Reference for electronegativities of different metal oxidation statesReaction between potassium permanganate, alum, and sodium hydrogen sulfiteWhich plastic type is used inside dishwashers?What factors influence the resultant oxidation state of Fe in 3Ca(OH)2+2FeCL3?Oxidation states of iron in Roussin's saltsPredominance of III oxidation state for lanthanidesNomenclature of polyatomic ionsWhat are oxidation states used for?experimentally determine oxidation state of Iron compoundWhat are the magnetic properties of [Ni(S2C2Ph2)2]^z's 3 oxidation states?Stability of 3d metal fluorides and iodides in different oxidation states
Why is Drogon so much better in battle than Rhaegal and Viserion?
Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?
Parse a C++14 integer literal
What should I wear to go and sign an employment contract?
Would it be possible to set up a franchise in the ancient world?
Why did Varys explain his plans to Tyrion, even after it was clear he was unwilling?
Can't think of a good word or term to describe not feeling or thinking
What does this 'x' mean on the stem of the voice's note, above the notehead?
Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
Warped chessboard
Identification of a badge with Russian text
How to draw the following figure in Latex
Have the writers and actors of Game Of Thrones responded to its poor reception?
pwaS eht tirsf dna tasl setterl fo hace dorw
How to choose the correct exposure for flower photography?
Does a windmilling propeller create more drag than a stopped propeller in an engine out scenario
Good examples of "two is easy, three is hard" in computational sciences
How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?
Why is python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?
Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?
Latin words remembered from high school 50 years ago
Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?
Print characters from list with a For-loop
Better than Rembrandt
Reference for electronegativities of different metal oxidation states
Reaction between potassium permanganate, alum, and sodium hydrogen sulfiteWhich plastic type is used inside dishwashers?What factors influence the resultant oxidation state of Fe in 3Ca(OH)2+2FeCL3?Oxidation states of iron in Roussin's saltsPredominance of III oxidation state for lanthanidesNomenclature of polyatomic ionsWhat are oxidation states used for?experimentally determine oxidation state of Iron compoundWhat are the magnetic properties of [Ni(S2C2Ph2)2]^z's 3 oxidation states?Stability of 3d metal fluorides and iodides in different oxidation states
$begingroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference. 
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference.
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference.
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
$endgroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference.
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
edited 31 mins ago
orthocresol♦
41.2k7123254
41.2k7123254
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
asked 2 hours ago
M.O.M.O.
664
664
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115469%2freference-for-electronegativities-of-different-metal-oxidation-states%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
$endgroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
answered 1 hour ago
andselisk♦andselisk
21.3k772139
21.3k772139
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115469%2freference-for-electronegativities-of-different-metal-oxidation-states%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
