Derivation of D-dimensional Laplacian in spherical coordinatesWhy is a diffeomorphism an isometry if and only if it commutes with the Laplacian?Laplace-Beltrami operator on a circle - ExplanationLaplacian in Polar Coordinates - Understanding the derivationHow to remember laplacian in polar and (hyper)spherical coordinates$Delta mathbf n = -2 mathbf n$ on the Euclidean sphere
Designing a prison for a telekinetic race
Multicolumn in table not centered
Why the color Red in Us, what is the significance?
Can others monetize my project with GPLv3?
How do you call it when two celestial bodies come as close to each other as they will in their current orbits?
Sort, slice and rebuild new object with array data
How can I pack my food so it doesn't smell?
Does git delete empty folders?
Is there any road between the CA State Route 120 and Sherman Pass Road (Forest Route 22S0) that crosses Yosemite/Serria/Sequoia National Park/Forest?
Vacuum collapse -- why do strong metals implode but glass doesn't?
Is this kind of description not recommended?
Can a Beast Master ranger choose a swarm as an animal companion?
Metal that glows when near pieces of itself
What are the ramifications of this change to upcasting spells?
Can my Boyfriend, who lives in the UK and has a Polish passport, visit me in the USA?
How many spells can a level 1 wizard learn?
Are there any OR challenges that are similar to kaggle's competitions?
Do predators tend to have vertical slit pupils versus horizontal for prey animals?
Earliest evidence of objects intended for future archaeologists?
Infinite loop in CURSOR
Chess software to analyze games
Writing/buying Seforim rather than Sefer Torah
Why should someone be willing to write a strong recommendation even if that means losing a undergraduate from their lab?
How can I describe being temporarily stupid?
Derivation of D-dimensional Laplacian in spherical coordinates
Why is a diffeomorphism an isometry if and only if it commutes with the Laplacian?Laplace-Beltrami operator on a circle - ExplanationLaplacian in Polar Coordinates - Understanding the derivationHow to remember laplacian in polar and (hyper)spherical coordinates$Delta mathbf n = -2 mathbf n$ on the Euclidean sphere
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm trying to derive the D-dimensional laplacian over Euclidean space for a function $f$ that is invariant under D-dimensional Euclidean rotations.
Specifically i'm trying to go from the equation
$$
Delta_D phi = U'(phi)
$$
to the equation
$$
fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr = U'(phi)
$$
where $r = (x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2+dots+x_D^2)^1/2$. I'm a physicist and currently I don't have much knowledge about differential geometry and operators over manifolds, but still i wanted to know how, in a rigorous manner, to derive that equation under that change of coordinates.
Searching on the internet i found that the general form for the laplacian is given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator
$$
Delta_D phi= frac1sqrtdet gpartial_ileft(sqrtdet gg^ijpartial_jphiright)
$$
but i don't know how the metric tensor is in the coordinates specified. I know that in Euclidian space is just a Kroneker delta, but what about spherical coordinates?
On the Wikipedia article gives the result right away without any explanation.
I'm really curious to see how to derive it. I didn't find any explanation with computation in my google search.
differential-geometry physics laplacian
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to derive the D-dimensional laplacian over Euclidean space for a function $f$ that is invariant under D-dimensional Euclidean rotations.
Specifically i'm trying to go from the equation
$$
Delta_D phi = U'(phi)
$$
to the equation
$$
fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr = U'(phi)
$$
where $r = (x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2+dots+x_D^2)^1/2$. I'm a physicist and currently I don't have much knowledge about differential geometry and operators over manifolds, but still i wanted to know how, in a rigorous manner, to derive that equation under that change of coordinates.
Searching on the internet i found that the general form for the laplacian is given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator
$$
Delta_D phi= frac1sqrtdet gpartial_ileft(sqrtdet gg^ijpartial_jphiright)
$$
but i don't know how the metric tensor is in the coordinates specified. I know that in Euclidian space is just a Kroneker delta, but what about spherical coordinates?
On the Wikipedia article gives the result right away without any explanation.
I'm really curious to see how to derive it. I didn't find any explanation with computation in my google search.
differential-geometry physics laplacian
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Have you seen this text : link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4614-0706-5%2F1.pdf ? Besides, a little detail : Euclidian $to$ Euclidean
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to derive the D-dimensional laplacian over Euclidean space for a function $f$ that is invariant under D-dimensional Euclidean rotations.
Specifically i'm trying to go from the equation
$$
Delta_D phi = U'(phi)
$$
to the equation
$$
fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr = U'(phi)
$$
where $r = (x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2+dots+x_D^2)^1/2$. I'm a physicist and currently I don't have much knowledge about differential geometry and operators over manifolds, but still i wanted to know how, in a rigorous manner, to derive that equation under that change of coordinates.
Searching on the internet i found that the general form for the laplacian is given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator
$$
Delta_D phi= frac1sqrtdet gpartial_ileft(sqrtdet gg^ijpartial_jphiright)
$$
but i don't know how the metric tensor is in the coordinates specified. I know that in Euclidian space is just a Kroneker delta, but what about spherical coordinates?
On the Wikipedia article gives the result right away without any explanation.
I'm really curious to see how to derive it. I didn't find any explanation with computation in my google search.
differential-geometry physics laplacian
$endgroup$
I'm trying to derive the D-dimensional laplacian over Euclidean space for a function $f$ that is invariant under D-dimensional Euclidean rotations.
Specifically i'm trying to go from the equation
$$
Delta_D phi = U'(phi)
$$
to the equation
$$
fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr = U'(phi)
$$
where $r = (x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2+dots+x_D^2)^1/2$. I'm a physicist and currently I don't have much knowledge about differential geometry and operators over manifolds, but still i wanted to know how, in a rigorous manner, to derive that equation under that change of coordinates.
Searching on the internet i found that the general form for the laplacian is given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator
$$
Delta_D phi= frac1sqrtdet gpartial_ileft(sqrtdet gg^ijpartial_jphiright)
$$
but i don't know how the metric tensor is in the coordinates specified. I know that in Euclidian space is just a Kroneker delta, but what about spherical coordinates?
On the Wikipedia article gives the result right away without any explanation.
I'm really curious to see how to derive it. I didn't find any explanation with computation in my google search.
differential-geometry physics laplacian
differential-geometry physics laplacian
edited 8 hours ago
Jean Marie
34.6k4 gold badges26 silver badges60 bronze badges
34.6k4 gold badges26 silver badges60 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Davide MorganteDavide Morgante
2,6381 gold badge8 silver badges26 bronze badges
2,6381 gold badge8 silver badges26 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Have you seen this text : link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4614-0706-5%2F1.pdf ? Besides, a little detail : Euclidian $to$ Euclidean
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have you seen this text : link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4614-0706-5%2F1.pdf ? Besides, a little detail : Euclidian $to$ Euclidean
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you seen this text : link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4614-0706-5%2F1.pdf ? Besides, a little detail : Euclidian $to$ Euclidean
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you seen this text : link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4614-0706-5%2F1.pdf ? Besides, a little detail : Euclidian $to$ Euclidean
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since you're a physicist, I thought a variational derivation might be appealing. Consider the functional $$F[phi]=int left[frac12(nabla phi)^2+U(phi)right] dV.$$ Then the functional derivative is $$fracdeltadelta phiF[rho]=fracpartial Upartial phi-nabla^2 phi =U'(phi)-Delta_D phi,$$ so your first equation is equivalent to $delta F[phi]/delta phi=0$. But $phi$ is a function of $r$ alone, so we can integrate out the irrelevant angular degrees of freedom to obtain $$F[phi]=C_Dint left[frac12(partial_r phi)^2+U(phi)right] r^D-1dr$$ where $C_D$ is some $D$-dependent multiplicative constant. We may then compute the functional derivative once again as
$$dfracdeltadelta phiF[phi]=C_n left[U'(phi)r^D-1-partial_r(r^D-1 partial_rphi)right]=C_n r^D-1left[U'(phi)-fracD-1rfracdphidr-fracd^2phidr^2 right].$$
For this variational derivative to vanish again, we must therefore have $$Delta_D phi = U'(phi) = fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr$$ which was the result to be derived.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a longer derivation that requires mostly basic calculus.
The Laplacian is invariant under rotations. Specifically, if $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ and $nabla^2 f(x);=alpha$, then $nabla^2 g;
(R^-1 x)=alpha$ where $R$ is any rotation matrix ($R^TR=I$ and $det(R)=1$) and $g(x) := f(Rx)$.
Now suppose that $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ has the property that $f(x)= h(||x||)$ where $h:mathbb [0,infty) rightarrow mathbb R$, $h$ is twice differentiable, and $||x||=sqrtsum_i x_i^2.$
At $x$, we can form an orthonormal basis $x$. Now
$$
nabla^2 f(x) = sum_i=1^n fracpartial^2 fpartial x_i^2(x)
$$
and by invariance under rotation, we can use the basis $x$ to get
beginequation
(1)quadquadnabla^2 f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i
endequation
where $p_i:= k_i''(0)$ and $k_i(epsilon) := f(x+epsilon v_i)$.
The fact that $f$ only depends on the radius implies that all of the $k_i$ are the same and for $i=2, 3, ldots n$,
$$f(x+epsilon v_i) = k_i(epsilon) = k(epsilon) = f(x+ epsilon v_2)=h(sqrt).$$
Let $r=||x||$. Using calculus,
$$k'(epsilon) = h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2, quad mathrmand $$
$$k''(epsilon) = h''(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilon^2r^2+epsilon^2 + h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 -epsilon fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 r^2+epsilon^2.$$
Thus $p_i:= k''(0) = h''(r)cdot 0 + h'(r)fracrr^2=h'(r)/r$. Applying this to equation (1) gives
$$
nabla^2f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i = h''(r) + (n-1)frach'(r)r.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3328113%2fderivation-of-d-dimensional-laplacian-in-spherical-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since you're a physicist, I thought a variational derivation might be appealing. Consider the functional $$F[phi]=int left[frac12(nabla phi)^2+U(phi)right] dV.$$ Then the functional derivative is $$fracdeltadelta phiF[rho]=fracpartial Upartial phi-nabla^2 phi =U'(phi)-Delta_D phi,$$ so your first equation is equivalent to $delta F[phi]/delta phi=0$. But $phi$ is a function of $r$ alone, so we can integrate out the irrelevant angular degrees of freedom to obtain $$F[phi]=C_Dint left[frac12(partial_r phi)^2+U(phi)right] r^D-1dr$$ where $C_D$ is some $D$-dependent multiplicative constant. We may then compute the functional derivative once again as
$$dfracdeltadelta phiF[phi]=C_n left[U'(phi)r^D-1-partial_r(r^D-1 partial_rphi)right]=C_n r^D-1left[U'(phi)-fracD-1rfracdphidr-fracd^2phidr^2 right].$$
For this variational derivative to vanish again, we must therefore have $$Delta_D phi = U'(phi) = fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr$$ which was the result to be derived.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you're a physicist, I thought a variational derivation might be appealing. Consider the functional $$F[phi]=int left[frac12(nabla phi)^2+U(phi)right] dV.$$ Then the functional derivative is $$fracdeltadelta phiF[rho]=fracpartial Upartial phi-nabla^2 phi =U'(phi)-Delta_D phi,$$ so your first equation is equivalent to $delta F[phi]/delta phi=0$. But $phi$ is a function of $r$ alone, so we can integrate out the irrelevant angular degrees of freedom to obtain $$F[phi]=C_Dint left[frac12(partial_r phi)^2+U(phi)right] r^D-1dr$$ where $C_D$ is some $D$-dependent multiplicative constant. We may then compute the functional derivative once again as
$$dfracdeltadelta phiF[phi]=C_n left[U'(phi)r^D-1-partial_r(r^D-1 partial_rphi)right]=C_n r^D-1left[U'(phi)-fracD-1rfracdphidr-fracd^2phidr^2 right].$$
For this variational derivative to vanish again, we must therefore have $$Delta_D phi = U'(phi) = fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr$$ which was the result to be derived.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you're a physicist, I thought a variational derivation might be appealing. Consider the functional $$F[phi]=int left[frac12(nabla phi)^2+U(phi)right] dV.$$ Then the functional derivative is $$fracdeltadelta phiF[rho]=fracpartial Upartial phi-nabla^2 phi =U'(phi)-Delta_D phi,$$ so your first equation is equivalent to $delta F[phi]/delta phi=0$. But $phi$ is a function of $r$ alone, so we can integrate out the irrelevant angular degrees of freedom to obtain $$F[phi]=C_Dint left[frac12(partial_r phi)^2+U(phi)right] r^D-1dr$$ where $C_D$ is some $D$-dependent multiplicative constant. We may then compute the functional derivative once again as
$$dfracdeltadelta phiF[phi]=C_n left[U'(phi)r^D-1-partial_r(r^D-1 partial_rphi)right]=C_n r^D-1left[U'(phi)-fracD-1rfracdphidr-fracd^2phidr^2 right].$$
For this variational derivative to vanish again, we must therefore have $$Delta_D phi = U'(phi) = fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr$$ which was the result to be derived.
$endgroup$
Since you're a physicist, I thought a variational derivation might be appealing. Consider the functional $$F[phi]=int left[frac12(nabla phi)^2+U(phi)right] dV.$$ Then the functional derivative is $$fracdeltadelta phiF[rho]=fracpartial Upartial phi-nabla^2 phi =U'(phi)-Delta_D phi,$$ so your first equation is equivalent to $delta F[phi]/delta phi=0$. But $phi$ is a function of $r$ alone, so we can integrate out the irrelevant angular degrees of freedom to obtain $$F[phi]=C_Dint left[frac12(partial_r phi)^2+U(phi)right] r^D-1dr$$ where $C_D$ is some $D$-dependent multiplicative constant. We may then compute the functional derivative once again as
$$dfracdeltadelta phiF[phi]=C_n left[U'(phi)r^D-1-partial_r(r^D-1 partial_rphi)right]=C_n r^D-1left[U'(phi)-fracD-1rfracdphidr-fracd^2phidr^2 right].$$
For this variational derivative to vanish again, we must therefore have $$Delta_D phi = U'(phi) = fracd^2phidr^2+fracD-1rfracdphidr$$ which was the result to be derived.
answered 7 hours ago
SemiclassicalSemiclassical
11.2k3 gold badges26 silver badges70 bronze badges
11.2k3 gold badges26 silver badges70 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I love this! Thank you so much. This way is much clearer to me. Maybe in the future i'll go in depth in the differential geometry way.
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a longer derivation that requires mostly basic calculus.
The Laplacian is invariant under rotations. Specifically, if $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ and $nabla^2 f(x);=alpha$, then $nabla^2 g;
(R^-1 x)=alpha$ where $R$ is any rotation matrix ($R^TR=I$ and $det(R)=1$) and $g(x) := f(Rx)$.
Now suppose that $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ has the property that $f(x)= h(||x||)$ where $h:mathbb [0,infty) rightarrow mathbb R$, $h$ is twice differentiable, and $||x||=sqrtsum_i x_i^2.$
At $x$, we can form an orthonormal basis $x$. Now
$$
nabla^2 f(x) = sum_i=1^n fracpartial^2 fpartial x_i^2(x)
$$
and by invariance under rotation, we can use the basis $x$ to get
beginequation
(1)quadquadnabla^2 f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i
endequation
where $p_i:= k_i''(0)$ and $k_i(epsilon) := f(x+epsilon v_i)$.
The fact that $f$ only depends on the radius implies that all of the $k_i$ are the same and for $i=2, 3, ldots n$,
$$f(x+epsilon v_i) = k_i(epsilon) = k(epsilon) = f(x+ epsilon v_2)=h(sqrt).$$
Let $r=||x||$. Using calculus,
$$k'(epsilon) = h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2, quad mathrmand $$
$$k''(epsilon) = h''(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilon^2r^2+epsilon^2 + h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 -epsilon fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 r^2+epsilon^2.$$
Thus $p_i:= k''(0) = h''(r)cdot 0 + h'(r)fracrr^2=h'(r)/r$. Applying this to equation (1) gives
$$
nabla^2f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i = h''(r) + (n-1)frach'(r)r.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a longer derivation that requires mostly basic calculus.
The Laplacian is invariant under rotations. Specifically, if $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ and $nabla^2 f(x);=alpha$, then $nabla^2 g;
(R^-1 x)=alpha$ where $R$ is any rotation matrix ($R^TR=I$ and $det(R)=1$) and $g(x) := f(Rx)$.
Now suppose that $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ has the property that $f(x)= h(||x||)$ where $h:mathbb [0,infty) rightarrow mathbb R$, $h$ is twice differentiable, and $||x||=sqrtsum_i x_i^2.$
At $x$, we can form an orthonormal basis $x$. Now
$$
nabla^2 f(x) = sum_i=1^n fracpartial^2 fpartial x_i^2(x)
$$
and by invariance under rotation, we can use the basis $x$ to get
beginequation
(1)quadquadnabla^2 f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i
endequation
where $p_i:= k_i''(0)$ and $k_i(epsilon) := f(x+epsilon v_i)$.
The fact that $f$ only depends on the radius implies that all of the $k_i$ are the same and for $i=2, 3, ldots n$,
$$f(x+epsilon v_i) = k_i(epsilon) = k(epsilon) = f(x+ epsilon v_2)=h(sqrt).$$
Let $r=||x||$. Using calculus,
$$k'(epsilon) = h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2, quad mathrmand $$
$$k''(epsilon) = h''(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilon^2r^2+epsilon^2 + h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 -epsilon fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 r^2+epsilon^2.$$
Thus $p_i:= k''(0) = h''(r)cdot 0 + h'(r)fracrr^2=h'(r)/r$. Applying this to equation (1) gives
$$
nabla^2f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i = h''(r) + (n-1)frach'(r)r.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a longer derivation that requires mostly basic calculus.
The Laplacian is invariant under rotations. Specifically, if $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ and $nabla^2 f(x);=alpha$, then $nabla^2 g;
(R^-1 x)=alpha$ where $R$ is any rotation matrix ($R^TR=I$ and $det(R)=1$) and $g(x) := f(Rx)$.
Now suppose that $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ has the property that $f(x)= h(||x||)$ where $h:mathbb [0,infty) rightarrow mathbb R$, $h$ is twice differentiable, and $||x||=sqrtsum_i x_i^2.$
At $x$, we can form an orthonormal basis $x$. Now
$$
nabla^2 f(x) = sum_i=1^n fracpartial^2 fpartial x_i^2(x)
$$
and by invariance under rotation, we can use the basis $x$ to get
beginequation
(1)quadquadnabla^2 f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i
endequation
where $p_i:= k_i''(0)$ and $k_i(epsilon) := f(x+epsilon v_i)$.
The fact that $f$ only depends on the radius implies that all of the $k_i$ are the same and for $i=2, 3, ldots n$,
$$f(x+epsilon v_i) = k_i(epsilon) = k(epsilon) = f(x+ epsilon v_2)=h(sqrt).$$
Let $r=||x||$. Using calculus,
$$k'(epsilon) = h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2, quad mathrmand $$
$$k''(epsilon) = h''(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilon^2r^2+epsilon^2 + h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 -epsilon fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 r^2+epsilon^2.$$
Thus $p_i:= k''(0) = h''(r)cdot 0 + h'(r)fracrr^2=h'(r)/r$. Applying this to equation (1) gives
$$
nabla^2f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i = h''(r) + (n-1)frach'(r)r.
$$
$endgroup$
Here is a longer derivation that requires mostly basic calculus.
The Laplacian is invariant under rotations. Specifically, if $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ and $nabla^2 f(x);=alpha$, then $nabla^2 g;
(R^-1 x)=alpha$ where $R$ is any rotation matrix ($R^TR=I$ and $det(R)=1$) and $g(x) := f(Rx)$.
Now suppose that $f:mathbb R^nrightarrow mathbb R^n$ has the property that $f(x)= h(||x||)$ where $h:mathbb [0,infty) rightarrow mathbb R$, $h$ is twice differentiable, and $||x||=sqrtsum_i x_i^2.$
At $x$, we can form an orthonormal basis $x$. Now
$$
nabla^2 f(x) = sum_i=1^n fracpartial^2 fpartial x_i^2(x)
$$
and by invariance under rotation, we can use the basis $x$ to get
beginequation
(1)quadquadnabla^2 f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i
endequation
where $p_i:= k_i''(0)$ and $k_i(epsilon) := f(x+epsilon v_i)$.
The fact that $f$ only depends on the radius implies that all of the $k_i$ are the same and for $i=2, 3, ldots n$,
$$f(x+epsilon v_i) = k_i(epsilon) = k(epsilon) = f(x+ epsilon v_2)=h(sqrt).$$
Let $r=||x||$. Using calculus,
$$k'(epsilon) = h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2, quad mathrmand $$
$$k''(epsilon) = h''(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracepsilon^2r^2+epsilon^2 + h'(sqrtr^2+epsilon^2)fracsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 -epsilon fracepsilonsqrtr^2+epsilon^2 r^2+epsilon^2.$$
Thus $p_i:= k''(0) = h''(r)cdot 0 + h'(r)fracrr^2=h'(r)/r$. Applying this to equation (1) gives
$$
nabla^2f(x)= h''(||x||) + sum_i=2^n p_i = h''(r) + (n-1)frach'(r)r.
$$
answered 6 hours ago
irchansirchans
1,3614 silver badges14 bronze badges
1,3614 silver badges14 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, even this i can understand! Very straight forward, thanks
$endgroup$
– Davide Morgante
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3328113%2fderivation-of-d-dimensional-laplacian-in-spherical-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Have you seen this text : link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4614-0706-5%2F1.pdf ? Besides, a little detail : Euclidian $to$ Euclidean
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
8 hours ago