Problem with GFCI at start of circuit with both lights and two receptaclesCan I put an AFCI receptacle on a branch circuit that shares a neutral with another branch circuit?What could cause two of my receptacles to stop working?When replacing non-grounding type receptacles is a GFCI receptacle required, or can any GFCI device be used?How to restore power after tripping a surge protection device?What options are there to achieve both grounding/ground-fault and arc-fault protection on old 2-wire circuits?Two GFCI on 20A bathroom circuitTesting my 2-wire home receptacles with a Southwire model 50020S-AGFCI/AFCI Trips With No Load And New Wire110v outlet on 220v circuit with 220 GFCI to boat dockhelp me interpret the results of an outlet tester on some GFCI receptacles

Physical Interpretation of an Overdamped Pendulum

Problem with GFCI at start of circuit with both lights and two receptacles

Airline power sockets shut down when I plug my computer in. How can I avoid that?

Is there a way, other than having a Diviner friend, for a player to avoid rolling Initiative at the start of a combat?

6502: is BCD *fundamentally* the same performance as non-BCD?

Expressing a chain of boolean ORs using ILP

What's the point of writing that I know will never be used or read?

Setting up a Mathematical Institute of Refereeing?

What are the advantages of this gold finger shape?

What's a good pattern to calculate a variable only when it is used the first time?

Is this bar slide trick shown on Cheers real or a visual effect?

What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?

Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?

What allows us to use imaginary numbers?

Resource is refusing to do a handover before leaving

Why is the battery jumpered to a resistor in this schematic?

What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?

Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?

Knights and Knaves on a (Not So) Deserted Island

Is there a word for returning to unpreparedness?

How would armour (and combat) change if the fighter didn't need to actually wear it?

Meaning of だけはわからない

Heyawacky: Ace of Cups

Upside down reversion for a Greek letter



Problem with GFCI at start of circuit with both lights and two receptacles


Can I put an AFCI receptacle on a branch circuit that shares a neutral with another branch circuit?What could cause two of my receptacles to stop working?When replacing non-grounding type receptacles is a GFCI receptacle required, or can any GFCI device be used?How to restore power after tripping a surge protection device?What options are there to achieve both grounding/ground-fault and arc-fault protection on old 2-wire circuits?Two GFCI on 20A bathroom circuitTesting my 2-wire home receptacles with a Southwire model 50020S-AGFCI/AFCI Trips With No Load And New Wire110v outlet on 220v circuit with 220 GFCI to boat dockhelp me interpret the results of an outlet tester on some GFCI receptacles






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)



I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.



Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)



A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."



I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).



I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.



Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.



My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?










share|improve this question







New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).

    – Harper
    3 hours ago

















1















With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)



I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.



Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)



A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."



I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).



I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.



Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.



My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?










share|improve this question







New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).

    – Harper
    3 hours ago













1












1








1








With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)



I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.



Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)



A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."



I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).



I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.



Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.



My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?










share|improve this question







New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











With normal receptacle at first device in circuit all works fine--all lights and both receptacles. (I inherited the circuit--didn't do it myself.)



I thought, "Why not install a GFCI as first device?" to provide protection to the two receptacles that are the 3rd and 4th devices in the circuit.



Well, neither of two NEW GFCIS even acknowledge that there is current being supplied to them. (I assure you that there is 120v there.)



A friend wasn't sure but guessed that the GFCIs are saying "I can't help you with lights; receptacles only."



I obviously didn't know that, but it makes sense. There's no way to provide GFCI protection for lights anyway (I assume).



I've Googled a fair amount and followed many links, but have yet to find someone saying "GFCI is wired to not let this situation work." Every one either "it's okay but it's against code so don't do it" or similar hedging.



Whatever, I'm going back to the normal receptacle where I was on Monday with everything working. BTW, a GFCI tester showed no red and two yellows, which means "CORRECT" for this particular tester.



My only question is: forget code for the moment--should the two GFCIs have worked?







electrical gfci






share|improve this question







New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question







New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









DSlomer64DSlomer64

1062 bronze badges




1062 bronze badges




New contributor



DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




DSlomer64 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).

    – Harper
    3 hours ago

















  • That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).

    – Harper
    3 hours ago
















That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).

– Harper
3 hours ago





That's not a GFCI tester. That's an outlet tester. Some outlet testers are combination devices, containing both an outlet tester (which is 3 lights red yellow yellow) and a GFCI fault tester (a button).

– Harper
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














Lights?



A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.



However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:



  • If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.

  • If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.

Line vs. Load



With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.



With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.



  • Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.

  • Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.

  • Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.

Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.



FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:



  • "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.

  • GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.





share|improve this answer


































    1














    You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
    As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )



    Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
    Anyways..
    Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".



    All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.



    Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




























      0














      Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.



      Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).



      Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).



      My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.



      If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.



      Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.



      By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.






      share|improve this answer





























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "73"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171394%2fproblem-with-gfci-at-start-of-circuit-with-both-lights-and-two-receptacles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4














        Lights?



        A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.



        However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:



        • If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.

        • If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.

        Line vs. Load



        With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.



        With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.



        • Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.

        • Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.

        • Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.

        Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.



        FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:



        • "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.

        • GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.





        share|improve this answer































          4














          Lights?



          A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.



          However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:



          • If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.

          • If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.

          Line vs. Load



          With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.



          With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.



          • Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.

          • Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.

          • Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.

          Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.



          FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:



          • "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.

          • GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.





          share|improve this answer





























            4












            4








            4







            Lights?



            A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.



            However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:



            • If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.

            • If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.

            Line vs. Load



            With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.



            With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.



            • Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.

            • Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.

            • Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.

            Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.



            FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:



            • "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.

            • GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.





            share|improve this answer















            Lights?



            A GFCI can protect lights. You just usually don't need to protect lights. Lights that are installed out-of-reach in the ceiling are normally not required to be protected by GFCI simply because GFCI would not help. GFCI protects against current leaking through a person. If you can't touch the light, no current can flow through you. There is one exception: lights above a tub or shower.



            However, there is nothing wrong with GFCI protecting lights. Just keep in mind that:



            • If your lights & receptacles in a bathroom are on the same circuit and the lights are protected by the same GFCI that protects the receptacles, then if the GFCI trips, the lights will go out. You might be holding a hair dryer or other device that, while at that point no longer an electric shock hazard, might still not be a good situation in the dark.

            • If your lights use a smart switch that relies on leaking a little current to ground, that could cause nuisance trips of a GFCI.

            Line vs. Load



            With a regular (non-GFCI) receptacle, you typically will have "incoming" hot/neutral and "outgoing" hot/neutral, and it doesn't matter which wires go to which screws, as long as you get "hot" vs. "neutral" correct.



            With a GFCI, it matters. A lot.



            • Figure out which set of wires is "incoming" - i.e., hot/neutral coming from the circuit breaker. There are a number of ways to do this if the wiring isn't obvious. I would turn off the breaker, disconnect all the wires from the receptacle, cap them for safety, turn on the breaker and check with a non-contact tester.

            • Connect the "incoming" wires to the LINE side of a GFCI receptacle.

            • Test the receptacle - it should work fine with normal loads. TEST/RESET should work for testing the GFCI functions, as well as a "GFCI tester". If you have problems at this point then your wiring is really messed up or you have a bad GFCI receptacle.

            Now that you have the LINE side working, connect the remaining hot & neutral wires to the LOAD side of the GFCI. If it trips immediately then you have ground fault somewhere in the existing LOAD-side wiring (the lights or other receptacles). If it does not trip then use a GFCI tester to test from each of the other receptacles to make sure everything is good.



            FYI, the lights on the "GFCI tester" have absolutely nothing to do with GFCI. The tester is really two functions stuck in one convenient package:



            • "Magic 8-ball" (Harper's term) tester for hot vs. neutral vs. ground connections. Not 100% reliable for diagnosis of a particular problem, but very useful for basic testing.

            • GFCI tester - drains a small amount of current from hot to ground to test GFCI functionality.






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 7 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            manassehkatzmanassehkatz

            16.5k1 gold badge24 silver badges51 bronze badges




            16.5k1 gold badge24 silver badges51 bronze badges


























                1














                You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
                As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )



                Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
                Anyways..
                Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".



                All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.



                Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor



                Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                  1














                  You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
                  As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )



                  Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
                  Anyways..
                  Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".



                  All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.



                  Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
                    As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )



                    Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
                    Anyways..
                    Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".



                    All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.



                    Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    You can indeed install a GFCI as a first device, but you need to know which are the incoming "Hot" (usually black) and "Neutral" ( white).
                    As well and hopefully, there's a associated ground ( usually bare copper wire )



                    Lighting can be protected, but there would have to be a reason. And that would be " Can a person come in contact with a light fixture ". I do know in a couple cases where in very big / expensive homes I have seen enormous sized bathrooms with a table / chair and a table lamp wall outlet which was switched from a wall switch... "That" would be one scenario where lighting would be protected from a GFCI.
                    Anyways..
                    Note that on the GFCI Outlet connections are labeled "Line" and "Load".



                    All above being said you need to establish which wires are indeed your incoming power. Home Depot / Lowe's sells proximity / non contact testers as well as the meter types.



                    Always turn off the source power before you attempt any work.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor



                    Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    answered 5 hours ago









                    Retired ElectricianRetired Electrician

                    765 bronze badges




                    765 bronze badges




                    New contributor



                    Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




                    New contributor




                    Retired Electrician is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.


























                        0














                        Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.



                        Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).



                        Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).



                        My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.



                        If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.



                        Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.



                        By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.






                        share|improve this answer































                          0














                          Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.



                          Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).



                          Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).



                          My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.



                          If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.



                          Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.



                          By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.






                          share|improve this answer





























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.



                            Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).



                            Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).



                            My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.



                            If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.



                            Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.



                            By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.






                            share|improve this answer















                            Using a GFCI device in the first position to protect the entire circuit is a perfectly fine idea. It will work if the device is wired correctly and the rest of the circuit is (already) wired correctly.



                            Lights definitely can be placed on GFCI (it just doesn't buy you much if they are also grounded).



                            Where this usually goes wrong is the warning tape that says (in as many words) "For Wizards Only". It covers up the LOAD terminals (though we have seen one that covered LINE by mistake). Typically people note that a plain receptacle has 4 screws (interchangeable), and RIP! the GFCI also has 4 screws (NOT interchangeable, but they don't know that).



                            My trick of hooking up GFCIs is to leave the warning tape in place and connect LINE first. Cap off everything else, and power up. The GFCI socket should be able to power an appliance, test, and reset.



                            If more than one wire needs to go to a LINE terminal, I recommend pigtailing rather than using the GFCI as a splice. That way you can test the circuit with the GFCI omitted altogether, and test the GFCI after that all checks out.



                            Once all that checks out, everything hooked to LINE is frozen. It will not be removed from LINE. Now you tear off the tape and add any hot-neutral pairs to LOAD. Then you power up and test again. If you have any problems, you know the LINE wires were not the problem, so you focus your troubleshooting efforts on LOAD. And it can be a pre-existing defect in downline wiring, e.g. A bootlegged ground or shared/borrowed neutral.



                            By not hooking up all 4 wires at once, you avert the common mistake of hooking LINE wires to LOAD and vice versa. A modern GFCI will not power up in those conditions. An old one will, but TEST/RESET won't work.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 2 hours ago

























                            answered 3 hours ago









                            HarperHarper

                            92.2k6 gold badges67 silver badges190 bronze badges




                            92.2k6 gold badges67 silver badges190 bronze badges























                                DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                DSlomer64 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171394%2fproblem-with-gfci-at-start-of-circuit-with-both-lights-and-two-receptacles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367