Type 1 Error & Type 2 Error's pregnancy test analogy: is it legit?Goldfeld - Quandt test statistic equal to 1Test of two variance ratios being equalChristiano Fitzgerald filtering processWhat is the standard error on quarterly GDP figure?Using the sample mean to test hypothesesIf someone stays at home because they can't find the type of job they want, are they included in unemployment numbers?Multivariate linear regression: how to test for whether the slopes are the same?

What is the difference between 元 (圓), 幣, and 金?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Dragon forelimb placement

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Is the language <p,n> belongs to NP class?

Shell script not opening as desktop application

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Type 1 Error & Type 2 Error's pregnancy test analogy: is it legit?

Relation between Frobenius, spectral norm and sum of maxima

Service Entrance Breakers Rain Shield

Creating a document with mixed languages

Why are weather verbs 曇る and 晴れる treated differently in this sentence?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

How do you know if an analog film camera is still working?

Is the month field really deprecated?

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?



Type 1 Error & Type 2 Error's pregnancy test analogy: is it legit?


Goldfeld - Quandt test statistic equal to 1Test of two variance ratios being equalChristiano Fitzgerald filtering processWhat is the standard error on quarterly GDP figure?Using the sample mean to test hypothesesIf someone stays at home because they can't find the type of job they want, are they included in unemployment numbers?Multivariate linear regression: how to test for whether the slopes are the same?













1












$begingroup$


enter image description here



I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.



As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.



So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?



For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.



However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.



I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)



But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.



So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?



enter image description here










share|improve this question







New contributor




user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    enter image description here



    I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.



    As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.



    So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?



    For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.



    However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.



    I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)



    But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.



    So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      enter image description here



      I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.



      As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.



      So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?



      For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.



      However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.



      I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)



      But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.



      So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      enter image description here



      I found this picture in my stats book but I'm now confused to what 'positive' and 'negative' is referring to.



      As seen in the table below, Type 1 error is the error that its H0 is actually true but FALSEly claims that it's false. Type 2 error, on the other hand, is the error that its H0 is actually false but FALSEly claims that it's true.



      So my question is, how do the pregnancy analogy and whole 'false positive' & 'false negative' thing make sense?



      For the first picture to be a type 1 error, H0 should be "The person is NOT pregnant" so that "You're pregnant" statement becomes false.



      However, the second picture has the complete opposite H0, where H0 should be "The person is pregnant" so that "You're not pregnant" statement becomes false.



      I thought it was really confusing because I thought false POSITIVE and false NEGATIVE corresponded to "You're pregnant"(positive) / "You're NOT pregnant"(negative)



      But based on the table below, that doesn't seem to make any sense.



      So the question is, is there anything that I'm missing here or is it just that textbook's analogy sucks?



      enter image description here







      statistics






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      user8491363user8491363

      61




      61




      New contributor




      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user8491363 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Presumably here



          • the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant

          • the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant

          so being pregnant would be the positive result.



          You take a pregnancy test



          • if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test


          • if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test


          So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "591"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27677%2ftype-1-error-type-2-errors-pregnancy-test-analogy-is-it-legit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Presumably here



            • the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant

            • the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant

            so being pregnant would be the positive result.



            You take a pregnancy test



            • if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test


            • if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test


            So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              Presumably here



              • the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant

              • the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant

              so being pregnant would be the positive result.



              You take a pregnancy test



              • if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test


              • if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test


              So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Presumably here



                • the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant

                • the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant

                so being pregnant would be the positive result.



                You take a pregnancy test



                • if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test


                • if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test


                So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Presumably here



                • the null hypothesis is $H_0:$ You are not pregnant

                • the alternative hypothesis is $H_1:$ You are pregnant

                so being pregnant would be the positive result.



                You take a pregnancy test



                • if the pregnancy test gives a positive result when you are not pregnant then this is a false positive, a Type I error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact true but has been rejected by the test


                • if the pregnancy test gives a negative result when you are pregnant then this is a false negative, a Type II error when the null hypothesis $H_0$ is in fact untrue but has not been rejected by the test


                So in a statement of being a true/false positive/negative test, the true/false part is about the accuracy of the test while the positive/negative part is about the result of the test rather than being the real situation







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                HenryHenry

                3,801316




                3,801316




















                    user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    user8491363 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27677%2ftype-1-error-type-2-errors-pregnancy-test-analogy-is-it-legit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480