Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI?What is the oldest computer capable of running a modern version of GNU/Linux?Is there a Linux client for Amiga Explorer?Which Linux or BSD distributions do still support i386, i486 or i586 CPUs?Refactoring Old Printer Driver for Current Linux KernelWhen was Linux kernel became libre software?What was the first Linux distribution?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

How would a aircraft visually signal in distress?

What's the right way to purge recursively with apt?

Is it recommended against to open-source the code of a webapp?

How do photons get into the eyes?

What does the "c." listed under weapon length mean?

Cause of continuous spectral lines

Why does Kathryn say this in 12 Monkeys?

Why don't B747s start takeoffs with full throttle?

Deformation of rectangular plot

How hard would it be to convert a glider into an powered electric aircraft?

Russian equivalents of "no love lost"

Avoiding cliches when writing gods

Last survivors from different time periods living together

Notation of last measure of a song with a pickup measure

Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?

siunitx error: Invalid numerical input

What happens when the attacking player dies to damage triggers after killing the blocking creatures in the first combat step of double strike?

Can an Eldritch Knight use Action Surge and thus Arcane Charge even when surprised?

After the loss of Challenger, why weren’t Galileo and Ulysses launched by Centaurs on expendable boosters?

Are "living" organ banks practical?

What is the purpose of building foundations?

Is it possible to (7 day) schedule sleep time of a hard drive?

Should an arbiter claim draw at a K+R vs K+R endgame?



Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI?


What is the oldest computer capable of running a modern version of GNU/Linux?Is there a Linux client for Amiga Explorer?Which Linux or BSD distributions do still support i386, i486 or i586 CPUs?Refactoring Old Printer Driver for Current Linux KernelWhen was Linux kernel became libre software?What was the first Linux distribution?













10















Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?










share|improve this question









New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3





    Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.

    – chrylis
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?

    – Peter Cordes
    19 hours ago











  • An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    17 hours ago






  • 5





    Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.

    – pipe
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.

    – pipe
    5 hours ago















10















Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?










share|improve this question









New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 3





    Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.

    – chrylis
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?

    – Peter Cordes
    19 hours ago











  • An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    17 hours ago






  • 5





    Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.

    – pipe
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.

    – pipe
    5 hours ago













10












10








10








Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?










share|improve this question









New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI (not necessarily Iconic but something simpler like Midnight Commander)?







linux gui






share|improve this question









New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









DrSheldon

2,64531238




2,64531238






New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked yesterday









JohnDoeaJohnDoea

1918




1918




New contributor



JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




JohnDoea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 3





    Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.

    – chrylis
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?

    – Peter Cordes
    19 hours ago











  • An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    17 hours ago






  • 5





    Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.

    – pipe
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.

    – pipe
    5 hours ago












  • 3





    Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.

    – chrylis
    23 hours ago






  • 1





    You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?

    – Peter Cordes
    19 hours ago











  • An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    17 hours ago






  • 5





    Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.

    – pipe
    17 hours ago






  • 3





    @JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.

    – pipe
    5 hours ago







3




3





Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.

– chrylis
23 hours ago





Note that what you call "iconic" is pretty much the definition of a graphical user interface; mc is a text user interface, or TUI.

– chrylis
23 hours ago




1




1





You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?

– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago





You say "does" (present tense). Are you asking if any later-developed GUIs like X11 or SVGAlib could run on a Linux 0.0.1 kernel, and mess around with a VGA card from user-space?

– Peter Cordes
19 hours ago













An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.

– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago





An interview with David Dawes provides some historical details from 1991 on. 1991, the year Linux was conceived, incidentally (or not) was also the first year i386 code (for other *nixes) was incorporated into X11.

– Peter A. Schneider
17 hours ago




5




5





Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.

– pipe
17 hours ago





Linux today does not have a GUI so I don't understand what you mean.

– pipe
17 hours ago




3




3





@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.

– pipe
5 hours ago





@JohnDoea The downvote button literally says "does not show any research effort" so you might take that into consideration before asking.

– pipe
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















26














Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.



No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.



In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).




I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).



I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)




Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.



Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.



The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.



1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.





share


















  • 30





    Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

    – forest
    21 hours ago







  • 2





    @forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

    – R..
    14 hours ago






  • 6





    The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

    – a CVn
    14 hours ago






  • 4





    It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

    – hobbs
    12 hours ago











  • Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

    – jwh20
    10 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11185%2fdid-the-first-version-of-linux-developed-by-linus-torvalds-have-a-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









26














Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.



No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.



In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).




I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).



I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)




Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.



Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.



The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.



1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.





share


















  • 30





    Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

    – forest
    21 hours ago







  • 2





    @forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

    – R..
    14 hours ago






  • 6





    The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

    – a CVn
    14 hours ago






  • 4





    It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

    – hobbs
    12 hours ago











  • Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

    – jwh20
    10 hours ago















26














Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.



No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.



In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).




I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).



I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)




Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.



Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.



The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.



1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.





share


















  • 30





    Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

    – forest
    21 hours ago







  • 2





    @forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

    – R..
    14 hours ago






  • 6





    The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

    – a CVn
    14 hours ago






  • 4





    It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

    – hobbs
    12 hours ago











  • Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

    – jwh20
    10 hours ago













26












26








26







Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.



No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.



In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).




I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).



I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)




Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.



Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.



The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.



1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.





share













Note, Linux is only a kernel, like msdos.sys in DOS or krnl386.exe in Windows.



No. It had no GUI, it was purely command line.



In Linus' initial statement, roughly with the release of the Linux kernel 0.0.1, we said, he ported bash and gcc to it. He ported probably also the most important GNU tools (make and fileutils (today part of coreutils)).




I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).



I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to
work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few
months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want.
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them
:-)




Note: This initial mail looks a little bit self-advertising and flamish with the eyes of the today, but it is better to not see that post from the current culture.



Although X11 was ported to it in in years, roughly in 19931. It was a huge work, much bigger than writing the kernel itself, but having the kernel, also the X11 port appeared.



The today obsolete SVGAlib appeared roughly also in that year1.



1I did not find a reference on the net for that, except my remembers.






share











share


share










answered yesterday









peterhpeterh

882720




882720







  • 30





    Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

    – forest
    21 hours ago







  • 2





    @forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

    – R..
    14 hours ago






  • 6





    The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

    – a CVn
    14 hours ago






  • 4





    It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

    – hobbs
    12 hours ago











  • Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

    – jwh20
    10 hours ago












  • 30





    Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

    – forest
    21 hours ago







  • 2





    @forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

    – R..
    14 hours ago






  • 6





    The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

    – a CVn
    14 hours ago






  • 4





    It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

    – hobbs
    12 hours ago











  • Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

    – jwh20
    10 hours ago







30




30





Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

– forest
21 hours ago






Self-advertising and flamish? But Linus even says that it's just a hobby that won't be big and professional (boy was he mistaken, but that's another subject). If anything, he seems more humble than usual.

– forest
21 hours ago





2




2





@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

– R..
14 hours ago





@forest: Yeah, I don't see what's at all self-advertising and flamish about the quoted part, at least. It's a lot more friendly than at least 95% of his emails in the past 20 years, and I'd consider it reasonable form for announcing a related project of interest on a mailing list I moderate.

– R..
14 hours ago




6




6





The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

– a CVn
14 hours ago





The kernel doesn't offer a command line interface (nor a GUI), unless you count that of the boot loader passing parameters when chaining to the kernel (and I pretty much doubt that interface was in place in the early releases either). The kernel does hardware and kernel-internal initialization, then passes control to an init program (whether sysvinit, systemd, Upstart, or something else) that is supposed to get the system to a "useful" state. Try passing init=/bin/sh to the kernel on a modern system some time, and you'll probably get a moderate likeness to the early Linux systems.

– a CVn
14 hours ago




4




4





It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

– hobbs
12 hours ago





It's better not to see anything from "the current culture" if you value things like facts and reality.

– hobbs
12 hours ago













Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

– jwh20
10 hours ago





Actually the thing that Torvalds developed was indeed just the Linux kernel. It had no GUI or UI at all. It took additional things, such as porting a shell like /bin/sh or /bin/csh to give it any UI at all.

– jwh20
10 hours ago










JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











JohnDoea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11185%2fdid-the-first-version-of-linux-developed-by-linus-torvalds-have-a-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її