Is time complexity more important than space complexity?What is a good binary encoding for $phi$-based balanced ternary arithmetic algorithms?Time complexity and space complexity in recursive algorithmRelation of Space and Time in Complexity?What is the time/space complexity of $n!$? Can $n!$ has polynomial space complexity?How can one find a job after working as a freelancer?Was the “cuckoo search” independently discovered before 2009? If so, what was the name given to it?United space-time complexity of finite stringsGeneralized Geography problem time and space complexityTime and space complexity of Radix sortTime complexity of an algorithm: Is it important to state the base of the logarithm?

Was the Lonely Mountain, where Smaug lived, a volcano?

Parsing text written the millitext font

Why did the Death Eaters wait to reopen the Chamber of Secrets?

Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?

Why is it bad to use your whole foot in rock climbing

My mom's return ticket is 3 days after I-94 expires

Is it a good security practice to force employees hide their employer to avoid being targeted?

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?

Why did Robert pick unworthy men for the White Cloaks?

Is it true that "only photographers care about noise"?

Undocumented incompatibility between changes and siunitx?

Approach sick days in feedback meeting

Why didn't all the iron and heavier elements find their way to the center of the accretion disc in the early solar system?

I am caught when I was about to steal some candies

Did I need a visa in 2004 and 2006?

What do you call the action of "describing events as they happen" like sports anchors do?

Part of my house is inexplicably gone

What publication claimed that Michael Jackson died in a nuclear holocaust?

Do Veracrypt encrypted volumes have any kind of brute force protection?

Is fission/fusion to iron the most efficient way to convert mass to energy?

Which are the methodologies for interpreting Vedas?

What does BREAD stand for while drafting?

If absolute velocity does not exist, how can we say a rocket accelerates in empty space?

What does this line mean in Zelazny's The Courts of Chaos?



Is time complexity more important than space complexity?


What is a good binary encoding for $phi$-based balanced ternary arithmetic algorithms?Time complexity and space complexity in recursive algorithmRelation of Space and Time in Complexity?What is the time/space complexity of $n!$? Can $n!$ has polynomial space complexity?How can one find a job after working as a freelancer?Was the “cuckoo search” independently discovered before 2009? If so, what was the name given to it?United space-time complexity of finite stringsGeneralized Geography problem time and space complexityTime and space complexity of Radix sortTime complexity of an algorithm: Is it important to state the base of the logarithm?













2












$begingroup$


I've noticed quite a few cryptographic algorithms speak mainly of the time complexity of an algorithm. For example, with a hashing function h, find x given y = h(x). We normally speak on how long it will take. Or the time to find the discrete log for a public key.



Edit:



While writing this question, I pondered that maybe because for most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen) , have O(1) space time complexity. i.e. If the solution does not work, we throw it away and encrypt.



Clarification on this will be really helpful.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    I've noticed quite a few cryptographic algorithms speak mainly of the time complexity of an algorithm. For example, with a hashing function h, find x given y = h(x). We normally speak on how long it will take. Or the time to find the discrete log for a public key.



    Edit:



    While writing this question, I pondered that maybe because for most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen) , have O(1) space time complexity. i.e. If the solution does not work, we throw it away and encrypt.



    Clarification on this will be really helpful.










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor



    WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I've noticed quite a few cryptographic algorithms speak mainly of the time complexity of an algorithm. For example, with a hashing function h, find x given y = h(x). We normally speak on how long it will take. Or the time to find the discrete log for a public key.



      Edit:



      While writing this question, I pondered that maybe because for most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen) , have O(1) space time complexity. i.e. If the solution does not work, we throw it away and encrypt.



      Clarification on this will be really helpful.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor



      WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$




      I've noticed quite a few cryptographic algorithms speak mainly of the time complexity of an algorithm. For example, with a hashing function h, find x given y = h(x). We normally speak on how long it will take. Or the time to find the discrete log for a public key.



      Edit:



      While writing this question, I pondered that maybe because for most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen) , have O(1) space time complexity. i.e. If the solution does not work, we throw it away and encrypt.



      Clarification on this will be really helpful.







      algorithms time-complexity cryptography






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor



      WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor



      WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Apass.Jack

      16.8k11246




      16.8k11246






      New contributor



      WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      WeCanBeFriendsWeCanBeFriends

      1213




      1213




      New contributor



      WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          In fact, when we are talking about algorithms in general, time-complexity is discussed much more frequently than space-complexity. Let me provide a few ideas to support that more general phenomenon which applies to the cryptography as well.



          • There are much more about time-complexity to talk about in computer science and software industry while space-complexity is more restricted to hardware. It occurs to me that there are over 10 times more techniques/concepts/tasks/papers about time-complexity than space-complexity. Overwhelmingly, programming contests are about time-complexity.

          • Unlike time, space/memory can be reused. Practically speaking, we see that memory is cheap now while we are still hungry for computing speed.

          Now come to the cryptography side of the question.



          • As you have observed, most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen), have $O(1)$ space time-complexity. So there is not much value of space-complexity.

          • On the other hand, the time-complexity is the critical factor of a cryptographic algorithm. It should produce data fast enough. It should produce data secure enough, meaning the time-complexity of all decrypting algorithms should be very slow.





          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            To add to what Apass.Jack said, in most computational models (e.g. Turing Machines, maybe RAM as well, I don't know), space used is bounded by time : you need to do at least one operation per unit of memory to "use" it.



            For example you won't find algorithms with $O(n^2)$ time complexity and $O(2^n)$ space complexity.



            Space complexity is usually studied/mentioned when it is critical, for example when it is as big as the time complexity (e.g. Shank's algorithm with $O(sqrtn)$ time and space complexity in crypto)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              If you are looking at theoretical results, they are theoretical.



              If you are looking at practical results, the one that is more important is the one that keeps you from getting results. For the price of a small new car, I can buy a computer with $2 cdot 10^12$ bits of RAM, which can perform about $5 cdot 10^15$ operations per day. With that computer, the space needed MUST be below $2 cdot 10^12$ bits, or I cannot solve that problem. The number of operations SHOULD be below $5 cdot 10^15$, or I will have to wait quite a while for results - but for say $10^17$ operations I still have the choice between being patient or investing the time into improving the algorithm or the implementation.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "419"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );






                WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110540%2fis-time-complexity-more-important-than-space-complexity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                In fact, when we are talking about algorithms in general, time-complexity is discussed much more frequently than space-complexity. Let me provide a few ideas to support that more general phenomenon which applies to the cryptography as well.



                • There are much more about time-complexity to talk about in computer science and software industry while space-complexity is more restricted to hardware. It occurs to me that there are over 10 times more techniques/concepts/tasks/papers about time-complexity than space-complexity. Overwhelmingly, programming contests are about time-complexity.

                • Unlike time, space/memory can be reused. Practically speaking, we see that memory is cheap now while we are still hungry for computing speed.

                Now come to the cryptography side of the question.



                • As you have observed, most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen), have $O(1)$ space time-complexity. So there is not much value of space-complexity.

                • On the other hand, the time-complexity is the critical factor of a cryptographic algorithm. It should produce data fast enough. It should produce data secure enough, meaning the time-complexity of all decrypting algorithms should be very slow.





                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  In fact, when we are talking about algorithms in general, time-complexity is discussed much more frequently than space-complexity. Let me provide a few ideas to support that more general phenomenon which applies to the cryptography as well.



                  • There are much more about time-complexity to talk about in computer science and software industry while space-complexity is more restricted to hardware. It occurs to me that there are over 10 times more techniques/concepts/tasks/papers about time-complexity than space-complexity. Overwhelmingly, programming contests are about time-complexity.

                  • Unlike time, space/memory can be reused. Practically speaking, we see that memory is cheap now while we are still hungry for computing speed.

                  Now come to the cryptography side of the question.



                  • As you have observed, most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen), have $O(1)$ space time-complexity. So there is not much value of space-complexity.

                  • On the other hand, the time-complexity is the critical factor of a cryptographic algorithm. It should produce data fast enough. It should produce data secure enough, meaning the time-complexity of all decrypting algorithms should be very slow.





                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    In fact, when we are talking about algorithms in general, time-complexity is discussed much more frequently than space-complexity. Let me provide a few ideas to support that more general phenomenon which applies to the cryptography as well.



                    • There are much more about time-complexity to talk about in computer science and software industry while space-complexity is more restricted to hardware. It occurs to me that there are over 10 times more techniques/concepts/tasks/papers about time-complexity than space-complexity. Overwhelmingly, programming contests are about time-complexity.

                    • Unlike time, space/memory can be reused. Practically speaking, we see that memory is cheap now while we are still hungry for computing speed.

                    Now come to the cryptography side of the question.



                    • As you have observed, most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen), have $O(1)$ space time-complexity. So there is not much value of space-complexity.

                    • On the other hand, the time-complexity is the critical factor of a cryptographic algorithm. It should produce data fast enough. It should produce data secure enough, meaning the time-complexity of all decrypting algorithms should be very slow.





                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    In fact, when we are talking about algorithms in general, time-complexity is discussed much more frequently than space-complexity. Let me provide a few ideas to support that more general phenomenon which applies to the cryptography as well.



                    • There are much more about time-complexity to talk about in computer science and software industry while space-complexity is more restricted to hardware. It occurs to me that there are over 10 times more techniques/concepts/tasks/papers about time-complexity than space-complexity. Overwhelmingly, programming contests are about time-complexity.

                    • Unlike time, space/memory can be reused. Practically speaking, we see that memory is cheap now while we are still hungry for computing speed.

                    Now come to the cryptography side of the question.



                    • As you have observed, most algorithms in cryptography (that I have seen), have $O(1)$ space time-complexity. So there is not much value of space-complexity.

                    • On the other hand, the time-complexity is the critical factor of a cryptographic algorithm. It should produce data fast enough. It should produce data secure enough, meaning the time-complexity of all decrypting algorithms should be very slow.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 5 hours ago









                    Apass.JackApass.Jack

                    16.8k11246




                    16.8k11246





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        To add to what Apass.Jack said, in most computational models (e.g. Turing Machines, maybe RAM as well, I don't know), space used is bounded by time : you need to do at least one operation per unit of memory to "use" it.



                        For example you won't find algorithms with $O(n^2)$ time complexity and $O(2^n)$ space complexity.



                        Space complexity is usually studied/mentioned when it is critical, for example when it is as big as the time complexity (e.g. Shank's algorithm with $O(sqrtn)$ time and space complexity in crypto)






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          To add to what Apass.Jack said, in most computational models (e.g. Turing Machines, maybe RAM as well, I don't know), space used is bounded by time : you need to do at least one operation per unit of memory to "use" it.



                          For example you won't find algorithms with $O(n^2)$ time complexity and $O(2^n)$ space complexity.



                          Space complexity is usually studied/mentioned when it is critical, for example when it is as big as the time complexity (e.g. Shank's algorithm with $O(sqrtn)$ time and space complexity in crypto)






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            To add to what Apass.Jack said, in most computational models (e.g. Turing Machines, maybe RAM as well, I don't know), space used is bounded by time : you need to do at least one operation per unit of memory to "use" it.



                            For example you won't find algorithms with $O(n^2)$ time complexity and $O(2^n)$ space complexity.



                            Space complexity is usually studied/mentioned when it is critical, for example when it is as big as the time complexity (e.g. Shank's algorithm with $O(sqrtn)$ time and space complexity in crypto)






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            To add to what Apass.Jack said, in most computational models (e.g. Turing Machines, maybe RAM as well, I don't know), space used is bounded by time : you need to do at least one operation per unit of memory to "use" it.



                            For example you won't find algorithms with $O(n^2)$ time complexity and $O(2^n)$ space complexity.



                            Space complexity is usually studied/mentioned when it is critical, for example when it is as big as the time complexity (e.g. Shank's algorithm with $O(sqrtn)$ time and space complexity in crypto)







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 5 hours ago









                            GBatGBat

                            36717




                            36717





















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                If you are looking at theoretical results, they are theoretical.



                                If you are looking at practical results, the one that is more important is the one that keeps you from getting results. For the price of a small new car, I can buy a computer with $2 cdot 10^12$ bits of RAM, which can perform about $5 cdot 10^15$ operations per day. With that computer, the space needed MUST be below $2 cdot 10^12$ bits, or I cannot solve that problem. The number of operations SHOULD be below $5 cdot 10^15$, or I will have to wait quite a while for results - but for say $10^17$ operations I still have the choice between being patient or investing the time into improving the algorithm or the implementation.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  If you are looking at theoretical results, they are theoretical.



                                  If you are looking at practical results, the one that is more important is the one that keeps you from getting results. For the price of a small new car, I can buy a computer with $2 cdot 10^12$ bits of RAM, which can perform about $5 cdot 10^15$ operations per day. With that computer, the space needed MUST be below $2 cdot 10^12$ bits, or I cannot solve that problem. The number of operations SHOULD be below $5 cdot 10^15$, or I will have to wait quite a while for results - but for say $10^17$ operations I still have the choice between being patient or investing the time into improving the algorithm or the implementation.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    If you are looking at theoretical results, they are theoretical.



                                    If you are looking at practical results, the one that is more important is the one that keeps you from getting results. For the price of a small new car, I can buy a computer with $2 cdot 10^12$ bits of RAM, which can perform about $5 cdot 10^15$ operations per day. With that computer, the space needed MUST be below $2 cdot 10^12$ bits, or I cannot solve that problem. The number of operations SHOULD be below $5 cdot 10^15$, or I will have to wait quite a while for results - but for say $10^17$ operations I still have the choice between being patient or investing the time into improving the algorithm or the implementation.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    If you are looking at theoretical results, they are theoretical.



                                    If you are looking at practical results, the one that is more important is the one that keeps you from getting results. For the price of a small new car, I can buy a computer with $2 cdot 10^12$ bits of RAM, which can perform about $5 cdot 10^15$ operations per day. With that computer, the space needed MUST be below $2 cdot 10^12$ bits, or I cannot solve that problem. The number of operations SHOULD be below $5 cdot 10^15$, or I will have to wait quite a while for results - but for say $10^17$ operations I still have the choice between being patient or investing the time into improving the algorithm or the implementation.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered 4 hours ago









                                    gnasher729gnasher729

                                    13.4k1824




                                    13.4k1824




















                                        WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded


















                                        WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                        WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                        WeCanBeFriends is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110540%2fis-time-complexity-more-important-than-space-complexity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                        Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                        Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її