Type 1 Error & Type 2 Error's pregnancy test analogy: is it legit?Goldfeld - Quandt test statistic equal to 1Test of two variance ratios being equalChristiano Fitzgerald filtering processWhat is the standard error on quarterly GDP figure?Using the sample mean to test hypothesesIf someone stays at home because they can't find the type of job they want, are they included in unemployment numbers?Multivariate linear regression: how to test for whether the slopes are the same?
What is the difference between 元 (圓), 幣, and 金?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
Dragon forelimb placement
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Is the language <p,n> belongs to NP class?
Shell script not opening as desktop application
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
Type 1 Error & Type 2 Error's pregnancy test analogy: is it legit?
Relation between Frobenius, spectral norm and sum of maxima
Service Entrance Breakers Rain Shield
Creating a document with mixed languages
Why are weather verbs 曇る and 晴れる treated differently in this sentence?
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
How do you know if an analog film camera is still working?
Is the month field really deprecated?
DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
Type 1 Error & Type 2 Error's pregnancy test analogy: is it legit?
Goldfeld - Quandt test statistic equal to 1Test of two variance ratios being equalChristiano Fitzgerald filtering processWhat is the standard error on quarterly GDP figure?Using the sample mean to test hypothesesIf someone stays at home because they can't find the type of job they want, are they included in unemployment numbers?Multivariate linear regression: how to test for whether the slopes are the same?
$begingroup$

I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.
As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.
So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?
For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.
However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.
I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)
But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.
So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?

statistics
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$

I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.
As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.
So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?
For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.
However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.
I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)
But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.
So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?

statistics
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$

I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.
As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.
So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?
For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.
However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.
I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)
But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.
So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?

statistics
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$

I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.
As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.
So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?
For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.
However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.
I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)
But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.
So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?

statistics
statistics
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
user8491363user8491363
61
61
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Presumably here
- the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant
- the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant
so being pregnant would be the positive result.
You take a pregnancy test
if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test
if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test
So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "591"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27677%2ftype-1-error-type-2-errors-pregnancy-test-analogy-is-it-legit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Presumably here
- the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant
- the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant
so being pregnant would be the positive result.
You take a pregnancy test
if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test
if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test
So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Presumably here
- the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant
- the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant
so being pregnant would be the positive result.
You take a pregnancy test
if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test
if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test
So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Presumably here
- the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant
- the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant
so being pregnant would be the positive result.
You take a pregnancy test
if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test
if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test
So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation
$endgroup$
Presumably here
- the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant
- the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant
so being pregnant would be the positive result.
You take a pregnancy test
if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test
if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test
So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation
answered 1 hour ago
HenryHenry
3,801316
3,801316
add a comment |
add a comment |
user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27677%2ftype-1-error-type-2-errors-pregnancy-test-analogy-is-it-legit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown