erasing a part of a plothow to draw part of the picture to be line and the other part to be the “leadsto” symbolWhat is the easiest way to plot a function and its tangent lines at the turning points?Packages to plot functions such as the logistic function (or “S-shaped function”)?x axis domain/range in a plotTikZ: a cylinder of infinite heightEquivalent to “shorten <=” for intermediate points3D point plot - visualizationHow to plot linear histograms with Latex?Simple tikz picture, a line connecting nodesPlacing numbers at the above and right side of the plot frame

Are "living" organ banks practical?

SF novella separating the dumb majority from the intelligent part of mankind

Where does this pattern of naming products come from?

Can a user sell my software (MIT license) without modification?

What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?

Do any instruments not produce overtones?

What is the purpose of building foundations?

Russian equivalents of "no love lost"

Why don’t airliners have temporary liveries?

Efficient integer floor function in C++

What does the "c." listed under weapon length mean?

Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access

When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision

Do you need type ratings for private flying?

Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI?

Is it recommended against to open-source the code of a webapp?

Phone number to a lounge, or lounges generally

Is the term 'open source' a trademark?

Should I "tell" my exposition or give it through dialogue?

Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?

How Can I Tell The Difference Between Unmarked Sugar and Stevia?

Does the "6 seconds per round" rule apply to speaking/roleplaying during combat situations?

Do the English have an ancient (obsolete) verb for the action of the book opening?

How to translate “Me doing X” like in online posts?



erasing a part of a plot


how to draw part of the picture to be line and the other part to be the “leadsto” symbolWhat is the easiest way to plot a function and its tangent lines at the turning points?Packages to plot functions such as the logistic function (or “S-shaped function”)?x axis domain/range in a plotTikZ: a cylinder of infinite heightEquivalent to “shorten <=” for intermediate points3D point plot - visualizationHow to plot linear histograms with Latex?Simple tikz picture, a line connecting nodesPlacing numbers at the above and right side of the plot frame













2















How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



documentclassstandalone
usepackageexpl3
ExplSyntaxOn
int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
ExplSyntaxOff
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamssymb
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryarrows,shapes,positioning
usepackagepgfplots
usetikzlibrarycalc
begindocument
newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
pagestyleempty
centering
begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
endtikzpicture
enddocument









share|improve this question




























    2















    How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackageexpl3
    ExplSyntaxOn
    int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
    ExplSyntaxOff
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackageamssymb
    usepackagegraphicx
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibraryarrows,shapes,positioning
    usepackagepgfplots
    usetikzlibrarycalc
    begindocument
    newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
    pagestyleempty
    centering
    begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
    draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
    draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
    draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
    endtikzpicture
    enddocument









    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



      documentclassstandalone
      usepackageexpl3
      ExplSyntaxOn
      int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
      ExplSyntaxOff
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackageamssymb
      usepackagegraphicx
      usepackagetikz
      usetikzlibraryarrows,shapes,positioning
      usepackagepgfplots
      usetikzlibrarycalc
      begindocument
      newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
      pagestyleempty
      centering
      begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
      draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
      draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
      draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
      endtikzpicture
      enddocument









      share|improve this question
















      How is it possible to erase the line (keep it short) that goes up to infinity and use an infinity symbol to indicate so? (Do not touch the rest of the plot and the inserted numbers please if possible.)



      documentclassstandalone
      usepackageexpl3
      ExplSyntaxOn
      int_zero_new:N g__prg_map_int
      ExplSyntaxOff
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackageamssymb
      usepackagegraphicx
      usepackagetikz
      usetikzlibraryarrows,shapes,positioning
      usepackagepgfplots
      usetikzlibrarycalc
      begindocument
      newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
      pagestyleempty
      centering
      begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.05]
      draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
      draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
      draw [smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,black] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
      endtikzpicture
      enddocument






      tikz-pgf plot






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      Torbjørn T.

      160k13263451




      160k13263451










      asked 8 hours ago









      Amir Amir

      1355




      1355




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



          I understand that you looking for something like this:



          enter image description here



          With use of clip function:



          documentclass[margin=3mm]standalone
          usepackagepgfplots
          usetikzlibraryarrows,
          calc,
          positioning,
          shapes
          begindocument
          newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
          pagestyleempty
          centering
          begintikzpicture[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
          clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
          draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
          draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
          draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
          draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
          node[below right] at (1,5.1) $uparrowinfty$;
          endtikzpicture
          enddocument


          Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

            – marmot
            7 hours ago


















          3














          I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



          documentclass[tikz]standalone
          usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
          begindocument
          begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
          draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
          draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
          beginscope
          clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
          draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
          plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
          endscope
          draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=box and curve]
          ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
          endtikzpicture
          enddocument


          enter image description here



          With pgfplots it would be much easier.



          documentclass[tikz]standalone
          usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
          usepackagepgfplots
          pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
          begindocument
          begintikzpicture
          beginaxis[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
          xmin=-2,xmax=45]
          addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
          very thick] ((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))));
          path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
          endaxis
          draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=top and curve]
          ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
          endtikzpicture
          enddocument


          enter image description here



          Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493866%2ferasing-a-part-of-a-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]standalone
            usepackagepgfplots
            usetikzlibraryarrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes
            begindocument
            newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
            pagestyleempty
            centering
            begintikzpicture[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) $uparrowinfty$;
            endtikzpicture
            enddocument


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              7 hours ago















            2














            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]standalone
            usepackagepgfplots
            usetikzlibraryarrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes
            begindocument
            newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
            pagestyleempty
            centering
            begintikzpicture[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) $uparrowinfty$;
            endtikzpicture
            enddocument


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              7 hours ago













            2












            2








            2







            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]standalone
            usepackagepgfplots
            usetikzlibraryarrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes
            begindocument
            newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
            pagestyleempty
            centering
            begintikzpicture[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) $uparrowinfty$;
            endtikzpicture
            enddocument


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.






            share|improve this answer















            edit: it seems that my solution is almost the same as from @marmoth (+1). In time of uploading mine, I was not aware about this.



            I understand that you looking for something like this:



            enter image description here



            With use of clip function:



            documentclass[margin=3mm]standalone
            usepackagepgfplots
            usetikzlibraryarrows,
            calc,
            positioning,
            shapes
            begindocument
            newcommandddfrac[2]fracdisplaystyle #1displaystyle #2
            pagestyleempty
            centering
            begintikzpicture[yscale=1, xscale=0.1]
            clip (-1,-1.75) rectangle (50,5);
            draw[-stealth] (-1,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[-stealth] (0,-1.75) -- (0,5);
            draw [domain=0.1:40, smooth,very thick] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            draw [domain=0.1:40, samples=51,red] plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            node[below right] at (1,5.1) $uparrowinfty$;
            endtikzpicture
            enddocument


            Selection smooth in your draw plot options is wrong. Correct result is when you replace it with selected number of samples. for example with samples=51. See red curve.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 7 hours ago









            ZarkoZarko

            136k872180




            136k872180












            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              7 hours ago

















            • Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

              – marmot
              7 hours ago
















            Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

            – marmot
            7 hours ago





            Wouldn't it be appropriate to give credit to me for clip and the fact that the original plot is off? You have just copied both from my answer.

            – marmot
            7 hours ago











            3














            I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



            documentclass[tikz]standalone
            usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
            begindocument
            begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
            draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
            draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
            beginscope
            clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
            draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
            plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
            endscope
            draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=box and curve]
            ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
            endtikzpicture
            enddocument


            enter image description here



            With pgfplots it would be much easier.



            documentclass[tikz]standalone
            usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
            usepackagepgfplots
            pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
            begindocument
            begintikzpicture
            beginaxis[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
            xmin=-2,xmax=45]
            addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
            very thick] ((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))));
            path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
            endaxis
            draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=top and curve]
            ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
            endtikzpicture
            enddocument


            enter image description here



            Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





























              3














              I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



              documentclass[tikz]standalone
              usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
              begindocument
              begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
              draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
              draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
              beginscope
              clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
              draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
              plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
              endscope
              draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=box and curve]
              ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
              endtikzpicture
              enddocument


              enter image description here



              With pgfplots it would be much easier.



              documentclass[tikz]standalone
              usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
              usepackagepgfplots
              pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
              begindocument
              begintikzpicture
              beginaxis[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
              xmin=-2,xmax=45]
              addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
              very thick] ((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))));
              path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
              endaxis
              draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=top and curve]
              ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
              endtikzpicture
              enddocument


              enter image description here



              Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer



























                3












                3








                3







                I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



                documentclass[tikz]standalone
                usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
                begindocument
                begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
                draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
                draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
                beginscope
                clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
                draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
                plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
                endscope
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=box and curve]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
                endtikzpicture
                enddocument


                enter image description here



                With pgfplots it would be much easier.



                documentclass[tikz]standalone
                usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
                usepackagepgfplots
                pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
                begindocument
                begintikzpicture
                beginaxis[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
                xmin=-2,xmax=45]
                addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
                very thick] ((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))));
                path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
                endaxis
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=top and curve]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
                endtikzpicture
                enddocument


                enter image description here



                Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer















                I am assuming that you do not want to use pgfplots even though you are loading it. In that case you could clip and intersect.



                documentclass[tikz]standalone
                usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
                begindocument
                begintikzpicture[yscale=1,xscale=0.1]
                draw[thick,->,>=stealth] (-10,0) -- (45,0);
                draw[thick] (0,-2) -- (0,5);
                beginscope
                clip[name path global=box] (-10,-2) rectangle (45,5);
                draw[smooth,very thick,domain=0.1:40,samples=101,black,name path global=curve]
                plot (x,((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10)))));
                endscope
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=box and curve]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
                endtikzpicture
                enddocument


                enter image description here



                With pgfplots it would be much easier.



                documentclass[tikz]standalone
                usetikzlibrarypositioning,intersections
                usepackagepgfplots
                pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
                begindocument
                begintikzpicture
                beginaxis[axis lines=middle,xtick=empty,ytick=empty,ymin=-2,ymax=5,
                xmin=-2,xmax=45]
                addplot[domain=0.1:45,samples=101,smooth,name path global=curve,
                very thick] ((1*exp(-x/10))/(1-1*exp(-x/10)))+((0.00001*exp(-x/10))/((1-1*exp(-x/10))*(1-1*exp(-x/10))));
                path[name path global=top] (-2,4.99) -- (45,4.99);
                endaxis
                draw[-stealth,very thick,name intersections=of=top and curve]
                ([yshift=-0.1pt]intersection-1) -- ++(0,0.5) node[midway,right]$infty$;
                endtikzpicture
                enddocument


                enter image description here



                Interestingly the plots are not the same, most likely because of the better precision of pgfplots. Mathematica seems to be on the side of pgfplots. So I increased the samples in the TikZ picture to match this (but I feel pgfplots is more elegant anyway).



                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 7 hours ago

























                answered 8 hours ago









                marmotmarmot

                132k6167318




                132k6167318



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493866%2ferasing-a-part-of-a-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367