Do the eight axioms of vector space imply closure?Does a vector space need to be closed?difference between vector space and subspace of vector spaceHow to determine vector space?Linear Algebra: Vector Space, Standard OperationSubspaces: Does closure under scalar multiplication imply additive identity?Why is the following set not a vector space?Intuitive idea of Vector space of functionA counterexample that shows addition and scalar multiplication is not enough for a vector space?Do matrices always represent vector spaces?Verifying a Vector SpaceHow $C[a, b]$ satisfies the axioms of vector space
Outer Class can have how many inner class(es)
Why don't modern jet engines use forced exhaust mixing?
Unsolved Problems due to Lack of Computational Power
Vegetarian dishes on Russian trains (European part)
When does The Truman Show take place?
Do living authors still get paid royalties for their old work?
What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?
Expand def in write18
Meaning of words заштырить and отштырить
Postdoc interview - somewhat positive reply but no news?
Are there categories whose internal hom is somewhat 'exotic'?
What is bodily formation? Does it refer to the breath or the body?
Does git delete empty folders?
From France west coast to Portugal via ship?
Inset Square From a Rectangular Face
Show two plots together: a two dimensional curve tangent to the maxima of a three dimensional plot
Levenshtein Neighbours
Playing a fast but quiet Alberti bass
Number of matrices with bounded products of rows and columns
Did they show Truman doing private things (toilet, etc) when filming him for 24 hours, 7 days a week?
Land Registry Clause
What's the point of writing that I know will never be used or read?
What is "super" in superphosphate?
Quick destruction of a helium filled airship?
Do the eight axioms of vector space imply closure?
Does a vector space need to be closed?difference between vector space and subspace of vector spaceHow to determine vector space?Linear Algebra: Vector Space, Standard OperationSubspaces: Does closure under scalar multiplication imply additive identity?Why is the following set not a vector space?Intuitive idea of Vector space of functionA counterexample that shows addition and scalar multiplication is not enough for a vector space?Do matrices always represent vector spaces?Verifying a Vector SpaceHow $C[a, b]$ satisfies the axioms of vector space
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.
Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.
But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?
I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.
Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.
But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?
I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.
Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.
But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?
I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
This post is similar to my question but I do not quite understand the explanation.
Usually, when we try to prove whether a set is a vector space, we will check closure on summation and multiplication, as well as the axioms of vector space.
But, why books like Linear Algebra Done Wrong, when they talk about vector space, they only talk about the 8 axioms?
I am wondering if it is somewhere inside definitions or from the 8 axioms.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited 10 hours ago
dmtri
1,8212 gold badges5 silver badges21 bronze badges
1,8212 gold badges5 silver badges21 bronze badges
asked 11 hours ago
JOHN JOHN
5111 silver badge10 bronze badges
5111 silver badge10 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".
He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write
$$ f: V times V to V$$
and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.
Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.
Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.
But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to
$$cdot(alpha,v)$$
In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,
$$ alpha vec v$$
Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3326972%2fdo-the-eight-axioms-of-vector-space-imply-closure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".
He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".
He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".
He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
$endgroup$
Treil says "A vector space $V$ is a collection of objects, called vectors..., along with two operations, addition of vectors and multiplication by a number (scalar), such that ...".
He is using operation in sense of functions $+: V times Vto V$ and $ cdot: mathbb F times V to V$. In particular he is assuming closure as part of the defintion of an operation. When you need to check (for instance) that a subset $W$ of a vector space $V$ is itself a vector space (under the "same" operations), that means you need to check that $+$ and $cdot $ are in fact operations on $W$. This requires that you check $W$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
answered 10 hours ago
Jamie RadcliffeJamie Radcliffe
5263 silver badges5 bronze badges
5263 silver badges5 bronze badges
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
for the part $+: V times V mapsto V$, I am not familiar with the notation. Can you explain a bit more? Why $+$ is a function from $V times V$ to $V$?
$endgroup$
– JOHN
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Addition is a function that takes an ordered pair as an input, and gives a single element as output. In real numbers, for example, $+(3,5)=8$.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@John: You may want to read about binary operation for context.
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write
$$ f: V times V to V$$
and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.
Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.
Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.
But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to
$$cdot(alpha,v)$$
In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,
$$ alpha vec v$$
Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write
$$ f: V times V to V$$
and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.
Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.
Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.
But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to
$$cdot(alpha,v)$$
In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,
$$ alpha vec v$$
Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write
$$ f: V times V to V$$
and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.
Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.
Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.
But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to
$$cdot(alpha,v)$$
In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,
$$ alpha vec v$$
Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.
$endgroup$
The OP should note that we usually denote a function from $V times V$ to $V$ by a letter, say $f$, and write
$$ f: V times V to V$$
and denote the image of $(v,w) in V times V$ under $f$, an element in $V$, by $f(v,w)$.
Now if the operation is addition, $+$, of vectors, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $vec v + vec w$ as opposed to $+(v,w)$.
Again, we might want to use some letter $f$ to denote a function from $Bbb R times V$ to $V$, so that if $alpha in Bbb R$ and $v in V$ the image under $f$ of $(alpha,v)$ is denoted by $f(alpha,v)$.
But if the operation is scalar multiplication of a vector, $cdot$, we find it both convenient and illuminating to use $alpha cdot vec v$ as opposed to
$$cdot(alpha,v)$$
In fact, when multiplying by a scalar, the multiplication symbol is usually dropped when no ambiguity can occur, and juxtaposition of the scalar on the left of the vector is an appreciated notation/convention,
$$ alpha vec v$$
Note that in 1. Vector spaces of the book the author uses juxtaposition for scalar multiplication; see also the first example in 1.1. Examples.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt
5,3851 gold badge9 silver badges30 bronze badges
5,3851 gold badge9 silver badges30 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3326972%2fdo-the-eight-axioms-of-vector-space-imply-closure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Actually, there is only one axiom for vector spaces. "A vectors space over a field $k$ is an abelian group together with an action of $k$" ;)
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: How do you define action of $k$?
$endgroup$
– Shahab
10 hours ago