How to “know” if I have a passion?Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social lifeShould I stay in school?Should I stay in my PhD?I want my conservation research to make a difference. I am a first-year PhD student. What should my career path be?Are software engineers with PhD in demand in Academia?Is it worth going to college when you have no real passion for the subject you will study?

Was Switzerland really impossible to invade during WW2?

Do living authors still get paid royalties for their old work?

Is there a known non-euclidean geometry where two concentric circles of different radii can intersect? (as in the novel "The Universe Between")

How could Tony Stark wield the Infinity Nano Gauntlet - at all?

Count the frequency of items in an array

Why does my air conditioner still run, even when it is cooler outside than in?

What is the evidence on the danger of feeding whole blueberries and grapes to infants and toddlers?

Have only girls been born for a long time in this village?

How much code would a codegolf golf if a codegolf could golf code?

Changing a TGV booking

Can a Beast Master ranger choose a swarm as an animal companion?

Convert HTML color to OLE

Does C++20 mandate source code being stored in files?

Is Eldritch Blast affected by antimagic field

Church Booleans

Was Tuvok bluffing when he said that Voyager's transporters rendered the Kazon weapons useless?

Count the frequency of integers in an array

How to think about joining a company whose business I do not understand?

Vacuum collapse -- why do strong metals implode but glass doesn't?

Is it appropriate for a business to ask me for my credit report?

Would it be illegal for Facebook to actively promote a political agenda?

Earliest evidence of objects intended for future archaeologists?

Does a Spores druid's extra damage from Symbiotic Entity apply to a creature hit by the secondary damage of Green-Flame Blade?

Is there such a thing as too inconvenient?



How to “know” if I have a passion?


Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social lifeShould I stay in school?Should I stay in my PhD?I want my conservation research to make a difference. I am a first-year PhD student. What should my career path be?Are software engineers with PhD in demand in Academia?Is it worth going to college when you have no real passion for the subject you will study?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Most students encounter a life-changing decision during their undergraduate years. That is either to choose a high paying yet a career they might not be passionate about or a career they like but is unlikely to be high paying.



It is not unusual to find career advice popping in various internet circles that fixate on the importance of passion. The general rhetoric is "If you have a "sufficient" passion for X, you are guaranteed a "good" career in X and hence a good life."
Now, on some levels, the advice makes sense. Students are usually willing to sacrifice guaranteed-to-pay-well professions in hopes to excel in their own professions fueled by passion.
Now my question is, What is the sufficiency precisely in this context?



To be more precise, say I think I feel passionate for mathematics. Maybe because I am good at it. Maybe because I contemplate on it in my free time. Now when it comes to the actual profession, the "apparent" passion fades away and I am left regretting pursuing the field (something that is not unusual to see with Ph.D. students).
Or say, I feel I like physics and mathematics but I also get easily swayed away by high paying professions like data science.



How can I come to "know" whether I truly have a passion for mathematics or whether I was merely deluded into thinking that because I was made to feel that I am good at mathematics by the relevant education system?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You are passionate about a field if problems in that field keep you awake at night.

    – Bob Brown
    7 hours ago











  • It's okay to be passionate about data science, too. Hard for us to pick your career for you, though.

    – Bryan Krause
    7 hours ago

















3















Most students encounter a life-changing decision during their undergraduate years. That is either to choose a high paying yet a career they might not be passionate about or a career they like but is unlikely to be high paying.



It is not unusual to find career advice popping in various internet circles that fixate on the importance of passion. The general rhetoric is "If you have a "sufficient" passion for X, you are guaranteed a "good" career in X and hence a good life."
Now, on some levels, the advice makes sense. Students are usually willing to sacrifice guaranteed-to-pay-well professions in hopes to excel in their own professions fueled by passion.
Now my question is, What is the sufficiency precisely in this context?



To be more precise, say I think I feel passionate for mathematics. Maybe because I am good at it. Maybe because I contemplate on it in my free time. Now when it comes to the actual profession, the "apparent" passion fades away and I am left regretting pursuing the field (something that is not unusual to see with Ph.D. students).
Or say, I feel I like physics and mathematics but I also get easily swayed away by high paying professions like data science.



How can I come to "know" whether I truly have a passion for mathematics or whether I was merely deluded into thinking that because I was made to feel that I am good at mathematics by the relevant education system?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You are passionate about a field if problems in that field keep you awake at night.

    – Bob Brown
    7 hours ago











  • It's okay to be passionate about data science, too. Hard for us to pick your career for you, though.

    – Bryan Krause
    7 hours ago













3












3








3


1






Most students encounter a life-changing decision during their undergraduate years. That is either to choose a high paying yet a career they might not be passionate about or a career they like but is unlikely to be high paying.



It is not unusual to find career advice popping in various internet circles that fixate on the importance of passion. The general rhetoric is "If you have a "sufficient" passion for X, you are guaranteed a "good" career in X and hence a good life."
Now, on some levels, the advice makes sense. Students are usually willing to sacrifice guaranteed-to-pay-well professions in hopes to excel in their own professions fueled by passion.
Now my question is, What is the sufficiency precisely in this context?



To be more precise, say I think I feel passionate for mathematics. Maybe because I am good at it. Maybe because I contemplate on it in my free time. Now when it comes to the actual profession, the "apparent" passion fades away and I am left regretting pursuing the field (something that is not unusual to see with Ph.D. students).
Or say, I feel I like physics and mathematics but I also get easily swayed away by high paying professions like data science.



How can I come to "know" whether I truly have a passion for mathematics or whether I was merely deluded into thinking that because I was made to feel that I am good at mathematics by the relevant education system?










share|improve this question














Most students encounter a life-changing decision during their undergraduate years. That is either to choose a high paying yet a career they might not be passionate about or a career they like but is unlikely to be high paying.



It is not unusual to find career advice popping in various internet circles that fixate on the importance of passion. The general rhetoric is "If you have a "sufficient" passion for X, you are guaranteed a "good" career in X and hence a good life."
Now, on some levels, the advice makes sense. Students are usually willing to sacrifice guaranteed-to-pay-well professions in hopes to excel in their own professions fueled by passion.
Now my question is, What is the sufficiency precisely in this context?



To be more precise, say I think I feel passionate for mathematics. Maybe because I am good at it. Maybe because I contemplate on it in my free time. Now when it comes to the actual profession, the "apparent" passion fades away and I am left regretting pursuing the field (something that is not unusual to see with Ph.D. students).
Or say, I feel I like physics and mathematics but I also get easily swayed away by high paying professions like data science.



How can I come to "know" whether I truly have a passion for mathematics or whether I was merely deluded into thinking that because I was made to feel that I am good at mathematics by the relevant education system?







career-path undergraduate






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









mathnoob123mathnoob123

1264 bronze badges




1264 bronze badges










  • 2





    You are passionate about a field if problems in that field keep you awake at night.

    – Bob Brown
    7 hours ago











  • It's okay to be passionate about data science, too. Hard for us to pick your career for you, though.

    – Bryan Krause
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    You are passionate about a field if problems in that field keep you awake at night.

    – Bob Brown
    7 hours ago











  • It's okay to be passionate about data science, too. Hard for us to pick your career for you, though.

    – Bryan Krause
    7 hours ago







2




2





You are passionate about a field if problems in that field keep you awake at night.

– Bob Brown
7 hours ago





You are passionate about a field if problems in that field keep you awake at night.

– Bob Brown
7 hours ago













It's okay to be passionate about data science, too. Hard for us to pick your career for you, though.

– Bryan Krause
7 hours ago





It's okay to be passionate about data science, too. Hard for us to pick your career for you, though.

– Bryan Krause
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3














I'm going to just guess that if you are asking the question, then you don't have it. Yet. Or at least, not a lot of it. Yet. But there is time to develop it and, at your age, my suggestion is that you don't worry too much about it. Yet. And you look around at the possibilities.



A wasted life is one in which you can't really do what you really want to do. Too many people have that forced on them by circumstances, but if you can manage it, spend some time to see what develops.



And also expect that at different times in your life you will have passion for different things, some quite distinct from the others. If you can manage to follow those passions then you can have a rich and rewarding life. And you don't get a do-over.



You will know it when you experience it. But first, experience a lot of things.






share|improve this answer
































    3














    If you were really passionate about something, you'd know because you'd want to do it in exclusion of all else. You think about that thing even if you're bathing, eating, etc.



    Having said that I can understand what you're asking because if we define passion this way, precious few people would be passionate about anything that they can actually make a living from. That includes academics - e.g. this question




    I just want to get married, and have weekends and evenings off, and chill out and play board games, and have nice conversations with friends, and have time to exercise and eat good food, and partake in hobbies, and read books and play computer games and watch movies and write a novel or two.




    And from there it's just a short way to "I just want to get married and have my entire week off ..."



    So now what? I suggest:



    1. Can you imagine yourself doing it as a career? You don't have to like it more than board games, conversations with friends, etc, but you should like it enough that you can do it for upwards of 40+ hours a week. On the other hand if it starts getting painful to go to work every day, it's not a good idea to do it.

    2. Are you good at it? If you are, then you can get results even if you aren't passionate (by above definition) about it.

    It may not be a popular position, but you can certainly base your career around things that you aren't passionate about (by above definition). For example, my mother became a doctor because that's traditionally what all good students at her high school did. She didn't particularly like it any more than other careers, but she studied it, did well at it, became a trained doctor, became a specialist, and eventually managed her own department. She would often complain about her work at the dinner table, and talk about e.g. how she would rather teach language at a local high school, but by all metrics she still had a successful career.






    share|improve this answer
































      2














      I suppose the point of this answer is to reject the notion that having a passion for area X is any sort of prerequisite for working in area X and having a successful career. I should make clear that I'm an assistant professor of mathematics at Oberlin College, a small liberal arts college in northeastern Ohio. My job affords me a balance between teaching and research that I love and wouldn't give up for the world. Whether this counts as success is obviously a matter of opinion.



      Throughout college (and grad school) I met math majors that knew they wanted to study math for the rest of their lives from the age of 12 or 13. Myself, I became a math major because my engineering pre-major advisor thought that taking two math classes in the spring of my freshman year was a bit much and thus I registered for five math classes to spite her. I had many interests as an undergraduate (mostly in history, foreign languages and literature), and feel that I probably could have gone on to a successful career in any number of them that I would have ultimately found rewarding.



      Now there's no way to get around the fact that to succeed in grad school you're going to have to work very hard. In fact you'll probably work so hard that you'll convince yourself that it's a blessing you're even being paid because you'd gladly do this work for free.



      I guess my point is that if you really enjoy a field and have a talent for it then you shouldn't discount going on to grad school for it. Even if your passion for the subject doesn't coincide with the romantic notions of some of your classmates. At the end of the day hard work is likely the stronger predicter of success in any event.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 2





        " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

        – Buffy
        5 hours ago


















      0














      People who say you still need to find it and stuff are screwing up your brain. There is no the "lazy" type of passion that will drive you to do something same and specific every day. It's human nature. "Specialization is for insects". That's why you need some external motivator. Like, I want to be a great mathematician and then specialize even more in which field and stick with it.



      Passion is a combination of external and internal motivation.





      share








      New contributor



      hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "415"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134905%2fhow-to-know-if-i-have-a-passion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        I'm going to just guess that if you are asking the question, then you don't have it. Yet. Or at least, not a lot of it. Yet. But there is time to develop it and, at your age, my suggestion is that you don't worry too much about it. Yet. And you look around at the possibilities.



        A wasted life is one in which you can't really do what you really want to do. Too many people have that forced on them by circumstances, but if you can manage it, spend some time to see what develops.



        And also expect that at different times in your life you will have passion for different things, some quite distinct from the others. If you can manage to follow those passions then you can have a rich and rewarding life. And you don't get a do-over.



        You will know it when you experience it. But first, experience a lot of things.






        share|improve this answer





























          3














          I'm going to just guess that if you are asking the question, then you don't have it. Yet. Or at least, not a lot of it. Yet. But there is time to develop it and, at your age, my suggestion is that you don't worry too much about it. Yet. And you look around at the possibilities.



          A wasted life is one in which you can't really do what you really want to do. Too many people have that forced on them by circumstances, but if you can manage it, spend some time to see what develops.



          And also expect that at different times in your life you will have passion for different things, some quite distinct from the others. If you can manage to follow those passions then you can have a rich and rewarding life. And you don't get a do-over.



          You will know it when you experience it. But first, experience a lot of things.






          share|improve this answer



























            3












            3








            3







            I'm going to just guess that if you are asking the question, then you don't have it. Yet. Or at least, not a lot of it. Yet. But there is time to develop it and, at your age, my suggestion is that you don't worry too much about it. Yet. And you look around at the possibilities.



            A wasted life is one in which you can't really do what you really want to do. Too many people have that forced on them by circumstances, but if you can manage it, spend some time to see what develops.



            And also expect that at different times in your life you will have passion for different things, some quite distinct from the others. If you can manage to follow those passions then you can have a rich and rewarding life. And you don't get a do-over.



            You will know it when you experience it. But first, experience a lot of things.






            share|improve this answer













            I'm going to just guess that if you are asking the question, then you don't have it. Yet. Or at least, not a lot of it. Yet. But there is time to develop it and, at your age, my suggestion is that you don't worry too much about it. Yet. And you look around at the possibilities.



            A wasted life is one in which you can't really do what you really want to do. Too many people have that forced on them by circumstances, but if you can manage it, spend some time to see what develops.



            And also expect that at different times in your life you will have passion for different things, some quite distinct from the others. If you can manage to follow those passions then you can have a rich and rewarding life. And you don't get a do-over.



            You will know it when you experience it. But first, experience a lot of things.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            BuffyBuffy

            77.7k21 gold badges235 silver badges346 bronze badges




            77.7k21 gold badges235 silver badges346 bronze badges


























                3














                If you were really passionate about something, you'd know because you'd want to do it in exclusion of all else. You think about that thing even if you're bathing, eating, etc.



                Having said that I can understand what you're asking because if we define passion this way, precious few people would be passionate about anything that they can actually make a living from. That includes academics - e.g. this question




                I just want to get married, and have weekends and evenings off, and chill out and play board games, and have nice conversations with friends, and have time to exercise and eat good food, and partake in hobbies, and read books and play computer games and watch movies and write a novel or two.




                And from there it's just a short way to "I just want to get married and have my entire week off ..."



                So now what? I suggest:



                1. Can you imagine yourself doing it as a career? You don't have to like it more than board games, conversations with friends, etc, but you should like it enough that you can do it for upwards of 40+ hours a week. On the other hand if it starts getting painful to go to work every day, it's not a good idea to do it.

                2. Are you good at it? If you are, then you can get results even if you aren't passionate (by above definition) about it.

                It may not be a popular position, but you can certainly base your career around things that you aren't passionate about (by above definition). For example, my mother became a doctor because that's traditionally what all good students at her high school did. She didn't particularly like it any more than other careers, but she studied it, did well at it, became a trained doctor, became a specialist, and eventually managed her own department. She would often complain about her work at the dinner table, and talk about e.g. how she would rather teach language at a local high school, but by all metrics she still had a successful career.






                share|improve this answer





























                  3














                  If you were really passionate about something, you'd know because you'd want to do it in exclusion of all else. You think about that thing even if you're bathing, eating, etc.



                  Having said that I can understand what you're asking because if we define passion this way, precious few people would be passionate about anything that they can actually make a living from. That includes academics - e.g. this question




                  I just want to get married, and have weekends and evenings off, and chill out and play board games, and have nice conversations with friends, and have time to exercise and eat good food, and partake in hobbies, and read books and play computer games and watch movies and write a novel or two.




                  And from there it's just a short way to "I just want to get married and have my entire week off ..."



                  So now what? I suggest:



                  1. Can you imagine yourself doing it as a career? You don't have to like it more than board games, conversations with friends, etc, but you should like it enough that you can do it for upwards of 40+ hours a week. On the other hand if it starts getting painful to go to work every day, it's not a good idea to do it.

                  2. Are you good at it? If you are, then you can get results even if you aren't passionate (by above definition) about it.

                  It may not be a popular position, but you can certainly base your career around things that you aren't passionate about (by above definition). For example, my mother became a doctor because that's traditionally what all good students at her high school did. She didn't particularly like it any more than other careers, but she studied it, did well at it, became a trained doctor, became a specialist, and eventually managed her own department. She would often complain about her work at the dinner table, and talk about e.g. how she would rather teach language at a local high school, but by all metrics she still had a successful career.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    3












                    3








                    3







                    If you were really passionate about something, you'd know because you'd want to do it in exclusion of all else. You think about that thing even if you're bathing, eating, etc.



                    Having said that I can understand what you're asking because if we define passion this way, precious few people would be passionate about anything that they can actually make a living from. That includes academics - e.g. this question




                    I just want to get married, and have weekends and evenings off, and chill out and play board games, and have nice conversations with friends, and have time to exercise and eat good food, and partake in hobbies, and read books and play computer games and watch movies and write a novel or two.




                    And from there it's just a short way to "I just want to get married and have my entire week off ..."



                    So now what? I suggest:



                    1. Can you imagine yourself doing it as a career? You don't have to like it more than board games, conversations with friends, etc, but you should like it enough that you can do it for upwards of 40+ hours a week. On the other hand if it starts getting painful to go to work every day, it's not a good idea to do it.

                    2. Are you good at it? If you are, then you can get results even if you aren't passionate (by above definition) about it.

                    It may not be a popular position, but you can certainly base your career around things that you aren't passionate about (by above definition). For example, my mother became a doctor because that's traditionally what all good students at her high school did. She didn't particularly like it any more than other careers, but she studied it, did well at it, became a trained doctor, became a specialist, and eventually managed her own department. She would often complain about her work at the dinner table, and talk about e.g. how she would rather teach language at a local high school, but by all metrics she still had a successful career.






                    share|improve this answer













                    If you were really passionate about something, you'd know because you'd want to do it in exclusion of all else. You think about that thing even if you're bathing, eating, etc.



                    Having said that I can understand what you're asking because if we define passion this way, precious few people would be passionate about anything that they can actually make a living from. That includes academics - e.g. this question




                    I just want to get married, and have weekends and evenings off, and chill out and play board games, and have nice conversations with friends, and have time to exercise and eat good food, and partake in hobbies, and read books and play computer games and watch movies and write a novel or two.




                    And from there it's just a short way to "I just want to get married and have my entire week off ..."



                    So now what? I suggest:



                    1. Can you imagine yourself doing it as a career? You don't have to like it more than board games, conversations with friends, etc, but you should like it enough that you can do it for upwards of 40+ hours a week. On the other hand if it starts getting painful to go to work every day, it's not a good idea to do it.

                    2. Are you good at it? If you are, then you can get results even if you aren't passionate (by above definition) about it.

                    It may not be a popular position, but you can certainly base your career around things that you aren't passionate about (by above definition). For example, my mother became a doctor because that's traditionally what all good students at her high school did. She didn't particularly like it any more than other careers, but she studied it, did well at it, became a trained doctor, became a specialist, and eventually managed her own department. She would often complain about her work at the dinner table, and talk about e.g. how she would rather teach language at a local high school, but by all metrics she still had a successful career.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 6 hours ago









                    AllureAllure

                    42.8k20 gold badges129 silver badges189 bronze badges




                    42.8k20 gold badges129 silver badges189 bronze badges
























                        2














                        I suppose the point of this answer is to reject the notion that having a passion for area X is any sort of prerequisite for working in area X and having a successful career. I should make clear that I'm an assistant professor of mathematics at Oberlin College, a small liberal arts college in northeastern Ohio. My job affords me a balance between teaching and research that I love and wouldn't give up for the world. Whether this counts as success is obviously a matter of opinion.



                        Throughout college (and grad school) I met math majors that knew they wanted to study math for the rest of their lives from the age of 12 or 13. Myself, I became a math major because my engineering pre-major advisor thought that taking two math classes in the spring of my freshman year was a bit much and thus I registered for five math classes to spite her. I had many interests as an undergraduate (mostly in history, foreign languages and literature), and feel that I probably could have gone on to a successful career in any number of them that I would have ultimately found rewarding.



                        Now there's no way to get around the fact that to succeed in grad school you're going to have to work very hard. In fact you'll probably work so hard that you'll convince yourself that it's a blessing you're even being paid because you'd gladly do this work for free.



                        I guess my point is that if you really enjoy a field and have a talent for it then you shouldn't discount going on to grad school for it. Even if your passion for the subject doesn't coincide with the romantic notions of some of your classmates. At the end of the day hard work is likely the stronger predicter of success in any event.






                        share|improve this answer




















                        • 2





                          " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

                          – Buffy
                          5 hours ago















                        2














                        I suppose the point of this answer is to reject the notion that having a passion for area X is any sort of prerequisite for working in area X and having a successful career. I should make clear that I'm an assistant professor of mathematics at Oberlin College, a small liberal arts college in northeastern Ohio. My job affords me a balance between teaching and research that I love and wouldn't give up for the world. Whether this counts as success is obviously a matter of opinion.



                        Throughout college (and grad school) I met math majors that knew they wanted to study math for the rest of their lives from the age of 12 or 13. Myself, I became a math major because my engineering pre-major advisor thought that taking two math classes in the spring of my freshman year was a bit much and thus I registered for five math classes to spite her. I had many interests as an undergraduate (mostly in history, foreign languages and literature), and feel that I probably could have gone on to a successful career in any number of them that I would have ultimately found rewarding.



                        Now there's no way to get around the fact that to succeed in grad school you're going to have to work very hard. In fact you'll probably work so hard that you'll convince yourself that it's a blessing you're even being paid because you'd gladly do this work for free.



                        I guess my point is that if you really enjoy a field and have a talent for it then you shouldn't discount going on to grad school for it. Even if your passion for the subject doesn't coincide with the romantic notions of some of your classmates. At the end of the day hard work is likely the stronger predicter of success in any event.






                        share|improve this answer




















                        • 2





                          " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

                          – Buffy
                          5 hours ago













                        2












                        2








                        2







                        I suppose the point of this answer is to reject the notion that having a passion for area X is any sort of prerequisite for working in area X and having a successful career. I should make clear that I'm an assistant professor of mathematics at Oberlin College, a small liberal arts college in northeastern Ohio. My job affords me a balance between teaching and research that I love and wouldn't give up for the world. Whether this counts as success is obviously a matter of opinion.



                        Throughout college (and grad school) I met math majors that knew they wanted to study math for the rest of their lives from the age of 12 or 13. Myself, I became a math major because my engineering pre-major advisor thought that taking two math classes in the spring of my freshman year was a bit much and thus I registered for five math classes to spite her. I had many interests as an undergraduate (mostly in history, foreign languages and literature), and feel that I probably could have gone on to a successful career in any number of them that I would have ultimately found rewarding.



                        Now there's no way to get around the fact that to succeed in grad school you're going to have to work very hard. In fact you'll probably work so hard that you'll convince yourself that it's a blessing you're even being paid because you'd gladly do this work for free.



                        I guess my point is that if you really enjoy a field and have a talent for it then you shouldn't discount going on to grad school for it. Even if your passion for the subject doesn't coincide with the romantic notions of some of your classmates. At the end of the day hard work is likely the stronger predicter of success in any event.






                        share|improve this answer













                        I suppose the point of this answer is to reject the notion that having a passion for area X is any sort of prerequisite for working in area X and having a successful career. I should make clear that I'm an assistant professor of mathematics at Oberlin College, a small liberal arts college in northeastern Ohio. My job affords me a balance between teaching and research that I love and wouldn't give up for the world. Whether this counts as success is obviously a matter of opinion.



                        Throughout college (and grad school) I met math majors that knew they wanted to study math for the rest of their lives from the age of 12 or 13. Myself, I became a math major because my engineering pre-major advisor thought that taking two math classes in the spring of my freshman year was a bit much and thus I registered for five math classes to spite her. I had many interests as an undergraduate (mostly in history, foreign languages and literature), and feel that I probably could have gone on to a successful career in any number of them that I would have ultimately found rewarding.



                        Now there's no way to get around the fact that to succeed in grad school you're going to have to work very hard. In fact you'll probably work so hard that you'll convince yourself that it's a blessing you're even being paid because you'd gladly do this work for free.



                        I guess my point is that if you really enjoy a field and have a talent for it then you shouldn't discount going on to grad school for it. Even if your passion for the subject doesn't coincide with the romantic notions of some of your classmates. At the end of the day hard work is likely the stronger predicter of success in any event.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 5 hours ago









                        Ben LinowitzBen Linowitz

                        9363 silver badges12 bronze badges




                        9363 silver badges12 bronze badges










                        • 2





                          " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

                          – Buffy
                          5 hours ago












                        • 2





                          " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

                          – Buffy
                          5 hours ago







                        2




                        2





                        " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

                        – Buffy
                        5 hours ago





                        " I registered for five math classes to spite her." Loving it. I have a similar story.

                        – Buffy
                        5 hours ago











                        0














                        People who say you still need to find it and stuff are screwing up your brain. There is no the "lazy" type of passion that will drive you to do something same and specific every day. It's human nature. "Specialization is for insects". That's why you need some external motivator. Like, I want to be a great mathematician and then specialize even more in which field and stick with it.



                        Passion is a combination of external and internal motivation.





                        share








                        New contributor



                        hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                          0














                          People who say you still need to find it and stuff are screwing up your brain. There is no the "lazy" type of passion that will drive you to do something same and specific every day. It's human nature. "Specialization is for insects". That's why you need some external motivator. Like, I want to be a great mathematician and then specialize even more in which field and stick with it.



                          Passion is a combination of external and internal motivation.





                          share








                          New contributor



                          hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            People who say you still need to find it and stuff are screwing up your brain. There is no the "lazy" type of passion that will drive you to do something same and specific every day. It's human nature. "Specialization is for insects". That's why you need some external motivator. Like, I want to be a great mathematician and then specialize even more in which field and stick with it.



                            Passion is a combination of external and internal motivation.





                            share








                            New contributor



                            hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            People who say you still need to find it and stuff are screwing up your brain. There is no the "lazy" type of passion that will drive you to do something same and specific every day. It's human nature. "Specialization is for insects". That's why you need some external motivator. Like, I want to be a great mathematician and then specialize even more in which field and stick with it.



                            Passion is a combination of external and internal motivation.






                            share








                            New contributor



                            hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.







                            share


                            share






                            New contributor



                            hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.








                            answered 2 mins ago









                            hackerlinuxhackerlinux

                            1




                            1




                            New contributor



                            hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.




                            New contributor




                            hackerlinux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.
































                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134905%2fhow-to-know-if-i-have-a-passion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її