If two metric spaces are topologically equivalent (homeomorphic) imply that they are complete?Real numbers equipped with the metric $ d (x,y) = | arctan(x) - arctan(y)| $ is an incomplete metric spaceWhich of the following metric spaces are complete?Showing that a metric space is completeUnderstanding Complete Metric Spaces and Cauchy SequencesCompact homeomorphic non bilipschitz homeomorphic metric spacesA metric space is complete when every closed and bounded subset of it is compactTopologically equivalent metrics? Ceiling function of metric $d$Limit Points of closure of $A$ is subset of limit points of $A$If $d_1,d_2$ are not equivalent metrics, is it true $(X,d_1)$ is not homeomorphic to $(X,d_2)$?Under what metric spaces are pointwise and uniform convergence equivalent?How to *disprove* topological equivalence

How do you know if an analog film camera is still working?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

If I cast Expeditious Retreat, can I Dash as a bonus action on the same turn?

Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?

Explain the parameters before and after @ in the treminal

Suffixes -unt and -ut-

Is it possible to rebuild the bike frame (to make it lighter) by welding aluminum tubes

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

The iconography of Laddu Gopal's soles

Magento 2: Admin panel 3 level menu structure not working

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.



If two metric spaces are topologically equivalent (homeomorphic) imply that they are complete?


Real numbers equipped with the metric $ d (x,y) = | arctan(x) - arctan(y)| $ is an incomplete metric spaceWhich of the following metric spaces are complete?Showing that a metric space is completeUnderstanding Complete Metric Spaces and Cauchy SequencesCompact homeomorphic non bilipschitz homeomorphic metric spacesA metric space is complete when every closed and bounded subset of it is compactTopologically equivalent metrics? Ceiling function of metric $d$Limit Points of closure of $A$ is subset of limit points of $A$If $d_1,d_2$ are not equivalent metrics, is it true $(X,d_1)$ is not homeomorphic to $(X,d_2)$?Under what metric spaces are pointwise and uniform convergence equivalent?How to *disprove* topological equivalence













2












$begingroup$


My definition of topologically equivalent is: every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit.



I know that



Let $(X,d_A)$ and $(X, d_B)$ be two strongly equivalent metric spaces, if $(X, d_A)$ is complete then $(X, d_B)$ is complete.



I was thinking that if these spaces were just topologically equivalent yet would the statement be true?



My answer is no.



But I can't think of a counter example.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is missing a part :definition is every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit - and vice versa
    $endgroup$
    – Maksim
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


My definition of topologically equivalent is: every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit.



I know that



Let $(X,d_A)$ and $(X, d_B)$ be two strongly equivalent metric spaces, if $(X, d_A)$ is complete then $(X, d_B)$ is complete.



I was thinking that if these spaces were just topologically equivalent yet would the statement be true?



My answer is no.



But I can't think of a counter example.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is missing a part :definition is every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit - and vice versa
    $endgroup$
    – Maksim
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


My definition of topologically equivalent is: every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit.



I know that



Let $(X,d_A)$ and $(X, d_B)$ be two strongly equivalent metric spaces, if $(X, d_A)$ is complete then $(X, d_B)$ is complete.



I was thinking that if these spaces were just topologically equivalent yet would the statement be true?



My answer is no.



But I can't think of a counter example.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My definition of topologically equivalent is: every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit.



I know that



Let $(X,d_A)$ and $(X, d_B)$ be two strongly equivalent metric spaces, if $(X, d_A)$ is complete then $(X, d_B)$ is complete.



I was thinking that if these spaces were just topologically equivalent yet would the statement be true?



My answer is no.



But I can't think of a counter example.







general-topology convergence metric-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









YuiTo Cheng

2,3084937




2,3084937










asked 3 hours ago









Juliana de SouzaJuliana de Souza

876




876







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is missing a part :definition is every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit - and vice versa
    $endgroup$
    – Maksim
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is missing a part :definition is every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit - and vice versa
    $endgroup$
    – Maksim
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
I think there is missing a part :definition is every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit - and vice versa
$endgroup$
– Maksim
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think there is missing a part :definition is every convergent sequence in $(X, d_A)$ converges at $(X, d_B)$ to the same limit - and vice versa
$endgroup$
– Maksim
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Consider $(Bbb R,d)$ , where $d$ is the usual metric and $(Bbb R,rho)$ , where $rho$ is the metric defined by $$rho(x,y)=vert arctan x-arctan y vert$$ Then $(Bbb R,d)$ is topologically equivalent to $(Bbb R,rho)$(How ?), but one is complete while the other is not (How?)



Try to fill the gaps!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
    $endgroup$
    – Chinnapparaj R
    3 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$

$(-1,1)$ is topologically equivalent to $mathbb R$ via the homeomorphism $x to frac x x$. $(-1,1)$ is not complete but $mathbb R$ is complete. [Usual metric on both spaces].






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3178082%2fif-two-metric-spaces-are-topologically-equivalent-homeomorphic-imply-that-they%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Consider $(Bbb R,d)$ , where $d$ is the usual metric and $(Bbb R,rho)$ , where $rho$ is the metric defined by $$rho(x,y)=vert arctan x-arctan y vert$$ Then $(Bbb R,d)$ is topologically equivalent to $(Bbb R,rho)$(How ?), but one is complete while the other is not (How?)



    Try to fill the gaps!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
      $endgroup$
      – Chinnapparaj R
      3 hours ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Consider $(Bbb R,d)$ , where $d$ is the usual metric and $(Bbb R,rho)$ , where $rho$ is the metric defined by $$rho(x,y)=vert arctan x-arctan y vert$$ Then $(Bbb R,d)$ is topologically equivalent to $(Bbb R,rho)$(How ?), but one is complete while the other is not (How?)



    Try to fill the gaps!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
      $endgroup$
      – Chinnapparaj R
      3 hours ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Consider $(Bbb R,d)$ , where $d$ is the usual metric and $(Bbb R,rho)$ , where $rho$ is the metric defined by $$rho(x,y)=vert arctan x-arctan y vert$$ Then $(Bbb R,d)$ is topologically equivalent to $(Bbb R,rho)$(How ?), but one is complete while the other is not (How?)



    Try to fill the gaps!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Consider $(Bbb R,d)$ , where $d$ is the usual metric and $(Bbb R,rho)$ , where $rho$ is the metric defined by $$rho(x,y)=vert arctan x-arctan y vert$$ Then $(Bbb R,d)$ is topologically equivalent to $(Bbb R,rho)$(How ?), but one is complete while the other is not (How?)



    Try to fill the gaps!







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 3 hours ago









    Chinnapparaj RChinnapparaj R

    5,9382928




    5,9382928







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
      $endgroup$
      – Chinnapparaj R
      3 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
      $endgroup$
      – Chinnapparaj R
      3 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
    $endgroup$
    – Chinnapparaj R
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/152243/… for the proof of non-completeness
    $endgroup$
    – Chinnapparaj R
    3 hours ago











    5












    $begingroup$

    $(-1,1)$ is topologically equivalent to $mathbb R$ via the homeomorphism $x to frac x x$. $(-1,1)$ is not complete but $mathbb R$ is complete. [Usual metric on both spaces].






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      $(-1,1)$ is topologically equivalent to $mathbb R$ via the homeomorphism $x to frac x x$. $(-1,1)$ is not complete but $mathbb R$ is complete. [Usual metric on both spaces].






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        $(-1,1)$ is topologically equivalent to $mathbb R$ via the homeomorphism $x to frac x x$. $(-1,1)$ is not complete but $mathbb R$ is complete. [Usual metric on both spaces].






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $(-1,1)$ is topologically equivalent to $mathbb R$ via the homeomorphism $x to frac x x$. $(-1,1)$ is not complete but $mathbb R$ is complete. [Usual metric on both spaces].







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

        72.7k53170




        72.7k53170



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3178082%2fif-two-metric-spaces-are-topologically-equivalent-homeomorphic-imply-that-they%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480