Why do Ryanair allow me to book connecting itineraries through a third party, but not through their own website?What does the “Kiwi.com Guarantee” cover?“Flight mode” phone use banned on Ryanair. Is this a worldwide phenomenon?Flight + hotel deal on expedia, can I use other flight tickets without any consequences?Vacation booking reference problem with checkmytrip.comHow to find all flights scheduled between a pair of cities?Scheduled Ryanair flights from Zaventem moved to Charleroi?Way to avoid two bookings for a flight?How can I choose FRA without HHN on kiwi.com?How to verify, with different airlines, that the broker booked the flight correctly?Airline cancelled direct flight. I changed flight to another day. Must airline offer free change of hotel booked through airline?Cancelling £700 of flights with RyanAir. No refunds. Options?

What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?

what kind of chord progession is this?

Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)

How strong are Wi-Fi signals?

What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?

Inconsistent results from Wolfram Could

How long until a random word with letters "A", "B", "C" ends in the pattern "ABC"?

Employer asking for online access to bank account - Is this a scam?

Is the Indo-European language family made up?

Construct a word ladder

Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?

Do photons bend spacetime or not?

How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?

Alignment: "Breaking out" of environment (enumerate / minipage)

What is the largest (size) solid object ever dropped from an airplane to impact the ground in freefall?

Why do most published works in medical imaging try to reduce false positives?

What is a really good book for complex variables?

Could a 19.25mm revolver actually exist?

The art of clickbait captions

What are these arcade games in Ghostbusters 1984?

Python program to take in two strings and print the larger string

Should I disclose a colleague's illness (that I should not know) when others badmouth him

Looking for a soft substance that doesn't dissolve underwater

My employer faked my resume to acquire projects



Why do Ryanair allow me to book connecting itineraries through a third party, but not through their own website?


What does the “Kiwi.com Guarantee” cover?“Flight mode” phone use banned on Ryanair. Is this a worldwide phenomenon?Flight + hotel deal on expedia, can I use other flight tickets without any consequences?Vacation booking reference problem with checkmytrip.comHow to find all flights scheduled between a pair of cities?Scheduled Ryanair flights from Zaventem moved to Charleroi?Way to avoid two bookings for a flight?How can I choose FRA without HHN on kiwi.com?How to verify, with different airlines, that the broker booked the flight correctly?Airline cancelled direct flight. I changed flight to another day. Must airline offer free change of hotel booked through airline?Cancelling £700 of flights with RyanAir. No refunds. Options?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








32















Yesterday I booked trip to Rome.



enter image description here



I found this journey through Skyscanner and booked it through Kiwi.com.



Before booking with Kiwi, I tried searching the same flights up directly with Norwegian Air and Ryanair, to see what the prices were there. With Ryanair, I could not find the flight at all. Ryanair told me they do not offer any flights between those cities. They still tell me that.



enter image description here



While researching for this question, I found out that I can actually find the individual legs of the flights on Ryanair.com, just not the whole CIA-OSL stretch. The thought occurred to me that perhaps they want to avoid selling the whole journey on a single booking, so that they are not liable for missed connections, etc, but it seems to me that whatever they gain from that should be way less than the lost revenue from not offering the trip at all?










share|improve this question






























    32















    Yesterday I booked trip to Rome.



    enter image description here



    I found this journey through Skyscanner and booked it through Kiwi.com.



    Before booking with Kiwi, I tried searching the same flights up directly with Norwegian Air and Ryanair, to see what the prices were there. With Ryanair, I could not find the flight at all. Ryanair told me they do not offer any flights between those cities. They still tell me that.



    enter image description here



    While researching for this question, I found out that I can actually find the individual legs of the flights on Ryanair.com, just not the whole CIA-OSL stretch. The thought occurred to me that perhaps they want to avoid selling the whole journey on a single booking, so that they are not liable for missed connections, etc, but it seems to me that whatever they gain from that should be way less than the lost revenue from not offering the trip at all?










    share|improve this question


























      32












      32








      32


      4






      Yesterday I booked trip to Rome.



      enter image description here



      I found this journey through Skyscanner and booked it through Kiwi.com.



      Before booking with Kiwi, I tried searching the same flights up directly with Norwegian Air and Ryanair, to see what the prices were there. With Ryanair, I could not find the flight at all. Ryanair told me they do not offer any flights between those cities. They still tell me that.



      enter image description here



      While researching for this question, I found out that I can actually find the individual legs of the flights on Ryanair.com, just not the whole CIA-OSL stretch. The thought occurred to me that perhaps they want to avoid selling the whole journey on a single booking, so that they are not liable for missed connections, etc, but it seems to me that whatever they gain from that should be way less than the lost revenue from not offering the trip at all?










      share|improve this question
















      Yesterday I booked trip to Rome.



      enter image description here



      I found this journey through Skyscanner and booked it through Kiwi.com.



      Before booking with Kiwi, I tried searching the same flights up directly with Norwegian Air and Ryanair, to see what the prices were there. With Ryanair, I could not find the flight at all. Ryanair told me they do not offer any flights between those cities. They still tell me that.



      enter image description here



      While researching for this question, I found out that I can actually find the individual legs of the flights on Ryanair.com, just not the whole CIA-OSL stretch. The thought occurred to me that perhaps they want to avoid selling the whole journey on a single booking, so that they are not liable for missed connections, etc, but it seems to me that whatever they gain from that should be way less than the lost revenue from not offering the trip at all?







      air-travel bookings airlines connecting-flights ryanair






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      smci

      1,3461012




      1,3461012










      asked yesterday









      RevetahwRevetahw

      13.5k76397




      13.5k76397




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          54














          Ryanair is working almost strictly point-to-point. With a very few exceptions, they simply don't do connecting tickets, which saves them all the hassle and costs with accomodating people who missed their connection and so on. I can't comment on the profitability of this approach, but the fact that most low-cost carriers work this way is an indication that it does make some sense.



          Kiwi.com, on the other hand, is a company that specializes in stitching together an itinerary from multiple separate tickets. They will book two separate Ryanair tickets for you and add their "Kiwi.com Guarantee" on top, which basically means you are not completely screwed if you miss the connection, but it's still nowhere near a true single booking.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 5





            Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

            – Revetahw
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

            – David Richerby
            yesterday







          • 1





            Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

            – Ister
            yesterday






          • 5





            @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

            – Moo
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

            – TooTea
            22 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "273"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139098%2fwhy-do-ryanair-allow-me-to-book-connecting-itineraries-through-a-third-party-bu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          54














          Ryanair is working almost strictly point-to-point. With a very few exceptions, they simply don't do connecting tickets, which saves them all the hassle and costs with accomodating people who missed their connection and so on. I can't comment on the profitability of this approach, but the fact that most low-cost carriers work this way is an indication that it does make some sense.



          Kiwi.com, on the other hand, is a company that specializes in stitching together an itinerary from multiple separate tickets. They will book two separate Ryanair tickets for you and add their "Kiwi.com Guarantee" on top, which basically means you are not completely screwed if you miss the connection, but it's still nowhere near a true single booking.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 5





            Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

            – Revetahw
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

            – David Richerby
            yesterday







          • 1





            Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

            – Ister
            yesterday






          • 5





            @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

            – Moo
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

            – TooTea
            22 hours ago
















          54














          Ryanair is working almost strictly point-to-point. With a very few exceptions, they simply don't do connecting tickets, which saves them all the hassle and costs with accomodating people who missed their connection and so on. I can't comment on the profitability of this approach, but the fact that most low-cost carriers work this way is an indication that it does make some sense.



          Kiwi.com, on the other hand, is a company that specializes in stitching together an itinerary from multiple separate tickets. They will book two separate Ryanair tickets for you and add their "Kiwi.com Guarantee" on top, which basically means you are not completely screwed if you miss the connection, but it's still nowhere near a true single booking.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 5





            Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

            – Revetahw
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

            – David Richerby
            yesterday







          • 1





            Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

            – Ister
            yesterday






          • 5





            @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

            – Moo
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

            – TooTea
            22 hours ago














          54












          54








          54







          Ryanair is working almost strictly point-to-point. With a very few exceptions, they simply don't do connecting tickets, which saves them all the hassle and costs with accomodating people who missed their connection and so on. I can't comment on the profitability of this approach, but the fact that most low-cost carriers work this way is an indication that it does make some sense.



          Kiwi.com, on the other hand, is a company that specializes in stitching together an itinerary from multiple separate tickets. They will book two separate Ryanair tickets for you and add their "Kiwi.com Guarantee" on top, which basically means you are not completely screwed if you miss the connection, but it's still nowhere near a true single booking.






          share|improve this answer













          Ryanair is working almost strictly point-to-point. With a very few exceptions, they simply don't do connecting tickets, which saves them all the hassle and costs with accomodating people who missed their connection and so on. I can't comment on the profitability of this approach, but the fact that most low-cost carriers work this way is an indication that it does make some sense.



          Kiwi.com, on the other hand, is a company that specializes in stitching together an itinerary from multiple separate tickets. They will book two separate Ryanair tickets for you and add their "Kiwi.com Guarantee" on top, which basically means you are not completely screwed if you miss the connection, but it's still nowhere near a true single booking.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          TooTeaTooTea

          979513




          979513







          • 5





            Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

            – Revetahw
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

            – David Richerby
            yesterday







          • 1





            Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

            – Ister
            yesterday






          • 5





            @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

            – Moo
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

            – TooTea
            22 hours ago













          • 5





            Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

            – Revetahw
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

            – David Richerby
            yesterday







          • 1





            Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

            – Ister
            yesterday






          • 5





            @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

            – Moo
            yesterday






          • 7





            @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

            – TooTea
            22 hours ago








          5




          5





          Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

          – Revetahw
          yesterday





          Interesting. I notice that if I had thought about all this during the booking process, I could have probably saved something like 40 euros by making individual bookings directly from Ryanair.com. This answer suggests the Kiwi guarantee is not all that, so perhaps it would have been worth it to do so. I will consider that for next time.

          – Revetahw
          yesterday




          7




          7





          @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

          – David Richerby
          yesterday






          @Revetahw Ryanair doesn't cancel remaining legs because they're selling you a bunch of one-way tickets as separate journeys. There are no "remaining legs". And, actually, this is another potential problem for your scheme. If an airline has to cancel your flight before you've left your start location, they can just give you a full refund. Because budget airlines sell you one-way tickets, if your STN-OSL flight gets cancelled, Ryanair can just say "OK, here's your money back. That's the end of our obligations." Hopefully Kiwi covers this.

          – David Richerby
          yesterday





          1




          1





          Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

          – Ister
          yesterday





          Since flight is operated by an airline located in EU and tickets are sold in a single transaction, the ticket seller is bound by the EU regulation and effectively has to offer exactly similar support as airline would have to in case of missing the connecting flight.

          – Ister
          yesterday




          5




          5





          @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

          – Moo
          yesterday





          @Ister you are going to have to provide decent citations for that, because everything I have read about EU261 and other EU regulations in this area suggest otherwise.

          – Moo
          yesterday




          7




          7





          @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

          – TooTea
          22 hours ago






          @Ister Do you have anything to support that assertion? Because it sounds pretty unlikely, in that it would transfer responsibility from airlines to any travel agent. The Regulation doesn't say a word about a "seller", all the obligations are linked to an "operating air carrier", where "air carrier means an air transport undertaking with a valid operating licence".

          – TooTea
          22 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139098%2fwhy-do-ryanair-allow-me-to-book-connecting-itineraries-through-a-third-party-bu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її