Tiffeneau–Demjanov rearrangement productsFavorskii rearrangementDetermination of products in reactions involving carbocation rearrangement?Regioselectivity of the Beckmann rearrangementHoffmann's rearrangementNumber of products on dehydrobrominationBenzilic acid rearrangementRing contraction in benzilic rearrangementRetention of configuration in Hofmann rearrangementMechanism of Fritsch–Buttenberg–Wiechell rearrangement8a-methyl-1,2,3,4,4a,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-4a-ylium carbocation rearrangement
How do I properly use a function under a class?
Is the first of the 10 Commandments considered a mitzvah?
Undocumented incompatibility between changes and siunitx?
Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?
Is fission/fusion to iron the most efficient way to convert mass to energy?
Why did the AvroCar fail to fly above 3 feet?
What game uses six-sided dice with symbols as well as numbers on the 5 and 6 faces?
Did I need a visa in 2004 and 2006?
Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?
Remove the small black rectangle that appears at the end of environment
Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it
How (un)safe is it to ride barefoot?
Approach sick days in feedback meeting
Is it a good security practice to force employees hide their employer to avoid being targeted?
Must I use my personal social media account for work?
In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?
How can religions without a hell discourage evil-doing?
What's the relation between у.е. to USD?
Generate parentheses solution
Do Veracrypt encrypted volumes have any kind of brute force protection?
Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?
What publication claimed that Michael Jackson died in a nuclear holocaust?
Can a 40amp breaker be used safely and without issue with a 40amp device on 6AWG wire?
Is Jesus the last Prophet?
Tiffeneau–Demjanov rearrangement products
Favorskii rearrangementDetermination of products in reactions involving carbocation rearrangement?Regioselectivity of the Beckmann rearrangementHoffmann's rearrangementNumber of products on dehydrobrominationBenzilic acid rearrangementRing contraction in benzilic rearrangementRetention of configuration in Hofmann rearrangementMechanism of Fritsch–Buttenberg–Wiechell rearrangement8a-methyl-1,2,3,4,4a,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-4a-ylium carbocation rearrangement
$begingroup$
With reference to the paper J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73 (5), 2293–2295 (ResearchGate link). It states that
cis-2-Aminocyclohexanol on treatment with nitrous acid undergoes a pinacol rearrangement, yielding both cyclohexanone and cyclopentylmethanal as products.
However, it goes on to state that the trans epimer would specifically yield the latter as the major product. Can someone explain this (preferably via mechanism)?
organic-chemistry rearrangements
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With reference to the paper J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73 (5), 2293–2295 (ResearchGate link). It states that
cis-2-Aminocyclohexanol on treatment with nitrous acid undergoes a pinacol rearrangement, yielding both cyclohexanone and cyclopentylmethanal as products.
However, it goes on to state that the trans epimer would specifically yield the latter as the major product. Can someone explain this (preferably via mechanism)?
organic-chemistry rearrangements
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you draw out three-dimensional structures for both starting materials.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With reference to the paper J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73 (5), 2293–2295 (ResearchGate link). It states that
cis-2-Aminocyclohexanol on treatment with nitrous acid undergoes a pinacol rearrangement, yielding both cyclohexanone and cyclopentylmethanal as products.
However, it goes on to state that the trans epimer would specifically yield the latter as the major product. Can someone explain this (preferably via mechanism)?
organic-chemistry rearrangements
$endgroup$
With reference to the paper J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73 (5), 2293–2295 (ResearchGate link). It states that
cis-2-Aminocyclohexanol on treatment with nitrous acid undergoes a pinacol rearrangement, yielding both cyclohexanone and cyclopentylmethanal as products.
However, it goes on to state that the trans epimer would specifically yield the latter as the major product. Can someone explain this (preferably via mechanism)?
organic-chemistry rearrangements
organic-chemistry rearrangements
edited 32 secs ago
Melanie Shebel♦
3,48173273
3,48173273
asked 14 hours ago
Sameer ThakurSameer Thakur
696
696
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you draw out three-dimensional structures for both starting materials.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you draw out three-dimensional structures for both starting materials.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you draw out three-dimensional structures for both starting materials.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you draw out three-dimensional structures for both starting materials.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Quite a fun one to work out. The first thing to know is that there is a stereoelectronic requirement for migrating group to be anti to the leaving group (N2+), for orbital overlap reasons.
You need to consider the chair conformations of both stereoisomers, in both possible ring-flip forms. For the cis stereoisomer, you would expect roughly a 1:1 mixture of ring-flip forms. When the OH is axial, the group anti to the LG is H, and the cyclohexanone is formed. Similarly, when OH is equatorial, the C-C bond is anti and the cyclopentane product is formed.
Now, for the trans-isomer there are two factors favouring the cyclopentane. First, the chair form in which both groups are equatorial will predominate, and this is the stereoisomer that leads to the cyclopentane. Secondly, in the (minor) conformer where the OH and N2 are axial there is no anti group to migrate according to the normal mechanism. The OH itself is anti to the N2, and I'm not aware (off the top of my head) of any examples of 1,2-hydroxy shifts. However, I expect some epoxide might be formed via an SN2 pathway.
Apologies for hand-drawing - doing this on my phone...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I took the opportunity to read the McCasland paper1 to which the OP's link referred. The products were isolated as there 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones. In the case of the cis-isomer 4, the reaction mixture was "apparently richer" in the aldehyde 3.
As @PCK has argued for the trans-isomer 1 the highlighted bonds are aligned properly for a ring contraction. Clearly, the diaxial conformation of 1 is not a factor.
Assuming that the diazonium group has an A-value similar to that of cyanide (0.2 kcal/mol; OH, 1.0 kcal/mol), the equilibrium constant for the two cis conformations at ambient temperature is 3.8, which favors conformation 4b. If indeed the formation of aldehyde 3 predominates over cyclohexanone 5, then hydride migration must be a slower process than ring contraction. In the event, orbital overlap of the red bonds in 4 is essential.
1) G. E. McCasland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 73, 2293
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f116689%2ftiffeneau-demjanov-rearrangement-products%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Quite a fun one to work out. The first thing to know is that there is a stereoelectronic requirement for migrating group to be anti to the leaving group (N2+), for orbital overlap reasons.
You need to consider the chair conformations of both stereoisomers, in both possible ring-flip forms. For the cis stereoisomer, you would expect roughly a 1:1 mixture of ring-flip forms. When the OH is axial, the group anti to the LG is H, and the cyclohexanone is formed. Similarly, when OH is equatorial, the C-C bond is anti and the cyclopentane product is formed.
Now, for the trans-isomer there are two factors favouring the cyclopentane. First, the chair form in which both groups are equatorial will predominate, and this is the stereoisomer that leads to the cyclopentane. Secondly, in the (minor) conformer where the OH and N2 are axial there is no anti group to migrate according to the normal mechanism. The OH itself is anti to the N2, and I'm not aware (off the top of my head) of any examples of 1,2-hydroxy shifts. However, I expect some epoxide might be formed via an SN2 pathway.
Apologies for hand-drawing - doing this on my phone...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quite a fun one to work out. The first thing to know is that there is a stereoelectronic requirement for migrating group to be anti to the leaving group (N2+), for orbital overlap reasons.
You need to consider the chair conformations of both stereoisomers, in both possible ring-flip forms. For the cis stereoisomer, you would expect roughly a 1:1 mixture of ring-flip forms. When the OH is axial, the group anti to the LG is H, and the cyclohexanone is formed. Similarly, when OH is equatorial, the C-C bond is anti and the cyclopentane product is formed.
Now, for the trans-isomer there are two factors favouring the cyclopentane. First, the chair form in which both groups are equatorial will predominate, and this is the stereoisomer that leads to the cyclopentane. Secondly, in the (minor) conformer where the OH and N2 are axial there is no anti group to migrate according to the normal mechanism. The OH itself is anti to the N2, and I'm not aware (off the top of my head) of any examples of 1,2-hydroxy shifts. However, I expect some epoxide might be formed via an SN2 pathway.
Apologies for hand-drawing - doing this on my phone...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quite a fun one to work out. The first thing to know is that there is a stereoelectronic requirement for migrating group to be anti to the leaving group (N2+), for orbital overlap reasons.
You need to consider the chair conformations of both stereoisomers, in both possible ring-flip forms. For the cis stereoisomer, you would expect roughly a 1:1 mixture of ring-flip forms. When the OH is axial, the group anti to the LG is H, and the cyclohexanone is formed. Similarly, when OH is equatorial, the C-C bond is anti and the cyclopentane product is formed.
Now, for the trans-isomer there are two factors favouring the cyclopentane. First, the chair form in which both groups are equatorial will predominate, and this is the stereoisomer that leads to the cyclopentane. Secondly, in the (minor) conformer where the OH and N2 are axial there is no anti group to migrate according to the normal mechanism. The OH itself is anti to the N2, and I'm not aware (off the top of my head) of any examples of 1,2-hydroxy shifts. However, I expect some epoxide might be formed via an SN2 pathway.
Apologies for hand-drawing - doing this on my phone...
$endgroup$
Quite a fun one to work out. The first thing to know is that there is a stereoelectronic requirement for migrating group to be anti to the leaving group (N2+), for orbital overlap reasons.
You need to consider the chair conformations of both stereoisomers, in both possible ring-flip forms. For the cis stereoisomer, you would expect roughly a 1:1 mixture of ring-flip forms. When the OH is axial, the group anti to the LG is H, and the cyclohexanone is formed. Similarly, when OH is equatorial, the C-C bond is anti and the cyclopentane product is formed.
Now, for the trans-isomer there are two factors favouring the cyclopentane. First, the chair form in which both groups are equatorial will predominate, and this is the stereoisomer that leads to the cyclopentane. Secondly, in the (minor) conformer where the OH and N2 are axial there is no anti group to migrate according to the normal mechanism. The OH itself is anti to the N2, and I'm not aware (off the top of my head) of any examples of 1,2-hydroxy shifts. However, I expect some epoxide might be formed via an SN2 pathway.
Apologies for hand-drawing - doing this on my phone...
answered 7 hours ago
PCKPCK
3987
3987
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I took the opportunity to read the McCasland paper1 to which the OP's link referred. The products were isolated as there 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones. In the case of the cis-isomer 4, the reaction mixture was "apparently richer" in the aldehyde 3.
As @PCK has argued for the trans-isomer 1 the highlighted bonds are aligned properly for a ring contraction. Clearly, the diaxial conformation of 1 is not a factor.
Assuming that the diazonium group has an A-value similar to that of cyanide (0.2 kcal/mol; OH, 1.0 kcal/mol), the equilibrium constant for the two cis conformations at ambient temperature is 3.8, which favors conformation 4b. If indeed the formation of aldehyde 3 predominates over cyclohexanone 5, then hydride migration must be a slower process than ring contraction. In the event, orbital overlap of the red bonds in 4 is essential.
1) G. E. McCasland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 73, 2293
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I took the opportunity to read the McCasland paper1 to which the OP's link referred. The products were isolated as there 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones. In the case of the cis-isomer 4, the reaction mixture was "apparently richer" in the aldehyde 3.
As @PCK has argued for the trans-isomer 1 the highlighted bonds are aligned properly for a ring contraction. Clearly, the diaxial conformation of 1 is not a factor.
Assuming that the diazonium group has an A-value similar to that of cyanide (0.2 kcal/mol; OH, 1.0 kcal/mol), the equilibrium constant for the two cis conformations at ambient temperature is 3.8, which favors conformation 4b. If indeed the formation of aldehyde 3 predominates over cyclohexanone 5, then hydride migration must be a slower process than ring contraction. In the event, orbital overlap of the red bonds in 4 is essential.
1) G. E. McCasland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 73, 2293
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I took the opportunity to read the McCasland paper1 to which the OP's link referred. The products were isolated as there 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones. In the case of the cis-isomer 4, the reaction mixture was "apparently richer" in the aldehyde 3.
As @PCK has argued for the trans-isomer 1 the highlighted bonds are aligned properly for a ring contraction. Clearly, the diaxial conformation of 1 is not a factor.
Assuming that the diazonium group has an A-value similar to that of cyanide (0.2 kcal/mol; OH, 1.0 kcal/mol), the equilibrium constant for the two cis conformations at ambient temperature is 3.8, which favors conformation 4b. If indeed the formation of aldehyde 3 predominates over cyclohexanone 5, then hydride migration must be a slower process than ring contraction. In the event, orbital overlap of the red bonds in 4 is essential.
1) G. E. McCasland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 73, 2293
$endgroup$
I took the opportunity to read the McCasland paper1 to which the OP's link referred. The products were isolated as there 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones. In the case of the cis-isomer 4, the reaction mixture was "apparently richer" in the aldehyde 3.
As @PCK has argued for the trans-isomer 1 the highlighted bonds are aligned properly for a ring contraction. Clearly, the diaxial conformation of 1 is not a factor.
Assuming that the diazonium group has an A-value similar to that of cyanide (0.2 kcal/mol; OH, 1.0 kcal/mol), the equilibrium constant for the two cis conformations at ambient temperature is 3.8, which favors conformation 4b. If indeed the formation of aldehyde 3 predominates over cyclohexanone 5, then hydride migration must be a slower process than ring contraction. In the event, orbital overlap of the red bonds in 4 is essential.
1) G. E. McCasland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 73, 2293
answered 6 hours ago
user55119user55119
4,76211242
4,76211242
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f116689%2ftiffeneau-demjanov-rearrangement-products%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I would suggest that you draw out three-dimensional structures for both starting materials.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
8 hours ago