Have only girls been born for a long time in this village?Is it possible to influence the sex of a baby by controlling the mothers' diet?Do C-Section born babies have worse immune systems?Have fewer children with Down Syndrome been born in the United States?

Have only girls been born for a long time in this village?

Can 'in-' mean both 'in' and 'no'?

The Lucky House

Is there such a thing as too inconvenient?

How can I differentiate a eusocial organism from a hive mind collective?

How could Tony Stark wield the Infinity Nano Gauntlet - at all?

Land Registry Clause

Installing the original OS X version onto a Mac?

Have made several mistakes during the course of my PhD. Can't help but feel resentment. Can I get some advice about how to move forward?

Where is this New York City Broadway location from Fall 1958?

Can I check a small array of bools in one go?

On the relation between the asymptotics of a Dirichlet series' coefficients and the series' analytic continuability

Gofer work in exchange for Letter of Recommendation

Control GPIO pins from C

Hiker's Cabin Mystery | Pt. XV

awkward stretchy fingering

Check disk usage of files returned with spaces

What can I do to keep a threaded bolt from falling out of it’s slot

Could sidesticks be linked?

Why should care be taken while closing a capacitive circuit?

Unsolved Problems due to Lack of Computational Power

Why doesn't mathematics collapse down, even though humans quite often make mistakes in their proofs?

Are there reliable, formulaic ways to form chords on the guitar?

Why Won't my Serial Read value stay the same



Have only girls been born for a long time in this village?


Is it possible to influence the sex of a baby by controlling the mothers' diet?Do C-Section born babies have worse immune systems?Have fewer children with Down Syndrome been born in the United States?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















German media has reported that a village in Poland has had only girls born for the last decade:




The head of the parish promises a reward, the Catholic village priest asks for God's help: In the Polish village of 300 souls, Mistitz, no boys have been born for almost ten years.




Source: "Mistitz in Polen – Dorf ohne Jungen", tagesschau Stand: 17.08.2019 11:43



How is that possible that there are no boys born? Statistically, it seems to me to be nearly impossible. Is this real, or is it a publicity gag or something else?



English media has also reported on the village: "Girls only: Tiny Polish village of 300 people waits for first birth of a boy for nearly a DECADE", Daily Mail










share|improve this question









New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    For most of us that can't understand German, could you please flesh out some details and a clear-cut verifiable claim from the article? And of course it'd be near impossible, raising suspicion, but not impossible.

    – M.A.R.
    12 hours ago






  • 4





    Is it statistically impossible? With my German, I couldn't find the number of births anywhere in the article. But the village population seems to be 300. So I'd guess at 25 kids, all female. The odds of that happening by chance in any one village is 1 in 2^25 or 1 in 33 million. But there are a couple of million villages in the world, so the odds of one somewhere with 25 consecutive female births is about 1 in 15 - and if there is one, that is the one that makes the news. Unlikely, but not impossible. And if in fact there have only been 20 births the odds are more like 1 in 2.

    – Jack B
    12 hours ago


















7















German media has reported that a village in Poland has had only girls born for the last decade:




The head of the parish promises a reward, the Catholic village priest asks for God's help: In the Polish village of 300 souls, Mistitz, no boys have been born for almost ten years.




Source: "Mistitz in Polen – Dorf ohne Jungen", tagesschau Stand: 17.08.2019 11:43



How is that possible that there are no boys born? Statistically, it seems to me to be nearly impossible. Is this real, or is it a publicity gag or something else?



English media has also reported on the village: "Girls only: Tiny Polish village of 300 people waits for first birth of a boy for nearly a DECADE", Daily Mail










share|improve this question









New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    For most of us that can't understand German, could you please flesh out some details and a clear-cut verifiable claim from the article? And of course it'd be near impossible, raising suspicion, but not impossible.

    – M.A.R.
    12 hours ago






  • 4





    Is it statistically impossible? With my German, I couldn't find the number of births anywhere in the article. But the village population seems to be 300. So I'd guess at 25 kids, all female. The odds of that happening by chance in any one village is 1 in 2^25 or 1 in 33 million. But there are a couple of million villages in the world, so the odds of one somewhere with 25 consecutive female births is about 1 in 15 - and if there is one, that is the one that makes the news. Unlikely, but not impossible. And if in fact there have only been 20 births the odds are more like 1 in 2.

    – Jack B
    12 hours ago














7












7








7








German media has reported that a village in Poland has had only girls born for the last decade:




The head of the parish promises a reward, the Catholic village priest asks for God's help: In the Polish village of 300 souls, Mistitz, no boys have been born for almost ten years.




Source: "Mistitz in Polen – Dorf ohne Jungen", tagesschau Stand: 17.08.2019 11:43



How is that possible that there are no boys born? Statistically, it seems to me to be nearly impossible. Is this real, or is it a publicity gag or something else?



English media has also reported on the village: "Girls only: Tiny Polish village of 300 people waits for first birth of a boy for nearly a DECADE", Daily Mail










share|improve this question









New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











German media has reported that a village in Poland has had only girls born for the last decade:




The head of the parish promises a reward, the Catholic village priest asks for God's help: In the Polish village of 300 souls, Mistitz, no boys have been born for almost ten years.




Source: "Mistitz in Polen – Dorf ohne Jungen", tagesschau Stand: 17.08.2019 11:43



How is that possible that there are no boys born? Statistically, it seems to me to be nearly impossible. Is this real, or is it a publicity gag or something else?



English media has also reported on the village: "Girls only: Tiny Polish village of 300 people waits for first birth of a boy for nearly a DECADE", Daily Mail







human-reproduction birth






share|improve this question









New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









HDE 226868

6,3681 gold badge41 silver badges53 bronze badges




6,3681 gold badge41 silver badges53 bronze badges






New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 13 hours ago









J. DoeJ. Doe

1306 bronze badges




1306 bronze badges




New contributor



J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




J. Doe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 3





    For most of us that can't understand German, could you please flesh out some details and a clear-cut verifiable claim from the article? And of course it'd be near impossible, raising suspicion, but not impossible.

    – M.A.R.
    12 hours ago






  • 4





    Is it statistically impossible? With my German, I couldn't find the number of births anywhere in the article. But the village population seems to be 300. So I'd guess at 25 kids, all female. The odds of that happening by chance in any one village is 1 in 2^25 or 1 in 33 million. But there are a couple of million villages in the world, so the odds of one somewhere with 25 consecutive female births is about 1 in 15 - and if there is one, that is the one that makes the news. Unlikely, but not impossible. And if in fact there have only been 20 births the odds are more like 1 in 2.

    – Jack B
    12 hours ago













  • 3





    For most of us that can't understand German, could you please flesh out some details and a clear-cut verifiable claim from the article? And of course it'd be near impossible, raising suspicion, but not impossible.

    – M.A.R.
    12 hours ago






  • 4





    Is it statistically impossible? With my German, I couldn't find the number of births anywhere in the article. But the village population seems to be 300. So I'd guess at 25 kids, all female. The odds of that happening by chance in any one village is 1 in 2^25 or 1 in 33 million. But there are a couple of million villages in the world, so the odds of one somewhere with 25 consecutive female births is about 1 in 15 - and if there is one, that is the one that makes the news. Unlikely, but not impossible. And if in fact there have only been 20 births the odds are more like 1 in 2.

    – Jack B
    12 hours ago








3




3





For most of us that can't understand German, could you please flesh out some details and a clear-cut verifiable claim from the article? And of course it'd be near impossible, raising suspicion, but not impossible.

– M.A.R.
12 hours ago





For most of us that can't understand German, could you please flesh out some details and a clear-cut verifiable claim from the article? And of course it'd be near impossible, raising suspicion, but not impossible.

– M.A.R.
12 hours ago




4




4





Is it statistically impossible? With my German, I couldn't find the number of births anywhere in the article. But the village population seems to be 300. So I'd guess at 25 kids, all female. The odds of that happening by chance in any one village is 1 in 2^25 or 1 in 33 million. But there are a couple of million villages in the world, so the odds of one somewhere with 25 consecutive female births is about 1 in 15 - and if there is one, that is the one that makes the news. Unlikely, but not impossible. And if in fact there have only been 20 births the odds are more like 1 in 2.

– Jack B
12 hours ago






Is it statistically impossible? With my German, I couldn't find the number of births anywhere in the article. But the village population seems to be 300. So I'd guess at 25 kids, all female. The odds of that happening by chance in any one village is 1 in 2^25 or 1 in 33 million. But there are a couple of million villages in the world, so the odds of one somewhere with 25 consecutive female births is about 1 in 15 - and if there is one, that is the one that makes the news. Unlikely, but not impossible. And if in fact there have only been 20 births the odds are more like 1 in 2.

– Jack B
12 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















19














Support for the claim appears to rest on explicit birth records, although interviews with families in the village were also conducted. The New York Post writes (emphasis mine)




According to birth records, there hasn’t been a boy born there since 2009, though 12 girls have come into the world in that time frame.




I did some digging and was unable to access said records (not wholly surprising, I suppose), or more details on them. It appears that media conducted interviews with families in the area to back this up; the Post's phrasing is ambiguous, but it indicates that boys in general are less common in the town:




Most family interviewed by the press reported having daughters, often more than one.




The Associated Press cites Krystyna Zydziak, the "community head", as saying that ten girls have been born since 2010; the media also talked with various village and local officials, including the county mayor.



Now, the crux of my answer - aside from indicating the likely veracity of the claim - is that none of this should be overly surprising. The village is small (current population 272, according to the New York Times), and therefore there have only been a small number of births in the last decade (12, according to the Post and other media, e.g. Today and Fox News).



If the chance of a baby being a boy and the chance of a baby being a girl are equal, then the odds of 12 consecutive births all yielding girls is (1/2)12 = 0.0244%. That's small, but when you consider that there are many towns and villages in the world, it shouldn't be surprising that at some point, just from randomness, 12 girls are born in a row in a given town. The odds of the same thing happening with 12 boys (which would also be widely reported) are identical, so the odds of 12 consecutive babies having the same sex is 0.0488%. (The Daily Mail notes that in 2017, 207,000 boys were born in Poland, as were 196,000 girls, making the odds slightly lower.)



Of course, more than randomness could be at play; environmental or cultural factors could be responsible. It's possible that maternal diet pre-conception (not post-conception, of course) can play a role. Several studies have claimed that the sex of a child can slightly be influenced by dietary factors:




  • Breakfast cereals, salt and potassium may increase the chances of having a boy (Mathews 2008))


  • A maternal high-fat diet may lead to more male offspring in mice (Mao et al. 2010)

That said, these results are contentious and not well-supported. I mention them only because the Daily Mail article you mentioned wrote that scientists "have offered to conduct research to investigate the unique situation", and perhaps any environmental factors will be turned up if that research happens.






share|improve this answer






















  • 7





    To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

    – Jack B
    10 hours ago






  • 6





    You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

    – gnasher729
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

    – IMil
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

    – HDE 226868
    3 hours ago







  • 3





    "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    3 hours ago



















3














Generally if such statistics would exist, they would be available to every Polish citizen per freedom of information act. Alas, there's no such statistics in Poland. While the claim might be true, citing birth records is a fake source. I know well which sources are available and who can get it, because I'm citizen of Poland who worked for years as a reporter who processed statistical data about Polish cities and villages and who works often with freedom of information requests. In fact I have friends who tried to get exact statistics (i.e. sex) for Poland and it's impossible (i.e. there's no current statistics and they are for bigger administrative divisions).



The more detailed answer:



  1. I couldn't find reliable information about parish or priest offering a reward. The head of the gmina (higher administrative division, just above the village or, to be precise - above sołectwo) - Rajmund Frischko - promises the reward. Also he asked experts (mainly in the genetics field) for help, not God. Some experts already promised to investigate this case[1], but it won't help much, because...


  2. The statistics aren't clear - in Poland de facto the official home address doesn't have to be the same as real; there's law forbidding such case, but it's a dead law - at least for now. Birth records are administrative thing, they don't show reality - especially with that dead law where so many people live in different place than it shows up in registers/in the id card. But even if somehow real address would always fit the official one then...


  3. There's no official statistics for the claims of the press. Sex statistics are given only for a higher administrative division (i.e. gmina Cisek) and the last published statistics is from 2014 - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Piramida_wieku_Gmina_Cisek.png - the blue bars are women, black are men. That's the only reliable data so far.

  4. As it's not a job of sołtys (head of the village) or wójt (head of the gmina) to process such statistics, so they also don't have a way to be sure except rumors.

  5. Even the population of the village given in the Internet is a rumor. The last statistics are from 2007 (328 people). There weren't any publications about that village in 2016, so press made that up.[3]

Sources and notes:



[1] https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/plec-dziecka-we-wsi-miejsce-odrzanskie-rodza-sie-same-dziewczynki-chlopiec-byl-ale-9-lat-temu-6404238660814465a



[2] https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-w-gminach-wedlug-stanu-w-dniu-31-12-2011-r-bilans-opracowany-w-oparciu-o-wyniki-nsp-2011,2,1.html



[3] there are a lot of databases which probably use some statistical methods or user input - they are mostly incorrect - either coordinates, population etc. It feels like "we don't have data, but we want it, so let's put something random here". The only reliable data is on https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/






share|improve this answer








New contributor



Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    19














    Support for the claim appears to rest on explicit birth records, although interviews with families in the village were also conducted. The New York Post writes (emphasis mine)




    According to birth records, there hasn’t been a boy born there since 2009, though 12 girls have come into the world in that time frame.




    I did some digging and was unable to access said records (not wholly surprising, I suppose), or more details on them. It appears that media conducted interviews with families in the area to back this up; the Post's phrasing is ambiguous, but it indicates that boys in general are less common in the town:




    Most family interviewed by the press reported having daughters, often more than one.




    The Associated Press cites Krystyna Zydziak, the "community head", as saying that ten girls have been born since 2010; the media also talked with various village and local officials, including the county mayor.



    Now, the crux of my answer - aside from indicating the likely veracity of the claim - is that none of this should be overly surprising. The village is small (current population 272, according to the New York Times), and therefore there have only been a small number of births in the last decade (12, according to the Post and other media, e.g. Today and Fox News).



    If the chance of a baby being a boy and the chance of a baby being a girl are equal, then the odds of 12 consecutive births all yielding girls is (1/2)12 = 0.0244%. That's small, but when you consider that there are many towns and villages in the world, it shouldn't be surprising that at some point, just from randomness, 12 girls are born in a row in a given town. The odds of the same thing happening with 12 boys (which would also be widely reported) are identical, so the odds of 12 consecutive babies having the same sex is 0.0488%. (The Daily Mail notes that in 2017, 207,000 boys were born in Poland, as were 196,000 girls, making the odds slightly lower.)



    Of course, more than randomness could be at play; environmental or cultural factors could be responsible. It's possible that maternal diet pre-conception (not post-conception, of course) can play a role. Several studies have claimed that the sex of a child can slightly be influenced by dietary factors:




    • Breakfast cereals, salt and potassium may increase the chances of having a boy (Mathews 2008))


    • A maternal high-fat diet may lead to more male offspring in mice (Mao et al. 2010)

    That said, these results are contentious and not well-supported. I mention them only because the Daily Mail article you mentioned wrote that scientists "have offered to conduct research to investigate the unique situation", and perhaps any environmental factors will be turned up if that research happens.






    share|improve this answer






















    • 7





      To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

      – Jack B
      10 hours ago






    • 6





      You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

      – gnasher729
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

      – IMil
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

      – HDE 226868
      3 hours ago







    • 3





      "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

      – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
      3 hours ago
















    19














    Support for the claim appears to rest on explicit birth records, although interviews with families in the village were also conducted. The New York Post writes (emphasis mine)




    According to birth records, there hasn’t been a boy born there since 2009, though 12 girls have come into the world in that time frame.




    I did some digging and was unable to access said records (not wholly surprising, I suppose), or more details on them. It appears that media conducted interviews with families in the area to back this up; the Post's phrasing is ambiguous, but it indicates that boys in general are less common in the town:




    Most family interviewed by the press reported having daughters, often more than one.




    The Associated Press cites Krystyna Zydziak, the "community head", as saying that ten girls have been born since 2010; the media also talked with various village and local officials, including the county mayor.



    Now, the crux of my answer - aside from indicating the likely veracity of the claim - is that none of this should be overly surprising. The village is small (current population 272, according to the New York Times), and therefore there have only been a small number of births in the last decade (12, according to the Post and other media, e.g. Today and Fox News).



    If the chance of a baby being a boy and the chance of a baby being a girl are equal, then the odds of 12 consecutive births all yielding girls is (1/2)12 = 0.0244%. That's small, but when you consider that there are many towns and villages in the world, it shouldn't be surprising that at some point, just from randomness, 12 girls are born in a row in a given town. The odds of the same thing happening with 12 boys (which would also be widely reported) are identical, so the odds of 12 consecutive babies having the same sex is 0.0488%. (The Daily Mail notes that in 2017, 207,000 boys were born in Poland, as were 196,000 girls, making the odds slightly lower.)



    Of course, more than randomness could be at play; environmental or cultural factors could be responsible. It's possible that maternal diet pre-conception (not post-conception, of course) can play a role. Several studies have claimed that the sex of a child can slightly be influenced by dietary factors:




    • Breakfast cereals, salt and potassium may increase the chances of having a boy (Mathews 2008))


    • A maternal high-fat diet may lead to more male offspring in mice (Mao et al. 2010)

    That said, these results are contentious and not well-supported. I mention them only because the Daily Mail article you mentioned wrote that scientists "have offered to conduct research to investigate the unique situation", and perhaps any environmental factors will be turned up if that research happens.






    share|improve this answer






















    • 7





      To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

      – Jack B
      10 hours ago






    • 6





      You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

      – gnasher729
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

      – IMil
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

      – HDE 226868
      3 hours ago







    • 3





      "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

      – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
      3 hours ago














    19












    19








    19







    Support for the claim appears to rest on explicit birth records, although interviews with families in the village were also conducted. The New York Post writes (emphasis mine)




    According to birth records, there hasn’t been a boy born there since 2009, though 12 girls have come into the world in that time frame.




    I did some digging and was unable to access said records (not wholly surprising, I suppose), or more details on them. It appears that media conducted interviews with families in the area to back this up; the Post's phrasing is ambiguous, but it indicates that boys in general are less common in the town:




    Most family interviewed by the press reported having daughters, often more than one.




    The Associated Press cites Krystyna Zydziak, the "community head", as saying that ten girls have been born since 2010; the media also talked with various village and local officials, including the county mayor.



    Now, the crux of my answer - aside from indicating the likely veracity of the claim - is that none of this should be overly surprising. The village is small (current population 272, according to the New York Times), and therefore there have only been a small number of births in the last decade (12, according to the Post and other media, e.g. Today and Fox News).



    If the chance of a baby being a boy and the chance of a baby being a girl are equal, then the odds of 12 consecutive births all yielding girls is (1/2)12 = 0.0244%. That's small, but when you consider that there are many towns and villages in the world, it shouldn't be surprising that at some point, just from randomness, 12 girls are born in a row in a given town. The odds of the same thing happening with 12 boys (which would also be widely reported) are identical, so the odds of 12 consecutive babies having the same sex is 0.0488%. (The Daily Mail notes that in 2017, 207,000 boys were born in Poland, as were 196,000 girls, making the odds slightly lower.)



    Of course, more than randomness could be at play; environmental or cultural factors could be responsible. It's possible that maternal diet pre-conception (not post-conception, of course) can play a role. Several studies have claimed that the sex of a child can slightly be influenced by dietary factors:




    • Breakfast cereals, salt and potassium may increase the chances of having a boy (Mathews 2008))


    • A maternal high-fat diet may lead to more male offspring in mice (Mao et al. 2010)

    That said, these results are contentious and not well-supported. I mention them only because the Daily Mail article you mentioned wrote that scientists "have offered to conduct research to investigate the unique situation", and perhaps any environmental factors will be turned up if that research happens.






    share|improve this answer















    Support for the claim appears to rest on explicit birth records, although interviews with families in the village were also conducted. The New York Post writes (emphasis mine)




    According to birth records, there hasn’t been a boy born there since 2009, though 12 girls have come into the world in that time frame.




    I did some digging and was unable to access said records (not wholly surprising, I suppose), or more details on them. It appears that media conducted interviews with families in the area to back this up; the Post's phrasing is ambiguous, but it indicates that boys in general are less common in the town:




    Most family interviewed by the press reported having daughters, often more than one.




    The Associated Press cites Krystyna Zydziak, the "community head", as saying that ten girls have been born since 2010; the media also talked with various village and local officials, including the county mayor.



    Now, the crux of my answer - aside from indicating the likely veracity of the claim - is that none of this should be overly surprising. The village is small (current population 272, according to the New York Times), and therefore there have only been a small number of births in the last decade (12, according to the Post and other media, e.g. Today and Fox News).



    If the chance of a baby being a boy and the chance of a baby being a girl are equal, then the odds of 12 consecutive births all yielding girls is (1/2)12 = 0.0244%. That's small, but when you consider that there are many towns and villages in the world, it shouldn't be surprising that at some point, just from randomness, 12 girls are born in a row in a given town. The odds of the same thing happening with 12 boys (which would also be widely reported) are identical, so the odds of 12 consecutive babies having the same sex is 0.0488%. (The Daily Mail notes that in 2017, 207,000 boys were born in Poland, as were 196,000 girls, making the odds slightly lower.)



    Of course, more than randomness could be at play; environmental or cultural factors could be responsible. It's possible that maternal diet pre-conception (not post-conception, of course) can play a role. Several studies have claimed that the sex of a child can slightly be influenced by dietary factors:




    • Breakfast cereals, salt and potassium may increase the chances of having a boy (Mathews 2008))


    • A maternal high-fat diet may lead to more male offspring in mice (Mao et al. 2010)

    That said, these results are contentious and not well-supported. I mention them only because the Daily Mail article you mentioned wrote that scientists "have offered to conduct research to investigate the unique situation", and perhaps any environmental factors will be turned up if that research happens.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 11 hours ago









    HDE 226868HDE 226868

    6,3681 gold badge41 silver badges53 bronze badges




    6,3681 gold badge41 silver badges53 bronze badges










    • 7





      To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

      – Jack B
      10 hours ago






    • 6





      You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

      – gnasher729
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

      – IMil
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

      – HDE 226868
      3 hours ago







    • 3





      "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

      – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
      3 hours ago













    • 7





      To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

      – Jack B
      10 hours ago






    • 6





      You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

      – gnasher729
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

      – IMil
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

      – HDE 226868
      3 hours ago







    • 3





      "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

      – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
      3 hours ago








    7




    7





    To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

    – Jack B
    10 hours ago





    To add a little more to the statistics... If odds of a run of 12 births being all female is (as correctly calculated in this answer) 1 in 4096. So if there are 2.5 million villages in the world, one would expect about 600 where this happened. There are probably a few in every major country.

    – Jack B
    10 hours ago




    6




    6





    You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

    – gnasher729
    8 hours ago





    You should probably also add the odds of twelve boys in a row, since that would be equally reported as a coincidence. So the chance is 1 in 2048.

    – gnasher729
    8 hours ago




    1




    1





    It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

    – IMil
    3 hours ago





    It would probably be better to remove all references to dietary factors, because statistics alone is enough to explain the "mystery" away.

    – IMil
    3 hours ago




    1




    1





    @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

    – HDE 226868
    3 hours ago






    @Oddthinking The Post cites birth records as the basis for its article; unless those records can be accessed directly, I see no more direct way to check the claim (although I'm open to suggestions!).

    – HDE 226868
    3 hours ago





    3




    3





    "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    3 hours ago






    "a baby’s sex depended on the woman’s diet, which should be rich in calcium if she wants to have a boy" - that claim is significantly more contentious than the one in the question

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    3 hours ago














    3














    Generally if such statistics would exist, they would be available to every Polish citizen per freedom of information act. Alas, there's no such statistics in Poland. While the claim might be true, citing birth records is a fake source. I know well which sources are available and who can get it, because I'm citizen of Poland who worked for years as a reporter who processed statistical data about Polish cities and villages and who works often with freedom of information requests. In fact I have friends who tried to get exact statistics (i.e. sex) for Poland and it's impossible (i.e. there's no current statistics and they are for bigger administrative divisions).



    The more detailed answer:



    1. I couldn't find reliable information about parish or priest offering a reward. The head of the gmina (higher administrative division, just above the village or, to be precise - above sołectwo) - Rajmund Frischko - promises the reward. Also he asked experts (mainly in the genetics field) for help, not God. Some experts already promised to investigate this case[1], but it won't help much, because...


    2. The statistics aren't clear - in Poland de facto the official home address doesn't have to be the same as real; there's law forbidding such case, but it's a dead law - at least for now. Birth records are administrative thing, they don't show reality - especially with that dead law where so many people live in different place than it shows up in registers/in the id card. But even if somehow real address would always fit the official one then...


    3. There's no official statistics for the claims of the press. Sex statistics are given only for a higher administrative division (i.e. gmina Cisek) and the last published statistics is from 2014 - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Piramida_wieku_Gmina_Cisek.png - the blue bars are women, black are men. That's the only reliable data so far.

    4. As it's not a job of sołtys (head of the village) or wójt (head of the gmina) to process such statistics, so they also don't have a way to be sure except rumors.

    5. Even the population of the village given in the Internet is a rumor. The last statistics are from 2007 (328 people). There weren't any publications about that village in 2016, so press made that up.[3]

    Sources and notes:



    [1] https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/plec-dziecka-we-wsi-miejsce-odrzanskie-rodza-sie-same-dziewczynki-chlopiec-byl-ale-9-lat-temu-6404238660814465a



    [2] https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-w-gminach-wedlug-stanu-w-dniu-31-12-2011-r-bilans-opracowany-w-oparciu-o-wyniki-nsp-2011,2,1.html



    [3] there are a lot of databases which probably use some statistical methods or user input - they are mostly incorrect - either coordinates, population etc. It feels like "we don't have data, but we want it, so let's put something random here". The only reliable data is on https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      3














      Generally if such statistics would exist, they would be available to every Polish citizen per freedom of information act. Alas, there's no such statistics in Poland. While the claim might be true, citing birth records is a fake source. I know well which sources are available and who can get it, because I'm citizen of Poland who worked for years as a reporter who processed statistical data about Polish cities and villages and who works often with freedom of information requests. In fact I have friends who tried to get exact statistics (i.e. sex) for Poland and it's impossible (i.e. there's no current statistics and they are for bigger administrative divisions).



      The more detailed answer:



      1. I couldn't find reliable information about parish or priest offering a reward. The head of the gmina (higher administrative division, just above the village or, to be precise - above sołectwo) - Rajmund Frischko - promises the reward. Also he asked experts (mainly in the genetics field) for help, not God. Some experts already promised to investigate this case[1], but it won't help much, because...


      2. The statistics aren't clear - in Poland de facto the official home address doesn't have to be the same as real; there's law forbidding such case, but it's a dead law - at least for now. Birth records are administrative thing, they don't show reality - especially with that dead law where so many people live in different place than it shows up in registers/in the id card. But even if somehow real address would always fit the official one then...


      3. There's no official statistics for the claims of the press. Sex statistics are given only for a higher administrative division (i.e. gmina Cisek) and the last published statistics is from 2014 - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Piramida_wieku_Gmina_Cisek.png - the blue bars are women, black are men. That's the only reliable data so far.

      4. As it's not a job of sołtys (head of the village) or wójt (head of the gmina) to process such statistics, so they also don't have a way to be sure except rumors.

      5. Even the population of the village given in the Internet is a rumor. The last statistics are from 2007 (328 people). There weren't any publications about that village in 2016, so press made that up.[3]

      Sources and notes:



      [1] https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/plec-dziecka-we-wsi-miejsce-odrzanskie-rodza-sie-same-dziewczynki-chlopiec-byl-ale-9-lat-temu-6404238660814465a



      [2] https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-w-gminach-wedlug-stanu-w-dniu-31-12-2011-r-bilans-opracowany-w-oparciu-o-wyniki-nsp-2011,2,1.html



      [3] there are a lot of databases which probably use some statistical methods or user input - they are mostly incorrect - either coordinates, population etc. It feels like "we don't have data, but we want it, so let's put something random here". The only reliable data is on https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor



      Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        3












        3








        3







        Generally if such statistics would exist, they would be available to every Polish citizen per freedom of information act. Alas, there's no such statistics in Poland. While the claim might be true, citing birth records is a fake source. I know well which sources are available and who can get it, because I'm citizen of Poland who worked for years as a reporter who processed statistical data about Polish cities and villages and who works often with freedom of information requests. In fact I have friends who tried to get exact statistics (i.e. sex) for Poland and it's impossible (i.e. there's no current statistics and they are for bigger administrative divisions).



        The more detailed answer:



        1. I couldn't find reliable information about parish or priest offering a reward. The head of the gmina (higher administrative division, just above the village or, to be precise - above sołectwo) - Rajmund Frischko - promises the reward. Also he asked experts (mainly in the genetics field) for help, not God. Some experts already promised to investigate this case[1], but it won't help much, because...


        2. The statistics aren't clear - in Poland de facto the official home address doesn't have to be the same as real; there's law forbidding such case, but it's a dead law - at least for now. Birth records are administrative thing, they don't show reality - especially with that dead law where so many people live in different place than it shows up in registers/in the id card. But even if somehow real address would always fit the official one then...


        3. There's no official statistics for the claims of the press. Sex statistics are given only for a higher administrative division (i.e. gmina Cisek) and the last published statistics is from 2014 - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Piramida_wieku_Gmina_Cisek.png - the blue bars are women, black are men. That's the only reliable data so far.

        4. As it's not a job of sołtys (head of the village) or wójt (head of the gmina) to process such statistics, so they also don't have a way to be sure except rumors.

        5. Even the population of the village given in the Internet is a rumor. The last statistics are from 2007 (328 people). There weren't any publications about that village in 2016, so press made that up.[3]

        Sources and notes:



        [1] https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/plec-dziecka-we-wsi-miejsce-odrzanskie-rodza-sie-same-dziewczynki-chlopiec-byl-ale-9-lat-temu-6404238660814465a



        [2] https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-w-gminach-wedlug-stanu-w-dniu-31-12-2011-r-bilans-opracowany-w-oparciu-o-wyniki-nsp-2011,2,1.html



        [3] there are a lot of databases which probably use some statistical methods or user input - they are mostly incorrect - either coordinates, population etc. It feels like "we don't have data, but we want it, so let's put something random here". The only reliable data is on https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Generally if such statistics would exist, they would be available to every Polish citizen per freedom of information act. Alas, there's no such statistics in Poland. While the claim might be true, citing birth records is a fake source. I know well which sources are available and who can get it, because I'm citizen of Poland who worked for years as a reporter who processed statistical data about Polish cities and villages and who works often with freedom of information requests. In fact I have friends who tried to get exact statistics (i.e. sex) for Poland and it's impossible (i.e. there's no current statistics and they are for bigger administrative divisions).



        The more detailed answer:



        1. I couldn't find reliable information about parish or priest offering a reward. The head of the gmina (higher administrative division, just above the village or, to be precise - above sołectwo) - Rajmund Frischko - promises the reward. Also he asked experts (mainly in the genetics field) for help, not God. Some experts already promised to investigate this case[1], but it won't help much, because...


        2. The statistics aren't clear - in Poland de facto the official home address doesn't have to be the same as real; there's law forbidding such case, but it's a dead law - at least for now. Birth records are administrative thing, they don't show reality - especially with that dead law where so many people live in different place than it shows up in registers/in the id card. But even if somehow real address would always fit the official one then...


        3. There's no official statistics for the claims of the press. Sex statistics are given only for a higher administrative division (i.e. gmina Cisek) and the last published statistics is from 2014 - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Piramida_wieku_Gmina_Cisek.png - the blue bars are women, black are men. That's the only reliable data so far.

        4. As it's not a job of sołtys (head of the village) or wójt (head of the gmina) to process such statistics, so they also don't have a way to be sure except rumors.

        5. Even the population of the village given in the Internet is a rumor. The last statistics are from 2007 (328 people). There weren't any publications about that village in 2016, so press made that up.[3]

        Sources and notes:



        [1] https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/plec-dziecka-we-wsi-miejsce-odrzanskie-rodza-sie-same-dziewczynki-chlopiec-byl-ale-9-lat-temu-6404238660814465a



        [2] https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/ludnosc-w-gminach-wedlug-stanu-w-dniu-31-12-2011-r-bilans-opracowany-w-oparciu-o-wyniki-nsp-2011,2,1.html



        [3] there are a lot of databases which probably use some statistical methods or user input - they are mostly incorrect - either coordinates, population etc. It feels like "we don't have data, but we want it, so let's put something random here". The only reliable data is on https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor



        Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        answered 29 mins ago









        KrzysiuKrzysiu

        312 bronze badges




        312 bronze badges




        New contributor



        Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




        New contributor




        Krzysiu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її