using Leibniz rule to solve definite integralLeibniz integral rule implementationDerivative w.r.t. limits of integration of double definite integral (Leibniz' rule)Leibniz rule for improper integralA general case - Leibniz ruleMisconception in applying Leibniz' ruleDerivative of Parametric Integral Using LeibnizApplying Leibniz rule to multiple integralUsing Leibniz Rule to Find an ExpressionLeibniz integral rule in SDEWhy can I not use leibniz integral rule in this case?

Does Nitrogen inside commercial airliner wheels prevent blowouts on touchdown?

Is it rude to call a professor by their last name with no prefix in a non-academic setting?

Caught 2 students cheating together on the final exam that I proctored

Why would Ryanair allow me to book this journey through a third party, but not through their own website?

Where can I find visible/radio telescopic observations of the center of the Milky Way galaxy?

Count Even Digits In Number

Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)

number headings

How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?

Plot and know intersection points of multiple lines/functions

Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?

NIntegrate doesn't evaluate

What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?

Should breaking down something like a door be adjudicated as an attempt to beat its AC and HP, or as an ability check against a set DC?

Grammar Question Regarding "Are the" or "Is the" When Referring to Something that May or May not be Plural

Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?

Any advice on creating fictional locations in real places when writing historical fiction?

Is it possible to play as a necromancer skeleton?

Should one buy new hardware after a system compromise?

Installed Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when active

Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?

How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?

My employer faked my resume to acquire projects

Is the Indo-European language family made up?



using Leibniz rule to solve definite integral


Leibniz integral rule implementationDerivative w.r.t. limits of integration of double definite integral (Leibniz' rule)Leibniz rule for improper integralA general case - Leibniz ruleMisconception in applying Leibniz' ruleDerivative of Parametric Integral Using LeibnizApplying Leibniz rule to multiple integralUsing Leibniz Rule to Find an ExpressionLeibniz integral rule in SDEWhy can I not use leibniz integral rule in this case?













4












$begingroup$


The total number of distinct $x$ in $[0,1]$ for which $$int_0^xfract^21+t^4dt=2x-1$$ holds is



I tried solving using Leibniz rule but that gives $0$ no. of solutions. However the answer is $1$.






integration definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Differentiating doesn't really make sense. Try to use the intermediate value theorem (with some bounding of the integral).
    $endgroup$
    – cmk
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    why can't i use differentiation
    $endgroup$
    – Lakshay
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can't use differentiation because $f'(x) = g'(x) not implies f(x) = g(x)$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Vizag
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question was asked in IIT JEE (A) in 2016.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
    8 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


The total number of distinct $x$ in $[0,1]$ for which $$int_0^xfract^21+t^4dt=2x-1$$ holds is



I tried solving using Leibniz rule but that gives $0$ no. of solutions. However the answer is $1$.






integration definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Differentiating doesn't really make sense. Try to use the intermediate value theorem (with some bounding of the integral).
    $endgroup$
    – cmk
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    why can't i use differentiation
    $endgroup$
    – Lakshay
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can't use differentiation because $f'(x) = g'(x) not implies f(x) = g(x)$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Vizag
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question was asked in IIT JEE (A) in 2016.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
    8 hours ago













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


The total number of distinct $x$ in $[0,1]$ for which $$int_0^xfract^21+t^4dt=2x-1$$ holds is



I tried solving using Leibniz rule but that gives $0$ no. of solutions. However the answer is $1$.






integration definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The total number of distinct $x$ in $[0,1]$ for which $$int_0^xfract^21+t^4dt=2x-1$$ holds is



I tried solving using Leibniz rule but that gives $0$ no. of solutions. However the answer is $1$.






integration definite-integrals




integration definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









cmk

62010




62010










asked 9 hours ago









LakshayLakshay

1306




1306











  • $begingroup$
    Differentiating doesn't really make sense. Try to use the intermediate value theorem (with some bounding of the integral).
    $endgroup$
    – cmk
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    why can't i use differentiation
    $endgroup$
    – Lakshay
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can't use differentiation because $f'(x) = g'(x) not implies f(x) = g(x)$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Vizag
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question was asked in IIT JEE (A) in 2016.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Differentiating doesn't really make sense. Try to use the intermediate value theorem (with some bounding of the integral).
    $endgroup$
    – cmk
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    why can't i use differentiation
    $endgroup$
    – Lakshay
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can't use differentiation because $f'(x) = g'(x) not implies f(x) = g(x)$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Vizag
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question was asked in IIT JEE (A) in 2016.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
Differentiating doesn't really make sense. Try to use the intermediate value theorem (with some bounding of the integral).
$endgroup$
– cmk
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
Differentiating doesn't really make sense. Try to use the intermediate value theorem (with some bounding of the integral).
$endgroup$
– cmk
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
why can't i use differentiation
$endgroup$
– Lakshay
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
why can't i use differentiation
$endgroup$
– Lakshay
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
You can't use differentiation because $f'(x) = g'(x) not implies f(x) = g(x)$ in general.
$endgroup$
– Vizag
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
You can't use differentiation because $f'(x) = g'(x) not implies f(x) = g(x)$ in general.
$endgroup$
– Vizag
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
This question was asked in IIT JEE (A) in 2016.
$endgroup$
– Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
This question was asked in IIT JEE (A) in 2016.
$endgroup$
– Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Consider the function $$f(x)=2x-1-intlimits_0^xfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ Clearly, $f$ is continuous on $[0,1].$ Note that $f(0)=-1<0$, and $$f(1)=1-intlimits_0^1fract^21+t^4 dtgeq 1-intlimits_0^1frac11+0 dt=0.$$ If $f(1)$ is zero, we've found a solution. If not, then $f(1)>0.$ In this case, the intermediate value theorem guarantees that there exists $cin (0,1)$ for which $f(c)=0,$ or $$2c-1=intlimits_0^cfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ This shows that there is, at least, one solution. Next, note that $$f'(x)=2-fracx^21+x^4>0$$ for $xin [0,1]$, so the function is strictly increasing, which tells us that the previously-found zero of $f$ is the only such zero. In the end, we did use the fundamental theorem of calculus here, but only to show that the zero of $f$ was unique.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    Hint: Use that $$1+t^4=1+t^4+2t^2-2t^2=(1+t^2)^2-(sqrt2t)^2=(1+t^2-sqrt2t)(1+t^2+sqrt2t)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      it complicates the solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
      8 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3238363%2fusing-leibniz-rule-to-solve-definite-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    Consider the function $$f(x)=2x-1-intlimits_0^xfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ Clearly, $f$ is continuous on $[0,1].$ Note that $f(0)=-1<0$, and $$f(1)=1-intlimits_0^1fract^21+t^4 dtgeq 1-intlimits_0^1frac11+0 dt=0.$$ If $f(1)$ is zero, we've found a solution. If not, then $f(1)>0.$ In this case, the intermediate value theorem guarantees that there exists $cin (0,1)$ for which $f(c)=0,$ or $$2c-1=intlimits_0^cfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ This shows that there is, at least, one solution. Next, note that $$f'(x)=2-fracx^21+x^4>0$$ for $xin [0,1]$, so the function is strictly increasing, which tells us that the previously-found zero of $f$ is the only such zero. In the end, we did use the fundamental theorem of calculus here, but only to show that the zero of $f$ was unique.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      7












      $begingroup$

      Consider the function $$f(x)=2x-1-intlimits_0^xfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ Clearly, $f$ is continuous on $[0,1].$ Note that $f(0)=-1<0$, and $$f(1)=1-intlimits_0^1fract^21+t^4 dtgeq 1-intlimits_0^1frac11+0 dt=0.$$ If $f(1)$ is zero, we've found a solution. If not, then $f(1)>0.$ In this case, the intermediate value theorem guarantees that there exists $cin (0,1)$ for which $f(c)=0,$ or $$2c-1=intlimits_0^cfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ This shows that there is, at least, one solution. Next, note that $$f'(x)=2-fracx^21+x^4>0$$ for $xin [0,1]$, so the function is strictly increasing, which tells us that the previously-found zero of $f$ is the only such zero. In the end, we did use the fundamental theorem of calculus here, but only to show that the zero of $f$ was unique.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        Consider the function $$f(x)=2x-1-intlimits_0^xfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ Clearly, $f$ is continuous on $[0,1].$ Note that $f(0)=-1<0$, and $$f(1)=1-intlimits_0^1fract^21+t^4 dtgeq 1-intlimits_0^1frac11+0 dt=0.$$ If $f(1)$ is zero, we've found a solution. If not, then $f(1)>0.$ In this case, the intermediate value theorem guarantees that there exists $cin (0,1)$ for which $f(c)=0,$ or $$2c-1=intlimits_0^cfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ This shows that there is, at least, one solution. Next, note that $$f'(x)=2-fracx^21+x^4>0$$ for $xin [0,1]$, so the function is strictly increasing, which tells us that the previously-found zero of $f$ is the only such zero. In the end, we did use the fundamental theorem of calculus here, but only to show that the zero of $f$ was unique.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Consider the function $$f(x)=2x-1-intlimits_0^xfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ Clearly, $f$ is continuous on $[0,1].$ Note that $f(0)=-1<0$, and $$f(1)=1-intlimits_0^1fract^21+t^4 dtgeq 1-intlimits_0^1frac11+0 dt=0.$$ If $f(1)$ is zero, we've found a solution. If not, then $f(1)>0.$ In this case, the intermediate value theorem guarantees that there exists $cin (0,1)$ for which $f(c)=0,$ or $$2c-1=intlimits_0^cfract^21+t^4 dt.$$ This shows that there is, at least, one solution. Next, note that $$f'(x)=2-fracx^21+x^4>0$$ for $xin [0,1]$, so the function is strictly increasing, which tells us that the previously-found zero of $f$ is the only such zero. In the end, we did use the fundamental theorem of calculus here, but only to show that the zero of $f$ was unique.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago

























        answered 9 hours ago









        cmkcmk

        62010




        62010





















            2












            $begingroup$

            Hint: Use that $$1+t^4=1+t^4+2t^2-2t^2=(1+t^2)^2-(sqrt2t)^2=(1+t^2-sqrt2t)(1+t^2+sqrt2t)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              it complicates the solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
              8 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            Hint: Use that $$1+t^4=1+t^4+2t^2-2t^2=(1+t^2)^2-(sqrt2t)^2=(1+t^2-sqrt2t)(1+t^2+sqrt2t)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              it complicates the solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
              8 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Hint: Use that $$1+t^4=1+t^4+2t^2-2t^2=(1+t^2)^2-(sqrt2t)^2=(1+t^2-sqrt2t)(1+t^2+sqrt2t)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Hint: Use that $$1+t^4=1+t^4+2t^2-2t^2=(1+t^2)^2-(sqrt2t)^2=(1+t^2-sqrt2t)(1+t^2+sqrt2t)$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 9 hours ago









            Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner

            81.3k42867




            81.3k42867











            • $begingroup$
              it complicates the solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
              8 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              it complicates the solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
              8 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            it complicates the solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            it complicates the solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Dr Zafar Ahmed DSc
            8 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3238363%2fusing-leibniz-rule-to-solve-definite-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Image
            Internet forum softwarePHP software Internet communityPHPMySQLdatabase management systemInternet forumCharles WarnerMatt MechamJarvis Entertainment GroupIkonboardInvisionFreeAjaxIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry Invision Community From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Invision Community Developer(s) Invision Power Services Stable release 4.4.6 / August 19, 2019 ; 34 days ago  ( 2019-08-19 ) Platform PHP / MySQL Type Forum software License Proprietary Website invisioncommunity.com Invision Community (previously known as IPS Community Suite ) is primarily an Internet community software produced by Invision Power Services, Inc. It is written in PHP and uses MySQL as a database management system. Invision Power Services sell applications that each can be bought and installed separately in addition to the Suite, the most widely known being the Internet forum software Invision Power Board. Invisi
            Read more

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Image
            Would it be easier to colonise a living world or a dead world? Postal services in Italy - Poste Italiane vs. Friendpost vs. GPS What is /dev/null and why can't I use hx on it? Why are engines with carburetors hard to start in cold weather? How to make a gift without seeming creepy? Without exposing his identity, did Roy help his parents with money so that they can afford to stay in their home? Does the Creighton Method of Natural Family Planning have a failure rate of 3.2% or less? How do I break the broom in Untitled Goose Game? Had there been instances of national states banning harmful imports before the mid-19th C Opium Wars? D&D Monsters and Copyright Is sleeping on the groud in cold weather better than on an air mattress? Transiting through Switzerland by coach with lots of cash quadratic equations on 2 by 2 matrices Always Lubricate Skewers? I pay for a service, but I miss the broadcast Iron-age tools, is there a way to extract heavy metals
            Read more

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її

            Image
            ЛаскавецьФлора УкраїниФлора ЄвропиФлора АфрикиФлора АзіїРослини, описані 1753 ОкружковіОднорічнатрав'яниста рослинаАфриціЄвропіАзіїУкраїні Ласкавець круглолистий Матеріал з Вікіпедії — вільної енциклопедії. Перейти до навігації Перейти до пошуку ? Ласкавець круглолистий Біологічна класифікація Домен: Ядерні (Eukaryota) Царство: Зелені рослини (Viridiplantae) Відділ: Вищі рослини (Streptophyta) — Судинні (Tracheophyta) — Покритонасінні (Angiospermae) — Евдикоти (Eudicots) — Айстериди (Asterids) Порядок: Аралієцвіті (Apiales) Родина: Окружкові (Apiaceae) Підродина: Селерові (Apioideae) Триба: Bupleureae Рід: Ласкавець ( Bupleurum ) Вид: Ласкавець круглолистий Біноміальна назва Bupleurum rotundifolium L., 1753 Посилання Вікісховище: Bupleurum rotundifolium Віківиди: Bupleurum rotundifolium EOL: 581711 IPNI: 38361-2 ITIS: 29608 NCBI: 90446 Ласкавець круглолистий [1] [1] [2] ( Bupleurum rotundifolium ) — вид рослин родини Окружкові (Apiaceae)
            Read more