How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)Are there actually any advantages to Android full-disk encryption?Android / CyanogenMod encryption vs GNU/LinuxEncrypted files storage. How to simplify the password management scheme?How is the FileVault master key protected?Is it possible to retrieve flash-based encrypted disks content (SSD, cellphones, USB sticks, …) after password wipe/replacement?How to correctly handle passwords for an Android appBest practice for securing encrypted content on Android appHow does Android 6 full encryption work … when it doesn't ask for the password at start time?How can Android encryption be so fast?Connection between PIN/password and encryption keys in Android

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

A Journey Through Space and Time

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?

Non-Jewish family in an Orthodox Jewish Wedding

Concept of linear mappings are confusing me

LED on same Pin as Toggle Switch, not illuminating

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

How is this relation reflexive?

I probably found a bug with the sudo apt install function

Banach space and Hilbert space topology

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?

Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?



How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)


Are there actually any advantages to Android full-disk encryption?Android / CyanogenMod encryption vs GNU/LinuxEncrypted files storage. How to simplify the password management scheme?How is the FileVault master key protected?Is it possible to retrieve flash-based encrypted disks content (SSD, cellphones, USB sticks, …) after password wipe/replacement?How to correctly handle passwords for an Android appBest practice for securing encrypted content on Android appHow does Android 6 full encryption work … when it doesn't ask for the password at start time?How can Android encryption be so fast?Connection between PIN/password and encryption keys in Android






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    58 mins ago

















7















There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    58 mins ago













7












7








7


1






There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












There are built-in functionalities to encrypt a storage on OS X (FileVault) and Android.



On OS X: to enable encryption current user must have a password protected account. After enabling the encryption, recovery key is generated (something like HHWj-Y8DK-ODO4-BQEN-FQ4V-M4O8). After the encryption is finished (and in all probability before that as well) user is able to change his password, without the need to re-encrypt the storage.



On Android: user is required to set lockscreen protection to either pin or password. After storage encription is done (again, probably before that as well), user is able to change password, and even switch from password to pin and vice versa.



Now here is what puzzles me: my understanding is that when storage is encrypted, it is done via current user password (sort of like encrypting an arhive) and if password is changed — the whole storage must be re-encrypted. This (apparenty incorrect) understanding brings me to following questions:



  1. Based on what "key" (since it is not the password itself) encryption is done then?

    • For OS X, I am guessing, it's the recovery key, but how is it connected to the user's password then?


  2. If password is not the basis for encryption, why is it required to set one before encrypting your storage?

  3. How is ability to decrypt storage is maintained (without re-encrypting) after password is changed?






encryption passwords android disk-encryption macosx






share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Moshe Katz

486311




486311






New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 12 hours ago









Filipp W.Filipp W.

1385




1385




New contributor




Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Filipp W. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    58 mins ago

















  • I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

    – forest
    58 mins ago
















I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

– forest
58 mins ago





I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate, but I can't find the question I'm thinking of...

– forest
58 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9














At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

    – vidarlo
    11 hours ago











  • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

    – AndrolGenhald
    11 hours ago











  • That, I do not disagree with :)

    – vidarlo
    11 hours ago


















4














I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




  • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




    • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


    • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

    • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


  • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



  • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



  1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


  2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


  3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "162"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206979%2fhow-is-it-possible-for-users-password-to-be-changed-after-storage-was-encrypted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9














    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      11 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago















    9














    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      11 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago













    9












    9








    9







    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.






    share|improve this answer













    At a high level, disk encryption is implemented using a data encryption key (DEK) and a key encryption key (KEK). The DEK is generated randomly and used to encrypt the drive, the KEK is derived from the user's password using a KDF like PBKDF2 or Argon2 and then used to encrypt the DEK.



    When changing the password, the DEK is simply encrypted with a new KEK derived from the new password.



    Encrypting without a password is likely prohibited to avoid a false sense of security. It'd be a bit like locking your door but leaving the key in the lock.



    Of course, if you're changing your password because you believe someone figured it out, and that person also had access to the encrypted device, it's possible they stored a copy of the DEK. In this case it may be necessary to re-encrypt the entire drive, though doing so will likely take some time.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 11 hours ago









    AndrolGenhaldAndrolGenhald

    12k52837




    12k52837







    • 3





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      11 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago












    • 3





      It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago











    • @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

      – AndrolGenhald
      11 hours ago











    • That, I do not disagree with :)

      – vidarlo
      11 hours ago







    3




    3





    It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

    – vidarlo
    11 hours ago





    It should be noted that encryption without encrypting the DEK may be useful. It allows for extremely quick secure deletion of content of the drive. Wipe they DEK, and the information stored is effectively wiped as well.

    – vidarlo
    11 hours ago













    @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

    – AndrolGenhald
    11 hours ago





    @vidarlo True, but I wouldn't expect the average user to understand this, or to need it.

    – AndrolGenhald
    11 hours ago













    That, I do not disagree with :)

    – vidarlo
    11 hours ago





    That, I do not disagree with :)

    – vidarlo
    11 hours ago













    4














    I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



    Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




    • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




      • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


      • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

      • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


    • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



    • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

    Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



    1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


    2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


    3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      4














      I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



      Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




      • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




        • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


        • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

        • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


      • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



      • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

      Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



      1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


      2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


      3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        4












        4








        4







        I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



        Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




        • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




          • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


          • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

          • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


        • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



        • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

        Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



        1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


        2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


        3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        I completely agree with AndrolGenhald's high-level answer. In case you are interested in a complementary low-level walk-through of Android's storage encryption implementation:



        Android can do File-Based Encryption (FBE) and Full-Disc Encryption (FDE), with "disc" referring to the /data partition. I will focus on FDE to illustrate the principle. The set-up is done by the Volume Daemon (Vold), specifically in system/vold/cryptfs.cpp.




        • cryptfs_enable_internal(int crypt_type, const char* passwd, ...) starts the storage encryption, with crypt_type specifying if a pin or password is used (to determine which keyboard to show on the unlock screen) and passwd giving the actual user pin/password. It will set up a footer crypt_ftr to be stored along the encrypted partition, then it calls create_encrypted_random_key to populate the crypt_ftr.




          • create_encrypted_random_key generates a random master key and a random salt and passes them on to encrypt_master_key.


          • encrypt_master_key uses a key-derivation function (e.g. scrypt), that takes the salt and the user pin/password as an input and deterministically derives an intermediate key. The master key is then encrypted with the intermediate key using AES-128-CBC. The encrypted master key and the salt are stored in crypt_ftr, but not the user pin/password.

          • Back in cryptfs_enable_internal, the crypt_ftr is written to the disc. Then the actual storage encryption via Linux' dm-crypt is triggered using the decrypted master key.


        • cryptfs_check_passwd(const char* passwd) starts storage decryption by backtracking the above steps to obtain the decrypted master key. The crypt_ftr has to be read from the disc, containing the encrypted master key and the salt. The user-supplied pin/password plus salt are fed into the key derivation function. This results in an intermediate key that can decrypt the master key (most of this happens in decrypt_master_key_aux).



        • cryptfs_changepw(int crypt_type, const char* newpw) handles changing the user pin/password. It will not generate a new master key, it just encrypts the existing master key via encrypt_master_key using the new user pin/password.

        Based on this information, the answers to your questions would be:



        1. The randomly generated master key is used for the actual storage encryption.


        2. We need a user pin/password to encrypt the master key. Thus the user pin/password is needed to later retrieve the master key for decrypting the storage.


        3. Changing the user pin/password will not change the master key, only the encryption of the master key.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago





















        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 8 hours ago









        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534

        412




        412




        New contributor




        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        f9c69e9781fa194211448473495534 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Filipp W. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206979%2fhow-is-it-possible-for-users-password-to-be-changed-after-storage-was-encrypted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367