Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read itHow do you refer to someone who has access to an abundance of resources?Term for a person who can read but cannot writeWhat do you call someone who hides files?Is there a word for “people who are computer illiterate”?Is there an adjective to describe someone who has access to all the facts, news or insider information?What is the opposite of someone who has been sheltered?Word to describe person who is rich in wealth, but is poor in class?Looking for a word describing the act of a person passing an access machine that does not imply if it is an entry or exitIs there a noun for “someone who has access”?What do you call a person who sells information about other people?

A life of PhD: is it feasible?

How to deal with an excess of white-space in a CRM UI?

Am I allowed to determine tenets of my contract as a warlock?

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?

What did the 8086 (and 8088) do upon encountering an illegal instruction?

Are athlete's college degrees discounted by employers and graduate school admissions?

Parsing text written the millitext font

Why are ambiguous grammars bad?

Can I attach a DC blower to intake manifold of my 150CC Yamaha FZS FI engine?

Why is my Taiyaki (Cake that looks like a fish) too hard and dry?

How can religions without a hell discourage evil-doing?

usage of mir gefallen

Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"

ISP is not hashing the password I log in with online. Should I take any action?

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

What is the theme of analysis?

How (un)safe is it to ride barefoot?

Is Jesus the last Prophet?

Changing the PK column of a data extension without completely recreating it

If absolute velocity does not exist, how can we say a rocket accelerates in empty space?

Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?

In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?

I sent an angry e-mail to my interviewers about a conflict at my home institution. Could this affect my application?

Are skill challenges an official option or homebrewed?



Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it


How do you refer to someone who has access to an abundance of resources?Term for a person who can read but cannot writeWhat do you call someone who hides files?Is there a word for “people who are computer illiterate”?Is there an adjective to describe someone who has access to all the facts, news or insider information?What is the opposite of someone who has been sheltered?Word to describe person who is rich in wealth, but is poor in class?Looking for a word describing the act of a person passing an access machine that does not imply if it is an entry or exitIs there a noun for “someone who has access”?What do you call a person who sells information about other people?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I'm looking for word for a person who handles records, but isn't expected to read them. I'm creating a list of positions within an organization who should have access to certain records. Alongside the people who need to actually read these records, there are other people who handle the records as a practical matter. These are the people who may file and retrieve the information, or carry the key to the filing cabinet, or IT staff who are responsible for data encryption and storage. Anyone who could read the information, but really doesn't have reason to.



It would be good if it carried a connotation of trust and responsibility. The word "fiduciary" comes to mind, as it carries implications of professional ethics. As far as I know, that word applies to finances specifically.
"Custodian/custodial" is in the ballpark, but perhaps too specific. Ideally, this word would describe anyone along the chain who has access, but does not act on curiosity outside of their direct job function.



A thesaurus search for "fiduciary" gives curator, depositor, trustee, and guardian. These are all a bit too specific, though "trustee" comes close. A thesaurus search for "custodial" has the same problem. They are all words for someone whose job it is to care for some thing. I want to include people who have access to that thing incidentally as part of their job.



The word can be an adjective (applied to the position), noun (describe the position), or adverb (applied to job function).



"Joe will have (adjective) access to the files." OR "Joe will have access to the files in a (adjective) capacity."

"Joe will have access to the files as a (noun)."

"Joe can access the files (adverb)."



I'm guessing there are existing legal terms for what I'm looking for, which is why I'm reaching out on this SE. I'm not drafting a legal document, though.



Edit: Let me clarify a bit. I'm looking for a way to describe the relationship of existing positions to the information in question. This isn't a new job title or even a primary job duty. The motivation is that I'm creating a list of which job titles have access to certain information, and I'd like to mark a difference between those who are supposed to be reading the information, and those who only have access of a necessity because of the way things work.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    +1 to custodian and guardian. How about steward?

    – tk421
    7 hours ago

















3















I'm looking for word for a person who handles records, but isn't expected to read them. I'm creating a list of positions within an organization who should have access to certain records. Alongside the people who need to actually read these records, there are other people who handle the records as a practical matter. These are the people who may file and retrieve the information, or carry the key to the filing cabinet, or IT staff who are responsible for data encryption and storage. Anyone who could read the information, but really doesn't have reason to.



It would be good if it carried a connotation of trust and responsibility. The word "fiduciary" comes to mind, as it carries implications of professional ethics. As far as I know, that word applies to finances specifically.
"Custodian/custodial" is in the ballpark, but perhaps too specific. Ideally, this word would describe anyone along the chain who has access, but does not act on curiosity outside of their direct job function.



A thesaurus search for "fiduciary" gives curator, depositor, trustee, and guardian. These are all a bit too specific, though "trustee" comes close. A thesaurus search for "custodial" has the same problem. They are all words for someone whose job it is to care for some thing. I want to include people who have access to that thing incidentally as part of their job.



The word can be an adjective (applied to the position), noun (describe the position), or adverb (applied to job function).



"Joe will have (adjective) access to the files." OR "Joe will have access to the files in a (adjective) capacity."

"Joe will have access to the files as a (noun)."

"Joe can access the files (adverb)."



I'm guessing there are existing legal terms for what I'm looking for, which is why I'm reaching out on this SE. I'm not drafting a legal document, though.



Edit: Let me clarify a bit. I'm looking for a way to describe the relationship of existing positions to the information in question. This isn't a new job title or even a primary job duty. The motivation is that I'm creating a list of which job titles have access to certain information, and I'd like to mark a difference between those who are supposed to be reading the information, and those who only have access of a necessity because of the way things work.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    +1 to custodian and guardian. How about steward?

    – tk421
    7 hours ago













3












3








3








I'm looking for word for a person who handles records, but isn't expected to read them. I'm creating a list of positions within an organization who should have access to certain records. Alongside the people who need to actually read these records, there are other people who handle the records as a practical matter. These are the people who may file and retrieve the information, or carry the key to the filing cabinet, or IT staff who are responsible for data encryption and storage. Anyone who could read the information, but really doesn't have reason to.



It would be good if it carried a connotation of trust and responsibility. The word "fiduciary" comes to mind, as it carries implications of professional ethics. As far as I know, that word applies to finances specifically.
"Custodian/custodial" is in the ballpark, but perhaps too specific. Ideally, this word would describe anyone along the chain who has access, but does not act on curiosity outside of their direct job function.



A thesaurus search for "fiduciary" gives curator, depositor, trustee, and guardian. These are all a bit too specific, though "trustee" comes close. A thesaurus search for "custodial" has the same problem. They are all words for someone whose job it is to care for some thing. I want to include people who have access to that thing incidentally as part of their job.



The word can be an adjective (applied to the position), noun (describe the position), or adverb (applied to job function).



"Joe will have (adjective) access to the files." OR "Joe will have access to the files in a (adjective) capacity."

"Joe will have access to the files as a (noun)."

"Joe can access the files (adverb)."



I'm guessing there are existing legal terms for what I'm looking for, which is why I'm reaching out on this SE. I'm not drafting a legal document, though.



Edit: Let me clarify a bit. I'm looking for a way to describe the relationship of existing positions to the information in question. This isn't a new job title or even a primary job duty. The motivation is that I'm creating a list of which job titles have access to certain information, and I'd like to mark a difference between those who are supposed to be reading the information, and those who only have access of a necessity because of the way things work.










share|improve this question
















I'm looking for word for a person who handles records, but isn't expected to read them. I'm creating a list of positions within an organization who should have access to certain records. Alongside the people who need to actually read these records, there are other people who handle the records as a practical matter. These are the people who may file and retrieve the information, or carry the key to the filing cabinet, or IT staff who are responsible for data encryption and storage. Anyone who could read the information, but really doesn't have reason to.



It would be good if it carried a connotation of trust and responsibility. The word "fiduciary" comes to mind, as it carries implications of professional ethics. As far as I know, that word applies to finances specifically.
"Custodian/custodial" is in the ballpark, but perhaps too specific. Ideally, this word would describe anyone along the chain who has access, but does not act on curiosity outside of their direct job function.



A thesaurus search for "fiduciary" gives curator, depositor, trustee, and guardian. These are all a bit too specific, though "trustee" comes close. A thesaurus search for "custodial" has the same problem. They are all words for someone whose job it is to care for some thing. I want to include people who have access to that thing incidentally as part of their job.



The word can be an adjective (applied to the position), noun (describe the position), or adverb (applied to job function).



"Joe will have (adjective) access to the files." OR "Joe will have access to the files in a (adjective) capacity."

"Joe will have access to the files as a (noun)."

"Joe can access the files (adverb)."



I'm guessing there are existing legal terms for what I'm looking for, which is why I'm reaching out on this SE. I'm not drafting a legal document, though.



Edit: Let me clarify a bit. I'm looking for a way to describe the relationship of existing positions to the information in question. This isn't a new job title or even a primary job duty. The motivation is that I'm creating a list of which job titles have access to certain information, and I'd like to mark a difference between those who are supposed to be reading the information, and those who only have access of a necessity because of the way things work.







single-word-requests legalese






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







Solocutor

















asked 8 hours ago









SolocutorSolocutor

9131413




9131413







  • 1





    +1 to custodian and guardian. How about steward?

    – tk421
    7 hours ago












  • 1





    +1 to custodian and guardian. How about steward?

    – tk421
    7 hours ago







1




1





+1 to custodian and guardian. How about steward?

– tk421
7 hours ago





+1 to custodian and guardian. How about steward?

– tk421
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2














I suggest Keeper. My Oxford Dictionary defines the word as a person who manages or looks after something or someone.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

    – Weather Vane
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago












  • Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago


















2














The word archivist is a good choice.




[Merriam-Webster]

: a person who has the job of collecting and storing the materials in an archive




So:




Joe is an archivist.

Joe will have archival access to the files.




This follows from archive:




1 : a place in which public records or historical materials (such as documents) are preserved

// an archive of historical manuscripts

// a film archive
also : the material preserved —often used in plural

// reading through the archives
2 : a repository or collection especially of information





It's possible to also use secretarial (from secretary), but secretaries are often tasked with reading, if not actually writing or editing, documents, so it doesn't convey a read-only sense as strongly.






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago











  • "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago


















1














If these people have responsibility for the records in some sense, then the term stewardship comes to mind.




Joe will have stewardship over the files.




See Merriam-Webster:




stewardship noun

2 : the conducting, supervising, or managing of something
especially : the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one's care







share|improve this answer























  • Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago











  • There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

    – Robusto
    5 hours ago


















1














Many organizations use the term position of trust to designate people who have physical access to spaces or documents as well as direct access to financial accounts via purchase cards. This category is broad, and includes people who may incidentally handle sensitive materials as part of their day-to-day records, like student interns filing human resources documents.



For example, the University System of Georgia in the US defines the term administratively in this way:




Positions of Trust are sensitive positions that involve responsibilities demanding a significant degree of public trust with significant risk for causing damage or realizing personal gain. Primary responsibilities to include but not limited to:



  • The direct interaction or care of children under the age of 18 or direct patient care


  • Security Access (e.g., public safety, IT security, personnel records, or patient records)


  • Operation, access, or control of financial resources (e.g., P-Card, handling of checks or cash, or Budget Authority in making significant financial decisions)


Each institution’s hiring office is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of positions of trust within their organization.




With your given examples, you might say:




As an IT staffperson with security access, Joe holds a position of trust within his organization.







share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f501505%2fsomeone-who-is-granted-access-to-information-but-not-expected-to-read-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    I suggest Keeper. My Oxford Dictionary defines the word as a person who manages or looks after something or someone.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

      – Weather Vane
      6 hours ago







    • 1





      @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

      – Jason Bassford
      6 hours ago












    • Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago















    2














    I suggest Keeper. My Oxford Dictionary defines the word as a person who manages or looks after something or someone.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

      – Weather Vane
      6 hours ago







    • 1





      @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

      – Jason Bassford
      6 hours ago












    • Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago













    2












    2








    2







    I suggest Keeper. My Oxford Dictionary defines the word as a person who manages or looks after something or someone.






    share|improve this answer













    I suggest Keeper. My Oxford Dictionary defines the word as a person who manages or looks after something or someone.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    Richard BeasleyRichard Beasley

    612




    612







    • 1





      Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

      – Weather Vane
      6 hours ago







    • 1





      @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

      – Jason Bassford
      6 hours ago












    • Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago












    • 1





      Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

      – Weather Vane
      6 hours ago







    • 1





      @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

      – Jason Bassford
      6 hours ago












    • Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago







    1




    1





    Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

    – Weather Vane
    6 hours ago






    Side note: the Oxford Dictionaries has become, and redirects to Lexico powered by Oxford.

    – Weather Vane
    6 hours ago





    1




    1





    @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago






    @WeatherVane I just noticed that. Very strange. I'll keep referring to is as Oxford Dictionaries (because I think it is, effectively), but it feels like it's lost some of its authority simply because it no longer carries the same name.

    – Jason Bassford
    6 hours ago














    Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago





    Thank you for this response. I was hoping for a more general term, that could apply to anyone who can read the information.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago













    2














    The word archivist is a good choice.




    [Merriam-Webster]

    : a person who has the job of collecting and storing the materials in an archive




    So:




    Joe is an archivist.

    Joe will have archival access to the files.




    This follows from archive:




    1 : a place in which public records or historical materials (such as documents) are preserved

    // an archive of historical manuscripts

    // a film archive
    also : the material preserved —often used in plural

    // reading through the archives
    2 : a repository or collection especially of information





    It's possible to also use secretarial (from secretary), but secretaries are often tasked with reading, if not actually writing or editing, documents, so it doesn't convey a read-only sense as strongly.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago















    2














    The word archivist is a good choice.




    [Merriam-Webster]

    : a person who has the job of collecting and storing the materials in an archive




    So:




    Joe is an archivist.

    Joe will have archival access to the files.




    This follows from archive:




    1 : a place in which public records or historical materials (such as documents) are preserved

    // an archive of historical manuscripts

    // a film archive
    also : the material preserved —often used in plural

    // reading through the archives
    2 : a repository or collection especially of information





    It's possible to also use secretarial (from secretary), but secretaries are often tasked with reading, if not actually writing or editing, documents, so it doesn't convey a read-only sense as strongly.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago













    2












    2








    2







    The word archivist is a good choice.




    [Merriam-Webster]

    : a person who has the job of collecting and storing the materials in an archive




    So:




    Joe is an archivist.

    Joe will have archival access to the files.




    This follows from archive:




    1 : a place in which public records or historical materials (such as documents) are preserved

    // an archive of historical manuscripts

    // a film archive
    also : the material preserved —often used in plural

    // reading through the archives
    2 : a repository or collection especially of information





    It's possible to also use secretarial (from secretary), but secretaries are often tasked with reading, if not actually writing or editing, documents, so it doesn't convey a read-only sense as strongly.






    share|improve this answer













    The word archivist is a good choice.




    [Merriam-Webster]

    : a person who has the job of collecting and storing the materials in an archive




    So:




    Joe is an archivist.

    Joe will have archival access to the files.




    This follows from archive:




    1 : a place in which public records or historical materials (such as documents) are preserved

    // an archive of historical manuscripts

    // a film archive
    also : the material preserved —often used in plural

    // reading through the archives
    2 : a repository or collection especially of information





    It's possible to also use secretarial (from secretary), but secretaries are often tasked with reading, if not actually writing or editing, documents, so it doesn't convey a read-only sense as strongly.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 6 hours ago









    Jason BassfordJason Bassford

    23k32856




    23k32856












    • Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago

















    • Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago
















    Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago





    Thank you for the suggestion, and I can see how it follows from my title. I'm not looking for a new job title, though. I'm looking for a way of describing existing job titles in relation to certain information. So while "Joe is an archivist." is a logical sentence, I'm looking for something like "Joe, our database manager, has access to the files a an (noun)." In theory, Joe could poke around in the database and read everything, but that's not his job. Storing this particular data is not even his job. It's just that, incidentally, he has access because of the nature of his job.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago













    "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago





    "Secretarial" is actually the closest suggestion yet. If I don't find another word, I may just use that. People understand that secretaries handle information, and it doesn't add on extra layers of responsibility the way words like "custodian" do.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago











    1














    If these people have responsibility for the records in some sense, then the term stewardship comes to mind.




    Joe will have stewardship over the files.




    See Merriam-Webster:




    stewardship noun

    2 : the conducting, supervising, or managing of something
    especially : the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one's care







    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

      – Robusto
      5 hours ago















    1














    If these people have responsibility for the records in some sense, then the term stewardship comes to mind.




    Joe will have stewardship over the files.




    See Merriam-Webster:




    stewardship noun

    2 : the conducting, supervising, or managing of something
    especially : the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one's care







    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

      – Robusto
      5 hours ago













    1












    1








    1







    If these people have responsibility for the records in some sense, then the term stewardship comes to mind.




    Joe will have stewardship over the files.




    See Merriam-Webster:




    stewardship noun

    2 : the conducting, supervising, or managing of something
    especially : the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one's care







    share|improve this answer













    If these people have responsibility for the records in some sense, then the term stewardship comes to mind.




    Joe will have stewardship over the files.




    See Merriam-Webster:




    stewardship noun

    2 : the conducting, supervising, or managing of something
    especially : the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one's care








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 6 hours ago









    RobustoRobusto

    130k30312526




    130k30312526












    • Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

      – Robusto
      5 hours ago

















    • Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

      – Solocutor
      5 hours ago











    • There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

      – Robusto
      5 hours ago
















    Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago





    Thank you. This is a reasonable suggestion, and probably the closest so far. I was hoping for something more general and without the connotation of added direct responsibility, just access. Something that could apply to the intern who carries the folder down the hall to a meeting or someone who clears the cache from the copy machine. He is not the the steward of the files, but he could access the contents in the course of his normal duties.

    – Solocutor
    5 hours ago













    There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

    – Robusto
    5 hours ago





    There can be more than one steward, and stewardship can suggest anyone who cares for the item in question to any extent.

    – Robusto
    5 hours ago











    1














    Many organizations use the term position of trust to designate people who have physical access to spaces or documents as well as direct access to financial accounts via purchase cards. This category is broad, and includes people who may incidentally handle sensitive materials as part of their day-to-day records, like student interns filing human resources documents.



    For example, the University System of Georgia in the US defines the term administratively in this way:




    Positions of Trust are sensitive positions that involve responsibilities demanding a significant degree of public trust with significant risk for causing damage or realizing personal gain. Primary responsibilities to include but not limited to:



    • The direct interaction or care of children under the age of 18 or direct patient care


    • Security Access (e.g., public safety, IT security, personnel records, or patient records)


    • Operation, access, or control of financial resources (e.g., P-Card, handling of checks or cash, or Budget Authority in making significant financial decisions)


    Each institution’s hiring office is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of positions of trust within their organization.




    With your given examples, you might say:




    As an IT staffperson with security access, Joe holds a position of trust within his organization.







    share|improve this answer



























      1














      Many organizations use the term position of trust to designate people who have physical access to spaces or documents as well as direct access to financial accounts via purchase cards. This category is broad, and includes people who may incidentally handle sensitive materials as part of their day-to-day records, like student interns filing human resources documents.



      For example, the University System of Georgia in the US defines the term administratively in this way:




      Positions of Trust are sensitive positions that involve responsibilities demanding a significant degree of public trust with significant risk for causing damage or realizing personal gain. Primary responsibilities to include but not limited to:



      • The direct interaction or care of children under the age of 18 or direct patient care


      • Security Access (e.g., public safety, IT security, personnel records, or patient records)


      • Operation, access, or control of financial resources (e.g., P-Card, handling of checks or cash, or Budget Authority in making significant financial decisions)


      Each institution’s hiring office is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of positions of trust within their organization.




      With your given examples, you might say:




      As an IT staffperson with security access, Joe holds a position of trust within his organization.







      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        Many organizations use the term position of trust to designate people who have physical access to spaces or documents as well as direct access to financial accounts via purchase cards. This category is broad, and includes people who may incidentally handle sensitive materials as part of their day-to-day records, like student interns filing human resources documents.



        For example, the University System of Georgia in the US defines the term administratively in this way:




        Positions of Trust are sensitive positions that involve responsibilities demanding a significant degree of public trust with significant risk for causing damage or realizing personal gain. Primary responsibilities to include but not limited to:



        • The direct interaction or care of children under the age of 18 or direct patient care


        • Security Access (e.g., public safety, IT security, personnel records, or patient records)


        • Operation, access, or control of financial resources (e.g., P-Card, handling of checks or cash, or Budget Authority in making significant financial decisions)


        Each institution’s hiring office is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of positions of trust within their organization.




        With your given examples, you might say:




        As an IT staffperson with security access, Joe holds a position of trust within his organization.







        share|improve this answer













        Many organizations use the term position of trust to designate people who have physical access to spaces or documents as well as direct access to financial accounts via purchase cards. This category is broad, and includes people who may incidentally handle sensitive materials as part of their day-to-day records, like student interns filing human resources documents.



        For example, the University System of Georgia in the US defines the term administratively in this way:




        Positions of Trust are sensitive positions that involve responsibilities demanding a significant degree of public trust with significant risk for causing damage or realizing personal gain. Primary responsibilities to include but not limited to:



        • The direct interaction or care of children under the age of 18 or direct patient care


        • Security Access (e.g., public safety, IT security, personnel records, or patient records)


        • Operation, access, or control of financial resources (e.g., P-Card, handling of checks or cash, or Budget Authority in making significant financial decisions)


        Each institution’s hiring office is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of positions of trust within their organization.




        With your given examples, you might say:




        As an IT staffperson with security access, Joe holds a position of trust within his organization.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

        11.2k12044




        11.2k12044



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f501505%2fsomeone-who-is-granted-access-to-information-but-not-expected-to-read-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單