Why would a fighter use the afterburner and air brakes at the same time?What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?How does flying with flaps differ from flying with airbrakes?Why do heavy bombers not carry air to air missiles?What are these boxes built into the tails of some fighters?Will afterburner work at settings less than full dry thrust?How does an aircraft distribute fuel equally between powering the turbines on the engine and injecting it into the afterburner?Why do military jets seem to always take off using the afterburner?Why does this regional jet have its air brakes wide open before touchdown?What effect would a afterburner have on the compressor if the nozzle outlet is not increased?What procedures are used for midair refueling without air supremacy?When, exactly, were the DC-8’s airbrakes removed?

Should I inform my future product owner that there are big chances that a team member will leave the company soon?

What is this WWII four-engine plane on skis?

Latex matrix formatting

Does household ovens ventilate heat to the outdoors?

Why would short-haul flights be pressurised at a higher cabin pressure?

Why would a fighter use the afterburner and air brakes at the same time?

Is my sink P-trap too low?

Bash attempts to write two shell prompts?

Writing a system of Linear Equations

How does doing something together work?

What does the "capacitor into resistance" symbol mean?

In what sequence should an advanced civilization teach technology to medieval society to maximize rate of adoption?

How many people need to succeed in a group check with three people?

Madrid to London w/ Expired 90/180 days stay as US citizen

Can an infinite series be thought of as adding up "infinitely many" terms?

What are the typical trumpet parts in classical music?

How can I draw overlapping triangles?

Floating Point XOR

Talk about Grandpa's weird talk: Who are these folks?

Tips for remembering the order of parameters for ln?

How to set a tolerance level for equality constraints

Have you ever been issued a passport or national identity card for travel by any other country?

Persuading players to be less attached to a pre-session 0 character concept

In Bb5 systems against the Sicilian, why does White exchange their b5 bishop without playing a6?



Why would a fighter use the afterburner and air brakes at the same time?


What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?How does flying with flaps differ from flying with airbrakes?Why do heavy bombers not carry air to air missiles?What are these boxes built into the tails of some fighters?Will afterburner work at settings less than full dry thrust?How does an aircraft distribute fuel equally between powering the turbines on the engine and injecting it into the afterburner?Why do military jets seem to always take off using the afterburner?Why does this regional jet have its air brakes wide open before touchdown?What effect would a afterburner have on the compressor if the nozzle outlet is not increased?What procedures are used for midair refueling without air supremacy?When, exactly, were the DC-8’s airbrakes removed?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


I was looking for air brake pictures on different fighters, and then I saw a Tornado using afterburner and air brake at the same time! Air brake duty is to reduce speed, isn't it? So why would a fighter burn so much fuel to increase thrust and then use speed brakes simultaneously?



Afterburner and Air brake



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$


    I was looking for air brake pictures on different fighters, and then I saw a Tornado using afterburner and air brake at the same time! Air brake duty is to reduce speed, isn't it? So why would a fighter burn so much fuel to increase thrust and then use speed brakes simultaneously?



    Afterburner and Air brake



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      I was looking for air brake pictures on different fighters, and then I saw a Tornado using afterburner and air brake at the same time! Air brake duty is to reduce speed, isn't it? So why would a fighter burn so much fuel to increase thrust and then use speed brakes simultaneously?



      Afterburner and Air brake



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I was looking for air brake pictures on different fighters, and then I saw a Tornado using afterburner and air brake at the same time! Air brake duty is to reduce speed, isn't it? So why would a fighter burn so much fuel to increase thrust and then use speed brakes simultaneously?



      Afterburner and Air brake



      enter image description here







      military afterburner airbrakes panavia-tornado






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      ymb1

      80.4k9 gold badges265 silver badges434 bronze badges




      80.4k9 gold badges265 silver badges434 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      Mamzi_PrMamzi_Pr

      532 bronze badges




      532 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          $begingroup$

          The first photo is from the Tornado Role Demonstration Team's display at RAF Leuchars in September 2012 (source).



          That Sep '12 show or its preparation is on YouTube. Most of the instances of the air brakes as seen from the cockpit (looking behind) are followed by the swing-wing extending and the afterburner turning off (you can tell from the sound of the variable nozzle actuators).



          While the photos are cool, I'd say it's just perfect timing before the pilot turned off the afterburner while slowing down.



          enter image description here

          Such example (above) can be seen after 7:40 in this video. Notice the wing position, and from the video notice the aforementioned sound once the wing is extended.



          Another possible reason is slowing down for the spectators to see and hear the afterburner. That can also coincide with the fake bomb drop – a pyrotechnic wall of fire, the smoke of which can be seen in the first photo in the question (example below).



          enter image description here
          An RAF Tornado GR4 carries out a mock bombing run (BBC)






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$






















            1














            $begingroup$

            Most jets don’t have fuel dumping system so when they need to reduce the weight in a short time they use afterburner to attain a permissible lending weight. However using afterburner causes aircraft to go supersonic very quickly. So they use speed brakes to stay subsonic.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor



            Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
              $endgroup$
              – DeltaLima
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              $endgroup$
              – Therac
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
              $endgroup$
              – Ralph J
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
              $endgroup$
              – Antzi
              4 hours ago













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "528"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );














            draft saved

            draft discarded
















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69735%2fwhy-would-a-fighter-use-the-afterburner-and-air-brakes-at-the-same-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            $begingroup$

            The first photo is from the Tornado Role Demonstration Team's display at RAF Leuchars in September 2012 (source).



            That Sep '12 show or its preparation is on YouTube. Most of the instances of the air brakes as seen from the cockpit (looking behind) are followed by the swing-wing extending and the afterburner turning off (you can tell from the sound of the variable nozzle actuators).



            While the photos are cool, I'd say it's just perfect timing before the pilot turned off the afterburner while slowing down.



            enter image description here

            Such example (above) can be seen after 7:40 in this video. Notice the wing position, and from the video notice the aforementioned sound once the wing is extended.



            Another possible reason is slowing down for the spectators to see and hear the afterburner. That can also coincide with the fake bomb drop – a pyrotechnic wall of fire, the smoke of which can be seen in the first photo in the question (example below).



            enter image description here
            An RAF Tornado GR4 carries out a mock bombing run (BBC)






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



















              4














              $begingroup$

              The first photo is from the Tornado Role Demonstration Team's display at RAF Leuchars in September 2012 (source).



              That Sep '12 show or its preparation is on YouTube. Most of the instances of the air brakes as seen from the cockpit (looking behind) are followed by the swing-wing extending and the afterburner turning off (you can tell from the sound of the variable nozzle actuators).



              While the photos are cool, I'd say it's just perfect timing before the pilot turned off the afterburner while slowing down.



              enter image description here

              Such example (above) can be seen after 7:40 in this video. Notice the wing position, and from the video notice the aforementioned sound once the wing is extended.



              Another possible reason is slowing down for the spectators to see and hear the afterburner. That can also coincide with the fake bomb drop – a pyrotechnic wall of fire, the smoke of which can be seen in the first photo in the question (example below).



              enter image description here
              An RAF Tornado GR4 carries out a mock bombing run (BBC)






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                4














                4










                4







                $begingroup$

                The first photo is from the Tornado Role Demonstration Team's display at RAF Leuchars in September 2012 (source).



                That Sep '12 show or its preparation is on YouTube. Most of the instances of the air brakes as seen from the cockpit (looking behind) are followed by the swing-wing extending and the afterburner turning off (you can tell from the sound of the variable nozzle actuators).



                While the photos are cool, I'd say it's just perfect timing before the pilot turned off the afterburner while slowing down.



                enter image description here

                Such example (above) can be seen after 7:40 in this video. Notice the wing position, and from the video notice the aforementioned sound once the wing is extended.



                Another possible reason is slowing down for the spectators to see and hear the afterburner. That can also coincide with the fake bomb drop – a pyrotechnic wall of fire, the smoke of which can be seen in the first photo in the question (example below).



                enter image description here
                An RAF Tornado GR4 carries out a mock bombing run (BBC)






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The first photo is from the Tornado Role Demonstration Team's display at RAF Leuchars in September 2012 (source).



                That Sep '12 show or its preparation is on YouTube. Most of the instances of the air brakes as seen from the cockpit (looking behind) are followed by the swing-wing extending and the afterburner turning off (you can tell from the sound of the variable nozzle actuators).



                While the photos are cool, I'd say it's just perfect timing before the pilot turned off the afterburner while slowing down.



                enter image description here

                Such example (above) can be seen after 7:40 in this video. Notice the wing position, and from the video notice the aforementioned sound once the wing is extended.



                Another possible reason is slowing down for the spectators to see and hear the afterburner. That can also coincide with the fake bomb drop – a pyrotechnic wall of fire, the smoke of which can be seen in the first photo in the question (example below).



                enter image description here
                An RAF Tornado GR4 carries out a mock bombing run (BBC)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 7 hours ago

























                answered 8 hours ago









                ymb1ymb1

                80.4k9 gold badges265 silver badges434 bronze badges




                80.4k9 gold badges265 silver badges434 bronze badges


























                    1














                    $begingroup$

                    Most jets don’t have fuel dumping system so when they need to reduce the weight in a short time they use afterburner to attain a permissible lending weight. However using afterburner causes aircraft to go supersonic very quickly. So they use speed brakes to stay subsonic.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
                      $endgroup$
                      – DeltaLima
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – Therac
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ralph J
                      6 hours ago






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
                      $endgroup$
                      – Antzi
                      4 hours ago















                    1














                    $begingroup$

                    Most jets don’t have fuel dumping system so when they need to reduce the weight in a short time they use afterburner to attain a permissible lending weight. However using afterburner causes aircraft to go supersonic very quickly. So they use speed brakes to stay subsonic.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
                      $endgroup$
                      – DeltaLima
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – Therac
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ralph J
                      6 hours ago






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
                      $endgroup$
                      – Antzi
                      4 hours ago













                    1














                    1










                    1







                    $begingroup$

                    Most jets don’t have fuel dumping system so when they need to reduce the weight in a short time they use afterburner to attain a permissible lending weight. However using afterburner causes aircraft to go supersonic very quickly. So they use speed brakes to stay subsonic.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$



                    Most jets don’t have fuel dumping system so when they need to reduce the weight in a short time they use afterburner to attain a permissible lending weight. However using afterburner causes aircraft to go supersonic very quickly. So they use speed brakes to stay subsonic.







                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor



                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 7 hours ago





















                    New contributor



                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    answered 8 hours ago









                    KolomKolom

                    273 bronze badges




                    273 bronze badges




                    New contributor



                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




                    New contributor




                    Kolom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
                      $endgroup$
                      – DeltaLima
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – Therac
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ralph J
                      6 hours ago






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
                      $endgroup$
                      – Antzi
                      4 hours ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
                      $endgroup$
                      – DeltaLima
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                      $endgroup$
                      – Therac
                      7 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ralph J
                      6 hours ago






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
                      $endgroup$
                      – Antzi
                      4 hours ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
                    $endgroup$
                    – DeltaLima
                    7 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Hello Kolom, welcome to aviation.stackexchange.com. We are looking for answers that give a bit more background to the claim that is made, such as references or an explanation. Simple one liners are often not enough to cover the topic.
                    $endgroup$
                    – DeltaLima
                    7 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                    $endgroup$
                    – Therac
                    7 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                    $endgroup$
                    – Therac
                    7 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ralph J
                    6 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    This answer is correct for a small handful of military aircraft, but states "most jets". This claim is utterly, absolutely incorrect. "Most jets" don't have afterburners.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ralph J
                    6 hours ago




                    3




                    3




                    $begingroup$
                    @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
                    $endgroup$
                    – Antzi
                    4 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    @RalphJ anybody with a sane mind would understand “most jets with afterburner”
                    $endgroup$
                    – Antzi
                    4 hours ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69735%2fwhy-would-a-fighter-use-the-afterburner-and-air-brakes-at-the-same-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її