When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?“Lacking meat”, “Content-free”, and poor defense-development. Please critique my workHow large should photos on my blog be?
Why is an old chain unsafe?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Is there a minimum number of transactions in a block?
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"
"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?
Can town administrative "code" overule state laws like those forbidding trespassing?
Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag
N.B. ligature in Latex
What is the white spray-pattern residue inside these Falcon Heavy nozzles?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Infinite past with a beginning?
DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
“Lacking meat”, “Content-free”, and poor defense-development. Please critique my workHow large should photos on my blog be?
Increasingly often, if you Google for a recipe your search results will be full of long, image-rich blog posts that, somewhere in there, have the actual recipe you were looking for. Many of these have a "printer-friendly version" link to make that easier; I can get the stuff I need in my kitchen on paper easily, but the author doesn't have to cut back on the part that is interesting when cooking is not imminent. Here's an example of the basic idea -- if you click on the "print" link it starts your browser print dialogue with a subset of the page's content. But that site made a separate page for the print version, and I want to post the recipe once not twice.
As somebody who sometimes posts about cooking, including recipes, on my blog, I'd like to be able to offer that printer-friendly version, too -- but I don't want to have to create the content twice. Is there some script or HTML magic that can help me? I write my blog posts in markdown and can include HTML tags. How do I modify my source to mark a portion of the post as content for a "print" link (and generate the link)?
non-fiction tools blog food-writing
add a comment |
Increasingly often, if you Google for a recipe your search results will be full of long, image-rich blog posts that, somewhere in there, have the actual recipe you were looking for. Many of these have a "printer-friendly version" link to make that easier; I can get the stuff I need in my kitchen on paper easily, but the author doesn't have to cut back on the part that is interesting when cooking is not imminent. Here's an example of the basic idea -- if you click on the "print" link it starts your browser print dialogue with a subset of the page's content. But that site made a separate page for the print version, and I want to post the recipe once not twice.
As somebody who sometimes posts about cooking, including recipes, on my blog, I'd like to be able to offer that printer-friendly version, too -- but I don't want to have to create the content twice. Is there some script or HTML magic that can help me? I write my blog posts in markdown and can include HTML tags. How do I modify my source to mark a portion of the post as content for a "print" link (and generate the link)?
non-fiction tools blog food-writing
2
I also blog recipes and want this feature! What a great question.
– Cyn
9 hours ago
Man, I know HTML but I've never been able to get CSS. I wonder if there is a plug in for this...there must be. I use Wordpress.
– Cyn
8 hours ago
@bruglesco single-sourcing two versions would be ok if necessary, but sometimes I edit after posting so having it just there once, with the print view generated on demand, would be ideal.
– Monica Cellio♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Increasingly often, if you Google for a recipe your search results will be full of long, image-rich blog posts that, somewhere in there, have the actual recipe you were looking for. Many of these have a "printer-friendly version" link to make that easier; I can get the stuff I need in my kitchen on paper easily, but the author doesn't have to cut back on the part that is interesting when cooking is not imminent. Here's an example of the basic idea -- if you click on the "print" link it starts your browser print dialogue with a subset of the page's content. But that site made a separate page for the print version, and I want to post the recipe once not twice.
As somebody who sometimes posts about cooking, including recipes, on my blog, I'd like to be able to offer that printer-friendly version, too -- but I don't want to have to create the content twice. Is there some script or HTML magic that can help me? I write my blog posts in markdown and can include HTML tags. How do I modify my source to mark a portion of the post as content for a "print" link (and generate the link)?
non-fiction tools blog food-writing
Increasingly often, if you Google for a recipe your search results will be full of long, image-rich blog posts that, somewhere in there, have the actual recipe you were looking for. Many of these have a "printer-friendly version" link to make that easier; I can get the stuff I need in my kitchen on paper easily, but the author doesn't have to cut back on the part that is interesting when cooking is not imminent. Here's an example of the basic idea -- if you click on the "print" link it starts your browser print dialogue with a subset of the page's content. But that site made a separate page for the print version, and I want to post the recipe once not twice.
As somebody who sometimes posts about cooking, including recipes, on my blog, I'd like to be able to offer that printer-friendly version, too -- but I don't want to have to create the content twice. Is there some script or HTML magic that can help me? I write my blog posts in markdown and can include HTML tags. How do I modify my source to mark a portion of the post as content for a "print" link (and generate the link)?
non-fiction tools blog food-writing
non-fiction tools blog food-writing
edited 9 hours ago
Monica Cellio
asked 10 hours ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
16.9k23690
16.9k23690
2
I also blog recipes and want this feature! What a great question.
– Cyn
9 hours ago
Man, I know HTML but I've never been able to get CSS. I wonder if there is a plug in for this...there must be. I use Wordpress.
– Cyn
8 hours ago
@bruglesco single-sourcing two versions would be ok if necessary, but sometimes I edit after posting so having it just there once, with the print view generated on demand, would be ideal.
– Monica Cellio♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2
I also blog recipes and want this feature! What a great question.
– Cyn
9 hours ago
Man, I know HTML but I've never been able to get CSS. I wonder if there is a plug in for this...there must be. I use Wordpress.
– Cyn
8 hours ago
@bruglesco single-sourcing two versions would be ok if necessary, but sometimes I edit after posting so having it just there once, with the print view generated on demand, would be ideal.
– Monica Cellio♦
4 hours ago
2
2
I also blog recipes and want this feature! What a great question.
– Cyn
9 hours ago
I also blog recipes and want this feature! What a great question.
– Cyn
9 hours ago
Man, I know HTML but I've never been able to get CSS. I wonder if there is a plug in for this...there must be. I use Wordpress.
– Cyn
8 hours ago
Man, I know HTML but I've never been able to get CSS. I wonder if there is a plug in for this...there must be. I use Wordpress.
– Cyn
8 hours ago
@bruglesco single-sourcing two versions would be ok if necessary, but sometimes I edit after posting so having it just there once, with the print view generated on demand, would be ideal.
– Monica Cellio♦
4 hours ago
@bruglesco single-sourcing two versions would be ok if necessary, but sometimes I edit after posting so having it just there once, with the print view generated on demand, would be ideal.
– Monica Cellio♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
CSS supports media queries since Level 2, Revision 1. That's from way back in 2011, so any modern web browser should support it.
If you're able to specify custom CSS, and apply custom CSS classes to your content, then you can define a CSS class such that the pictures and other ancilliary content is shown on screen, but only the actual recipe is printed on paper.
This way, you don't need to have a separate "printer friendly" page, because you're using CSS to define what "printer friendly" means for your particular content. Of course, it assumes that you have control over the CSS in the first place! The person visiting your web site just prints via their browser's normal "print" function.
Specifically, as discussed on MDN, you can either target print
media, or a specific characteristic of a media (a feature). For the former, you'd add something like
@media print
img.food-photo display: none;
body color: black;
to hide food-photo
class img
s and set the text color to black
when the rendering media is identified as print
.
For the latter, you can target non-color-capable media (whether screen, print, or otherwise) by writing something like
@media not color /* untested, but looks like it should work */
body color: black;
to set the text color to black
where color is not supported.
These can be combined to form even more complex rules, and of course the normal CSS inheritance rules apply as well, so you can override only those attributes that need to be different between, say, print and non-print.
You might also be interested in CSS feature queries, which look to be similar but geared toward even more specific feature support; for example, one example shows how to apply specific CSS depending on whether display: flex
is supported. This looks more useful for when you want to know that the user agent (browser) supports a feature, than for targetting specific media types or capabilities.
I came across a Stack Overflow question at What does @media screen and (max-width: 1024px) mean in CSS? which has some more complex examples that you may find enlightening.
I think that the biggest downside to using CSS for this is that it leaves the visitor with no easy way to print the whole page including the "narrative/journey" if that's what they want to do. There are tricks that one can use, but those by their very nature are rather technical.
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
1
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
add a comment |
You could keep the recipe in its own source file. recipeXYZ.html
for example. You then dynamically add that source to both your blog post as well as your simplified print page. My jQuery is a bit rusty but something from this SO question should work well.
$("#recipeDiv").load("recipeXYZ.html");
Now you can print from your original page, with its images, or from your print page, which is more printer friendly. You can also modify your recipe from one central location and have it update both pages as they both always receive their content from the same source.
The print page can even be generated dynamically.
<span id="printPreview">print preview</span>
$("#printPreview").click(function()
var w = window.open(); // you can change the dimenstions of the window here.
w.document.open().write("recipeXYZ.hml");
// you probably want to create the actual print button here.
);
add a comment |
You use @media
rules in your CSS style sheets to define which html tags you want to print and which are only visible on screen. E.g.
@media print
.stuff-you-don't-want-to-print
display: none;
To print the current browser window, you print it with JavaScript, e.g.
<a href="javascript:window.print()">Print</a>
The page you link to actually provides a separate web page to print. You can see that the URL of the page you print is different than the URL of the blog post. And if you look at the source code the pages are different. So in fact your "example" is an example of what you don't want, when you say that "[you] don't want to have to create the content twice". That page has created the content twice.
If you don't want to create the content twice, use media queries.
1
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44450%2fwhen-blogging-recipes-how-can-i-support-both-readers-who-want-the-narrative-jou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
CSS supports media queries since Level 2, Revision 1. That's from way back in 2011, so any modern web browser should support it.
If you're able to specify custom CSS, and apply custom CSS classes to your content, then you can define a CSS class such that the pictures and other ancilliary content is shown on screen, but only the actual recipe is printed on paper.
This way, you don't need to have a separate "printer friendly" page, because you're using CSS to define what "printer friendly" means for your particular content. Of course, it assumes that you have control over the CSS in the first place! The person visiting your web site just prints via their browser's normal "print" function.
Specifically, as discussed on MDN, you can either target print
media, or a specific characteristic of a media (a feature). For the former, you'd add something like
@media print
img.food-photo display: none;
body color: black;
to hide food-photo
class img
s and set the text color to black
when the rendering media is identified as print
.
For the latter, you can target non-color-capable media (whether screen, print, or otherwise) by writing something like
@media not color /* untested, but looks like it should work */
body color: black;
to set the text color to black
where color is not supported.
These can be combined to form even more complex rules, and of course the normal CSS inheritance rules apply as well, so you can override only those attributes that need to be different between, say, print and non-print.
You might also be interested in CSS feature queries, which look to be similar but geared toward even more specific feature support; for example, one example shows how to apply specific CSS depending on whether display: flex
is supported. This looks more useful for when you want to know that the user agent (browser) supports a feature, than for targetting specific media types or capabilities.
I came across a Stack Overflow question at What does @media screen and (max-width: 1024px) mean in CSS? which has some more complex examples that you may find enlightening.
I think that the biggest downside to using CSS for this is that it leaves the visitor with no easy way to print the whole page including the "narrative/journey" if that's what they want to do. There are tricks that one can use, but those by their very nature are rather technical.
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
1
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
add a comment |
CSS supports media queries since Level 2, Revision 1. That's from way back in 2011, so any modern web browser should support it.
If you're able to specify custom CSS, and apply custom CSS classes to your content, then you can define a CSS class such that the pictures and other ancilliary content is shown on screen, but only the actual recipe is printed on paper.
This way, you don't need to have a separate "printer friendly" page, because you're using CSS to define what "printer friendly" means for your particular content. Of course, it assumes that you have control over the CSS in the first place! The person visiting your web site just prints via their browser's normal "print" function.
Specifically, as discussed on MDN, you can either target print
media, or a specific characteristic of a media (a feature). For the former, you'd add something like
@media print
img.food-photo display: none;
body color: black;
to hide food-photo
class img
s and set the text color to black
when the rendering media is identified as print
.
For the latter, you can target non-color-capable media (whether screen, print, or otherwise) by writing something like
@media not color /* untested, but looks like it should work */
body color: black;
to set the text color to black
where color is not supported.
These can be combined to form even more complex rules, and of course the normal CSS inheritance rules apply as well, so you can override only those attributes that need to be different between, say, print and non-print.
You might also be interested in CSS feature queries, which look to be similar but geared toward even more specific feature support; for example, one example shows how to apply specific CSS depending on whether display: flex
is supported. This looks more useful for when you want to know that the user agent (browser) supports a feature, than for targetting specific media types or capabilities.
I came across a Stack Overflow question at What does @media screen and (max-width: 1024px) mean in CSS? which has some more complex examples that you may find enlightening.
I think that the biggest downside to using CSS for this is that it leaves the visitor with no easy way to print the whole page including the "narrative/journey" if that's what they want to do. There are tricks that one can use, but those by their very nature are rather technical.
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
1
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
add a comment |
CSS supports media queries since Level 2, Revision 1. That's from way back in 2011, so any modern web browser should support it.
If you're able to specify custom CSS, and apply custom CSS classes to your content, then you can define a CSS class such that the pictures and other ancilliary content is shown on screen, but only the actual recipe is printed on paper.
This way, you don't need to have a separate "printer friendly" page, because you're using CSS to define what "printer friendly" means for your particular content. Of course, it assumes that you have control over the CSS in the first place! The person visiting your web site just prints via their browser's normal "print" function.
Specifically, as discussed on MDN, you can either target print
media, or a specific characteristic of a media (a feature). For the former, you'd add something like
@media print
img.food-photo display: none;
body color: black;
to hide food-photo
class img
s and set the text color to black
when the rendering media is identified as print
.
For the latter, you can target non-color-capable media (whether screen, print, or otherwise) by writing something like
@media not color /* untested, but looks like it should work */
body color: black;
to set the text color to black
where color is not supported.
These can be combined to form even more complex rules, and of course the normal CSS inheritance rules apply as well, so you can override only those attributes that need to be different between, say, print and non-print.
You might also be interested in CSS feature queries, which look to be similar but geared toward even more specific feature support; for example, one example shows how to apply specific CSS depending on whether display: flex
is supported. This looks more useful for when you want to know that the user agent (browser) supports a feature, than for targetting specific media types or capabilities.
I came across a Stack Overflow question at What does @media screen and (max-width: 1024px) mean in CSS? which has some more complex examples that you may find enlightening.
I think that the biggest downside to using CSS for this is that it leaves the visitor with no easy way to print the whole page including the "narrative/journey" if that's what they want to do. There are tricks that one can use, but those by their very nature are rather technical.
CSS supports media queries since Level 2, Revision 1. That's from way back in 2011, so any modern web browser should support it.
If you're able to specify custom CSS, and apply custom CSS classes to your content, then you can define a CSS class such that the pictures and other ancilliary content is shown on screen, but only the actual recipe is printed on paper.
This way, you don't need to have a separate "printer friendly" page, because you're using CSS to define what "printer friendly" means for your particular content. Of course, it assumes that you have control over the CSS in the first place! The person visiting your web site just prints via their browser's normal "print" function.
Specifically, as discussed on MDN, you can either target print
media, or a specific characteristic of a media (a feature). For the former, you'd add something like
@media print
img.food-photo display: none;
body color: black;
to hide food-photo
class img
s and set the text color to black
when the rendering media is identified as print
.
For the latter, you can target non-color-capable media (whether screen, print, or otherwise) by writing something like
@media not color /* untested, but looks like it should work */
body color: black;
to set the text color to black
where color is not supported.
These can be combined to form even more complex rules, and of course the normal CSS inheritance rules apply as well, so you can override only those attributes that need to be different between, say, print and non-print.
You might also be interested in CSS feature queries, which look to be similar but geared toward even more specific feature support; for example, one example shows how to apply specific CSS depending on whether display: flex
is supported. This looks more useful for when you want to know that the user agent (browser) supports a feature, than for targetting specific media types or capabilities.
I came across a Stack Overflow question at What does @media screen and (max-width: 1024px) mean in CSS? which has some more complex examples that you may find enlightening.
I think that the biggest downside to using CSS for this is that it leaves the visitor with no easy way to print the whole page including the "narrative/journey" if that's what they want to do. There are tricks that one can use, but those by their very nature are rather technical.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
a CVn♦a CVn
2,73231733
2,73231733
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
1
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
add a comment |
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
1
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
Does this get rid of things like the background, header, footer, and sidebars? Or does it just get rid of images?
– Cyn
8 hours ago
1
1
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
How can a reader discover that the page will print well? I'd cut and paste the relevant content into an editor and try to print from there, and only see if the print is tolerable if cut-and-paste is broken somehow.
– Jeffrey Bosboom
1 hour ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
@Cyn It will get rid of whatever you program it to get rid of.
– Graipher
40 secs ago
add a comment |
You could keep the recipe in its own source file. recipeXYZ.html
for example. You then dynamically add that source to both your blog post as well as your simplified print page. My jQuery is a bit rusty but something from this SO question should work well.
$("#recipeDiv").load("recipeXYZ.html");
Now you can print from your original page, with its images, or from your print page, which is more printer friendly. You can also modify your recipe from one central location and have it update both pages as they both always receive their content from the same source.
The print page can even be generated dynamically.
<span id="printPreview">print preview</span>
$("#printPreview").click(function()
var w = window.open(); // you can change the dimenstions of the window here.
w.document.open().write("recipeXYZ.hml");
// you probably want to create the actual print button here.
);
add a comment |
You could keep the recipe in its own source file. recipeXYZ.html
for example. You then dynamically add that source to both your blog post as well as your simplified print page. My jQuery is a bit rusty but something from this SO question should work well.
$("#recipeDiv").load("recipeXYZ.html");
Now you can print from your original page, with its images, or from your print page, which is more printer friendly. You can also modify your recipe from one central location and have it update both pages as they both always receive their content from the same source.
The print page can even be generated dynamically.
<span id="printPreview">print preview</span>
$("#printPreview").click(function()
var w = window.open(); // you can change the dimenstions of the window here.
w.document.open().write("recipeXYZ.hml");
// you probably want to create the actual print button here.
);
add a comment |
You could keep the recipe in its own source file. recipeXYZ.html
for example. You then dynamically add that source to both your blog post as well as your simplified print page. My jQuery is a bit rusty but something from this SO question should work well.
$("#recipeDiv").load("recipeXYZ.html");
Now you can print from your original page, with its images, or from your print page, which is more printer friendly. You can also modify your recipe from one central location and have it update both pages as they both always receive their content from the same source.
The print page can even be generated dynamically.
<span id="printPreview">print preview</span>
$("#printPreview").click(function()
var w = window.open(); // you can change the dimenstions of the window here.
w.document.open().write("recipeXYZ.hml");
// you probably want to create the actual print button here.
);
You could keep the recipe in its own source file. recipeXYZ.html
for example. You then dynamically add that source to both your blog post as well as your simplified print page. My jQuery is a bit rusty but something from this SO question should work well.
$("#recipeDiv").load("recipeXYZ.html");
Now you can print from your original page, with its images, or from your print page, which is more printer friendly. You can also modify your recipe from one central location and have it update both pages as they both always receive their content from the same source.
The print page can even be generated dynamically.
<span id="printPreview">print preview</span>
$("#printPreview").click(function()
var w = window.open(); // you can change the dimenstions of the window here.
w.document.open().write("recipeXYZ.hml");
// you probably want to create the actual print button here.
);
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
bruglescobruglesco
2,491742
2,491742
add a comment |
add a comment |
You use @media
rules in your CSS style sheets to define which html tags you want to print and which are only visible on screen. E.g.
@media print
.stuff-you-don't-want-to-print
display: none;
To print the current browser window, you print it with JavaScript, e.g.
<a href="javascript:window.print()">Print</a>
The page you link to actually provides a separate web page to print. You can see that the URL of the page you print is different than the URL of the blog post. And if you look at the source code the pages are different. So in fact your "example" is an example of what you don't want, when you say that "[you] don't want to have to create the content twice". That page has created the content twice.
If you don't want to create the content twice, use media queries.
1
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
You use @media
rules in your CSS style sheets to define which html tags you want to print and which are only visible on screen. E.g.
@media print
.stuff-you-don't-want-to-print
display: none;
To print the current browser window, you print it with JavaScript, e.g.
<a href="javascript:window.print()">Print</a>
The page you link to actually provides a separate web page to print. You can see that the URL of the page you print is different than the URL of the blog post. And if you look at the source code the pages are different. So in fact your "example" is an example of what you don't want, when you say that "[you] don't want to have to create the content twice". That page has created the content twice.
If you don't want to create the content twice, use media queries.
1
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
You use @media
rules in your CSS style sheets to define which html tags you want to print and which are only visible on screen. E.g.
@media print
.stuff-you-don't-want-to-print
display: none;
To print the current browser window, you print it with JavaScript, e.g.
<a href="javascript:window.print()">Print</a>
The page you link to actually provides a separate web page to print. You can see that the URL of the page you print is different than the URL of the blog post. And if you look at the source code the pages are different. So in fact your "example" is an example of what you don't want, when you say that "[you] don't want to have to create the content twice". That page has created the content twice.
If you don't want to create the content twice, use media queries.
You use @media
rules in your CSS style sheets to define which html tags you want to print and which are only visible on screen. E.g.
@media print
.stuff-you-don't-want-to-print
display: none;
To print the current browser window, you print it with JavaScript, e.g.
<a href="javascript:window.print()">Print</a>
The page you link to actually provides a separate web page to print. You can see that the URL of the page you print is different than the URL of the blog post. And if you look at the source code the pages are different. So in fact your "example" is an example of what you don't want, when you say that "[you] don't want to have to create the content twice". That page has created the content twice.
If you don't want to create the content twice, use media queries.
edited 9 hours ago
bruglesco
2,491742
2,491742
answered 9 hours ago
user37740
1
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
1
1
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
About the example -- yeah, I meant that that's the effect I want, but not that implementation. I"ll clarify. As for your meta question, software questions about publishing are fine here; we even have a whole tag, plus several others (like scrivener and dita).
– Monica Cellio♦
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44450%2fwhen-blogging-recipes-how-can-i-support-both-readers-who-want-the-narrative-jou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I also blog recipes and want this feature! What a great question.
– Cyn
9 hours ago
Man, I know HTML but I've never been able to get CSS. I wonder if there is a plug in for this...there must be. I use Wordpress.
– Cyn
8 hours ago
@bruglesco single-sourcing two versions would be ok if necessary, but sometimes I edit after posting so having it just there once, with the print view generated on demand, would be ideal.
– Monica Cellio♦
4 hours ago