Statue View: TetrominoesStatue View: RaindropsA spartan skeleton SudokuSkeleton sudoku, the secondTrapezoids Compound Hidden PuzzleThe Ludicrous Loop: over a thousand cells of circular logic!Tetromi-nuri-dokuMasyu jigsaw puzzleStatue Park (Loop)Diabolical Deceptions: A 333rd Birthday Tribute to J.S. BachStatue Park: FiveStatue Park: Knight's Lines

Is the Indo-European language family made up?

What is a Centaur Thief's climbing speed?

Installed Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when active

Is it rude to call a professor by their last name with no prefix in a non-academic setting?

Why are C64 games inconsistent with which joystick port they use?

Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?

A Riley Respite

What was the idiom for something that we take without a doubt?

Should breaking down something like a door be adjudicated as an attempt to beat its AC and HP, or as an ability check against a set DC?

Why do most published works in medical imaging try to reduce false positives?

Which melee weapons have the Two-Handed property, but lack Heavy and Special?

Caught 2 students cheating together on the final exam that I proctored

In general, would I need to season a meat when making a sauce?

Is real public IP Address hidden when using a system wide proxy in Windows 10?

How did these characters "suit up" so quickly?

Boss wants me to falsify a report. How should I document this unethical demand?

Is it true that cut time means "play twice as fast as written"?

Plot and know intersection points of multiple lines/functions

Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)

Alignment: "Breaking out" of environment (enumerate / minipage)

What is a really good book for complex variables?

C++ forcing function parameter evalution order

Where's this lookout in Nova Scotia?

How do I partition a matrx into blocks and replace zeros with dots?



Statue View: Tetrominoes


Statue View: RaindropsA spartan skeleton SudokuSkeleton sudoku, the secondTrapezoids Compound Hidden PuzzleThe Ludicrous Loop: over a thousand cells of circular logic!Tetromi-nuri-dokuMasyu jigsaw puzzleStatue Park (Loop)Diabolical Deceptions: A 333rd Birthday Tribute to J.S. BachStatue Park: FiveStatue Park: Knight's Lines













14












$begingroup$


This is a Statue View puzzle, an original invention combining two logic puzzle genres: Statue Park and Canal View.



Rules of Statue View:



  • Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.

  • Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).

  • All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.

  • Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.

enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    14












    $begingroup$


    This is a Statue View puzzle, an original invention combining two logic puzzle genres: Statue Park and Canal View.



    Rules of Statue View:



    • Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.

    • Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).

    • All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.

    • Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.

    enter image description here










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      14












      14








      14





      $begingroup$


      This is a Statue View puzzle, an original invention combining two logic puzzle genres: Statue Park and Canal View.



      Rules of Statue View:



      • Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.

      • Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).

      • All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.

      • Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.

      enter image description here










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This is a Statue View puzzle, an original invention combining two logic puzzle genres: Statue Park and Canal View.



      Rules of Statue View:



      • Shade some cells of the grid to form the given set of pieces. Pieces may be rotated or reflected.

      • Pieces cannot be adjacent (though they can touch at a corner).

      • All unshaded cells must be (orthogonally) connected.

      • Any cells with numbers in them must be unshaded. These numbers give the total lengths of the runs of shaded cells starting immediately adjacent to the clue, and extending outwards from the clue.

      enter image description here







      logical-deduction grid-deduction






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 9 hours ago









      DeusoviDeusovi

      65.1k6224284




      65.1k6224284




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          Some initial observations:




          The 4 can have at most two cells shaded to the north, so the two cells east of it must be filled in.


          Then, since the unshaded cells (including the numbers) must be connected, the cell north of the 4 is also unshaded, and the four cells to the east of the 4 must be the I-tetromino.
          Step 1




          Also,




          The 5 can have at most two cells to the north and two to the west, so the cell south of it must be shaded.
          Step 2




          Then,




          The lone unshaded square at the east end of the "I" doesn't have any way of connecting with the other unshaded cells just by going farther east, so the cell north of it must also be unshaded.
          Step 3




          Then,




          The shaded cell south of the 5 could be fit as part of the L-, S, or T-tetromino (the O won't fit). However, if the "T" were there, only one cell to the west and one cell to the south of the 5 would be shaded, and at most two can fit to the north, which is not enough.
          Step4a

          Similarly, an upright "L" would give two cells connected to the 5 and block the square to its north. So, it must be the "S" or the upside-down "L" in that spot. The "S" would fill in one cell west of the five and two cells south, and the "L" would shade three cells to the south and block the cell west of the 5. A flipped "Z" would shade the two cells between the 3 and the 5, and just one cell south of the 5.
          Step 4b

          In any of those cases, the 5 would have three shades cells from the shape south of it, and both cells north of the 5 need to be shaded, as well as the cell immediately southwest of the 5.
          Step 5

          (I previously misread the rule about reflection, so I'm backing up to this point because it is possible for a Z-tetromino to fill both spaces between the 5 and the 3, or for a J-tetromino to sit below the 2 without shading the cell northwest of the 5).




          Now, a slightly reductionist approach.




          Let's assume for a moment that the O-tetromino is not in the top corner, south of the 2. That would mean the L/J-tetromino is in that corner, extending three squares to the west. The "O" thus cannot occupy any of the squares north of the central 3, or it would be directly adjacent.
          If the "O" were between the two 3s, each 3 would also need exactly one more adjacent cell to be shaded. For the westernmost 3, there is no way to do that without a shape that would extend east and end up next to the "O" as we have placed it. So, that is also not a possibility.
          Similarly, placing the "O" in the northwest corner, or one space to the east of that, does not leave enough room for other shapes to fill in the needs of the 3s.
          Finally, if the "O" occupied the two cells north of the western 3, the cell to its south would need to be shaded but there is no shape that can do that without ending up adjacent to the "O," blocking off the 3, or both.
          Thus, by process of elimination, the "O" must indeed be in the northeast corner, south of the 2.
          Step 6

          There are probably "nicer" ways to prove this without so much mental trial-and-error.




          From there,




          It's obvious that the "L" must be in the southeast corner.
          Step 7




          Finally,




          With just two pieces left, a visual approach is simple enough (I may come back and fill in logical steps later). This is where the reflection becomes necessary, and the Z- and T-tetrominoes fit to complete the puzzle:
          Completion







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84335%2fstatue-view-tetrominoes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8












          $begingroup$

          Some initial observations:




          The 4 can have at most two cells shaded to the north, so the two cells east of it must be filled in.


          Then, since the unshaded cells (including the numbers) must be connected, the cell north of the 4 is also unshaded, and the four cells to the east of the 4 must be the I-tetromino.
          Step 1




          Also,




          The 5 can have at most two cells to the north and two to the west, so the cell south of it must be shaded.
          Step 2




          Then,




          The lone unshaded square at the east end of the "I" doesn't have any way of connecting with the other unshaded cells just by going farther east, so the cell north of it must also be unshaded.
          Step 3




          Then,




          The shaded cell south of the 5 could be fit as part of the L-, S, or T-tetromino (the O won't fit). However, if the "T" were there, only one cell to the west and one cell to the south of the 5 would be shaded, and at most two can fit to the north, which is not enough.
          Step4a

          Similarly, an upright "L" would give two cells connected to the 5 and block the square to its north. So, it must be the "S" or the upside-down "L" in that spot. The "S" would fill in one cell west of the five and two cells south, and the "L" would shade three cells to the south and block the cell west of the 5. A flipped "Z" would shade the two cells between the 3 and the 5, and just one cell south of the 5.
          Step 4b

          In any of those cases, the 5 would have three shades cells from the shape south of it, and both cells north of the 5 need to be shaded, as well as the cell immediately southwest of the 5.
          Step 5

          (I previously misread the rule about reflection, so I'm backing up to this point because it is possible for a Z-tetromino to fill both spaces between the 5 and the 3, or for a J-tetromino to sit below the 2 without shading the cell northwest of the 5).




          Now, a slightly reductionist approach.




          Let's assume for a moment that the O-tetromino is not in the top corner, south of the 2. That would mean the L/J-tetromino is in that corner, extending three squares to the west. The "O" thus cannot occupy any of the squares north of the central 3, or it would be directly adjacent.
          If the "O" were between the two 3s, each 3 would also need exactly one more adjacent cell to be shaded. For the westernmost 3, there is no way to do that without a shape that would extend east and end up next to the "O" as we have placed it. So, that is also not a possibility.
          Similarly, placing the "O" in the northwest corner, or one space to the east of that, does not leave enough room for other shapes to fill in the needs of the 3s.
          Finally, if the "O" occupied the two cells north of the western 3, the cell to its south would need to be shaded but there is no shape that can do that without ending up adjacent to the "O," blocking off the 3, or both.
          Thus, by process of elimination, the "O" must indeed be in the northeast corner, south of the 2.
          Step 6

          There are probably "nicer" ways to prove this without so much mental trial-and-error.




          From there,




          It's obvious that the "L" must be in the southeast corner.
          Step 7




          Finally,




          With just two pieces left, a visual approach is simple enough (I may come back and fill in logical steps later). This is where the reflection becomes necessary, and the Z- and T-tetrominoes fit to complete the puzzle:
          Completion







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            5 hours ago















          8












          $begingroup$

          Some initial observations:




          The 4 can have at most two cells shaded to the north, so the two cells east of it must be filled in.


          Then, since the unshaded cells (including the numbers) must be connected, the cell north of the 4 is also unshaded, and the four cells to the east of the 4 must be the I-tetromino.
          Step 1




          Also,




          The 5 can have at most two cells to the north and two to the west, so the cell south of it must be shaded.
          Step 2




          Then,




          The lone unshaded square at the east end of the "I" doesn't have any way of connecting with the other unshaded cells just by going farther east, so the cell north of it must also be unshaded.
          Step 3




          Then,




          The shaded cell south of the 5 could be fit as part of the L-, S, or T-tetromino (the O won't fit). However, if the "T" were there, only one cell to the west and one cell to the south of the 5 would be shaded, and at most two can fit to the north, which is not enough.
          Step4a

          Similarly, an upright "L" would give two cells connected to the 5 and block the square to its north. So, it must be the "S" or the upside-down "L" in that spot. The "S" would fill in one cell west of the five and two cells south, and the "L" would shade three cells to the south and block the cell west of the 5. A flipped "Z" would shade the two cells between the 3 and the 5, and just one cell south of the 5.
          Step 4b

          In any of those cases, the 5 would have three shades cells from the shape south of it, and both cells north of the 5 need to be shaded, as well as the cell immediately southwest of the 5.
          Step 5

          (I previously misread the rule about reflection, so I'm backing up to this point because it is possible for a Z-tetromino to fill both spaces between the 5 and the 3, or for a J-tetromino to sit below the 2 without shading the cell northwest of the 5).




          Now, a slightly reductionist approach.




          Let's assume for a moment that the O-tetromino is not in the top corner, south of the 2. That would mean the L/J-tetromino is in that corner, extending three squares to the west. The "O" thus cannot occupy any of the squares north of the central 3, or it would be directly adjacent.
          If the "O" were between the two 3s, each 3 would also need exactly one more adjacent cell to be shaded. For the westernmost 3, there is no way to do that without a shape that would extend east and end up next to the "O" as we have placed it. So, that is also not a possibility.
          Similarly, placing the "O" in the northwest corner, or one space to the east of that, does not leave enough room for other shapes to fill in the needs of the 3s.
          Finally, if the "O" occupied the two cells north of the western 3, the cell to its south would need to be shaded but there is no shape that can do that without ending up adjacent to the "O," blocking off the 3, or both.
          Thus, by process of elimination, the "O" must indeed be in the northeast corner, south of the 2.
          Step 6

          There are probably "nicer" ways to prove this without so much mental trial-and-error.




          From there,




          It's obvious that the "L" must be in the southeast corner.
          Step 7




          Finally,




          With just two pieces left, a visual approach is simple enough (I may come back and fill in logical steps later). This is where the reflection becomes necessary, and the Z- and T-tetrominoes fit to complete the puzzle:
          Completion







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            5 hours ago













          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          Some initial observations:




          The 4 can have at most two cells shaded to the north, so the two cells east of it must be filled in.


          Then, since the unshaded cells (including the numbers) must be connected, the cell north of the 4 is also unshaded, and the four cells to the east of the 4 must be the I-tetromino.
          Step 1




          Also,




          The 5 can have at most two cells to the north and two to the west, so the cell south of it must be shaded.
          Step 2




          Then,




          The lone unshaded square at the east end of the "I" doesn't have any way of connecting with the other unshaded cells just by going farther east, so the cell north of it must also be unshaded.
          Step 3




          Then,




          The shaded cell south of the 5 could be fit as part of the L-, S, or T-tetromino (the O won't fit). However, if the "T" were there, only one cell to the west and one cell to the south of the 5 would be shaded, and at most two can fit to the north, which is not enough.
          Step4a

          Similarly, an upright "L" would give two cells connected to the 5 and block the square to its north. So, it must be the "S" or the upside-down "L" in that spot. The "S" would fill in one cell west of the five and two cells south, and the "L" would shade three cells to the south and block the cell west of the 5. A flipped "Z" would shade the two cells between the 3 and the 5, and just one cell south of the 5.
          Step 4b

          In any of those cases, the 5 would have three shades cells from the shape south of it, and both cells north of the 5 need to be shaded, as well as the cell immediately southwest of the 5.
          Step 5

          (I previously misread the rule about reflection, so I'm backing up to this point because it is possible for a Z-tetromino to fill both spaces between the 5 and the 3, or for a J-tetromino to sit below the 2 without shading the cell northwest of the 5).




          Now, a slightly reductionist approach.




          Let's assume for a moment that the O-tetromino is not in the top corner, south of the 2. That would mean the L/J-tetromino is in that corner, extending three squares to the west. The "O" thus cannot occupy any of the squares north of the central 3, or it would be directly adjacent.
          If the "O" were between the two 3s, each 3 would also need exactly one more adjacent cell to be shaded. For the westernmost 3, there is no way to do that without a shape that would extend east and end up next to the "O" as we have placed it. So, that is also not a possibility.
          Similarly, placing the "O" in the northwest corner, or one space to the east of that, does not leave enough room for other shapes to fill in the needs of the 3s.
          Finally, if the "O" occupied the two cells north of the western 3, the cell to its south would need to be shaded but there is no shape that can do that without ending up adjacent to the "O," blocking off the 3, or both.
          Thus, by process of elimination, the "O" must indeed be in the northeast corner, south of the 2.
          Step 6

          There are probably "nicer" ways to prove this without so much mental trial-and-error.




          From there,




          It's obvious that the "L" must be in the southeast corner.
          Step 7




          Finally,




          With just two pieces left, a visual approach is simple enough (I may come back and fill in logical steps later). This is where the reflection becomes necessary, and the Z- and T-tetrominoes fit to complete the puzzle:
          Completion







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Some initial observations:




          The 4 can have at most two cells shaded to the north, so the two cells east of it must be filled in.


          Then, since the unshaded cells (including the numbers) must be connected, the cell north of the 4 is also unshaded, and the four cells to the east of the 4 must be the I-tetromino.
          Step 1




          Also,




          The 5 can have at most two cells to the north and two to the west, so the cell south of it must be shaded.
          Step 2




          Then,




          The lone unshaded square at the east end of the "I" doesn't have any way of connecting with the other unshaded cells just by going farther east, so the cell north of it must also be unshaded.
          Step 3




          Then,




          The shaded cell south of the 5 could be fit as part of the L-, S, or T-tetromino (the O won't fit). However, if the "T" were there, only one cell to the west and one cell to the south of the 5 would be shaded, and at most two can fit to the north, which is not enough.
          Step4a

          Similarly, an upright "L" would give two cells connected to the 5 and block the square to its north. So, it must be the "S" or the upside-down "L" in that spot. The "S" would fill in one cell west of the five and two cells south, and the "L" would shade three cells to the south and block the cell west of the 5. A flipped "Z" would shade the two cells between the 3 and the 5, and just one cell south of the 5.
          Step 4b

          In any of those cases, the 5 would have three shades cells from the shape south of it, and both cells north of the 5 need to be shaded, as well as the cell immediately southwest of the 5.
          Step 5

          (I previously misread the rule about reflection, so I'm backing up to this point because it is possible for a Z-tetromino to fill both spaces between the 5 and the 3, or for a J-tetromino to sit below the 2 without shading the cell northwest of the 5).




          Now, a slightly reductionist approach.




          Let's assume for a moment that the O-tetromino is not in the top corner, south of the 2. That would mean the L/J-tetromino is in that corner, extending three squares to the west. The "O" thus cannot occupy any of the squares north of the central 3, or it would be directly adjacent.
          If the "O" were between the two 3s, each 3 would also need exactly one more adjacent cell to be shaded. For the westernmost 3, there is no way to do that without a shape that would extend east and end up next to the "O" as we have placed it. So, that is also not a possibility.
          Similarly, placing the "O" in the northwest corner, or one space to the east of that, does not leave enough room for other shapes to fill in the needs of the 3s.
          Finally, if the "O" occupied the two cells north of the western 3, the cell to its south would need to be shaded but there is no shape that can do that without ending up adjacent to the "O," blocking off the 3, or both.
          Thus, by process of elimination, the "O" must indeed be in the northeast corner, south of the 2.
          Step 6

          There are probably "nicer" ways to prove this without so much mental trial-and-error.




          From there,




          It's obvious that the "L" must be in the southeast corner.
          Step 7




          Finally,




          With just two pieces left, a visual approach is simple enough (I may come back and fill in logical steps later). This is where the reflection becomes necessary, and the Z- and T-tetrominoes fit to complete the puzzle:
          Completion








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          geekahedrongeekahedron

          3915




          3915











          • $begingroup$
            What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            5 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            9 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
            $endgroup$
            – LeppyR64
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
            $endgroup$
            – geekahedron
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            5 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
          $endgroup$
          – geekahedron
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          What is going on with my spoiler notation? It's not saving correctly for some reason
          $endgroup$
          – geekahedron
          9 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
          $endgroup$
          – LeppyR64
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Put double spaces on the end of lines. If you want to split spoilers you need to put something between them,
          $endgroup$
          – LeppyR64
          9 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
          $endgroup$
          – LeppyR64
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Don't forget that you can flip the shapes. For example the L/O forcing the filling of the cell northwest of the 5.
          $endgroup$
          – LeppyR64
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
          $endgroup$
          – geekahedron
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Oh, I totally misread the bit about reflection. That opens up some new options, and probably invalidates some of my previous logical leaps...
          $endgroup$
          – geekahedron
          7 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Wow - I'm impressed with the depth you went into in spoilers 4 and 5! There's definitely a much simpler argument, though. Should I spoil it (since you have the right answer anyway), or would you like to try to discover it for yourself?
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84335%2fstatue-view-tetrominoes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單