Windows 10 deletes lots of tiny files super slowly. Anything that can be done to speed it up?How to delete huge number of files on WindowsHow can I rename files and folders in Windows that are in use?Can boot anything except windowsHow can I create a Windows 8.1/10 user account that mirrors a guest accountMoving external hard drive between two Windows 10 installations deletes copied filesWindows 10: Most efficient way of getting around “The library, drive, or medial pool is empty” errors while copying photos from Android?how do I know if I have the windows 10 update that deletes filesOffice 2016 blocks document permanently after PC crashed

How to justify getting additional team member when the current team is doing well?

How can this Stack Exchange site have an animated favicon?

Why does my browser attempt to download pages from http://clhs.lisp.se instead of viewing them normally?

Plotting curves within a foreach loop and attributing colors from a colormap

Passiflora Snow Queen is drying out

Am I storing my camera the wrong way, in a dry box with humidity between 37-48?

Why weren't the Death Star plans transmitted electronically?

How 象【しょう】 ( ≈かたち、 すがた、ようす) and 象【ぞう】 (どうぶつ) got to be written with the same kanji?

Is it impolite to ask for an in-flight catalogue with no intention of buying?

Is it acceptable to say that a reviewer's concern is not going to be addressed because then the paper would be too long?

Hangman Game (YAHG)

Why, even after his imprisonment, people keep calling Hannibal Lecter "Doctor"?

I transpose the source code, you transpose the input!

Can my former employer sue me if I don't give them the photos I took (taking pictures was not part of my job description)?

My manager quit. Should I agree to defer wage increase to accommodate budget concerns?

How to check if my quadrature encoder is broken or not?

What should I consider when deciding whether to delay an exam?

Why does the leading tone (G#) go to E rather than A in this example?

Is a PWM required for regenerative braking on a DC Motor?

What would influence an alien race to map their planet in a way other than the traditional map of the Earth

Do wheelchair-accessible aircraft exist?

May I know how to stop these death waves?

Why are there two fundamental laws of logic?

New road bike: alloy dual pivot brakes work poorly



Windows 10 deletes lots of tiny files super slowly. Anything that can be done to speed it up?


How to delete huge number of files on WindowsHow can I rename files and folders in Windows that are in use?Can boot anything except windowsHow can I create a Windows 8.1/10 user account that mirrors a guest accountMoving external hard drive between two Windows 10 installations deletes copied filesWindows 10: Most efficient way of getting around “The library, drive, or medial pool is empty” errors while copying photos from Android?how do I know if I have the windows 10 update that deletes filesOffice 2016 blocks document permanently after PC crashed






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I work with tens of thousands 20kb jpg files in batches which add up to gigabytes. When I try to delete an old batch, windows 10 has a very low delete rate which some times even drops to zero for some reason:



enter image description here



Is this just a fact of life for the hardware I'm on, or is there some tips and tricks I could try to speed up this deletion process? Thanks for any suggestion!










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    What type of storage device are the files on an HDD or SSD? If we are talking about a HDD what is the cache size?

    – Ramhound
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    A number of options are explored at superuser.com/questions/416071/… for speedily deleting a folder with many files on Windows.

    – Gary
    7 hours ago











  • @Ramhound It is a HDD with 7200 RPM, Drive Controller: Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s, but for cache buffer size HWinfo says N/A for some reason.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago

















2















I work with tens of thousands 20kb jpg files in batches which add up to gigabytes. When I try to delete an old batch, windows 10 has a very low delete rate which some times even drops to zero for some reason:



enter image description here



Is this just a fact of life for the hardware I'm on, or is there some tips and tricks I could try to speed up this deletion process? Thanks for any suggestion!










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    What type of storage device are the files on an HDD or SSD? If we are talking about a HDD what is the cache size?

    – Ramhound
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    A number of options are explored at superuser.com/questions/416071/… for speedily deleting a folder with many files on Windows.

    – Gary
    7 hours ago











  • @Ramhound It is a HDD with 7200 RPM, Drive Controller: Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s, but for cache buffer size HWinfo says N/A for some reason.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago













2












2








2








I work with tens of thousands 20kb jpg files in batches which add up to gigabytes. When I try to delete an old batch, windows 10 has a very low delete rate which some times even drops to zero for some reason:



enter image description here



Is this just a fact of life for the hardware I'm on, or is there some tips and tricks I could try to speed up this deletion process? Thanks for any suggestion!










share|improve this question














I work with tens of thousands 20kb jpg files in batches which add up to gigabytes. When I try to delete an old batch, windows 10 has a very low delete rate which some times even drops to zero for some reason:



enter image description here



Is this just a fact of life for the hardware I'm on, or is there some tips and tricks I could try to speed up this deletion process? Thanks for any suggestion!







windows-10 file-management






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









KagaratschKagaratsch

1134 bronze badges




1134 bronze badges










  • 1





    What type of storage device are the files on an HDD or SSD? If we are talking about a HDD what is the cache size?

    – Ramhound
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    A number of options are explored at superuser.com/questions/416071/… for speedily deleting a folder with many files on Windows.

    – Gary
    7 hours ago











  • @Ramhound It is a HDD with 7200 RPM, Drive Controller: Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s, but for cache buffer size HWinfo says N/A for some reason.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago












  • 1





    What type of storage device are the files on an HDD or SSD? If we are talking about a HDD what is the cache size?

    – Ramhound
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    A number of options are explored at superuser.com/questions/416071/… for speedily deleting a folder with many files on Windows.

    – Gary
    7 hours ago











  • @Ramhound It is a HDD with 7200 RPM, Drive Controller: Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s, but for cache buffer size HWinfo says N/A for some reason.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago







1




1





What type of storage device are the files on an HDD or SSD? If we are talking about a HDD what is the cache size?

– Ramhound
8 hours ago





What type of storage device are the files on an HDD or SSD? If we are talking about a HDD what is the cache size?

– Ramhound
8 hours ago




1




1





A number of options are explored at superuser.com/questions/416071/… for speedily deleting a folder with many files on Windows.

– Gary
7 hours ago





A number of options are explored at superuser.com/questions/416071/… for speedily deleting a folder with many files on Windows.

– Gary
7 hours ago













@Ramhound It is a HDD with 7200 RPM, Drive Controller: Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s, but for cache buffer size HWinfo says N/A for some reason.

– Kagaratsch
1 hour ago





@Ramhound It is a HDD with 7200 RPM, Drive Controller: Serial ATA 6Gb/s @ 6Gb/s, but for cache buffer size HWinfo says N/A for some reason.

– Kagaratsch
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3
















From the image it looks like you are deleting the files through Explorer,
which is the slowest method possible.



What you can do to improve:



  • Delete the files using Shift+Del so the deleted files
    are not moved to the Recycle Bin (no recovery possible)



  • Issue the delete from inside a Command prompt using a command similar to
    (use del /? to see all parameters):



    del /f/q *.* (del in current folder, add `/s` to traverse sub-folders)
    del /f/q/s folder






share|improve this answer

























  • Yeah definitely shift delete!

    – wrecclesham
    4 hours ago











  • Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago


















1
















Deleting many directory entries will take longer than deleting a single directory of the net size.When deleting many files it takes many commands instead of single when single file is deleted.



Now, when 1 big file is deleted, the filemapper is told to unallocate the memory of that big file, but the 1s and 0s of the file are not reset, the mapper is just told it is free to write new stuff over the old 1s and 0s. Basically, it is one command, that takes time to clear up all of the memory allocations of the fragmented file. When you delete a million small files, you are sending a million commands to the mapper, that has to do each one at a time



So The solution is to use a software to wipe a drive of deleted files and the 1s and 0s left behind.It will take one single command to wipe the space.Use the software only if you think the files are not needed to be recovered later






share|improve this answer








New contributor



Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    -1
















    I think that the Speed resides in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor and this is why we all love it so much.



    Used with care, it can even avoid Historical Faults like the rm -Rf / that causes the Removal of the Entire Root Folder in the Unix Family of Operating Systems from where it originates.



    Now, what I would suggest would be just to get rid of your frames Folder that appears in your Question. For that, the Operating System Command is RMDIR or RD as it appears in the Picture pasted below.



    The RMDIR Operating System Command



    Your Operating System Command would be RMDIR /S /Q frames issued in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor started in the Folder that is the Parent Folder of the frames Folder.



    The only Issue with this Solution is that it deletes the contents of the Entire frames Folder and not only your 47,189 *.JPG Files.



    So we have a few ideas in this respect:



    1. The First Situation would be when your frames Folder contains ONLY your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you are free to apply this Solution and afterward to recreate your frames Folder using the MKDIR or MD Operating System Command.


    2. The Second Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A FEW Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you could first move them somewhere else using a File-Management Software Application and then you could move them back into the frames Folder after its Recreation as described at Point (1.).


    3. The Third Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A LOT - let us say Millions - of Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files. In this Situation it is better for you to use other Alternative Solutions as described by other Posters on this Web-Page.






    share|improve this answer

























    • This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

      – Kagaratsch
      1 hour ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1485083%2fwindows-10-deletes-lots-of-tiny-files-super-slowly-anything-that-can-be-done-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3
















    From the image it looks like you are deleting the files through Explorer,
    which is the slowest method possible.



    What you can do to improve:



    • Delete the files using Shift+Del so the deleted files
      are not moved to the Recycle Bin (no recovery possible)



    • Issue the delete from inside a Command prompt using a command similar to
      (use del /? to see all parameters):



      del /f/q *.* (del in current folder, add `/s` to traverse sub-folders)
      del /f/q/s folder






    share|improve this answer

























    • Yeah definitely shift delete!

      – wrecclesham
      4 hours ago











    • Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

      – Kagaratsch
      1 hour ago















    3
















    From the image it looks like you are deleting the files through Explorer,
    which is the slowest method possible.



    What you can do to improve:



    • Delete the files using Shift+Del so the deleted files
      are not moved to the Recycle Bin (no recovery possible)



    • Issue the delete from inside a Command prompt using a command similar to
      (use del /? to see all parameters):



      del /f/q *.* (del in current folder, add `/s` to traverse sub-folders)
      del /f/q/s folder






    share|improve this answer

























    • Yeah definitely shift delete!

      – wrecclesham
      4 hours ago











    • Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

      – Kagaratsch
      1 hour ago













    3














    3










    3









    From the image it looks like you are deleting the files through Explorer,
    which is the slowest method possible.



    What you can do to improve:



    • Delete the files using Shift+Del so the deleted files
      are not moved to the Recycle Bin (no recovery possible)



    • Issue the delete from inside a Command prompt using a command similar to
      (use del /? to see all parameters):



      del /f/q *.* (del in current folder, add `/s` to traverse sub-folders)
      del /f/q/s folder






    share|improve this answer













    From the image it looks like you are deleting the files through Explorer,
    which is the slowest method possible.



    What you can do to improve:



    • Delete the files using Shift+Del so the deleted files
      are not moved to the Recycle Bin (no recovery possible)



    • Issue the delete from inside a Command prompt using a command similar to
      (use del /? to see all parameters):



      del /f/q *.* (del in current folder, add `/s` to traverse sub-folders)
      del /f/q/s folder







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    harrymcharrymc

    285k16 gold badges304 silver badges619 bronze badges




    285k16 gold badges304 silver badges619 bronze badges















    • Yeah definitely shift delete!

      – wrecclesham
      4 hours ago











    • Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

      – Kagaratsch
      1 hour ago

















    • Yeah definitely shift delete!

      – wrecclesham
      4 hours ago











    • Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

      – Kagaratsch
      1 hour ago
















    Yeah definitely shift delete!

    – wrecclesham
    4 hours ago





    Yeah definitely shift delete!

    – wrecclesham
    4 hours ago













    Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago





    Thanks, I was actually doing shift delete, but now I'll give the del /f/q/s *.* in the frames folder a try. Hopefully that will speed things up.

    – Kagaratsch
    1 hour ago













    1
















    Deleting many directory entries will take longer than deleting a single directory of the net size.When deleting many files it takes many commands instead of single when single file is deleted.



    Now, when 1 big file is deleted, the filemapper is told to unallocate the memory of that big file, but the 1s and 0s of the file are not reset, the mapper is just told it is free to write new stuff over the old 1s and 0s. Basically, it is one command, that takes time to clear up all of the memory allocations of the fragmented file. When you delete a million small files, you are sending a million commands to the mapper, that has to do each one at a time



    So The solution is to use a software to wipe a drive of deleted files and the 1s and 0s left behind.It will take one single command to wipe the space.Use the software only if you think the files are not needed to be recovered later






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      1
















      Deleting many directory entries will take longer than deleting a single directory of the net size.When deleting many files it takes many commands instead of single when single file is deleted.



      Now, when 1 big file is deleted, the filemapper is told to unallocate the memory of that big file, but the 1s and 0s of the file are not reset, the mapper is just told it is free to write new stuff over the old 1s and 0s. Basically, it is one command, that takes time to clear up all of the memory allocations of the fragmented file. When you delete a million small files, you are sending a million commands to the mapper, that has to do each one at a time



      So The solution is to use a software to wipe a drive of deleted files and the 1s and 0s left behind.It will take one single command to wipe the space.Use the software only if you think the files are not needed to be recovered later






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor



      Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        1














        1










        1









        Deleting many directory entries will take longer than deleting a single directory of the net size.When deleting many files it takes many commands instead of single when single file is deleted.



        Now, when 1 big file is deleted, the filemapper is told to unallocate the memory of that big file, but the 1s and 0s of the file are not reset, the mapper is just told it is free to write new stuff over the old 1s and 0s. Basically, it is one command, that takes time to clear up all of the memory allocations of the fragmented file. When you delete a million small files, you are sending a million commands to the mapper, that has to do each one at a time



        So The solution is to use a software to wipe a drive of deleted files and the 1s and 0s left behind.It will take one single command to wipe the space.Use the software only if you think the files are not needed to be recovered later






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Deleting many directory entries will take longer than deleting a single directory of the net size.When deleting many files it takes many commands instead of single when single file is deleted.



        Now, when 1 big file is deleted, the filemapper is told to unallocate the memory of that big file, but the 1s and 0s of the file are not reset, the mapper is just told it is free to write new stuff over the old 1s and 0s. Basically, it is one command, that takes time to clear up all of the memory allocations of the fragmented file. When you delete a million small files, you are sending a million commands to the mapper, that has to do each one at a time



        So The solution is to use a software to wipe a drive of deleted files and the 1s and 0s left behind.It will take one single command to wipe the space.Use the software only if you think the files are not needed to be recovered later







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor



        Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        answered 7 hours ago









        Broly LSSJBroly LSSJ

        1112 bronze badges




        1112 bronze badges




        New contributor



        Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




        New contributor




        Broly LSSJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.


























            -1
















            I think that the Speed resides in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor and this is why we all love it so much.



            Used with care, it can even avoid Historical Faults like the rm -Rf / that causes the Removal of the Entire Root Folder in the Unix Family of Operating Systems from where it originates.



            Now, what I would suggest would be just to get rid of your frames Folder that appears in your Question. For that, the Operating System Command is RMDIR or RD as it appears in the Picture pasted below.



            The RMDIR Operating System Command



            Your Operating System Command would be RMDIR /S /Q frames issued in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor started in the Folder that is the Parent Folder of the frames Folder.



            The only Issue with this Solution is that it deletes the contents of the Entire frames Folder and not only your 47,189 *.JPG Files.



            So we have a few ideas in this respect:



            1. The First Situation would be when your frames Folder contains ONLY your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you are free to apply this Solution and afterward to recreate your frames Folder using the MKDIR or MD Operating System Command.


            2. The Second Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A FEW Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you could first move them somewhere else using a File-Management Software Application and then you could move them back into the frames Folder after its Recreation as described at Point (1.).


            3. The Third Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A LOT - let us say Millions - of Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files. In this Situation it is better for you to use other Alternative Solutions as described by other Posters on this Web-Page.






            share|improve this answer

























            • This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

              – Kagaratsch
              1 hour ago















            -1
















            I think that the Speed resides in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor and this is why we all love it so much.



            Used with care, it can even avoid Historical Faults like the rm -Rf / that causes the Removal of the Entire Root Folder in the Unix Family of Operating Systems from where it originates.



            Now, what I would suggest would be just to get rid of your frames Folder that appears in your Question. For that, the Operating System Command is RMDIR or RD as it appears in the Picture pasted below.



            The RMDIR Operating System Command



            Your Operating System Command would be RMDIR /S /Q frames issued in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor started in the Folder that is the Parent Folder of the frames Folder.



            The only Issue with this Solution is that it deletes the contents of the Entire frames Folder and not only your 47,189 *.JPG Files.



            So we have a few ideas in this respect:



            1. The First Situation would be when your frames Folder contains ONLY your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you are free to apply this Solution and afterward to recreate your frames Folder using the MKDIR or MD Operating System Command.


            2. The Second Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A FEW Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you could first move them somewhere else using a File-Management Software Application and then you could move them back into the frames Folder after its Recreation as described at Point (1.).


            3. The Third Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A LOT - let us say Millions - of Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files. In this Situation it is better for you to use other Alternative Solutions as described by other Posters on this Web-Page.






            share|improve this answer

























            • This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

              – Kagaratsch
              1 hour ago













            -1














            -1










            -1









            I think that the Speed resides in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor and this is why we all love it so much.



            Used with care, it can even avoid Historical Faults like the rm -Rf / that causes the Removal of the Entire Root Folder in the Unix Family of Operating Systems from where it originates.



            Now, what I would suggest would be just to get rid of your frames Folder that appears in your Question. For that, the Operating System Command is RMDIR or RD as it appears in the Picture pasted below.



            The RMDIR Operating System Command



            Your Operating System Command would be RMDIR /S /Q frames issued in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor started in the Folder that is the Parent Folder of the frames Folder.



            The only Issue with this Solution is that it deletes the contents of the Entire frames Folder and not only your 47,189 *.JPG Files.



            So we have a few ideas in this respect:



            1. The First Situation would be when your frames Folder contains ONLY your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you are free to apply this Solution and afterward to recreate your frames Folder using the MKDIR or MD Operating System Command.


            2. The Second Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A FEW Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you could first move them somewhere else using a File-Management Software Application and then you could move them back into the frames Folder after its Recreation as described at Point (1.).


            3. The Third Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A LOT - let us say Millions - of Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files. In this Situation it is better for you to use other Alternative Solutions as described by other Posters on this Web-Page.






            share|improve this answer













            I think that the Speed resides in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor and this is why we all love it so much.



            Used with care, it can even avoid Historical Faults like the rm -Rf / that causes the Removal of the Entire Root Folder in the Unix Family of Operating Systems from where it originates.



            Now, what I would suggest would be just to get rid of your frames Folder that appears in your Question. For that, the Operating System Command is RMDIR or RD as it appears in the Picture pasted below.



            The RMDIR Operating System Command



            Your Operating System Command would be RMDIR /S /Q frames issued in the Microsoft Windows Command-Line PreProcessor started in the Folder that is the Parent Folder of the frames Folder.



            The only Issue with this Solution is that it deletes the contents of the Entire frames Folder and not only your 47,189 *.JPG Files.



            So we have a few ideas in this respect:



            1. The First Situation would be when your frames Folder contains ONLY your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you are free to apply this Solution and afterward to recreate your frames Folder using the MKDIR or MD Operating System Command.


            2. The Second Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A FEW Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files in which Situation you could first move them somewhere else using a File-Management Software Application and then you could move them back into the frames Folder after its Recreation as described at Point (1.).


            3. The Third Situation would be when your frames Folder contains also A LOT - let us say Millions - of Files among your 47,189 *.JPG Files. In this Situation it is better for you to use other Alternative Solutions as described by other Posters on this Web-Page.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 5 hours ago









            DOBRESCU_MihaiDOBRESCU_Mihai

            767 bronze badges




            767 bronze badges















            • This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

              – Kagaratsch
              1 hour ago

















            • This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

              – Kagaratsch
              1 hour ago
















            This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

            – Kagaratsch
            1 hour ago





            This sounds like it may help, however I wonder why this answer got downvoted? Maybe the memory allocated to the files is not really released if we just unlist the folder from the tree, or something?

            – Kagaratsch
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1485083%2fwindows-10-deletes-lots-of-tiny-files-super-slowly-anything-that-can-be-done-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480