Do the eight axioms of vector space imply closure?Does a vector space need to be closed?difference between vector space and subspace of vector spaceHow to determine vector space?Linear Algebra: Vector Space, Standard OperationSubspaces: Does closure under scalar multiplication imply additive identity?Why is the following set not a vector space?Intuitive idea of Vector space of functionA counterexample that shows addition and scalar multiplication is not enough for a vector space?Do matrices always represent vector spaces?Verifying a Vector SpaceHow $C[a, b]$ satisfies the axioms of vector space

Outer Class can have how many inner class(es)

Why don't modern jet engines use forced exhaust mixing?

Unsolved Problems due to Lack of Computational Power

Vegetarian dishes on Russian trains (European part)

When does The Truman Show take place?

Do living authors still get paid royalties for their old work?

What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?

Expand def in write18

Meaning of words заштырить and отштырить

Postdoc interview - somewhat positive reply but no news?

Are there categories whose internal hom is somewhat 'exotic'?

What is bodily formation? Does it refer to the breath or the body?

Does git delete empty folders?

From France west coast to Portugal via ship?

Inset Square From a Rectangular Face

Show two plots together: a two dimensional curve tangent to the maxima of a three dimensional plot

Levenshtein Neighbours

Playing a fast but quiet Alberti bass

Number of matrices with bounded products of rows and columns

Did they show Truman doing private things (toilet, etc) when filming him for 24 hours, 7 days a week?

Land Registry Clause

What's the point of writing that I know will never be used or read?

What is "super" in superphosphate?

Quick destruction of a helium filled airship?



Do the eight axioms of vector space imply closure?


Does a vector space need to be closed?difference between vector space and subspace of vector spaceHow to determine vector space?Linear Algebra: Vector Space, Standard OperationSubspaces: Does closure under scalar multiplication imply additive identity?Why is the following set not a vector space?Intuitive idea of Vector space of functionA counterexample that shows addition and scalar multiplication is not enough for a vector space?Do matrices always represent vector spaces?Verifying a Vector SpaceHow $C[a, b]$ satisfies the axioms of vector space






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.



Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.



But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?



I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.



Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.



But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?



I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.



Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.



But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?



I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.



Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.



But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?



I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









dmtri

1,8212 gold badges5 silver badges21 bronze badges




1,8212 gold badges5 silver badges21 bronze badges










asked 11 hours ago









JOHN JOHN

5111 silver badge10 bronze badges




5111 silver badge10 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago















$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".



He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
    $endgroup$
    – G Tony Jacobs
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write



$$ f: V times V to V$$



and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.



Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.



Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.



But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to



$$cdot(alpha,v)$$



In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,



$$ alpha vec v$$



Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3326972%2fdo-the-eight-axioms-of-vector-space-imply-closure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".



    He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
      $endgroup$
      – G Tony Jacobs
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
      $endgroup$
      – Shahab
      10 hours ago















    8












    $begingroup$

    Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".



    He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
      $endgroup$
      – G Tony Jacobs
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
      $endgroup$
      – Shahab
      10 hours ago













    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".



    He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".



    He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 10 hours ago









    Jamie RadcliffeJamie Radcliffe

    5263 silver badges5 bronze badges




    5263 silver badges5 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
      $endgroup$
      – G Tony Jacobs
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
      $endgroup$
      – Shahab
      10 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
      $endgroup$
      – JOHN
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
      $endgroup$
      – G Tony Jacobs
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
      $endgroup$
      – Shahab
      10 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
    $endgroup$
    – JOHN
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
    $endgroup$
    – G Tony Jacobs
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
    $endgroup$
    – G Tony Jacobs
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
    $endgroup$
    – Shahab
    10 hours ago













    1












    $begingroup$

    The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write



    $$ f: V times V to V$$



    and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.



    Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.



    Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.



    But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to



    $$cdot(alpha,v)$$



    In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,



    $$ alpha vec v$$



    Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      1












      $begingroup$

      The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write



      $$ f: V times V to V$$



      and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.



      Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.



      Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.



      But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to



      $$cdot(alpha,v)$$



      In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,



      $$ alpha vec v$$



      Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write



        $$ f: V times V to V$$



        and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.



        Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.



        Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.



        But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to



        $$cdot(alpha,v)$$



        In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,



        $$ alpha vec v$$



        Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write



        $$ f: V times V to V$$



        and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.



        Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.



        Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.



        But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to



        $$cdot(alpha,v)$$



        In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,



        $$ alpha vec v$$



        Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt

        5,3851 gold badge9 silver badges30 bronze badges




        5,3851 gold badge9 silver badges30 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3326972%2fdo-the-eight-axioms-of-vector-space-imply-closure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її