Why does this image of cyclocarbon look like a nonagon?How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?Why does urine smell like ammonia?Does diamond have a pungent smell like graphite?Why does it require so much pressure to create diamonds?How do we know if this following molecule is a superimposable mirror image or non-superimposable mirror image ? [See Image attached]How would this reaction look like in a potential energy diagram? (SN1 Reaction)

Why is su world executable?

Meaning of だけはわからない

Attacking the Hydra

Java methods to add and authenticate users in MySQL

How do I ask for 2-3 days per week remote work in a job interview?

How to gracefully leave a company you helped start?

The space of cusp forms for GL_2 over F_q(T)

What would cause a nuclear power plant to break down after 2000 years, but not sooner?

Good way to stop electrolyte tabs from turning into powder?

How to mock ApexTestQueueItem, AsyncApexJob, and ApexTestResult for test coverage?

Physical Interpretation of an Overdamped Pendulum

Why should I pay for an SSL certificate?

What should I do if actually I found a serious flaw in someone's PhD thesis and an article derived from that PhD thesis?

Will some rockets really collapse under their own weight?

How does Monero protect users from inflation bugs if the blockchain can't be audited?

Output with the same length always

How does the Moon's gravity affect Earth's oceans despite Earth's stronger gravitational pull?

A Magic Diamond

Gofer work in exchange for LoR

Is this bar slide trick shown on Cheers real or a visual effect?

Eric Andre had a dream

Select elements of a list by comparing it to another list

Why does this image of cyclocarbon look like a nonagon?

Would getting a natural 20 with a penalty still count as a critical hit?



Why does this image of cyclocarbon look like a nonagon?


How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?Why does urine smell like ammonia?Does diamond have a pungent smell like graphite?Why does it require so much pressure to create diamonds?How do we know if this following molecule is a superimposable mirror image or non-superimposable mirror image ? [See Image attached]How would this reaction look like in a potential energy diagram? (SN1 Reaction)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


The $C_18$ allotrope cyclocarbon has been synthesized and imaged. Science has most details behind a paywall, but this discussion includes an image:



enter image description here



In this octakaidecagonal molecule, each $colorblueC$ is bonded viz. $C-colorblueCequiv C$. Yet the above image looks like a nonagon. Why does every other carbon atom stand out as an obvious vertex while the others don't? My thoughts:



  • The internal angles are close to $180^circ$, making vertices hard to see. However, I wouldn't expect the internal angles of this octakaidecagon to differ much.

  • I wonder if this molecule has a delocalised ring analogous to the one in benzene. On this idea, each of the nine visible edges could alternate between the states $C-Cequiv C,,Cequiv C-C$. But this wouldn't explain why "odd" vertices have one appearance while "even" ones have another. I'm not convinced of this idea anyway, because it would average out to $C=C=C$, unlike the $1.5$-bonds in benzene.









share|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Related: How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    8 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


The $C_18$ allotrope cyclocarbon has been synthesized and imaged. Science has most details behind a paywall, but this discussion includes an image:



enter image description here



In this octakaidecagonal molecule, each $colorblueC$ is bonded viz. $C-colorblueCequiv C$. Yet the above image looks like a nonagon. Why does every other carbon atom stand out as an obvious vertex while the others don't? My thoughts:



  • The internal angles are close to $180^circ$, making vertices hard to see. However, I wouldn't expect the internal angles of this octakaidecagon to differ much.

  • I wonder if this molecule has a delocalised ring analogous to the one in benzene. On this idea, each of the nine visible edges could alternate between the states $C-Cequiv C,,Cequiv C-C$. But this wouldn't explain why "odd" vertices have one appearance while "even" ones have another. I'm not convinced of this idea anyway, because it would average out to $C=C=C$, unlike the $1.5$-bonds in benzene.









share|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Related: How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    8 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


The $C_18$ allotrope cyclocarbon has been synthesized and imaged. Science has most details behind a paywall, but this discussion includes an image:



enter image description here



In this octakaidecagonal molecule, each $colorblueC$ is bonded viz. $C-colorblueCequiv C$. Yet the above image looks like a nonagon. Why does every other carbon atom stand out as an obvious vertex while the others don't? My thoughts:



  • The internal angles are close to $180^circ$, making vertices hard to see. However, I wouldn't expect the internal angles of this octakaidecagon to differ much.

  • I wonder if this molecule has a delocalised ring analogous to the one in benzene. On this idea, each of the nine visible edges could alternate between the states $C-Cequiv C,,Cequiv C-C$. But this wouldn't explain why "odd" vertices have one appearance while "even" ones have another. I'm not convinced of this idea anyway, because it would average out to $C=C=C$, unlike the $1.5$-bonds in benzene.









share|improve this question









$endgroup$




The $C_18$ allotrope cyclocarbon has been synthesized and imaged. Science has most details behind a paywall, but this discussion includes an image:



enter image description here



In this octakaidecagonal molecule, each $colorblueC$ is bonded viz. $C-colorblueCequiv C$. Yet the above image looks like a nonagon. Why does every other carbon atom stand out as an obvious vertex while the others don't? My thoughts:



  • The internal angles are close to $180^circ$, making vertices hard to see. However, I wouldn't expect the internal angles of this octakaidecagon to differ much.

  • I wonder if this molecule has a delocalised ring analogous to the one in benzene. On this idea, each of the nine visible edges could alternate between the states $C-Cequiv C,,Cequiv C-C$. But this wouldn't explain why "odd" vertices have one appearance while "even" ones have another. I'm not convinced of this idea anyway, because it would average out to $C=C=C$, unlike the $1.5$-bonds in benzene.






organic-chemistry carbon-allotropes






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









J.G.J.G.

1764 bronze badges




1764 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Related: How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Related: How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?
    $endgroup$
    – andselisk
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
Related: How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?
$endgroup$
– andselisk
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related: How small is the smallest known carbon ring containing only double bonds?
$endgroup$
– andselisk
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The first thing to say is that I'm not sure where that image is taken from; it's neither in the original article nor in the supporting information to the article. Therefore, it appears to be more of an "artist's impression" rather than an actual atomic force microscopy (AFM) image, which is what was reported in the paper.



Nevertheless, the actual AFM images of $ceC18$ are in Figs. 3Q and 3R. They are referred to as "AFM far" and "AFM close" respectively because of the height of the probe ($Delta z$):



AFM images of cyclo[18]carbon



One can indeed see that there is 9-fold symmetry (technically, $D_mathrm9h$). This implies that $ceC18$ has a 'polyyne' structure in which there are two different types of bonds $ce-C#C-C#C-phantom$, rather than a 'cumulene' structure in which every bond is equivalent $ce=C=C=C=C=$ (prior to this, computational studies had been equivocal as to which form was more stable).



The bright spots within the ring do not correspond to carbon atoms, but rather to carbon–carbon triple bonds. This is consistent with the AFM images obtained for other similar intermediates in the synthesis of cyclo[18]carbon. In the authors' own words:




Assigning the bright features in the “AFM far” images to the location of triple bonds, we observed curved polyyne segments with the expected number of triple bonds: 5 in $ceC22O4$ and 8 in $ceC20O2$. At small tip height, we observed sharp bond-like features with corners at the assigned positions of triple bonds and straight lines in between. This contrast was explained by CO tip relaxation, in that maxima in the potential energy landscape, from which the tip apex was repelled, were located above the triple bonds because of their high electron density. In between these maxima, ridges in the potential landscape led to straight bond-like features.




(The two bright spots outside the ring are due to individual $ceCO$ molecules.)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "431"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119283%2fwhy-does-this-image-of-cyclocarbon-look-like-a-nonagon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    The first thing to say is that I'm not sure where that image is taken from; it's neither in the original article nor in the supporting information to the article. Therefore, it appears to be more of an "artist's impression" rather than an actual atomic force microscopy (AFM) image, which is what was reported in the paper.



    Nevertheless, the actual AFM images of $ceC18$ are in Figs. 3Q and 3R. They are referred to as "AFM far" and "AFM close" respectively because of the height of the probe ($Delta z$):



    AFM images of cyclo[18]carbon



    One can indeed see that there is 9-fold symmetry (technically, $D_mathrm9h$). This implies that $ceC18$ has a 'polyyne' structure in which there are two different types of bonds $ce-C#C-C#C-phantom$, rather than a 'cumulene' structure in which every bond is equivalent $ce=C=C=C=C=$ (prior to this, computational studies had been equivocal as to which form was more stable).



    The bright spots within the ring do not correspond to carbon atoms, but rather to carbon–carbon triple bonds. This is consistent with the AFM images obtained for other similar intermediates in the synthesis of cyclo[18]carbon. In the authors' own words:




    Assigning the bright features in the “AFM far” images to the location of triple bonds, we observed curved polyyne segments with the expected number of triple bonds: 5 in $ceC22O4$ and 8 in $ceC20O2$. At small tip height, we observed sharp bond-like features with corners at the assigned positions of triple bonds and straight lines in between. This contrast was explained by CO tip relaxation, in that maxima in the potential energy landscape, from which the tip apex was repelled, were located above the triple bonds because of their high electron density. In between these maxima, ridges in the potential landscape led to straight bond-like features.




    (The two bright spots outside the ring are due to individual $ceCO$ molecules.)






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      7












      $begingroup$

      The first thing to say is that I'm not sure where that image is taken from; it's neither in the original article nor in the supporting information to the article. Therefore, it appears to be more of an "artist's impression" rather than an actual atomic force microscopy (AFM) image, which is what was reported in the paper.



      Nevertheless, the actual AFM images of $ceC18$ are in Figs. 3Q and 3R. They are referred to as "AFM far" and "AFM close" respectively because of the height of the probe ($Delta z$):



      AFM images of cyclo[18]carbon



      One can indeed see that there is 9-fold symmetry (technically, $D_mathrm9h$). This implies that $ceC18$ has a 'polyyne' structure in which there are two different types of bonds $ce-C#C-C#C-phantom$, rather than a 'cumulene' structure in which every bond is equivalent $ce=C=C=C=C=$ (prior to this, computational studies had been equivocal as to which form was more stable).



      The bright spots within the ring do not correspond to carbon atoms, but rather to carbon–carbon triple bonds. This is consistent with the AFM images obtained for other similar intermediates in the synthesis of cyclo[18]carbon. In the authors' own words:




      Assigning the bright features in the “AFM far” images to the location of triple bonds, we observed curved polyyne segments with the expected number of triple bonds: 5 in $ceC22O4$ and 8 in $ceC20O2$. At small tip height, we observed sharp bond-like features with corners at the assigned positions of triple bonds and straight lines in between. This contrast was explained by CO tip relaxation, in that maxima in the potential energy landscape, from which the tip apex was repelled, were located above the triple bonds because of their high electron density. In between these maxima, ridges in the potential landscape led to straight bond-like features.




      (The two bright spots outside the ring are due to individual $ceCO$ molecules.)






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        The first thing to say is that I'm not sure where that image is taken from; it's neither in the original article nor in the supporting information to the article. Therefore, it appears to be more of an "artist's impression" rather than an actual atomic force microscopy (AFM) image, which is what was reported in the paper.



        Nevertheless, the actual AFM images of $ceC18$ are in Figs. 3Q and 3R. They are referred to as "AFM far" and "AFM close" respectively because of the height of the probe ($Delta z$):



        AFM images of cyclo[18]carbon



        One can indeed see that there is 9-fold symmetry (technically, $D_mathrm9h$). This implies that $ceC18$ has a 'polyyne' structure in which there are two different types of bonds $ce-C#C-C#C-phantom$, rather than a 'cumulene' structure in which every bond is equivalent $ce=C=C=C=C=$ (prior to this, computational studies had been equivocal as to which form was more stable).



        The bright spots within the ring do not correspond to carbon atoms, but rather to carbon–carbon triple bonds. This is consistent with the AFM images obtained for other similar intermediates in the synthesis of cyclo[18]carbon. In the authors' own words:




        Assigning the bright features in the “AFM far” images to the location of triple bonds, we observed curved polyyne segments with the expected number of triple bonds: 5 in $ceC22O4$ and 8 in $ceC20O2$. At small tip height, we observed sharp bond-like features with corners at the assigned positions of triple bonds and straight lines in between. This contrast was explained by CO tip relaxation, in that maxima in the potential energy landscape, from which the tip apex was repelled, were located above the triple bonds because of their high electron density. In between these maxima, ridges in the potential landscape led to straight bond-like features.




        (The two bright spots outside the ring are due to individual $ceCO$ molecules.)






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The first thing to say is that I'm not sure where that image is taken from; it's neither in the original article nor in the supporting information to the article. Therefore, it appears to be more of an "artist's impression" rather than an actual atomic force microscopy (AFM) image, which is what was reported in the paper.



        Nevertheless, the actual AFM images of $ceC18$ are in Figs. 3Q and 3R. They are referred to as "AFM far" and "AFM close" respectively because of the height of the probe ($Delta z$):



        AFM images of cyclo[18]carbon



        One can indeed see that there is 9-fold symmetry (technically, $D_mathrm9h$). This implies that $ceC18$ has a 'polyyne' structure in which there are two different types of bonds $ce-C#C-C#C-phantom$, rather than a 'cumulene' structure in which every bond is equivalent $ce=C=C=C=C=$ (prior to this, computational studies had been equivocal as to which form was more stable).



        The bright spots within the ring do not correspond to carbon atoms, but rather to carbon–carbon triple bonds. This is consistent with the AFM images obtained for other similar intermediates in the synthesis of cyclo[18]carbon. In the authors' own words:




        Assigning the bright features in the “AFM far” images to the location of triple bonds, we observed curved polyyne segments with the expected number of triple bonds: 5 in $ceC22O4$ and 8 in $ceC20O2$. At small tip height, we observed sharp bond-like features with corners at the assigned positions of triple bonds and straight lines in between. This contrast was explained by CO tip relaxation, in that maxima in the potential energy landscape, from which the tip apex was repelled, were located above the triple bonds because of their high electron density. In between these maxima, ridges in the potential landscape led to straight bond-like features.




        (The two bright spots outside the ring are due to individual $ceCO$ molecules.)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        orthocresolorthocresol

        42.7k7 gold badges132 silver badges262 bronze badges




        42.7k7 gold badges132 silver badges262 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119283%2fwhy-does-this-image-of-cyclocarbon-look-like-a-nonagon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單