How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1?Are there downsides in using cat5 / cat5e cable for USB 3.0 connection?Problem with making a USB 3.0 A/B/Micro adapter - detects cable as USB 2.0USB 3.0 power and usb 2.0 dataHow should a USB C connector be wired to support 3.0?USB 3.1 Type-A Legacy Connector to USB 3.1 Type-CHow to determine IBM USB 6 pin header pinout?Pass USB 3.0 connection through D-SUB connector

Show two plots together: a two dimensional curve tangent to the maxima of a three dimensional plot

My new Acer Aspire 7 doesn't have a Legacy Boot option, what can I do to get it?

!I!n!s!e!r!t! !b!e!t!w!e!e!n!

Radix2 Fast Fourier Transform implemented in C++

Why is the name Bergson pronounced like Berksonne?

Can sulfuric acid itself be electrolysed?

Repurpose telephone line to ethernet

Control GPIO pins from C

Why do balloons get cold when they deflate?

Have only girls been born for a long time in this village?

Eric Andre had a dream

How best to join tables, which have different lengths on the same column values which exist in both tables?

Levenshtein Neighbours

Indirect speech - breaking the rules of it

Can I submit a paper computer science conference using an alias if using my real name can cause legal trouble in my original country

Best model for precedence constraints within scheduling problem

Saying something to a foreign coworker who uses "you people"

When does The Truman Show take place?

Are there categories whose internal hom is somewhat 'exotic'?

Why did St. Jerome use "virago" in Gen. 2:23?

Output with the same length always

Meaning and structure of headline "Hair it is: A List of ..."

Earliest evidence of objects intended for future archaeologists?

Do banks' profitability really suffer under low interest rates



How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1?


Are there downsides in using cat5 / cat5e cable for USB 3.0 connection?Problem with making a USB 3.0 A/B/Micro adapter - detects cable as USB 2.0USB 3.0 power and usb 2.0 dataHow should a USB C connector be wired to support 3.0?USB 3.1 Type-A Legacy Connector to USB 3.1 Type-CHow to determine IBM USB 6 pin header pinout?Pass USB 3.0 connection through D-SUB connector






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1, without using port, PC and/or having data transfer but instead with basic physics tests e.g. using multimeter?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it has four pins on the connector (or five for mini/micro USB), it's either USB 2.0 or 1.x. If it has more, it's 3.x. As far as I know there's no simple way to distinguish 3.0 and 3.1, but I could be wrong. I'm not sure if the cables even are any different.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you do any research? There is all the information you could ever need on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    11 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1, without using port, PC and/or having data transfer but instead with basic physics tests e.g. using multimeter?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it has four pins on the connector (or five for mini/micro USB), it's either USB 2.0 or 1.x. If it has more, it's 3.x. As far as I know there's no simple way to distinguish 3.0 and 3.1, but I could be wrong. I'm not sure if the cables even are any different.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you do any research? There is all the information you could ever need on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    11 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1, without using port, PC and/or having data transfer but instead with basic physics tests e.g. using multimeter?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1, without using port, PC and/or having data transfer but instead with basic physics tests e.g. using multimeter?







usb multimeter test






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









hacktastical

4,2665 silver badges21 bronze badges




4,2665 silver badges21 bronze badges










asked 12 hours ago









abdanabdan

1335 bronze badges




1335 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it has four pins on the connector (or five for mini/micro USB), it's either USB 2.0 or 1.x. If it has more, it's 3.x. As far as I know there's no simple way to distinguish 3.0 and 3.1, but I could be wrong. I'm not sure if the cables even are any different.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you do any research? There is all the information you could ever need on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    11 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it has four pins on the connector (or five for mini/micro USB), it's either USB 2.0 or 1.x. If it has more, it's 3.x. As far as I know there's no simple way to distinguish 3.0 and 3.1, but I could be wrong. I'm not sure if the cables even are any different.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you do any research? There is all the information you could ever need on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Jennings
    11 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
If it has four pins on the connector (or five for mini/micro USB), it's either USB 2.0 or 1.x. If it has more, it's 3.x. As far as I know there's no simple way to distinguish 3.0 and 3.1, but I could be wrong. I'm not sure if the cables even are any different.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
11 hours ago





$begingroup$
If it has four pins on the connector (or five for mini/micro USB), it's either USB 2.0 or 1.x. If it has more, it's 3.x. As far as I know there's no simple way to distinguish 3.0 and 3.1, but I could be wrong. I'm not sure if the cables even are any different.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
11 hours ago













$begingroup$
Did you do any research? There is all the information you could ever need on Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Peter Jennings
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Did you do any research? There is all the information you could ever need on Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Peter Jennings
11 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

First, there is no real thing as "version" of USB cable. USB cables must conform to certain electrical requirements to be qualified to work reliably at corresponding data rate.



In case of USB 2.0 the task is relatively easy - the cable/connector has only four wires, GND, D+, D-. VBUS. And maybe one locally-connected ID pin inside mini- and micro-USB plugs.



You probably want to distinguish if a cable is good for USB 2.0 HS, or only for FS. This can be determined only by measuring the cable+connector electrical transfer characteristics, primarily the differential characteristic impedance, and the cable's ability to deliver sufficient signal at far-end of the cable (when loaded with a standard 90-Ohm diff. load) If the cable characteristic impedance along the link (especially along solder wires inside connector molds) meet the specification (90 Ohm +-10%), and cable loss doesn't violate the far-end eye diagram template,



enter image description here



the cable is good for use in USB 2.0 480 Mbps transmission applications.



Unfortunately, a multimeter is far from being an adequate tool for doing this kind of measurements. To make these measurements you need (a) TDR (Time-Domain Reflectometer) or VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), and (b) an oscilloscope with a differential probe with effective bandwidth of no less than 2 GHz.



You also will need a test fixture that smoothly connects the USB female connector with coaxial cables used by high-speed instruments, which typically use SMA connectors.



enter image description here



For USB 3.0 signals (Gen1 5 Gbps) and USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 Gbps) the approach is essentially the same, just the frequency requirements are a lot higher - the oscilloscope must go up to 16 GHz, which dramatically increases the cost of test equipment. In addition to measuring the characteristic impedance, the USB 3.x cables must meet additional requirements to have low cross-talk, since USB 3.x cables carry at least two pairs of signals going in opposite directions, so their interference should be minimized.



In general, USB Implementer's Forum (USB-IF.ORG) has a library of documents including Electrical Test Specification for cables, here is one of the documents.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    2












    $begingroup$

    This is an interesting problem, as there are now a proliferation of similar-looking cable types with the introduction of USB 3.x and the Type C connector. Determining how many pairs are connected, and if it supports flip-over and other compliance issues is non-trivial. There's a lot of mis-marked junk out there and having a reliable way to sort it out would be useful.



    Have a look here to see how dire the situation really is: https://www.engadget.com/2016/02/03/benson-leung-chromebook-pixel-usb-type-c-test/



    I'm going to assume you're interested in testing USB C cables, since it's possible to suss out previous USB 2.0 vs. 3.x types by the connectors types they have on them. Then again, a test for these non-C cables might be useful too. If you work out a test for Type C, the others are subsets.



    Start by getting the actual USB 3.2 spec from USB-IF, here: https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb-32-specification-released-september-22-2017-and-ecns



    As a basic test, using a breakout board at each end and checking end-to-end with a multimeter would be the way to do it. You would check for continuity on each possible signal pair:



    • USB 2.0: DM/DP

    • USB '3.0 / 3.1' (one SS pair): DM/DP, SSTX+/SSTX-, SSRX+/SSRX-

    • USB 3.2 Gen 2 (two SS pairs): DM/DP, SSTX1+/SSTX1-, SSRX1+/SSRX1-, SSTX2+/SSTX2-, SSRX2+/SSRX2-

    As an improvement you could use a TDR reflection method, like some LAN cable testers use. This would also tell you if the cable is the right impedance.



    More about TDR testing here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/test-methods/time-domain-reflectometer-tdr/what-is-a-tdr.php



    Example LAN cable tester here: https://www.cablestogo.com/product/39002/lansmart-tdr-cable-tester



    Certifcation-level testing here: https://www.keysight.com/upload/cmc_upload/All/USB_3_0_test_solution_overview.pdf



    If you're thinking to make a product I think making a continuity tester board would be useful. The tester would terminate the cable at one end, and test for continuity at the other using a microcontroller to measure it. This would be able to reliably distinguish if the cable has the right number of of pairs.



    Example commercial USB test product: https://www.totalphase.com/blog/2018/09/tools-can-use-test-analyze-functions-power-delivery-usb-type-c-cables/



    It would be good to also check shield continuity as a separate test. It's supposed to be isolated from signal ground, but still present, and it's an area where many shoddy vendors will cheat.



    (To the other posters - think about how you would do incoming inspection / acceptance on cables you bought for your product. You'd do something like this, and maybe even take the cable apart too.)






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
      StackExchange.schematics.init();
      );
      , "cicuitlab");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "135"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f453491%2fhow-do-we-test-and-determine-if-a-usb-cableconnector-is-version-2-3-0-or-3-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      First, there is no real thing as "version" of USB cable. USB cables must conform to certain electrical requirements to be qualified to work reliably at corresponding data rate.



      In case of USB 2.0 the task is relatively easy - the cable/connector has only four wires, GND, D+, D-. VBUS. And maybe one locally-connected ID pin inside mini- and micro-USB plugs.



      You probably want to distinguish if a cable is good for USB 2.0 HS, or only for FS. This can be determined only by measuring the cable+connector electrical transfer characteristics, primarily the differential characteristic impedance, and the cable's ability to deliver sufficient signal at far-end of the cable (when loaded with a standard 90-Ohm diff. load) If the cable characteristic impedance along the link (especially along solder wires inside connector molds) meet the specification (90 Ohm +-10%), and cable loss doesn't violate the far-end eye diagram template,



      enter image description here



      the cable is good for use in USB 2.0 480 Mbps transmission applications.



      Unfortunately, a multimeter is far from being an adequate tool for doing this kind of measurements. To make these measurements you need (a) TDR (Time-Domain Reflectometer) or VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), and (b) an oscilloscope with a differential probe with effective bandwidth of no less than 2 GHz.



      You also will need a test fixture that smoothly connects the USB female connector with coaxial cables used by high-speed instruments, which typically use SMA connectors.



      enter image description here



      For USB 3.0 signals (Gen1 5 Gbps) and USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 Gbps) the approach is essentially the same, just the frequency requirements are a lot higher - the oscilloscope must go up to 16 GHz, which dramatically increases the cost of test equipment. In addition to measuring the characteristic impedance, the USB 3.x cables must meet additional requirements to have low cross-talk, since USB 3.x cables carry at least two pairs of signals going in opposite directions, so their interference should be minimized.



      In general, USB Implementer's Forum (USB-IF.ORG) has a library of documents including Electrical Test Specification for cables, here is one of the documents.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        3












        $begingroup$

        First, there is no real thing as "version" of USB cable. USB cables must conform to certain electrical requirements to be qualified to work reliably at corresponding data rate.



        In case of USB 2.0 the task is relatively easy - the cable/connector has only four wires, GND, D+, D-. VBUS. And maybe one locally-connected ID pin inside mini- and micro-USB plugs.



        You probably want to distinguish if a cable is good for USB 2.0 HS, or only for FS. This can be determined only by measuring the cable+connector electrical transfer characteristics, primarily the differential characteristic impedance, and the cable's ability to deliver sufficient signal at far-end of the cable (when loaded with a standard 90-Ohm diff. load) If the cable characteristic impedance along the link (especially along solder wires inside connector molds) meet the specification (90 Ohm +-10%), and cable loss doesn't violate the far-end eye diagram template,



        enter image description here



        the cable is good for use in USB 2.0 480 Mbps transmission applications.



        Unfortunately, a multimeter is far from being an adequate tool for doing this kind of measurements. To make these measurements you need (a) TDR (Time-Domain Reflectometer) or VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), and (b) an oscilloscope with a differential probe with effective bandwidth of no less than 2 GHz.



        You also will need a test fixture that smoothly connects the USB female connector with coaxial cables used by high-speed instruments, which typically use SMA connectors.



        enter image description here



        For USB 3.0 signals (Gen1 5 Gbps) and USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 Gbps) the approach is essentially the same, just the frequency requirements are a lot higher - the oscilloscope must go up to 16 GHz, which dramatically increases the cost of test equipment. In addition to measuring the characteristic impedance, the USB 3.x cables must meet additional requirements to have low cross-talk, since USB 3.x cables carry at least two pairs of signals going in opposite directions, so their interference should be minimized.



        In general, USB Implementer's Forum (USB-IF.ORG) has a library of documents including Electrical Test Specification for cables, here is one of the documents.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          First, there is no real thing as "version" of USB cable. USB cables must conform to certain electrical requirements to be qualified to work reliably at corresponding data rate.



          In case of USB 2.0 the task is relatively easy - the cable/connector has only four wires, GND, D+, D-. VBUS. And maybe one locally-connected ID pin inside mini- and micro-USB plugs.



          You probably want to distinguish if a cable is good for USB 2.0 HS, or only for FS. This can be determined only by measuring the cable+connector electrical transfer characteristics, primarily the differential characteristic impedance, and the cable's ability to deliver sufficient signal at far-end of the cable (when loaded with a standard 90-Ohm diff. load) If the cable characteristic impedance along the link (especially along solder wires inside connector molds) meet the specification (90 Ohm +-10%), and cable loss doesn't violate the far-end eye diagram template,



          enter image description here



          the cable is good for use in USB 2.0 480 Mbps transmission applications.



          Unfortunately, a multimeter is far from being an adequate tool for doing this kind of measurements. To make these measurements you need (a) TDR (Time-Domain Reflectometer) or VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), and (b) an oscilloscope with a differential probe with effective bandwidth of no less than 2 GHz.



          You also will need a test fixture that smoothly connects the USB female connector with coaxial cables used by high-speed instruments, which typically use SMA connectors.



          enter image description here



          For USB 3.0 signals (Gen1 5 Gbps) and USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 Gbps) the approach is essentially the same, just the frequency requirements are a lot higher - the oscilloscope must go up to 16 GHz, which dramatically increases the cost of test equipment. In addition to measuring the characteristic impedance, the USB 3.x cables must meet additional requirements to have low cross-talk, since USB 3.x cables carry at least two pairs of signals going in opposite directions, so their interference should be minimized.



          In general, USB Implementer's Forum (USB-IF.ORG) has a library of documents including Electrical Test Specification for cables, here is one of the documents.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          First, there is no real thing as "version" of USB cable. USB cables must conform to certain electrical requirements to be qualified to work reliably at corresponding data rate.



          In case of USB 2.0 the task is relatively easy - the cable/connector has only four wires, GND, D+, D-. VBUS. And maybe one locally-connected ID pin inside mini- and micro-USB plugs.



          You probably want to distinguish if a cable is good for USB 2.0 HS, or only for FS. This can be determined only by measuring the cable+connector electrical transfer characteristics, primarily the differential characteristic impedance, and the cable's ability to deliver sufficient signal at far-end of the cable (when loaded with a standard 90-Ohm diff. load) If the cable characteristic impedance along the link (especially along solder wires inside connector molds) meet the specification (90 Ohm +-10%), and cable loss doesn't violate the far-end eye diagram template,



          enter image description here



          the cable is good for use in USB 2.0 480 Mbps transmission applications.



          Unfortunately, a multimeter is far from being an adequate tool for doing this kind of measurements. To make these measurements you need (a) TDR (Time-Domain Reflectometer) or VNA (Vector Network Analyzer), and (b) an oscilloscope with a differential probe with effective bandwidth of no less than 2 GHz.



          You also will need a test fixture that smoothly connects the USB female connector with coaxial cables used by high-speed instruments, which typically use SMA connectors.



          enter image description here



          For USB 3.0 signals (Gen1 5 Gbps) and USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 Gbps) the approach is essentially the same, just the frequency requirements are a lot higher - the oscilloscope must go up to 16 GHz, which dramatically increases the cost of test equipment. In addition to measuring the characteristic impedance, the USB 3.x cables must meet additional requirements to have low cross-talk, since USB 3.x cables carry at least two pairs of signals going in opposite directions, so their interference should be minimized.



          In general, USB Implementer's Forum (USB-IF.ORG) has a library of documents including Electrical Test Specification for cables, here is one of the documents.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Ale..chenskiAle..chenski

          31.6k1 gold badge21 silver badges72 bronze badges




          31.6k1 gold badge21 silver badges72 bronze badges


























              2












              $begingroup$

              This is an interesting problem, as there are now a proliferation of similar-looking cable types with the introduction of USB 3.x and the Type C connector. Determining how many pairs are connected, and if it supports flip-over and other compliance issues is non-trivial. There's a lot of mis-marked junk out there and having a reliable way to sort it out would be useful.



              Have a look here to see how dire the situation really is: https://www.engadget.com/2016/02/03/benson-leung-chromebook-pixel-usb-type-c-test/



              I'm going to assume you're interested in testing USB C cables, since it's possible to suss out previous USB 2.0 vs. 3.x types by the connectors types they have on them. Then again, a test for these non-C cables might be useful too. If you work out a test for Type C, the others are subsets.



              Start by getting the actual USB 3.2 spec from USB-IF, here: https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb-32-specification-released-september-22-2017-and-ecns



              As a basic test, using a breakout board at each end and checking end-to-end with a multimeter would be the way to do it. You would check for continuity on each possible signal pair:



              • USB 2.0: DM/DP

              • USB '3.0 / 3.1' (one SS pair): DM/DP, SSTX+/SSTX-, SSRX+/SSRX-

              • USB 3.2 Gen 2 (two SS pairs): DM/DP, SSTX1+/SSTX1-, SSRX1+/SSRX1-, SSTX2+/SSTX2-, SSRX2+/SSRX2-

              As an improvement you could use a TDR reflection method, like some LAN cable testers use. This would also tell you if the cable is the right impedance.



              More about TDR testing here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/test-methods/time-domain-reflectometer-tdr/what-is-a-tdr.php



              Example LAN cable tester here: https://www.cablestogo.com/product/39002/lansmart-tdr-cable-tester



              Certifcation-level testing here: https://www.keysight.com/upload/cmc_upload/All/USB_3_0_test_solution_overview.pdf



              If you're thinking to make a product I think making a continuity tester board would be useful. The tester would terminate the cable at one end, and test for continuity at the other using a microcontroller to measure it. This would be able to reliably distinguish if the cable has the right number of of pairs.



              Example commercial USB test product: https://www.totalphase.com/blog/2018/09/tools-can-use-test-analyze-functions-power-delivery-usb-type-c-cables/



              It would be good to also check shield continuity as a separate test. It's supposed to be isolated from signal ground, but still present, and it's an area where many shoddy vendors will cheat.



              (To the other posters - think about how you would do incoming inspection / acceptance on cables you bought for your product. You'd do something like this, and maybe even take the cable apart too.)






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



















                2












                $begingroup$

                This is an interesting problem, as there are now a proliferation of similar-looking cable types with the introduction of USB 3.x and the Type C connector. Determining how many pairs are connected, and if it supports flip-over and other compliance issues is non-trivial. There's a lot of mis-marked junk out there and having a reliable way to sort it out would be useful.



                Have a look here to see how dire the situation really is: https://www.engadget.com/2016/02/03/benson-leung-chromebook-pixel-usb-type-c-test/



                I'm going to assume you're interested in testing USB C cables, since it's possible to suss out previous USB 2.0 vs. 3.x types by the connectors types they have on them. Then again, a test for these non-C cables might be useful too. If you work out a test for Type C, the others are subsets.



                Start by getting the actual USB 3.2 spec from USB-IF, here: https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb-32-specification-released-september-22-2017-and-ecns



                As a basic test, using a breakout board at each end and checking end-to-end with a multimeter would be the way to do it. You would check for continuity on each possible signal pair:



                • USB 2.0: DM/DP

                • USB '3.0 / 3.1' (one SS pair): DM/DP, SSTX+/SSTX-, SSRX+/SSRX-

                • USB 3.2 Gen 2 (two SS pairs): DM/DP, SSTX1+/SSTX1-, SSRX1+/SSRX1-, SSTX2+/SSTX2-, SSRX2+/SSRX2-

                As an improvement you could use a TDR reflection method, like some LAN cable testers use. This would also tell you if the cable is the right impedance.



                More about TDR testing here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/test-methods/time-domain-reflectometer-tdr/what-is-a-tdr.php



                Example LAN cable tester here: https://www.cablestogo.com/product/39002/lansmart-tdr-cable-tester



                Certifcation-level testing here: https://www.keysight.com/upload/cmc_upload/All/USB_3_0_test_solution_overview.pdf



                If you're thinking to make a product I think making a continuity tester board would be useful. The tester would terminate the cable at one end, and test for continuity at the other using a microcontroller to measure it. This would be able to reliably distinguish if the cable has the right number of of pairs.



                Example commercial USB test product: https://www.totalphase.com/blog/2018/09/tools-can-use-test-analyze-functions-power-delivery-usb-type-c-cables/



                It would be good to also check shield continuity as a separate test. It's supposed to be isolated from signal ground, but still present, and it's an area where many shoddy vendors will cheat.



                (To the other posters - think about how you would do incoming inspection / acceptance on cables you bought for your product. You'd do something like this, and maybe even take the cable apart too.)






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  This is an interesting problem, as there are now a proliferation of similar-looking cable types with the introduction of USB 3.x and the Type C connector. Determining how many pairs are connected, and if it supports flip-over and other compliance issues is non-trivial. There's a lot of mis-marked junk out there and having a reliable way to sort it out would be useful.



                  Have a look here to see how dire the situation really is: https://www.engadget.com/2016/02/03/benson-leung-chromebook-pixel-usb-type-c-test/



                  I'm going to assume you're interested in testing USB C cables, since it's possible to suss out previous USB 2.0 vs. 3.x types by the connectors types they have on them. Then again, a test for these non-C cables might be useful too. If you work out a test for Type C, the others are subsets.



                  Start by getting the actual USB 3.2 spec from USB-IF, here: https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb-32-specification-released-september-22-2017-and-ecns



                  As a basic test, using a breakout board at each end and checking end-to-end with a multimeter would be the way to do it. You would check for continuity on each possible signal pair:



                  • USB 2.0: DM/DP

                  • USB '3.0 / 3.1' (one SS pair): DM/DP, SSTX+/SSTX-, SSRX+/SSRX-

                  • USB 3.2 Gen 2 (two SS pairs): DM/DP, SSTX1+/SSTX1-, SSRX1+/SSRX1-, SSTX2+/SSTX2-, SSRX2+/SSRX2-

                  As an improvement you could use a TDR reflection method, like some LAN cable testers use. This would also tell you if the cable is the right impedance.



                  More about TDR testing here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/test-methods/time-domain-reflectometer-tdr/what-is-a-tdr.php



                  Example LAN cable tester here: https://www.cablestogo.com/product/39002/lansmart-tdr-cable-tester



                  Certifcation-level testing here: https://www.keysight.com/upload/cmc_upload/All/USB_3_0_test_solution_overview.pdf



                  If you're thinking to make a product I think making a continuity tester board would be useful. The tester would terminate the cable at one end, and test for continuity at the other using a microcontroller to measure it. This would be able to reliably distinguish if the cable has the right number of of pairs.



                  Example commercial USB test product: https://www.totalphase.com/blog/2018/09/tools-can-use-test-analyze-functions-power-delivery-usb-type-c-cables/



                  It would be good to also check shield continuity as a separate test. It's supposed to be isolated from signal ground, but still present, and it's an area where many shoddy vendors will cheat.



                  (To the other posters - think about how you would do incoming inspection / acceptance on cables you bought for your product. You'd do something like this, and maybe even take the cable apart too.)






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This is an interesting problem, as there are now a proliferation of similar-looking cable types with the introduction of USB 3.x and the Type C connector. Determining how many pairs are connected, and if it supports flip-over and other compliance issues is non-trivial. There's a lot of mis-marked junk out there and having a reliable way to sort it out would be useful.



                  Have a look here to see how dire the situation really is: https://www.engadget.com/2016/02/03/benson-leung-chromebook-pixel-usb-type-c-test/



                  I'm going to assume you're interested in testing USB C cables, since it's possible to suss out previous USB 2.0 vs. 3.x types by the connectors types they have on them. Then again, a test for these non-C cables might be useful too. If you work out a test for Type C, the others are subsets.



                  Start by getting the actual USB 3.2 spec from USB-IF, here: https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb-32-specification-released-september-22-2017-and-ecns



                  As a basic test, using a breakout board at each end and checking end-to-end with a multimeter would be the way to do it. You would check for continuity on each possible signal pair:



                  • USB 2.0: DM/DP

                  • USB '3.0 / 3.1' (one SS pair): DM/DP, SSTX+/SSTX-, SSRX+/SSRX-

                  • USB 3.2 Gen 2 (two SS pairs): DM/DP, SSTX1+/SSTX1-, SSRX1+/SSRX1-, SSTX2+/SSTX2-, SSRX2+/SSRX2-

                  As an improvement you could use a TDR reflection method, like some LAN cable testers use. This would also tell you if the cable is the right impedance.



                  More about TDR testing here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/test-methods/time-domain-reflectometer-tdr/what-is-a-tdr.php



                  Example LAN cable tester here: https://www.cablestogo.com/product/39002/lansmart-tdr-cable-tester



                  Certifcation-level testing here: https://www.keysight.com/upload/cmc_upload/All/USB_3_0_test_solution_overview.pdf



                  If you're thinking to make a product I think making a continuity tester board would be useful. The tester would terminate the cable at one end, and test for continuity at the other using a microcontroller to measure it. This would be able to reliably distinguish if the cable has the right number of of pairs.



                  Example commercial USB test product: https://www.totalphase.com/blog/2018/09/tools-can-use-test-analyze-functions-power-delivery-usb-type-c-cables/



                  It would be good to also check shield continuity as a separate test. It's supposed to be isolated from signal ground, but still present, and it's an area where many shoddy vendors will cheat.



                  (To the other posters - think about how you would do incoming inspection / acceptance on cables you bought for your product. You'd do something like this, and maybe even take the cable apart too.)







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 6 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  hacktasticalhacktastical

                  4,2665 silver badges21 bronze badges




                  4,2665 silver badges21 bronze badges






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f453491%2fhow-do-we-test-and-determine-if-a-usb-cableconnector-is-version-2-3-0-or-3-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367