Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?Connect the dotsNetwork connection: Create a network that guides the signal from start to goalSignal-network: Create a network that guides 2 signalsA case of academic misconduct?A moderate visual number puzzle“The Unfinished ________ Waltz”Constructing 0.35 Unit Length$verb|Eight Circles|$What is the optimal strategy for this triangular board game?Is it possible to methodically find the total of ways to read a given phrase making a stack?

Plot twist where the antagonist wins

Construct a word ladder

Why does Mjolnir fall down in Age of Ultron but not in Endgame?

The usage of "run a mile" in a sentence

What are the mechanical differences between the uncommon Medallion of Thoughts and the rare Potion of Mind Reading?

Why is a `for` loop so much faster to count True values?

Where have Brexit voters gone?

Installed Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when active

Externally monitoring CPU/SSD activity without software access

Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)

Is it true that cut time means "play twice as fast as written"?

High resistance, no current. What's the point of a potential then?

Would Jetfuel for a modern jet like an F-16 or a F-35 be producable in the WW2 era?

Alignment: "Breaking out" of environment (enumerate / minipage)

In general, would I need to season a meat when making a sauce?

My employer faked my resume to acquire projects

Do photons bend spacetime or not?

Where's this lookout in Nova Scotia?

NIntegrate doesn't evaluate

Are these reasonable traits for someone with autism?

What is Theresa May waiting for?

What are these arcade games in Ghostbusters 1984?

Which European Languages are not Indo-European?

Why didn't Project Mercury advance to an orbital flight on their second mission?



Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?


Connect the dotsNetwork connection: Create a network that guides the signal from start to goalSignal-network: Create a network that guides 2 signalsA case of academic misconduct?A moderate visual number puzzle“The Unfinished ________ Waltz”Constructing 0.35 Unit Length$verb|Eight Circles|$What is the optimal strategy for this triangular board game?Is it possible to methodically find the total of ways to read a given phrase making a stack?













9












$begingroup$


Connect each red circle with each black circle by drawing a line and the lines should not touch.

From each red circle, 3 lines must be drawn which connect red circles with black circles, but the lines must not touch.



enter image description here



I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$
















    9












    $begingroup$


    Connect each red circle with each black circle by drawing a line and the lines should not touch.

    From each red circle, 3 lines must be drawn which connect red circles with black circles, but the lines must not touch.



    enter image description here



    I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor



    Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$














      9












      9








      9


      1



      $begingroup$


      Connect each red circle with each black circle by drawing a line and the lines should not touch.

      From each red circle, 3 lines must be drawn which connect red circles with black circles, but the lines must not touch.



      enter image description here



      I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$




      Connect each red circle with each black circle by drawing a line and the lines should not touch.

      From each red circle, 3 lines must be drawn which connect red circles with black circles, but the lines must not touch.



      enter image description here



      I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.







      mathematics visual






      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 10 hours ago









      Rand al'Thor

      72.4k14238479




      72.4k14238479






      New contributor



      Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 11 hours ago









      Navid2132Navid2132

      462




      462




      New contributor



      Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Navid2132 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          12












          $begingroup$

          This is a famous problem called the Three utilities problem, which is part of the mathematical field of graph theory. The problem basically asks for a planar embedding of the utility graph, which does not exist.



          While it's not exactly know when the puzzle was invented, it was published at least as far back as 1913 and it took mathematicians until 1930 to solve it. That means it's rather difficult to prove why the puzzle is impossible to solve; it requires some advanced mathematics to do so, beyond the scope of almost all readers here. This is again a case of "it's hard to prove a negative".



          Simply put, there are just too many lines which need to be drawn and too few points. This is just a 'fact' of two-dimensional mathematics, just like the icosahedron being the largest (three dimensional) polyhedron.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
            $endgroup$
            – hexomino
            10 hours ago



















          9












          $begingroup$

          While many other answers have covered the fact that this is provably impossible as typically understood. I remember as a kid being presented with this as a riddle and the way it was phrased was similar to how you phrased it. In that case it is often acceptable to pass a line through one of the dots, resulting in:



          enter image description here



          Of course this is a bit of a cheeky answer, but the way it is often worded, especially if intended to actually be solved, this is a solution.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            7












            $begingroup$

            This is a problem I've thought about quite a bit too and here is my "proof" for why it cannot be done




            For convenience, let us label the black circles $B_1, B_2, B_3$ and the red circles $R_1, R_2, R_3$.
            Suppose there exists a way to connect all the circles as specified. Then the circles $B_1, R_1, B_2, R_2$ form a closed loop in the plane.
            Since the circle $B_3$ and $R_3$ must be connected to each other, they must be both inside the loop or both outside the loop.

            Both inside
            The interiors of the loops formed by sequences of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ and $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ are disjoint regions whose union is the interior of the original loop. The circle $R_3$ must lie inside one of these loops. If it is inside the first loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_2$ which is outside the first loop. If it is inside the second loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_1$ which is outside the second loop. This is a contradiction.

            Both outside
            In this case, either the sequence of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ or $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ forms a loop whose finite interior is disjoint from that of the original. Without loss of generality, suppose it is the former. Then $R_3$ must be within this loop or outside of it. If it is within the loop, then there is not way to connect it to $B_2$, which is outside the loop. If it is outside this loop, there is not way to connect it to $B_1$ which is within the larger loop formed by $B_3, R_1, B_2, R_2$. Hence another contradiction.




            Further reading




            This is a corollary of Kuratowksi's Theorem and is an example of what they call a $K_3,3$ graph.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              so its not possible?
              $endgroup$
              – Navid2132
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
              $endgroup$
              – hexomino
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
              $endgroup$
              – Domosed
              6 hours ago


















            3












            $begingroup$

            It has to do with graph theory and non-planar graphs.



            If (and only if) a graph is planar, you can draw it on a flat piece of paper without the lines ever crossing.



            On the other hand, Kuratowski's theorem states that a finite graph is planar if (and only if) it doesn't contain the K5 graph or the K3,3 graph in any form.



            The K5 graph is the completely connected graph with 5 nodes. The K3,3 graph is the complete bipartite graph with 3 nodes on either side, which is also known as "the utility graph" because of this very puzzle. (It's usually given in the form of connecting utilities to houses.)



            So this puzzle asks you to draw one of the two "archetypal" non-planar graphs, and therefore it's impossible to solve it on a flat piece of paper. Which is why some silly guys "fixed" the puzzle by printing it on a mug. :-)






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
              $endgroup$
              – Arnaud Mortier
              40 mins ago


















            3












            $begingroup$


            I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.




            If your friend ask you to do this on paper page, there is a solution with this small "legit hack":




            just make a hole in the paper, and draw a line through it, then continue the line on the other side and comme back through another hole !
            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              not the right answer
              $endgroup$
              – Navid2132
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
              $endgroup$
              – Synn
              11 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
              $endgroup$
              – David Tonhofer
              1 hour ago


















            1












            $begingroup$

            The answer is not so nice but there is nothing to do because this puzzle is unsolvable in 2D.look here ,It's the same principle
            (Welcome to Puzzling...)






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              so its not possible to slove it?
              $endgroup$
              – Navid2132
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, its not possible.
              $endgroup$
              – Tahel
              11 hours ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
              $endgroup$
              – F1Krazy
              2 hours ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "559"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Navid2132 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84316%2fwhy-is-this-simple-puzzle-impossible-to-solve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            12












            $begingroup$

            This is a famous problem called the Three utilities problem, which is part of the mathematical field of graph theory. The problem basically asks for a planar embedding of the utility graph, which does not exist.



            While it's not exactly know when the puzzle was invented, it was published at least as far back as 1913 and it took mathematicians until 1930 to solve it. That means it's rather difficult to prove why the puzzle is impossible to solve; it requires some advanced mathematics to do so, beyond the scope of almost all readers here. This is again a case of "it's hard to prove a negative".



            Simply put, there are just too many lines which need to be drawn and too few points. This is just a 'fact' of two-dimensional mathematics, just like the icosahedron being the largest (three dimensional) polyhedron.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
              $endgroup$
              – hexomino
              10 hours ago
















            12












            $begingroup$

            This is a famous problem called the Three utilities problem, which is part of the mathematical field of graph theory. The problem basically asks for a planar embedding of the utility graph, which does not exist.



            While it's not exactly know when the puzzle was invented, it was published at least as far back as 1913 and it took mathematicians until 1930 to solve it. That means it's rather difficult to prove why the puzzle is impossible to solve; it requires some advanced mathematics to do so, beyond the scope of almost all readers here. This is again a case of "it's hard to prove a negative".



            Simply put, there are just too many lines which need to be drawn and too few points. This is just a 'fact' of two-dimensional mathematics, just like the icosahedron being the largest (three dimensional) polyhedron.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
              $endgroup$
              – hexomino
              10 hours ago














            12












            12








            12





            $begingroup$

            This is a famous problem called the Three utilities problem, which is part of the mathematical field of graph theory. The problem basically asks for a planar embedding of the utility graph, which does not exist.



            While it's not exactly know when the puzzle was invented, it was published at least as far back as 1913 and it took mathematicians until 1930 to solve it. That means it's rather difficult to prove why the puzzle is impossible to solve; it requires some advanced mathematics to do so, beyond the scope of almost all readers here. This is again a case of "it's hard to prove a negative".



            Simply put, there are just too many lines which need to be drawn and too few points. This is just a 'fact' of two-dimensional mathematics, just like the icosahedron being the largest (three dimensional) polyhedron.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            This is a famous problem called the Three utilities problem, which is part of the mathematical field of graph theory. The problem basically asks for a planar embedding of the utility graph, which does not exist.



            While it's not exactly know when the puzzle was invented, it was published at least as far back as 1913 and it took mathematicians until 1930 to solve it. That means it's rather difficult to prove why the puzzle is impossible to solve; it requires some advanced mathematics to do so, beyond the scope of almost all readers here. This is again a case of "it's hard to prove a negative".



            Simply put, there are just too many lines which need to be drawn and too few points. This is just a 'fact' of two-dimensional mathematics, just like the icosahedron being the largest (three dimensional) polyhedron.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 11 hours ago









            GlorfindelGlorfindel

            15.8k46092




            15.8k46092











            • $begingroup$
              I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
              $endgroup$
              – hexomino
              10 hours ago

















            • $begingroup$
              I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
              $endgroup$
              – hexomino
              10 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
            $endgroup$
            – hexomino
            10 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            I would say it is not too difficult to prove once you can assume the Jordan curve theorem. I've essentially outlined the argument in my answer which I think is what they are referring to here
            $endgroup$
            – hexomino
            10 hours ago












            9












            $begingroup$

            While many other answers have covered the fact that this is provably impossible as typically understood. I remember as a kid being presented with this as a riddle and the way it was phrased was similar to how you phrased it. In that case it is often acceptable to pass a line through one of the dots, resulting in:



            enter image description here



            Of course this is a bit of a cheeky answer, but the way it is often worded, especially if intended to actually be solved, this is a solution.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              9












              $begingroup$

              While many other answers have covered the fact that this is provably impossible as typically understood. I remember as a kid being presented with this as a riddle and the way it was phrased was similar to how you phrased it. In that case it is often acceptable to pass a line through one of the dots, resulting in:



              enter image description here



              Of course this is a bit of a cheeky answer, but the way it is often worded, especially if intended to actually be solved, this is a solution.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                9












                9








                9





                $begingroup$

                While many other answers have covered the fact that this is provably impossible as typically understood. I remember as a kid being presented with this as a riddle and the way it was phrased was similar to how you phrased it. In that case it is often acceptable to pass a line through one of the dots, resulting in:



                enter image description here



                Of course this is a bit of a cheeky answer, but the way it is often worded, especially if intended to actually be solved, this is a solution.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                While many other answers have covered the fact that this is provably impossible as typically understood. I remember as a kid being presented with this as a riddle and the way it was phrased was similar to how you phrased it. In that case it is often acceptable to pass a line through one of the dots, resulting in:



                enter image description here



                Of course this is a bit of a cheeky answer, but the way it is often worded, especially if intended to actually be solved, this is a solution.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 hours ago

























                answered 3 hours ago









                LambdaBetaLambdaBeta

                3614




                3614





















                    7












                    $begingroup$

                    This is a problem I've thought about quite a bit too and here is my "proof" for why it cannot be done




                    For convenience, let us label the black circles $B_1, B_2, B_3$ and the red circles $R_1, R_2, R_3$.
                    Suppose there exists a way to connect all the circles as specified. Then the circles $B_1, R_1, B_2, R_2$ form a closed loop in the plane.
                    Since the circle $B_3$ and $R_3$ must be connected to each other, they must be both inside the loop or both outside the loop.

                    Both inside
                    The interiors of the loops formed by sequences of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ and $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ are disjoint regions whose union is the interior of the original loop. The circle $R_3$ must lie inside one of these loops. If it is inside the first loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_2$ which is outside the first loop. If it is inside the second loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_1$ which is outside the second loop. This is a contradiction.

                    Both outside
                    In this case, either the sequence of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ or $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ forms a loop whose finite interior is disjoint from that of the original. Without loss of generality, suppose it is the former. Then $R_3$ must be within this loop or outside of it. If it is within the loop, then there is not way to connect it to $B_2$, which is outside the loop. If it is outside this loop, there is not way to connect it to $B_1$ which is within the larger loop formed by $B_3, R_1, B_2, R_2$. Hence another contradiction.




                    Further reading




                    This is a corollary of Kuratowksi's Theorem and is an example of what they call a $K_3,3$ graph.







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
                      $endgroup$
                      – hexomino
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Domosed
                      6 hours ago















                    7












                    $begingroup$

                    This is a problem I've thought about quite a bit too and here is my "proof" for why it cannot be done




                    For convenience, let us label the black circles $B_1, B_2, B_3$ and the red circles $R_1, R_2, R_3$.
                    Suppose there exists a way to connect all the circles as specified. Then the circles $B_1, R_1, B_2, R_2$ form a closed loop in the plane.
                    Since the circle $B_3$ and $R_3$ must be connected to each other, they must be both inside the loop or both outside the loop.

                    Both inside
                    The interiors of the loops formed by sequences of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ and $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ are disjoint regions whose union is the interior of the original loop. The circle $R_3$ must lie inside one of these loops. If it is inside the first loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_2$ which is outside the first loop. If it is inside the second loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_1$ which is outside the second loop. This is a contradiction.

                    Both outside
                    In this case, either the sequence of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ or $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ forms a loop whose finite interior is disjoint from that of the original. Without loss of generality, suppose it is the former. Then $R_3$ must be within this loop or outside of it. If it is within the loop, then there is not way to connect it to $B_2$, which is outside the loop. If it is outside this loop, there is not way to connect it to $B_1$ which is within the larger loop formed by $B_3, R_1, B_2, R_2$. Hence another contradiction.




                    Further reading




                    This is a corollary of Kuratowksi's Theorem and is an example of what they call a $K_3,3$ graph.







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
                      $endgroup$
                      – hexomino
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Domosed
                      6 hours ago













                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    This is a problem I've thought about quite a bit too and here is my "proof" for why it cannot be done




                    For convenience, let us label the black circles $B_1, B_2, B_3$ and the red circles $R_1, R_2, R_3$.
                    Suppose there exists a way to connect all the circles as specified. Then the circles $B_1, R_1, B_2, R_2$ form a closed loop in the plane.
                    Since the circle $B_3$ and $R_3$ must be connected to each other, they must be both inside the loop or both outside the loop.

                    Both inside
                    The interiors of the loops formed by sequences of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ and $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ are disjoint regions whose union is the interior of the original loop. The circle $R_3$ must lie inside one of these loops. If it is inside the first loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_2$ which is outside the first loop. If it is inside the second loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_1$ which is outside the second loop. This is a contradiction.

                    Both outside
                    In this case, either the sequence of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ or $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ forms a loop whose finite interior is disjoint from that of the original. Without loss of generality, suppose it is the former. Then $R_3$ must be within this loop or outside of it. If it is within the loop, then there is not way to connect it to $B_2$, which is outside the loop. If it is outside this loop, there is not way to connect it to $B_1$ which is within the larger loop formed by $B_3, R_1, B_2, R_2$. Hence another contradiction.




                    Further reading




                    This is a corollary of Kuratowksi's Theorem and is an example of what they call a $K_3,3$ graph.







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    This is a problem I've thought about quite a bit too and here is my "proof" for why it cannot be done




                    For convenience, let us label the black circles $B_1, B_2, B_3$ and the red circles $R_1, R_2, R_3$.
                    Suppose there exists a way to connect all the circles as specified. Then the circles $B_1, R_1, B_2, R_2$ form a closed loop in the plane.
                    Since the circle $B_3$ and $R_3$ must be connected to each other, they must be both inside the loop or both outside the loop.

                    Both inside
                    The interiors of the loops formed by sequences of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ and $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ are disjoint regions whose union is the interior of the original loop. The circle $R_3$ must lie inside one of these loops. If it is inside the first loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_2$ which is outside the first loop. If it is inside the second loop, there is no way to connect it to $B_1$ which is outside the second loop. This is a contradiction.

                    Both outside
                    In this case, either the sequence of circles $B_1, R_1, B_3, R_2$ or $B_2, R_2, B_3, R_1$ forms a loop whose finite interior is disjoint from that of the original. Without loss of generality, suppose it is the former. Then $R_3$ must be within this loop or outside of it. If it is within the loop, then there is not way to connect it to $B_2$, which is outside the loop. If it is outside this loop, there is not way to connect it to $B_1$ which is within the larger loop formed by $B_3, R_1, B_2, R_2$. Hence another contradiction.




                    Further reading




                    This is a corollary of Kuratowksi's Theorem and is an example of what they call a $K_3,3$ graph.








                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 11 hours ago









                    hexominohexomino

                    50.8k4150240




                    50.8k4150240











                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
                      $endgroup$
                      – hexomino
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Domosed
                      6 hours ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
                      $endgroup$
                      – hexomino
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Domosed
                      6 hours ago















                    $begingroup$
                    so its not possible?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Navid2132
                    11 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    so its not possible?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Navid2132
                    11 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
                    $endgroup$
                    – hexomino
                    11 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    @Navid2132 Yes, unless you do something clever like suggested in Tahel's answer. But just as a planar problem, impossible to solve.
                    $endgroup$
                    – hexomino
                    11 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
                    $endgroup$
                    – Domosed
                    6 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    @hexomino, nice proof! +1!
                    $endgroup$
                    – Domosed
                    6 hours ago











                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    It has to do with graph theory and non-planar graphs.



                    If (and only if) a graph is planar, you can draw it on a flat piece of paper without the lines ever crossing.



                    On the other hand, Kuratowski's theorem states that a finite graph is planar if (and only if) it doesn't contain the K5 graph or the K3,3 graph in any form.



                    The K5 graph is the completely connected graph with 5 nodes. The K3,3 graph is the complete bipartite graph with 3 nodes on either side, which is also known as "the utility graph" because of this very puzzle. (It's usually given in the form of connecting utilities to houses.)



                    So this puzzle asks you to draw one of the two "archetypal" non-planar graphs, and therefore it's impossible to solve it on a flat piece of paper. Which is why some silly guys "fixed" the puzzle by printing it on a mug. :-)






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arnaud Mortier
                      40 mins ago















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    It has to do with graph theory and non-planar graphs.



                    If (and only if) a graph is planar, you can draw it on a flat piece of paper without the lines ever crossing.



                    On the other hand, Kuratowski's theorem states that a finite graph is planar if (and only if) it doesn't contain the K5 graph or the K3,3 graph in any form.



                    The K5 graph is the completely connected graph with 5 nodes. The K3,3 graph is the complete bipartite graph with 3 nodes on either side, which is also known as "the utility graph" because of this very puzzle. (It's usually given in the form of connecting utilities to houses.)



                    So this puzzle asks you to draw one of the two "archetypal" non-planar graphs, and therefore it's impossible to solve it on a flat piece of paper. Which is why some silly guys "fixed" the puzzle by printing it on a mug. :-)






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arnaud Mortier
                      40 mins ago













                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    It has to do with graph theory and non-planar graphs.



                    If (and only if) a graph is planar, you can draw it on a flat piece of paper without the lines ever crossing.



                    On the other hand, Kuratowski's theorem states that a finite graph is planar if (and only if) it doesn't contain the K5 graph or the K3,3 graph in any form.



                    The K5 graph is the completely connected graph with 5 nodes. The K3,3 graph is the complete bipartite graph with 3 nodes on either side, which is also known as "the utility graph" because of this very puzzle. (It's usually given in the form of connecting utilities to houses.)



                    So this puzzle asks you to draw one of the two "archetypal" non-planar graphs, and therefore it's impossible to solve it on a flat piece of paper. Which is why some silly guys "fixed" the puzzle by printing it on a mug. :-)






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    It has to do with graph theory and non-planar graphs.



                    If (and only if) a graph is planar, you can draw it on a flat piece of paper without the lines ever crossing.



                    On the other hand, Kuratowski's theorem states that a finite graph is planar if (and only if) it doesn't contain the K5 graph or the K3,3 graph in any form.



                    The K5 graph is the completely connected graph with 5 nodes. The K3,3 graph is the complete bipartite graph with 3 nodes on either side, which is also known as "the utility graph" because of this very puzzle. (It's usually given in the form of connecting utilities to houses.)



                    So this puzzle asks you to draw one of the two "archetypal" non-planar graphs, and therefore it's impossible to solve it on a flat piece of paper. Which is why some silly guys "fixed" the puzzle by printing it on a mug. :-)







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 11 hours ago









                    BassBass

                    32.2k477196




                    32.2k477196











                    • $begingroup$
                      The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arnaud Mortier
                      40 mins ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arnaud Mortier
                      40 mins ago















                    $begingroup$
                    The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Arnaud Mortier
                    40 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    The "If (and only if)" sentence should be replaced by "a graph is said to be.. " or "a graph is called...". It is good practice to keep words involving causality (in one or both ways) for situations that actually involve theorems and not definitions.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Arnaud Mortier
                    40 mins ago











                    3












                    $begingroup$


                    I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.




                    If your friend ask you to do this on paper page, there is a solution with this small "legit hack":




                    just make a hole in the paper, and draw a line through it, then continue the line on the other side and comme back through another hole !
                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      not the right answer
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Synn
                      11 hours ago







                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      6 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
                      $endgroup$
                      – David Tonhofer
                      1 hour ago















                    3












                    $begingroup$


                    I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.




                    If your friend ask you to do this on paper page, there is a solution with this small "legit hack":




                    just make a hole in the paper, and draw a line through it, then continue the line on the other side and comme back through another hole !
                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      not the right answer
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Synn
                      11 hours ago







                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      6 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
                      $endgroup$
                      – David Tonhofer
                      1 hour ago













                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$


                    I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.




                    If your friend ask you to do this on paper page, there is a solution with this small "legit hack":




                    just make a hole in the paper, and draw a line through it, then continue the line on the other side and comme back through another hole !
                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$




                    I am 32 years old now. When I was in 4th class, a friend of mine challenged me to solve this problem and I still can't solve it.




                    If your friend ask you to do this on paper page, there is a solution with this small "legit hack":




                    just make a hole in the paper, and draw a line through it, then continue the line on the other side and comme back through another hole !
                    enter image description here








                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 7 hours ago









                    Omega Krypton

                    6,7892953




                    6,7892953






                    New contributor



                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    answered 11 hours ago









                    SynnSynn

                    1785




                    1785




                    New contributor



                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




                    New contributor




                    Synn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.













                    • $begingroup$
                      not the right answer
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Synn
                      11 hours ago







                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      6 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
                      $endgroup$
                      – David Tonhofer
                      1 hour ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      not the right answer
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Synn
                      11 hours ago







                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      6 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
                      $endgroup$
                      – David Tonhofer
                      1 hour ago















                    $begingroup$
                    not the right answer
                    $endgroup$
                    – Navid2132
                    11 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    not the right answer
                    $endgroup$
                    – Navid2132
                    11 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Synn
                    11 hours ago





                    $begingroup$
                    Yep but tha't a correct solution on paper page.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Synn
                    11 hours ago





                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jaap Scherphuis
                    6 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    You could also fold a corner of the paper so that it covers part of a previously drawn edge, creating a gap or bridge for you to go through. This trick is more often used for drawing an impossible Euler path without lifting pen from the paper.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jaap Scherphuis
                    6 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Tonhofer
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    "Prepare the jump to Hyperspace and inform Lord Vader!"
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Tonhofer
                    1 hour ago











                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    The answer is not so nice but there is nothing to do because this puzzle is unsolvable in 2D.look here ,It's the same principle
                    (Welcome to Puzzling...)






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible to slove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes, its not possible.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tahel
                      11 hours ago






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – F1Krazy
                      2 hours ago















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    The answer is not so nice but there is nothing to do because this puzzle is unsolvable in 2D.look here ,It's the same principle
                    (Welcome to Puzzling...)






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible to slove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes, its not possible.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tahel
                      11 hours ago






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – F1Krazy
                      2 hours ago













                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    The answer is not so nice but there is nothing to do because this puzzle is unsolvable in 2D.look here ,It's the same principle
                    (Welcome to Puzzling...)






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The answer is not so nice but there is nothing to do because this puzzle is unsolvable in 2D.look here ,It's the same principle
                    (Welcome to Puzzling...)







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 11 hours ago









                    TahelTahel

                    76212




                    76212











                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible to slove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes, its not possible.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tahel
                      11 hours ago






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – F1Krazy
                      2 hours ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      so its not possible to slove it?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Navid2132
                      11 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes, its not possible.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tahel
                      11 hours ago






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – F1Krazy
                      2 hours ago















                    $begingroup$
                    so its not possible to slove it?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Navid2132
                    11 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    so its not possible to slove it?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Navid2132
                    11 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Yes, its not possible.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tahel
                    11 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Yes, its not possible.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tahel
                    11 hours ago




                    2




                    2




                    $begingroup$
                    While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
                    $endgroup$
                    – F1Krazy
                    2 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review
                    $endgroup$
                    – F1Krazy
                    2 hours ago










                    Navid2132 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Navid2132 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Navid2132 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Navid2132 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84316%2fwhy-is-this-simple-puzzle-impossible-to-solve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480