Problem with GFCI at start of circuit with both lights and two receptaclesCan I put an AFCI receptacle on a branch circuit that shares a neutral with another branch circuit?What could cause two of my receptacles to stop working?When replacing non-grounding type receptacles is a GFCI receptacle required, or can any GFCI device be used?How to restore power after tripping a surge protection device?What options are there to achieve both grounding/ground-fault and arc-fault protection on old 2-wire circuits?Two GFCI on 20A bathroom circuitTesting my 2-wire home receptacles with a Southwire model 50020S-AGFCI/AFCI Trips With No Load And New Wire110v outlet on 220v circuit with 220 GFCI to boat dockhelp me interpret the results of an outlet tester on some GFCI receptacles
Physical Interpretation of an Overdamped Pendulum
Problem with GFCI at start of circuit with both lights and two receptacles
Airline power sockets shut down when I plug my computer in. How can I avoid that?
Is there a way, other than having a Diviner friend, for a player to avoid rolling Initiative at the start of a combat?
6502: is BCD *fundamentally* the same performance as non-BCD?
Expressing a chain of boolean ORs using ILP
What's the point of writing that I know will never be used or read?
Setting up a Mathematical Institute of Refereeing?
What are the advantages of this gold finger shape?
What's a good pattern to calculate a variable only when it is used the first time?
Is this bar slide trick shown on Cheers real or a visual effect?
What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?
Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?
What allows us to use imaginary numbers?
Resource is refusing to do a handover before leaving
Why is the battery jumpered to a resistor in this schematic?
What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?
Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?
Knights and Knaves on a (Not So) Deserted Island
Is there a word for returning to unpreparedness?
How would armour (and combat) change if the fighter didn't need to actually wear it?
Meaning of だけはわからない
Heyawacky: Ace of Cups
Upside down reversion for a Greek letter
Problem with GFCI at start of circuit with both lights and two receptacles
Can I put an AFCI receptacle on a branch circuit that shares a neutral with another branch circuit?What could cause two of my receptacles to stop working?When replacing non-grounding type receptacles is a GFCI receptacle required, or can any GFCI device be used?How to restore power after tripping a surge protection device?What options are there to achieve both grounding/ground-fault and arc-fault protection on old 2-wire circuits?Two GFCI on 20A bathroom circuitTesting my 2-wire home receptacles with a Southwire model 50020S-AGFCI/AFCI Trips With No Load And New Wire110v outlet on 220v circuit with 220 GFCI to boat dockhelp me interpret the results of an outlet tester on some GFCI receptacles
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)
I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.
Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)
A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."
I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).
I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.
Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.
My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?
electrical gfci
New contributor
add a comment |
With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)
I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.
Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)
A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."
I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).
I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.
Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.
My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?
electrical gfci
New contributor
That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).
– Harper
3 hours ago
add a comment |
With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)
I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.
Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)
A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."
I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).
I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.
Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.
My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?
electrical gfci
New contributor
With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)
I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.
Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)
A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."
I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).
I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.
Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.
My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?
electrical gfci
electrical gfci
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
DSlomer64DSlomer64
1062 bronze badges
1062 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).
– Harper
3 hours ago
add a comment |
That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).
– Harper
3 hours ago
That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).
– Harper
3 hours ago
That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).
– Harper
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Lights?
A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.
However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:
- If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.
- If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.
Line vs. Load
With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.
With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.
- Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.
- Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.
- Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.
Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.
FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:
- "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.
- GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.
add a comment |
You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )
Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
Anyways..
Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".
All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.
Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.
New contributor
add a comment |
Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.
Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).
Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).
My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.
If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.
Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.
By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "73"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171394%2fproblem-with-gfci-at-start-of-circuit-with-both-lights-and-two-receptacles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Lights?
A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.
However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:
- If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.
- If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.
Line vs. Load
With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.
With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.
- Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.
- Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.
- Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.
Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.
FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:
- "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.
- GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.
add a comment |
Lights?
A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.
However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:
- If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.
- If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.
Line vs. Load
With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.
With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.
- Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.
- Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.
- Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.
Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.
FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:
- "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.
- GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.
add a comment |
Lights?
A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.
However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:
- If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.
- If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.
Line vs. Load
With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.
With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.
- Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.
- Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.
- Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.
Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.
FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:
- "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.
- GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.
Lights?
A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.
However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:
- If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.
- If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.
Line vs. Load
With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.
With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.
- Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.
- Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.
- Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.
Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.
FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:
- "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.
- GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
manassehkatzmanassehkatz
16.5k1 gold badge24 silver badges51 bronze badges
16.5k1 gold badge24 silver badges51 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )
Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
Anyways..
Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".
All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.
Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.
New contributor
add a comment |
You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )
Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
Anyways..
Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".
All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.
Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.
New contributor
add a comment |
You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )
Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
Anyways..
Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".
All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.
Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.
New contributor
You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )
Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
Anyways..
Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".
All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.
Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 5 hours ago
Retired ElectricianRetired Electrician
765 bronze badges
765 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.
Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).
Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).
My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.
If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.
Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.
By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.
add a comment |
Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.
Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).
Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).
My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.
If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.
Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.
By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.
add a comment |
Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.
Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).
Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).
My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.
If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.
Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.
By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.
Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.
Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).
Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).
My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.
If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.
Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.
By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
HarperHarper
92.2k6 gold badges67 silver badges190 bronze badges
92.2k6 gold badges67 silver badges190 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171394%2fproblem-with-gfci-at-start-of-circuit-with-both-lights-and-two-receptacles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).
– Harper
3 hours ago