blend is as natural as sugar is...

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago

















6















My wife just started back on her doctor-recommended Ketogenic diet. She's to have reduced Carbohydrates and Sugars, and to use artificial sweeteners for anything she does add sugar to.



While making our morning coffee, I found a clear plastic container with what looks like Stevia stored away - a taste confirms that it has a slightly different taste than the sugar I have on hand.



But I want to be absolutely sure before I recommend she use it in her baking - is there any surefire way to tell if this is Stevia and not sugar?



(Note: It may also possibly be Truvia.))










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Throw it away & buy a labelled container.

    – Tetsujin
    8 hours ago











  • Alternative suggestion. Don't sweeten things. [these are not random trolls, these are real, valid suggestions. I would rather have no sugar than some nasty chemical substitute.]

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin I may just wind up using it on my cocoa powder and getting some store labels to start properly labeling white powdery things in the kitchen - though if it IS Stevia, I'd like my wife to be able to use it, as she just got into Ketogenic baking with almond flour

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin: I've been on a low-carb keto diet for 6 years, and have lost 80 lbs (and kept it off), lowered my blood pressure and cholesterol, reversed my fatty liver disease, and staved off type 2 diabetes which runs in my family. My grandma had both legs amputated from gangrene caused by diabetes. I know a Vietnam vet who lost both his legs — not in the war, mind you — but from T2D. Some of us look at sugar with the same disgust you have for "artificial" sweeteners. To many, sugar is a "poison", if you will, it simply takes 30 - 50 years to show its effects. Please try to keep an open mind.

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago











  • BTW, a Stevia leaf extract + maltodextrin blend is as natural as sugar is...

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago













6












6








6








My wife just started back on her doctor-recommended Ketogenic diet. She's to have reduced Carbohydrates and Sugars, and to use artificial sweeteners for anything she does add sugar to.



While making our morning coffee, I found a clear plastic container with what looks like Stevia stored away - a taste confirms that it has a slightly different taste than the sugar I have on hand.



But I want to be absolutely sure before I recommend she use it in her baking - is there any surefire way to tell if this is Stevia and not sugar?



(Note: It may also possibly be Truvia.))










share|improve this question
















My wife just started back on her doctor-recommended Ketogenic diet. She's to have reduced Carbohydrates and Sugars, and to use artificial sweeteners for anything she does add sugar to.



While making our morning coffee, I found a clear plastic container with what looks like Stevia stored away - a taste confirms that it has a slightly different taste than the sugar I have on hand.



But I want to be absolutely sure before I recommend she use it in her baking - is there any surefire way to tell if this is Stevia and not sugar?



(Note: It may also possibly be Truvia.))







baking sugar sweeteners






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago







Zibbobz

















asked 8 hours ago









ZibbobzZibbobz

61221024




61221024







  • 2





    Throw it away & buy a labelled container.

    – Tetsujin
    8 hours ago











  • Alternative suggestion. Don't sweeten things. [these are not random trolls, these are real, valid suggestions. I would rather have no sugar than some nasty chemical substitute.]

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin I may just wind up using it on my cocoa powder and getting some store labels to start properly labeling white powdery things in the kitchen - though if it IS Stevia, I'd like my wife to be able to use it, as she just got into Ketogenic baking with almond flour

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin: I've been on a low-carb keto diet for 6 years, and have lost 80 lbs (and kept it off), lowered my blood pressure and cholesterol, reversed my fatty liver disease, and staved off type 2 diabetes which runs in my family. My grandma had both legs amputated from gangrene caused by diabetes. I know a Vietnam vet who lost both his legs — not in the war, mind you — but from T2D. Some of us look at sugar with the same disgust you have for "artificial" sweeteners. To many, sugar is a "poison", if you will, it simply takes 30 - 50 years to show its effects. Please try to keep an open mind.

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago











  • BTW, a Stevia leaf extract + maltodextrin blend is as natural as sugar is...

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago












  • 2





    Throw it away & buy a labelled container.

    – Tetsujin
    8 hours ago











  • Alternative suggestion. Don't sweeten things. [these are not random trolls, these are real, valid suggestions. I would rather have no sugar than some nasty chemical substitute.]

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin I may just wind up using it on my cocoa powder and getting some store labels to start properly labeling white powdery things in the kitchen - though if it IS Stevia, I'd like my wife to be able to use it, as she just got into Ketogenic baking with almond flour

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin: I've been on a low-carb keto diet for 6 years, and have lost 80 lbs (and kept it off), lowered my blood pressure and cholesterol, reversed my fatty liver disease, and staved off type 2 diabetes which runs in my family. My grandma had both legs amputated from gangrene caused by diabetes. I know a Vietnam vet who lost both his legs — not in the war, mind you — but from T2D. Some of us look at sugar with the same disgust you have for "artificial" sweeteners. To many, sugar is a "poison", if you will, it simply takes 30 - 50 years to show its effects. Please try to keep an open mind.

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago











  • BTW, a Stevia leaf extract + maltodextrin blend is as natural as sugar is...

    – NSGod
    2 hours ago







2




2





Throw it away & buy a labelled container.

– Tetsujin
8 hours ago





Throw it away & buy a labelled container.

– Tetsujin
8 hours ago













Alternative suggestion. Don't sweeten things. [these are not random trolls, these are real, valid suggestions. I would rather have no sugar than some nasty chemical substitute.]

– Tetsujin
7 hours ago





Alternative suggestion. Don't sweeten things. [these are not random trolls, these are real, valid suggestions. I would rather have no sugar than some nasty chemical substitute.]

– Tetsujin
7 hours ago













@Tetsujin I may just wind up using it on my cocoa powder and getting some store labels to start properly labeling white powdery things in the kitchen - though if it IS Stevia, I'd like my wife to be able to use it, as she just got into Ketogenic baking with almond flour

– Zibbobz
4 hours ago





@Tetsujin I may just wind up using it on my cocoa powder and getting some store labels to start properly labeling white powdery things in the kitchen - though if it IS Stevia, I'd like my wife to be able to use it, as she just got into Ketogenic baking with almond flour

– Zibbobz
4 hours ago













@Tetsujin: I've been on a low-carb keto diet for 6 years, and have lost 80 lbs (and kept it off), lowered my blood pressure and cholesterol, reversed my fatty liver disease, and staved off type 2 diabetes which runs in my family. My grandma had both legs amputated from gangrene caused by diabetes. I know a Vietnam vet who lost both his legs — not in the war, mind you — but from T2D. Some of us look at sugar with the same disgust you have for "artificial" sweeteners. To many, sugar is a "poison", if you will, it simply takes 30 - 50 years to show its effects. Please try to keep an open mind.

– NSGod
2 hours ago





@Tetsujin: I've been on a low-carb keto diet for 6 years, and have lost 80 lbs (and kept it off), lowered my blood pressure and cholesterol, reversed my fatty liver disease, and staved off type 2 diabetes which runs in my family. My grandma had both legs amputated from gangrene caused by diabetes. I know a Vietnam vet who lost both his legs — not in the war, mind you — but from T2D. Some of us look at sugar with the same disgust you have for "artificial" sweeteners. To many, sugar is a "poison", if you will, it simply takes 30 - 50 years to show its effects. Please try to keep an open mind.

– NSGod
2 hours ago













BTW, a Stevia leaf extract + maltodextrin blend is as natural as sugar is...

– NSGod
2 hours ago





BTW, a Stevia leaf extract + maltodextrin blend is as natural as sugar is...

– NSGod
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Don't throw it away. Worst case you use up the mystery sweetener on yourself, and use a new pack of Stevia for your wife and anything you share. That's what I recommend if you're not convinced by my solution or don't have sensitive kitchen scales.



At room temperature, sucrose (normal sugar) is very soluble in water: about 200 g of sugar will dissolve in 100 g of water.



It's harder to get a figure for the solubility of Stevia as it's not a single compound but a mixture of related compounds. However various patents claim "high solubility" stevia preparations of around 30 g per 100 g water, or around 1/7 as much.



This is enough of a difference to test: If (with plenty of stirring but no heat) the mystery sweetener will dissolve in an equal mass (weight) of water, it's sugar. If not it's stevia. This only works if you weigh it. You can't do this by volume.



You can always compare to known sugar; a comparison to know stevia is less useful unless it's identical, and brands evolve. The conclusion holds for fructose too (that's even more soluble), but glucose, which you're unlikely to have as pure powder at home, needs slightly more than its own weight of water to dissolve it.



Pure stevia is much sweeter than sugar, and when concentrated may have an aftertaste. It's also sold blended. When blended with other sweeteners the solubility test probably still applies (certainly in the case of erythritol, find in Truvia). Sometimes stevia is bulked out to make it a more direct substitute for sugar. The bulking agents may well be rather soluble and a source of carbohydrates (maltodextrin is sometimes used).






share|improve this answer

























  • How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago











  • @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

    – Chris H
    7 hours ago











  • Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago











  • Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

    – Chris H
    3 hours ago


















1














Wow, do not throw it away, especially if you have a scale handy.



First of all, pure stevia powder that isn't cut with anything would be incredibly sweet (with possibly a bitter aftertaste): the sweetness is much more concentrated than sugar. Generally, pure sugar substitutes like stevia extract, sucralose, etc. are usually "cut" or bulked with less sweet ingredients like maltodextrin (hardly sweet at all) or erythritol (75% as sweet as sugar).



Anyway,



1 cup of sugar weighs around 200 g.



1 cup of Truvia (erythritol and stevia extract) should weigh around 224 g.*



1 cup of Swerve (erythritol, oligosaccharides and natural flavors) should weigh around 204 g*



1 cup of Splenda (maltodextrin + sucralose) should weigh around 27 g (yes, it's that light)



1 cup of maltodextrin + stevia extract should also weigh around 27 g.



If she's ever used this sweetener for baking, then it's unlikely that it's Equal (aspartame), as that loses its sweetness when subjected to heat.



Note that any sweetener that contains erythritol will be easily distinguished by the extreme cooling sensation it has on the tongue compared to other sweeteners.






share|improve this answer
































    0














    Ants don't care about artificial sweeteners.



    Make two piles: one of your mystery sweet stuff and one of real sugar (as a control to make sure there are ants around). Maybe moisten them some or make syrup. Leave them outside somewhere you see ants. Then check them later.



    Carbohydrates (sugar) are fuel for all animals. Stevia has no food value. Ants taste things differently than we do. They only care about stuff with food value: real sugar. They will not go to artificial sweeteners.




    Experiment on yourself.



    Or you could use yourself as a guinea pig. Eat the ketogenic diet with your wife. When your ketostix are good and purple you are in ketosis. Then eat a hog load of the mystery powder. Sugar will break ketosis within 15 min and your ketostix will go back to white. If it is sweet and does not break ketosis then it is fine for the ketogenic diet. That is what she really wants to know, anyway.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

      – NSGod
      2 hours ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "49"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f99317%2fhow-can-i-tell-the-difference-between-unmarked-sugar-and-stevia%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    Don't throw it away. Worst case you use up the mystery sweetener on yourself, and use a new pack of Stevia for your wife and anything you share. That's what I recommend if you're not convinced by my solution or don't have sensitive kitchen scales.



    At room temperature, sucrose (normal sugar) is very soluble in water: about 200 g of sugar will dissolve in 100 g of water.



    It's harder to get a figure for the solubility of Stevia as it's not a single compound but a mixture of related compounds. However various patents claim "high solubility" stevia preparations of around 30 g per 100 g water, or around 1/7 as much.



    This is enough of a difference to test: If (with plenty of stirring but no heat) the mystery sweetener will dissolve in an equal mass (weight) of water, it's sugar. If not it's stevia. This only works if you weigh it. You can't do this by volume.



    You can always compare to known sugar; a comparison to know stevia is less useful unless it's identical, and brands evolve. The conclusion holds for fructose too (that's even more soluble), but glucose, which you're unlikely to have as pure powder at home, needs slightly more than its own weight of water to dissolve it.



    Pure stevia is much sweeter than sugar, and when concentrated may have an aftertaste. It's also sold blended. When blended with other sweeteners the solubility test probably still applies (certainly in the case of erythritol, find in Truvia). Sometimes stevia is bulked out to make it a more direct substitute for sugar. The bulking agents may well be rather soluble and a source of carbohydrates (maltodextrin is sometimes used).






    share|improve this answer

























    • How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

      – Tetsujin
      7 hours ago











    • @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

      – Chris H
      7 hours ago











    • Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

      – Zibbobz
      4 hours ago











    • Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

      – Chris H
      3 hours ago















    4














    Don't throw it away. Worst case you use up the mystery sweetener on yourself, and use a new pack of Stevia for your wife and anything you share. That's what I recommend if you're not convinced by my solution or don't have sensitive kitchen scales.



    At room temperature, sucrose (normal sugar) is very soluble in water: about 200 g of sugar will dissolve in 100 g of water.



    It's harder to get a figure for the solubility of Stevia as it's not a single compound but a mixture of related compounds. However various patents claim "high solubility" stevia preparations of around 30 g per 100 g water, or around 1/7 as much.



    This is enough of a difference to test: If (with plenty of stirring but no heat) the mystery sweetener will dissolve in an equal mass (weight) of water, it's sugar. If not it's stevia. This only works if you weigh it. You can't do this by volume.



    You can always compare to known sugar; a comparison to know stevia is less useful unless it's identical, and brands evolve. The conclusion holds for fructose too (that's even more soluble), but glucose, which you're unlikely to have as pure powder at home, needs slightly more than its own weight of water to dissolve it.



    Pure stevia is much sweeter than sugar, and when concentrated may have an aftertaste. It's also sold blended. When blended with other sweeteners the solubility test probably still applies (certainly in the case of erythritol, find in Truvia). Sometimes stevia is bulked out to make it a more direct substitute for sugar. The bulking agents may well be rather soluble and a source of carbohydrates (maltodextrin is sometimes used).






    share|improve this answer

























    • How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

      – Tetsujin
      7 hours ago











    • @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

      – Chris H
      7 hours ago











    • Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

      – Zibbobz
      4 hours ago











    • Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

      – Chris H
      3 hours ago













    4












    4








    4







    Don't throw it away. Worst case you use up the mystery sweetener on yourself, and use a new pack of Stevia for your wife and anything you share. That's what I recommend if you're not convinced by my solution or don't have sensitive kitchen scales.



    At room temperature, sucrose (normal sugar) is very soluble in water: about 200 g of sugar will dissolve in 100 g of water.



    It's harder to get a figure for the solubility of Stevia as it's not a single compound but a mixture of related compounds. However various patents claim "high solubility" stevia preparations of around 30 g per 100 g water, or around 1/7 as much.



    This is enough of a difference to test: If (with plenty of stirring but no heat) the mystery sweetener will dissolve in an equal mass (weight) of water, it's sugar. If not it's stevia. This only works if you weigh it. You can't do this by volume.



    You can always compare to known sugar; a comparison to know stevia is less useful unless it's identical, and brands evolve. The conclusion holds for fructose too (that's even more soluble), but glucose, which you're unlikely to have as pure powder at home, needs slightly more than its own weight of water to dissolve it.



    Pure stevia is much sweeter than sugar, and when concentrated may have an aftertaste. It's also sold blended. When blended with other sweeteners the solubility test probably still applies (certainly in the case of erythritol, find in Truvia). Sometimes stevia is bulked out to make it a more direct substitute for sugar. The bulking agents may well be rather soluble and a source of carbohydrates (maltodextrin is sometimes used).






    share|improve this answer















    Don't throw it away. Worst case you use up the mystery sweetener on yourself, and use a new pack of Stevia for your wife and anything you share. That's what I recommend if you're not convinced by my solution or don't have sensitive kitchen scales.



    At room temperature, sucrose (normal sugar) is very soluble in water: about 200 g of sugar will dissolve in 100 g of water.



    It's harder to get a figure for the solubility of Stevia as it's not a single compound but a mixture of related compounds. However various patents claim "high solubility" stevia preparations of around 30 g per 100 g water, or around 1/7 as much.



    This is enough of a difference to test: If (with plenty of stirring but no heat) the mystery sweetener will dissolve in an equal mass (weight) of water, it's sugar. If not it's stevia. This only works if you weigh it. You can't do this by volume.



    You can always compare to known sugar; a comparison to know stevia is less useful unless it's identical, and brands evolve. The conclusion holds for fructose too (that's even more soluble), but glucose, which you're unlikely to have as pure powder at home, needs slightly more than its own weight of water to dissolve it.



    Pure stevia is much sweeter than sugar, and when concentrated may have an aftertaste. It's also sold blended. When blended with other sweeteners the solubility test probably still applies (certainly in the case of erythritol, find in Truvia). Sometimes stevia is bulked out to make it a more direct substitute for sugar. The bulking agents may well be rather soluble and a source of carbohydrates (maltodextrin is sometimes used).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    Chris HChris H

    21.8k13863




    21.8k13863












    • How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

      – Tetsujin
      7 hours ago











    • @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

      – Chris H
      7 hours ago











    • Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

      – Zibbobz
      4 hours ago











    • Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

      – Chris H
      3 hours ago

















    • How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

      – Tetsujin
      7 hours ago











    • @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

      – Chris H
      7 hours ago











    • Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

      – Zibbobz
      4 hours ago











    • Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

      – Chris H
      3 hours ago
















    How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago





    How do you know it's not something other than stevia... some mixture - sweet'n'low or one of those other chemical monstrosities?

    – Tetsujin
    7 hours ago













    @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

    – Chris H
    7 hours ago





    @Tetsujin the OP only offers two possibilities

    – Chris H
    7 hours ago













    Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago





    Speaking honestly, Truvia is also possible. Not sweet & low though. I'll add it to my question though just to be through.

    – Zibbobz
    4 hours ago













    Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

    – Chris H
    3 hours ago





    Truvia looks like a mixture of stevia and erythritol, in secret proportions. Erythritol is more soluble than stevia but the test should still work. I'd do it myself but I don't have any non-sugar sweeteners in the house.

    – Chris H
    3 hours ago













    1














    Wow, do not throw it away, especially if you have a scale handy.



    First of all, pure stevia powder that isn't cut with anything would be incredibly sweet (with possibly a bitter aftertaste): the sweetness is much more concentrated than sugar. Generally, pure sugar substitutes like stevia extract, sucralose, etc. are usually "cut" or bulked with less sweet ingredients like maltodextrin (hardly sweet at all) or erythritol (75% as sweet as sugar).



    Anyway,



    1 cup of sugar weighs around 200 g.



    1 cup of Truvia (erythritol and stevia extract) should weigh around 224 g.*



    1 cup of Swerve (erythritol, oligosaccharides and natural flavors) should weigh around 204 g*



    1 cup of Splenda (maltodextrin + sucralose) should weigh around 27 g (yes, it's that light)



    1 cup of maltodextrin + stevia extract should also weigh around 27 g.



    If she's ever used this sweetener for baking, then it's unlikely that it's Equal (aspartame), as that loses its sweetness when subjected to heat.



    Note that any sweetener that contains erythritol will be easily distinguished by the extreme cooling sensation it has on the tongue compared to other sweeteners.






    share|improve this answer





























      1














      Wow, do not throw it away, especially if you have a scale handy.



      First of all, pure stevia powder that isn't cut with anything would be incredibly sweet (with possibly a bitter aftertaste): the sweetness is much more concentrated than sugar. Generally, pure sugar substitutes like stevia extract, sucralose, etc. are usually "cut" or bulked with less sweet ingredients like maltodextrin (hardly sweet at all) or erythritol (75% as sweet as sugar).



      Anyway,



      1 cup of sugar weighs around 200 g.



      1 cup of Truvia (erythritol and stevia extract) should weigh around 224 g.*



      1 cup of Swerve (erythritol, oligosaccharides and natural flavors) should weigh around 204 g*



      1 cup of Splenda (maltodextrin + sucralose) should weigh around 27 g (yes, it's that light)



      1 cup of maltodextrin + stevia extract should also weigh around 27 g.



      If she's ever used this sweetener for baking, then it's unlikely that it's Equal (aspartame), as that loses its sweetness when subjected to heat.



      Note that any sweetener that contains erythritol will be easily distinguished by the extreme cooling sensation it has on the tongue compared to other sweeteners.






      share|improve this answer



























        1












        1








        1







        Wow, do not throw it away, especially if you have a scale handy.



        First of all, pure stevia powder that isn't cut with anything would be incredibly sweet (with possibly a bitter aftertaste): the sweetness is much more concentrated than sugar. Generally, pure sugar substitutes like stevia extract, sucralose, etc. are usually "cut" or bulked with less sweet ingredients like maltodextrin (hardly sweet at all) or erythritol (75% as sweet as sugar).



        Anyway,



        1 cup of sugar weighs around 200 g.



        1 cup of Truvia (erythritol and stevia extract) should weigh around 224 g.*



        1 cup of Swerve (erythritol, oligosaccharides and natural flavors) should weigh around 204 g*



        1 cup of Splenda (maltodextrin + sucralose) should weigh around 27 g (yes, it's that light)



        1 cup of maltodextrin + stevia extract should also weigh around 27 g.



        If she's ever used this sweetener for baking, then it's unlikely that it's Equal (aspartame), as that loses its sweetness when subjected to heat.



        Note that any sweetener that contains erythritol will be easily distinguished by the extreme cooling sensation it has on the tongue compared to other sweeteners.






        share|improve this answer















        Wow, do not throw it away, especially if you have a scale handy.



        First of all, pure stevia powder that isn't cut with anything would be incredibly sweet (with possibly a bitter aftertaste): the sweetness is much more concentrated than sugar. Generally, pure sugar substitutes like stevia extract, sucralose, etc. are usually "cut" or bulked with less sweet ingredients like maltodextrin (hardly sweet at all) or erythritol (75% as sweet as sugar).



        Anyway,



        1 cup of sugar weighs around 200 g.



        1 cup of Truvia (erythritol and stevia extract) should weigh around 224 g.*



        1 cup of Swerve (erythritol, oligosaccharides and natural flavors) should weigh around 204 g*



        1 cup of Splenda (maltodextrin + sucralose) should weigh around 27 g (yes, it's that light)



        1 cup of maltodextrin + stevia extract should also weigh around 27 g.



        If she's ever used this sweetener for baking, then it's unlikely that it's Equal (aspartame), as that loses its sweetness when subjected to heat.



        Note that any sweetener that contains erythritol will be easily distinguished by the extreme cooling sensation it has on the tongue compared to other sweeteners.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        NSGodNSGod

        1965




        1965





















            0














            Ants don't care about artificial sweeteners.



            Make two piles: one of your mystery sweet stuff and one of real sugar (as a control to make sure there are ants around). Maybe moisten them some or make syrup. Leave them outside somewhere you see ants. Then check them later.



            Carbohydrates (sugar) are fuel for all animals. Stevia has no food value. Ants taste things differently than we do. They only care about stuff with food value: real sugar. They will not go to artificial sweeteners.




            Experiment on yourself.



            Or you could use yourself as a guinea pig. Eat the ketogenic diet with your wife. When your ketostix are good and purple you are in ketosis. Then eat a hog load of the mystery powder. Sugar will break ketosis within 15 min and your ketostix will go back to white. If it is sweet and does not break ketosis then it is fine for the ketogenic diet. That is what she really wants to know, anyway.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

              – NSGod
              2 hours ago
















            0














            Ants don't care about artificial sweeteners.



            Make two piles: one of your mystery sweet stuff and one of real sugar (as a control to make sure there are ants around). Maybe moisten them some or make syrup. Leave them outside somewhere you see ants. Then check them later.



            Carbohydrates (sugar) are fuel for all animals. Stevia has no food value. Ants taste things differently than we do. They only care about stuff with food value: real sugar. They will not go to artificial sweeteners.




            Experiment on yourself.



            Or you could use yourself as a guinea pig. Eat the ketogenic diet with your wife. When your ketostix are good and purple you are in ketosis. Then eat a hog load of the mystery powder. Sugar will break ketosis within 15 min and your ketostix will go back to white. If it is sweet and does not break ketosis then it is fine for the ketogenic diet. That is what she really wants to know, anyway.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

              – NSGod
              2 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            Ants don't care about artificial sweeteners.



            Make two piles: one of your mystery sweet stuff and one of real sugar (as a control to make sure there are ants around). Maybe moisten them some or make syrup. Leave them outside somewhere you see ants. Then check them later.



            Carbohydrates (sugar) are fuel for all animals. Stevia has no food value. Ants taste things differently than we do. They only care about stuff with food value: real sugar. They will not go to artificial sweeteners.




            Experiment on yourself.



            Or you could use yourself as a guinea pig. Eat the ketogenic diet with your wife. When your ketostix are good and purple you are in ketosis. Then eat a hog load of the mystery powder. Sugar will break ketosis within 15 min and your ketostix will go back to white. If it is sweet and does not break ketosis then it is fine for the ketogenic diet. That is what she really wants to know, anyway.






            share|improve this answer















            Ants don't care about artificial sweeteners.



            Make two piles: one of your mystery sweet stuff and one of real sugar (as a control to make sure there are ants around). Maybe moisten them some or make syrup. Leave them outside somewhere you see ants. Then check them later.



            Carbohydrates (sugar) are fuel for all animals. Stevia has no food value. Ants taste things differently than we do. They only care about stuff with food value: real sugar. They will not go to artificial sweeteners.




            Experiment on yourself.



            Or you could use yourself as a guinea pig. Eat the ketogenic diet with your wife. When your ketostix are good and purple you are in ketosis. Then eat a hog load of the mystery powder. Sugar will break ketosis within 15 min and your ketostix will go back to white. If it is sweet and does not break ketosis then it is fine for the ketogenic diet. That is what she really wants to know, anyway.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            WillkWillk

            1,05739




            1,05739












            • Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

              – NSGod
              2 hours ago


















            • Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

              – NSGod
              2 hours ago

















            Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

            – NSGod
            2 hours ago






            Interesting, I'll have to test this on the maltodextrin component of Splenda. (Maltodextrin is probably the only component they might go for)

            – NSGod
            2 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Seasoned Advice!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f99317%2fhow-can-i-tell-the-difference-between-unmarked-sugar-and-stevia%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її