Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI?What is the oldest computer capable of running a modern version of GNU/Linux?Is there a Linux client for Amiga Explorer?Which Linux or BSD distributions do still support i386, i486 or i586 CPUs?Refactoring Old Printer Driver for Current Linux KernelWhen was Linux kernel became libre software?What was the first Linux distribution?
What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?
How would a aircraft visually signal in distress?
What's the right way to purge recursively with apt?
Is it recommended against to open-source the code of a webapp?
How do photons get into the eyes?
What does the "c." listed under weapon length mean?
Cause of continuous spectral lines
Why does Kathryn say this in 12 Monkeys?
Why don't B747s start takeoffs with full throttle?
Deformation of rectangular plot
How hard would it be to convert a glider into an powered electric aircraft?
Russian equivalents of "no love lost"
Avoiding cliches when writing gods
Last survivors from different time periods living together
Notation of last measure of a song with a pickup measure
Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?
siunitx error: Invalid numerical input
What happens when the attacking player dies to damage triggers after killing the blocking creatures in the first combat step of double strike?
Can an Eldritch Knight use Action Surge and thus Arcane Charge even when surprised?
After the loss of Challenger, why weren’t Galileo and Ulysses launched by Centaurs on expendable boosters?
Are "living" organ banks practical?
What is the purpose of building foundations?
Is it possible to (7 day) schedule sleep time of a hard drive?
Should an arbiter claim draw at a K+R vs K+R endgame?
Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI?
What is the oldest computer capable of running a modern version of GNU/Linux?Is there a Linux client for Amiga Explorer?Which Linux or BSD distributions do still support i386, i486 or i586 CPUs?Refactoring Old Printer Driver for Current Linux KernelWhen was Linux kernel became libre software?What was the first Linux distribution?
Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?
linux gui
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?
linux gui
New contributor
3
Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.
– chrylis
23 hours ago
1
You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?
– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago
An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.
– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago
5
Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.
– pipe
17 hours ago
3
@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.
– pipe
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?
linux gui
New contributor
Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?
linux gui
linux gui
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
DrSheldon
2,64531238
2,64531238
New contributor
asked yesterday
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
1918
1918
New contributor
New contributor
3
Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.
– chrylis
23 hours ago
1
You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?
– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago
An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.
– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago
5
Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.
– pipe
17 hours ago
3
@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.
– pipe
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3
Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.
– chrylis
23 hours ago
1
You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?
– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago
An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.
– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago
5
Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.
– pipe
17 hours ago
3
@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.
– pipe
5 hours ago
3
3
Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.
– chrylis
23 hours ago
Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.
– chrylis
23 hours ago
1
1
You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?
– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago
You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?
– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago
An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.
– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago
An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.
– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago
5
5
Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.
– pipe
17 hours ago
Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.
– pipe
17 hours ago
3
3
@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.
– pipe
5 hours ago
@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.
– pipe
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.
No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.
In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)
Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.
Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.
The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.
1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.
30
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
2
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
6
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passinginit=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.
– a CVn
14 hours ago
4
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11185%2fdid-the-first-version-of-linux-developed-by-linus-torvalds-have-a-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.
No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.
In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)
Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.
Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.
The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.
1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.
30
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
2
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
6
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passinginit=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.
– a CVn
14 hours ago
4
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.
No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.
In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)
Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.
Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.
The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.
1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.
30
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
2
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
6
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passinginit=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.
– a CVn
14 hours ago
4
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.
No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.
In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)
Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.
Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.
The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.
1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.
Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.
No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.
In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)
Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.
Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.
The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.
1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.
answered yesterday
peterhpeterh
882720
882720
30
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
2
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
6
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passinginit=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.
– a CVn
14 hours ago
4
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
30
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
2
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
6
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passinginit=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.
– a CVn
14 hours ago
4
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
30
30
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.
– forest
21 hours ago
2
2
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.
– R..
14 hours ago
6
6
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing
init=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.– a CVn
14 hours ago
The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing
init=/bin/sh
to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.– a CVn
14 hours ago
4
4
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.
– hobbs
12 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.
– jwh20
10 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11185%2fdid-the-first-version-of-linux-developed-by-linus-torvalds-have-a-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.
– chrylis
23 hours ago
1
You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?
– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago
An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.
– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago
5
Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.
– pipe
17 hours ago
3
@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.
– pipe
5 hours ago