What halachos of mourning apply to a grandchild for his grandparent's death?What is the purpose of the laws of mourning?What types of hair - and whose hair - are included in mourning-related hair-cutting prohibitions?Is the mourning for a late relative dependent on the state of their relationship before death?Practical Halachas after death of a close relativeDoes a mourner tear one garment, or every garment he wears for a period of time?Throwing dust on head = common mourning ritual?Was it customary for there to be an annual lamentation for someone's death, e.g. the daughter of Jephthah? Details as to her mourning process?What is the origin and reason for mourners to sit on the floor or low seat?Are there special Halachos for homeowners?Do the stringencies for someone who is cremated apply if they didn’t specify/want to be cremated?
Reference for electronegativities of different metal oxidation states
How do we explain the use of a software on a math paper?
Vehemently against code formatting
What does it mean for a program to be 32 or 64 bit?
Bash - Execute two commands and get exit status 1 if first fails
How can sister protect herself from impulse purchases with a credit card?
Is it wise to pay off mortgage with 401k?
Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?
How could the B-29 bomber back up under its own power?
Gambler's Fallacy Dice
Why aren't satellites disintegrated even though they orbit earth within earth's Roche Limits?
Addressing an email
Would it be possible to set up a franchise in the ancient world?
Is there any official Lore on Keraptis the Wizard, apart from what is in White Plume Mountain?
Cycling to work - 30 mile return
Should I twist DC power and ground wires from a power supply?
How to fix "webpack Dev Server Invalid Options" in Vuejs
Can the bitcoin lightning network support more than 8 decimal places?
Precedent for disabled Kings
Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?
Chain rule instead of product rule
Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin
pwaS eht tirsf dna tasl setterl fo hace dorw
Why could the Lunar Ascent Engine be used only once?
What halachos of mourning apply to a grandchild for his grandparent's death?
What is the purpose of the laws of mourning?What types of hair - and whose hair - are included in mourning-related hair-cutting prohibitions?Is the mourning for a late relative dependent on the state of their relationship before death?Practical Halachas after death of a close relativeDoes a mourner tear one garment, or every garment he wears for a period of time?Throwing dust on head = common mourning ritual?Was it customary for there to be an annual lamentation for someone's death, e.g. the daughter of Jephthah? Details as to her mourning process?What is the origin and reason for mourners to sit on the floor or low seat?Are there special Halachos for homeowners?Do the stringencies for someone who is cremated apply if they didn’t specify/want to be cremated?
What halachos of mourning, if any, apply to a grandchild upon his or her grandparent's death? Do they tear keri'ah upon hearing of the grandparent's death? Do they sit shivah?
halacha mourning-aveilus
add a comment |
What halachos of mourning, if any, apply to a grandchild upon his or her grandparent's death? Do they tear keri'ah upon hearing of the grandparent's death? Do they sit shivah?
halacha mourning-aveilus
1
Unfortunate is the grandchild who never needed to mourn their grandparent.
– Double AA♦
4 hours ago
@DoubleAA Not exactly what I intended when saying that, but I see how my language lends itself to that. Will edit.
– DonielF
4 hours ago
add a comment |
What halachos of mourning, if any, apply to a grandchild upon his or her grandparent's death? Do they tear keri'ah upon hearing of the grandparent's death? Do they sit shivah?
halacha mourning-aveilus
What halachos of mourning, if any, apply to a grandchild upon his or her grandparent's death? Do they tear keri'ah upon hearing of the grandparent's death? Do they sit shivah?
halacha mourning-aveilus
halacha mourning-aveilus
edited 4 hours ago
DonielF
asked 5 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
18.1k12693
18.1k12693
1
Unfortunate is the grandchild who never needed to mourn their grandparent.
– Double AA♦
4 hours ago
@DoubleAA Not exactly what I intended when saying that, but I see how my language lends itself to that. Will edit.
– DonielF
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Unfortunate is the grandchild who never needed to mourn their grandparent.
– Double AA♦
4 hours ago
@DoubleAA Not exactly what I intended when saying that, but I see how my language lends itself to that. Will edit.
– DonielF
4 hours ago
1
1
Unfortunate is the grandchild who never needed to mourn their grandparent.
– Double AA♦
4 hours ago
Unfortunate is the grandchild who never needed to mourn their grandparent.
– Double AA♦
4 hours ago
@DoubleAA Not exactly what I intended when saying that, but I see how my language lends itself to that. Will edit.
– DonielF
4 hours ago
@DoubleAA Not exactly what I intended when saying that, but I see how my language lends itself to that. Will edit.
– DonielF
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Upon hearing bad news, one says the blessing ברוך אתה יקוק אלוקינו מלך העולם דיין האמת"" (OC 222:2).
Regarding mourning, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 374.6):
כל מי שמתאבל עליו מתאבל עמו אם מת לו מת ודוקא בעודו בפניו אבל שלא בפניו אין צריך לנהוג אבלות...: הגה וי"א דהאידנא נוהגין להקל באבילות זה של המתאבלים עמו דאין זה אלא משום כבוד המתאבלים ועכשיו נהגו כולם למחול וכן נוהגין האידנא שלא להתאבל כלל עם המתאבלים וכל המחמיר בזה אינו אלא מן המתמיהים (הגהות מיימוני פ"ב) ומ"מ נהגו שכל קרובי המת הפסולים לו לעדות מראים קצת אבילות בעצמן כל שבוע הראשונה דהיינו עד אחר שבת הראשון שאינם רוחצים ואין משנים קצת בגדיהם כמו בשאר שבת ויש מקומות שנהגו עוד להחמיר בענינים אחרים והעיקר כמו שכתבתי ... מי שרוצה להחמיר על עצמו להתאבל על מי שאינו צריך או ללבוש שחורים על קרובו אין מוחין בידו
Whomever he mourns for he [also] mourns with if he suffers a breavement. [This applies] only whilst he is in his presence, but when not in his presence, he is not bound to observe mourning rites... Gloss: Some say that nowadays we adopt a lenient view regarding this [type] of mourning with respect to those who mourn with him, for this is only out of respect to those who observe mourning rites, but now it is the common practice to forego [this honour], and thus is the accepted practice nowadays, [viz.,] not to mourn at all with those who observe mourning rites. He who adopts a stringent view in this [matter] is one of those who make people wonder [at their strange conduct]. Nevertheless, it is the accepted practice that all the near-of-kin of the dead person who are disqualified to offer testimony in his behalf, exhibit some [signs] of mourning [by placing] themselves [under this stringency] the first entire week, i.e., until after the first Sabbath [in] that they do not wash [themselves] nor change some of their clothes as on other Sabbaths. There are, however, localities where the accepted usage is to adopt additional stringencies in other matters [pertaining to this type of mourning], but the fundamental principle is as I have written [above]... One who desires to place himself under a stringency, [viz.,] to observe mourning rites for one for whom he is not dutibound [to mourn], or to put on dark clothes [in mourning] for his near-of-kin, is not reproved [for doing so].
Regarding tearing clothing, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 340:4):
כשם שקורע על קרובו שמתאבל עליו כך קורע בפני קרובו על מת שמת לקרובו כיצד הרי שמת בן בנו או אחי בנו או אם בנו חייב לקרוע בפני בנו וכן קורע על חמיו וחמותו והאשה קורעת על חמיה וחמותה. (ואין נוהגין עכשיו כן וכמו שיתבאר לקמן סי' שע"ד לענין אבלות):
Just as he rends for his near-of-kin, for whom he observes mourning rites, so does he rend in the presence of his near-of-kin, when the latter sustains a bereavement. In what respect? If his son's son dies, or his son's brother, or the mother of his son, he is required to rend in the presence of his son. So too, does he rend for his father-in-law and his mother-in-law, and a woman rends for her father-in-law and her mother-in-law. (Nowadays we do not follow this practice as will be explained infra §374 in the subject of mourning.)
In short, if the mourners insist the grandchild would have to act like a mourner in pretty much all respects while in front of them. Commonly though the mourners do not insist. Use of common sense to fit in and not offend the mourners is key.
(I'll say that even stronger: the grandchild is not in the thick of it like his parent is and is in a unique position to offer much needed support, so helping his parent in whatever way works best in their situation is a enormous act of kindness and is to be actively encouraged. Forget about the technical laws and do whatever is best for the real mourners which might indeed mean looking distraught and not shaving or bathing, but might not. Focus on the goal here not on the means.)
You can find some discussion in Rishonim trying to obligate grandchildren in particular in more mourning due to the obligation to honor a grandparent in Or Zarua 2:428.
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Upon hearing bad news, one says the blessing ברוך אתה יקוק אלוקינו מלך העולם דיין האמת"" (OC 222:2).
Regarding mourning, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 374.6):
כל מי שמתאבל עליו מתאבל עמו אם מת לו מת ודוקא בעודו בפניו אבל שלא בפניו אין צריך לנהוג אבלות...: הגה וי"א דהאידנא נוהגין להקל באבילות זה של המתאבלים עמו דאין זה אלא משום כבוד המתאבלים ועכשיו נהגו כולם למחול וכן נוהגין האידנא שלא להתאבל כלל עם המתאבלים וכל המחמיר בזה אינו אלא מן המתמיהים (הגהות מיימוני פ"ב) ומ"מ נהגו שכל קרובי המת הפסולים לו לעדות מראים קצת אבילות בעצמן כל שבוע הראשונה דהיינו עד אחר שבת הראשון שאינם רוחצים ואין משנים קצת בגדיהם כמו בשאר שבת ויש מקומות שנהגו עוד להחמיר בענינים אחרים והעיקר כמו שכתבתי ... מי שרוצה להחמיר על עצמו להתאבל על מי שאינו צריך או ללבוש שחורים על קרובו אין מוחין בידו
Whomever he mourns for he [also] mourns with if he suffers a breavement. [This applies] only whilst he is in his presence, but when not in his presence, he is not bound to observe mourning rites... Gloss: Some say that nowadays we adopt a lenient view regarding this [type] of mourning with respect to those who mourn with him, for this is only out of respect to those who observe mourning rites, but now it is the common practice to forego [this honour], and thus is the accepted practice nowadays, [viz.,] not to mourn at all with those who observe mourning rites. He who adopts a stringent view in this [matter] is one of those who make people wonder [at their strange conduct]. Nevertheless, it is the accepted practice that all the near-of-kin of the dead person who are disqualified to offer testimony in his behalf, exhibit some [signs] of mourning [by placing] themselves [under this stringency] the first entire week, i.e., until after the first Sabbath [in] that they do not wash [themselves] nor change some of their clothes as on other Sabbaths. There are, however, localities where the accepted usage is to adopt additional stringencies in other matters [pertaining to this type of mourning], but the fundamental principle is as I have written [above]... One who desires to place himself under a stringency, [viz.,] to observe mourning rites for one for whom he is not dutibound [to mourn], or to put on dark clothes [in mourning] for his near-of-kin, is not reproved [for doing so].
Regarding tearing clothing, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 340:4):
כשם שקורע על קרובו שמתאבל עליו כך קורע בפני קרובו על מת שמת לקרובו כיצד הרי שמת בן בנו או אחי בנו או אם בנו חייב לקרוע בפני בנו וכן קורע על חמיו וחמותו והאשה קורעת על חמיה וחמותה. (ואין נוהגין עכשיו כן וכמו שיתבאר לקמן סי' שע"ד לענין אבלות):
Just as he rends for his near-of-kin, for whom he observes mourning rites, so does he rend in the presence of his near-of-kin, when the latter sustains a bereavement. In what respect? If his son's son dies, or his son's brother, or the mother of his son, he is required to rend in the presence of his son. So too, does he rend for his father-in-law and his mother-in-law, and a woman rends for her father-in-law and her mother-in-law. (Nowadays we do not follow this practice as will be explained infra §374 in the subject of mourning.)
In short, if the mourners insist the grandchild would have to act like a mourner in pretty much all respects while in front of them. Commonly though the mourners do not insist. Use of common sense to fit in and not offend the mourners is key.
(I'll say that even stronger: the grandchild is not in the thick of it like his parent is and is in a unique position to offer much needed support, so helping his parent in whatever way works best in their situation is a enormous act of kindness and is to be actively encouraged. Forget about the technical laws and do whatever is best for the real mourners which might indeed mean looking distraught and not shaving or bathing, but might not. Focus on the goal here not on the means.)
You can find some discussion in Rishonim trying to obligate grandchildren in particular in more mourning due to the obligation to honor a grandparent in Or Zarua 2:428.
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Upon hearing bad news, one says the blessing ברוך אתה יקוק אלוקינו מלך העולם דיין האמת"" (OC 222:2).
Regarding mourning, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 374.6):
כל מי שמתאבל עליו מתאבל עמו אם מת לו מת ודוקא בעודו בפניו אבל שלא בפניו אין צריך לנהוג אבלות...: הגה וי"א דהאידנא נוהגין להקל באבילות זה של המתאבלים עמו דאין זה אלא משום כבוד המתאבלים ועכשיו נהגו כולם למחול וכן נוהגין האידנא שלא להתאבל כלל עם המתאבלים וכל המחמיר בזה אינו אלא מן המתמיהים (הגהות מיימוני פ"ב) ומ"מ נהגו שכל קרובי המת הפסולים לו לעדות מראים קצת אבילות בעצמן כל שבוע הראשונה דהיינו עד אחר שבת הראשון שאינם רוחצים ואין משנים קצת בגדיהם כמו בשאר שבת ויש מקומות שנהגו עוד להחמיר בענינים אחרים והעיקר כמו שכתבתי ... מי שרוצה להחמיר על עצמו להתאבל על מי שאינו צריך או ללבוש שחורים על קרובו אין מוחין בידו
Whomever he mourns for he [also] mourns with if he suffers a breavement. [This applies] only whilst he is in his presence, but when not in his presence, he is not bound to observe mourning rites... Gloss: Some say that nowadays we adopt a lenient view regarding this [type] of mourning with respect to those who mourn with him, for this is only out of respect to those who observe mourning rites, but now it is the common practice to forego [this honour], and thus is the accepted practice nowadays, [viz.,] not to mourn at all with those who observe mourning rites. He who adopts a stringent view in this [matter] is one of those who make people wonder [at their strange conduct]. Nevertheless, it is the accepted practice that all the near-of-kin of the dead person who are disqualified to offer testimony in his behalf, exhibit some [signs] of mourning [by placing] themselves [under this stringency] the first entire week, i.e., until after the first Sabbath [in] that they do not wash [themselves] nor change some of their clothes as on other Sabbaths. There are, however, localities where the accepted usage is to adopt additional stringencies in other matters [pertaining to this type of mourning], but the fundamental principle is as I have written [above]... One who desires to place himself under a stringency, [viz.,] to observe mourning rites for one for whom he is not dutibound [to mourn], or to put on dark clothes [in mourning] for his near-of-kin, is not reproved [for doing so].
Regarding tearing clothing, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 340:4):
כשם שקורע על קרובו שמתאבל עליו כך קורע בפני קרובו על מת שמת לקרובו כיצד הרי שמת בן בנו או אחי בנו או אם בנו חייב לקרוע בפני בנו וכן קורע על חמיו וחמותו והאשה קורעת על חמיה וחמותה. (ואין נוהגין עכשיו כן וכמו שיתבאר לקמן סי' שע"ד לענין אבלות):
Just as he rends for his near-of-kin, for whom he observes mourning rites, so does he rend in the presence of his near-of-kin, when the latter sustains a bereavement. In what respect? If his son's son dies, or his son's brother, or the mother of his son, he is required to rend in the presence of his son. So too, does he rend for his father-in-law and his mother-in-law, and a woman rends for her father-in-law and her mother-in-law. (Nowadays we do not follow this practice as will be explained infra §374 in the subject of mourning.)
In short, if the mourners insist the grandchild would have to act like a mourner in pretty much all respects while in front of them. Commonly though the mourners do not insist. Use of common sense to fit in and not offend the mourners is key.
(I'll say that even stronger: the grandchild is not in the thick of it like his parent is and is in a unique position to offer much needed support, so helping his parent in whatever way works best in their situation is a enormous act of kindness and is to be actively encouraged. Forget about the technical laws and do whatever is best for the real mourners which might indeed mean looking distraught and not shaving or bathing, but might not. Focus on the goal here not on the means.)
You can find some discussion in Rishonim trying to obligate grandchildren in particular in more mourning due to the obligation to honor a grandparent in Or Zarua 2:428.
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Upon hearing bad news, one says the blessing ברוך אתה יקוק אלוקינו מלך העולם דיין האמת"" (OC 222:2).
Regarding mourning, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 374.6):
כל מי שמתאבל עליו מתאבל עמו אם מת לו מת ודוקא בעודו בפניו אבל שלא בפניו אין צריך לנהוג אבלות...: הגה וי"א דהאידנא נוהגין להקל באבילות זה של המתאבלים עמו דאין זה אלא משום כבוד המתאבלים ועכשיו נהגו כולם למחול וכן נוהגין האידנא שלא להתאבל כלל עם המתאבלים וכל המחמיר בזה אינו אלא מן המתמיהים (הגהות מיימוני פ"ב) ומ"מ נהגו שכל קרובי המת הפסולים לו לעדות מראים קצת אבילות בעצמן כל שבוע הראשונה דהיינו עד אחר שבת הראשון שאינם רוחצים ואין משנים קצת בגדיהם כמו בשאר שבת ויש מקומות שנהגו עוד להחמיר בענינים אחרים והעיקר כמו שכתבתי ... מי שרוצה להחמיר על עצמו להתאבל על מי שאינו צריך או ללבוש שחורים על קרובו אין מוחין בידו
Whomever he mourns for he [also] mourns with if he suffers a breavement. [This applies] only whilst he is in his presence, but when not in his presence, he is not bound to observe mourning rites... Gloss: Some say that nowadays we adopt a lenient view regarding this [type] of mourning with respect to those who mourn with him, for this is only out of respect to those who observe mourning rites, but now it is the common practice to forego [this honour], and thus is the accepted practice nowadays, [viz.,] not to mourn at all with those who observe mourning rites. He who adopts a stringent view in this [matter] is one of those who make people wonder [at their strange conduct]. Nevertheless, it is the accepted practice that all the near-of-kin of the dead person who are disqualified to offer testimony in his behalf, exhibit some [signs] of mourning [by placing] themselves [under this stringency] the first entire week, i.e., until after the first Sabbath [in] that they do not wash [themselves] nor change some of their clothes as on other Sabbaths. There are, however, localities where the accepted usage is to adopt additional stringencies in other matters [pertaining to this type of mourning], but the fundamental principle is as I have written [above]... One who desires to place himself under a stringency, [viz.,] to observe mourning rites for one for whom he is not dutibound [to mourn], or to put on dark clothes [in mourning] for his near-of-kin, is not reproved [for doing so].
Regarding tearing clothing, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 340:4):
כשם שקורע על קרובו שמתאבל עליו כך קורע בפני קרובו על מת שמת לקרובו כיצד הרי שמת בן בנו או אחי בנו או אם בנו חייב לקרוע בפני בנו וכן קורע על חמיו וחמותו והאשה קורעת על חמיה וחמותה. (ואין נוהגין עכשיו כן וכמו שיתבאר לקמן סי' שע"ד לענין אבלות):
Just as he rends for his near-of-kin, for whom he observes mourning rites, so does he rend in the presence of his near-of-kin, when the latter sustains a bereavement. In what respect? If his son's son dies, or his son's brother, or the mother of his son, he is required to rend in the presence of his son. So too, does he rend for his father-in-law and his mother-in-law, and a woman rends for her father-in-law and her mother-in-law. (Nowadays we do not follow this practice as will be explained infra §374 in the subject of mourning.)
In short, if the mourners insist the grandchild would have to act like a mourner in pretty much all respects while in front of them. Commonly though the mourners do not insist. Use of common sense to fit in and not offend the mourners is key.
(I'll say that even stronger: the grandchild is not in the thick of it like his parent is and is in a unique position to offer much needed support, so helping his parent in whatever way works best in their situation is a enormous act of kindness and is to be actively encouraged. Forget about the technical laws and do whatever is best for the real mourners which might indeed mean looking distraught and not shaving or bathing, but might not. Focus on the goal here not on the means.)
You can find some discussion in Rishonim trying to obligate grandchildren in particular in more mourning due to the obligation to honor a grandparent in Or Zarua 2:428.
Upon hearing bad news, one says the blessing ברוך אתה יקוק אלוקינו מלך העולם דיין האמת"" (OC 222:2).
Regarding mourning, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 374.6):
כל מי שמתאבל עליו מתאבל עמו אם מת לו מת ודוקא בעודו בפניו אבל שלא בפניו אין צריך לנהוג אבלות...: הגה וי"א דהאידנא נוהגין להקל באבילות זה של המתאבלים עמו דאין זה אלא משום כבוד המתאבלים ועכשיו נהגו כולם למחול וכן נוהגין האידנא שלא להתאבל כלל עם המתאבלים וכל המחמיר בזה אינו אלא מן המתמיהים (הגהות מיימוני פ"ב) ומ"מ נהגו שכל קרובי המת הפסולים לו לעדות מראים קצת אבילות בעצמן כל שבוע הראשונה דהיינו עד אחר שבת הראשון שאינם רוחצים ואין משנים קצת בגדיהם כמו בשאר שבת ויש מקומות שנהגו עוד להחמיר בענינים אחרים והעיקר כמו שכתבתי ... מי שרוצה להחמיר על עצמו להתאבל על מי שאינו צריך או ללבוש שחורים על קרובו אין מוחין בידו
Whomever he mourns for he [also] mourns with if he suffers a breavement. [This applies] only whilst he is in his presence, but when not in his presence, he is not bound to observe mourning rites... Gloss: Some say that nowadays we adopt a lenient view regarding this [type] of mourning with respect to those who mourn with him, for this is only out of respect to those who observe mourning rites, but now it is the common practice to forego [this honour], and thus is the accepted practice nowadays, [viz.,] not to mourn at all with those who observe mourning rites. He who adopts a stringent view in this [matter] is one of those who make people wonder [at their strange conduct]. Nevertheless, it is the accepted practice that all the near-of-kin of the dead person who are disqualified to offer testimony in his behalf, exhibit some [signs] of mourning [by placing] themselves [under this stringency] the first entire week, i.e., until after the first Sabbath [in] that they do not wash [themselves] nor change some of their clothes as on other Sabbaths. There are, however, localities where the accepted usage is to adopt additional stringencies in other matters [pertaining to this type of mourning], but the fundamental principle is as I have written [above]... One who desires to place himself under a stringency, [viz.,] to observe mourning rites for one for whom he is not dutibound [to mourn], or to put on dark clothes [in mourning] for his near-of-kin, is not reproved [for doing so].
Regarding tearing clothing, the Shulchan Arukh rules (YD 340:4):
כשם שקורע על קרובו שמתאבל עליו כך קורע בפני קרובו על מת שמת לקרובו כיצד הרי שמת בן בנו או אחי בנו או אם בנו חייב לקרוע בפני בנו וכן קורע על חמיו וחמותו והאשה קורעת על חמיה וחמותה. (ואין נוהגין עכשיו כן וכמו שיתבאר לקמן סי' שע"ד לענין אבלות):
Just as he rends for his near-of-kin, for whom he observes mourning rites, so does he rend in the presence of his near-of-kin, when the latter sustains a bereavement. In what respect? If his son's son dies, or his son's brother, or the mother of his son, he is required to rend in the presence of his son. So too, does he rend for his father-in-law and his mother-in-law, and a woman rends for her father-in-law and her mother-in-law. (Nowadays we do not follow this practice as will be explained infra §374 in the subject of mourning.)
In short, if the mourners insist the grandchild would have to act like a mourner in pretty much all respects while in front of them. Commonly though the mourners do not insist. Use of common sense to fit in and not offend the mourners is key.
(I'll say that even stronger: the grandchild is not in the thick of it like his parent is and is in a unique position to offer much needed support, so helping his parent in whatever way works best in their situation is a enormous act of kindness and is to be actively encouraged. Forget about the technical laws and do whatever is best for the real mourners which might indeed mean looking distraught and not shaving or bathing, but might not. Focus on the goal here not on the means.)
You can find some discussion in Rishonim trying to obligate grandchildren in particular in more mourning due to the obligation to honor a grandparent in Or Zarua 2:428.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Double AA♦Double AA
79.7k6198433
79.7k6198433
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
1. To where in §374 is he referring? 2. If the mourners don’t insist/he’s not in the presence of the mourners, is the grandchild allowed to follow Hilchos Aveilus, but he’s not obligated to do so, or is it prohibited? 3. Likewise for keri’ah - is he saying the custom is not to tear, but one could if he wants to, or that one shouldn’t tear?
– DonielF
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
@DonielF 1 presumably 374:6 which I cited first so you'd get it, even though it's out of order. 2 the rama there says clearly in that source that one who does mourning for someone he doesn't need to "isn't reproved", but also that mourning too much for a second degree relative would make you מן המתמיהים bizarre. 3 wasteful tearing is prohibited as bal tashchis (though if the grandparent was the grandchild's teacher or was a respected person it may not be considered wasteful, but that's a general question not specifically for grandparent)
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Unfortunate is the grandchild who never needed to mourn their grandparent.
– Double AA♦
4 hours ago
@DoubleAA Not exactly what I intended when saying that, but I see how my language lends itself to that. Will edit.
– DonielF
4 hours ago