Is there a theorem in Real analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem in Complex analysis?The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic functionCauchy's Integral TheoremApplications of Residue Theorem in complex analysis?Complex analysis without Cauchy's theoremUnderstanding Integration in Complex analysisCauchy's integral formula and Green's theorem. Scalar or gradient?Integrating a real function using complex analysisIntegral with two different answers using real and complex analysis

Does Forgotten Realms setting count as “High magic”?

Wouldn't Kreacher have been able to escape even without following an order?

What did the first ever Hunger Games look like?

Is there a tool to measure the "maturity" of a code in Git?

Why are two-stroke engines nearly unheard of in aviation?

Why does '/' contain '..'?

Output a Super Mario Image

Tips for remembering the order of parameters for ln?

What would happen if Protagoras v Euathlus were heard in court today?

Are articles good enough to be the main source of information for PhD research?

Can an infinite series be thought of as adding up "infinitely many" terms?

Pronunciation of "солнце"

Is there a theorem in Real analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem in Complex analysis?

What is the origin of the "being immortal sucks" trope?

What does “We have long ago paid the goblins of Moria,” from The Hobbit mean?

Seven Places at Once - Another Google Earth Challenge?

Is my sink P-trap too low?

In what sequence should an advanced civilization teach technology to medieval society to maximize rate of adoption?

geschafft or geschaffen? which one is past participle of schaffen?

Floating Point XOR

Why is it called a stateful and a stateless firewall?

Did slaves have slaves?

Answer Not A Fool, or Answer A Fool?

Permutations in Disguise



Is there a theorem in Real analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem in Complex analysis?


The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic functionCauchy's Integral TheoremApplications of Residue Theorem in complex analysis?Complex analysis without Cauchy's theoremUnderstanding Integration in Complex analysisCauchy's integral formula and Green's theorem. Scalar or gradient?Integrating a real function using complex analysisIntegral with two different answers using real and complex analysis






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


Is there a theorem in Real Analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem/Cauchy's Integral Formula from Complex analysis?



If not, then why? What is it about the complex space that makes Cauchy's theorem true?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my answer as per your request
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago

















5












$begingroup$


Is there a theorem in Real Analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem/Cauchy's Integral Formula from Complex analysis?



If not, then why? What is it about the complex space that makes Cauchy's theorem true?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my answer as per your request
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


Is there a theorem in Real Analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem/Cauchy's Integral Formula from Complex analysis?



If not, then why? What is it about the complex space that makes Cauchy's theorem true?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Is there a theorem in Real Analysis similar to Cauchy's theorem/Cauchy's Integral Formula from Complex analysis?



If not, then why? What is it about the complex space that makes Cauchy's theorem true?







real-analysis calculus complex-analysis complex-numbers cauchy-integral-formula






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









krtgdlkrtgdl

19313 bronze badges




19313 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my answer as per your request
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my answer as per your request
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
I have edited my answer as per your request
$endgroup$
– Learnmore
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I have edited my answer as per your request
$endgroup$
– Learnmore
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1














$begingroup$

I actually think the real way to think about it is that Cauchy's Integral formula is a weird complex form of the Mean Value Property for harmonic functions.



Harmonic functions are characterised by the Mean Value Property, i.e., if $Usubseteq mathbbR^n$ is open, $xin U$ and $f$ is harmonic on $U$, then for all $r>0$ such that $B(x,r)subseteq U,$ we have



$$
f(x)=frac1dS(partial B(x,r))int_partial B(x,r) f(y)textrmdS(y),
$$

where $dS$ denotes the surface measure on $partial B(x,r)$. In case $n=2,$ this will be a regular cruve integral. The density appearing in the Cauchy formula needs to account for the fact that you're trying to compute a complex curve integral as opposed to a real one.



Note that holomorphic functions are, in particular, harmonic, so the above formula holds for them as a statement about real curve integrals.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    7 hours ago



















3














$begingroup$

The (possible) reasons are:



(1) If $f$ is analytic(differentiable) in $Bbb C$ then so is its derivative $f^'$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider the function $f(x)=x^2sin (frac1x)$.
(2) If you integrate an analytic function over a closed domain in $Bbb C$ (Cauchy's Theorem) then its integral is $0$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider $x^2 $ over $[-1,1]$



NOTE: For point (2) you could use the fact that every analytic function over a simply connected domain has an antiderivative which is not true in $Bbb R$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I see! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    7 hours ago


















1














$begingroup$

The essential difference between real and complex analysis at this level is that a complex function that's differentiable is analytic - it is the limit of its Taylor series in a disk. There are nonconstant infinitely differentiable real functions of a real variable all of whose derivatives at a point are $0$, hence not a power series in any disk.



See The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic function






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    0














    $begingroup$

    Several theorems are named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Cauchy's theorem may mean:



    Cauchy's integral theorem in complex analysis, also Cauchy's integral formula
    Cauchy's mean value theorem in real analysis, an extended form of the mean value theorem.
    Cauchy's criterion for uniform convergence.



    Which Cauchy's theorem are you referring too?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This should really be a comment...
      $endgroup$
      – Pixel
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      8 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
      $endgroup$
      – Phinda Hlawe
      8 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3357367%2fis-there-a-theorem-in-real-analysis-similar-to-cauchys-theorem-in-complex-analy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    $begingroup$

    I actually think the real way to think about it is that Cauchy's Integral formula is a weird complex form of the Mean Value Property for harmonic functions.



    Harmonic functions are characterised by the Mean Value Property, i.e., if $Usubseteq mathbbR^n$ is open, $xin U$ and $f$ is harmonic on $U$, then for all $r>0$ such that $B(x,r)subseteq U,$ we have



    $$
    f(x)=frac1dS(partial B(x,r))int_partial B(x,r) f(y)textrmdS(y),
    $$

    where $dS$ denotes the surface measure on $partial B(x,r)$. In case $n=2,$ this will be a regular cruve integral. The density appearing in the Cauchy formula needs to account for the fact that you're trying to compute a complex curve integral as opposed to a real one.



    Note that holomorphic functions are, in particular, harmonic, so the above formula holds for them as a statement about real curve integrals.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago
















    1














    $begingroup$

    I actually think the real way to think about it is that Cauchy's Integral formula is a weird complex form of the Mean Value Property for harmonic functions.



    Harmonic functions are characterised by the Mean Value Property, i.e., if $Usubseteq mathbbR^n$ is open, $xin U$ and $f$ is harmonic on $U$, then for all $r>0$ such that $B(x,r)subseteq U,$ we have



    $$
    f(x)=frac1dS(partial B(x,r))int_partial B(x,r) f(y)textrmdS(y),
    $$

    where $dS$ denotes the surface measure on $partial B(x,r)$. In case $n=2,$ this will be a regular cruve integral. The density appearing in the Cauchy formula needs to account for the fact that you're trying to compute a complex curve integral as opposed to a real one.



    Note that holomorphic functions are, in particular, harmonic, so the above formula holds for them as a statement about real curve integrals.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago














    1














    1










    1







    $begingroup$

    I actually think the real way to think about it is that Cauchy's Integral formula is a weird complex form of the Mean Value Property for harmonic functions.



    Harmonic functions are characterised by the Mean Value Property, i.e., if $Usubseteq mathbbR^n$ is open, $xin U$ and $f$ is harmonic on $U$, then for all $r>0$ such that $B(x,r)subseteq U,$ we have



    $$
    f(x)=frac1dS(partial B(x,r))int_partial B(x,r) f(y)textrmdS(y),
    $$

    where $dS$ denotes the surface measure on $partial B(x,r)$. In case $n=2,$ this will be a regular cruve integral. The density appearing in the Cauchy formula needs to account for the fact that you're trying to compute a complex curve integral as opposed to a real one.



    Note that holomorphic functions are, in particular, harmonic, so the above formula holds for them as a statement about real curve integrals.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    I actually think the real way to think about it is that Cauchy's Integral formula is a weird complex form of the Mean Value Property for harmonic functions.



    Harmonic functions are characterised by the Mean Value Property, i.e., if $Usubseteq mathbbR^n$ is open, $xin U$ and $f$ is harmonic on $U$, then for all $r>0$ such that $B(x,r)subseteq U,$ we have



    $$
    f(x)=frac1dS(partial B(x,r))int_partial B(x,r) f(y)textrmdS(y),
    $$

    where $dS$ denotes the surface measure on $partial B(x,r)$. In case $n=2,$ this will be a regular cruve integral. The density appearing in the Cauchy formula needs to account for the fact that you're trying to compute a complex curve integral as opposed to a real one.



    Note that holomorphic functions are, in particular, harmonic, so the above formula holds for them as a statement about real curve integrals.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 8 hours ago









    WoolierThanThouWoolierThanThou

    1,4411 silver badge8 bronze badges




    1,4411 silver badge8 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago

















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    7 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    Thank you! I like this way of thinking about Cauchy's Integral formula!
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    7 hours ago














    3














    $begingroup$

    The (possible) reasons are:



    (1) If $f$ is analytic(differentiable) in $Bbb C$ then so is its derivative $f^'$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider the function $f(x)=x^2sin (frac1x)$.
    (2) If you integrate an analytic function over a closed domain in $Bbb C$ (Cauchy's Theorem) then its integral is $0$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider $x^2 $ over $[-1,1]$



    NOTE: For point (2) you could use the fact that every analytic function over a simply connected domain has an antiderivative which is not true in $Bbb R$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      8 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
      $endgroup$
      – Learnmore
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I see! Thank you!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago















    3














    $begingroup$

    The (possible) reasons are:



    (1) If $f$ is analytic(differentiable) in $Bbb C$ then so is its derivative $f^'$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider the function $f(x)=x^2sin (frac1x)$.
    (2) If you integrate an analytic function over a closed domain in $Bbb C$ (Cauchy's Theorem) then its integral is $0$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider $x^2 $ over $[-1,1]$



    NOTE: For point (2) you could use the fact that every analytic function over a simply connected domain has an antiderivative which is not true in $Bbb R$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      8 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
      $endgroup$
      – Learnmore
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I see! Thank you!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago













    3














    3










    3







    $begingroup$

    The (possible) reasons are:



    (1) If $f$ is analytic(differentiable) in $Bbb C$ then so is its derivative $f^'$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider the function $f(x)=x^2sin (frac1x)$.
    (2) If you integrate an analytic function over a closed domain in $Bbb C$ (Cauchy's Theorem) then its integral is $0$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider $x^2 $ over $[-1,1]$



    NOTE: For point (2) you could use the fact that every analytic function over a simply connected domain has an antiderivative which is not true in $Bbb R$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The (possible) reasons are:



    (1) If $f$ is analytic(differentiable) in $Bbb C$ then so is its derivative $f^'$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider the function $f(x)=x^2sin (frac1x)$.
    (2) If you integrate an analytic function over a closed domain in $Bbb C$ (Cauchy's Theorem) then its integral is $0$ which is not true in $Bbb R$ , example consider $x^2 $ over $[-1,1]$



    NOTE: For point (2) you could use the fact that every analytic function over a simply connected domain has an antiderivative which is not true in $Bbb R$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    LearnmoreLearnmore

    18.5k3 gold badges29 silver badges114 bronze badges




    18.5k3 gold badges29 silver badges114 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      8 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
      $endgroup$
      – Learnmore
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I see! Thank you!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      8 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
      $endgroup$
      – Learnmore
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I see! Thank you!
      $endgroup$
      – krtgdl
      7 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    8 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer. I am interested in the point you made about the integral of $x^2$ on $[-1,1]$. It is (computanionally) clear why the integral is non-zero, but is there perhaps a more insightful reason why this "closed path" in R is not zero- as this property seems to distinguish $mathbbR $ - calculus from $mathbbC$ - Calculus?
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    8 hours ago





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @krtgdl; It is because every analytic function has an antiderivative
    $endgroup$
    – Learnmore
    7 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Yes, I see! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I see! Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – krtgdl
    7 hours ago











    1














    $begingroup$

    The essential difference between real and complex analysis at this level is that a complex function that's differentiable is analytic - it is the limit of its Taylor series in a disk. There are nonconstant infinitely differentiable real functions of a real variable all of whose derivatives at a point are $0$, hence not a power series in any disk.



    See The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic function






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      1














      $begingroup$

      The essential difference between real and complex analysis at this level is that a complex function that's differentiable is analytic - it is the limit of its Taylor series in a disk. There are nonconstant infinitely differentiable real functions of a real variable all of whose derivatives at a point are $0$, hence not a power series in any disk.



      See The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic function






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        1














        1










        1







        $begingroup$

        The essential difference between real and complex analysis at this level is that a complex function that's differentiable is analytic - it is the limit of its Taylor series in a disk. There are nonconstant infinitely differentiable real functions of a real variable all of whose derivatives at a point are $0$, hence not a power series in any disk.



        See The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic function






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The essential difference between real and complex analysis at this level is that a complex function that's differentiable is analytic - it is the limit of its Taylor series in a disk. There are nonconstant infinitely differentiable real functions of a real variable all of whose derivatives at a point are $0$, hence not a power series in any disk.



        See The distinction between infinitely differentiable function and real analytic function







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker

        55.8k5 gold badges63 silver badges134 bronze badges




        55.8k5 gold badges63 silver badges134 bronze badges
























            0














            $begingroup$

            Several theorems are named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Cauchy's theorem may mean:



            Cauchy's integral theorem in complex analysis, also Cauchy's integral formula
            Cauchy's mean value theorem in real analysis, an extended form of the mean value theorem.
            Cauchy's criterion for uniform convergence.



            Which Cauchy's theorem are you referring too?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This should really be a comment...
              $endgroup$
              – Pixel
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
              $endgroup$
              – krtgdl
              8 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
              $endgroup$
              – Phinda Hlawe
              8 hours ago















            0














            $begingroup$

            Several theorems are named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Cauchy's theorem may mean:



            Cauchy's integral theorem in complex analysis, also Cauchy's integral formula
            Cauchy's mean value theorem in real analysis, an extended form of the mean value theorem.
            Cauchy's criterion for uniform convergence.



            Which Cauchy's theorem are you referring too?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This should really be a comment...
              $endgroup$
              – Pixel
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
              $endgroup$
              – krtgdl
              8 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
              $endgroup$
              – Phinda Hlawe
              8 hours ago













            0














            0










            0







            $begingroup$

            Several theorems are named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Cauchy's theorem may mean:



            Cauchy's integral theorem in complex analysis, also Cauchy's integral formula
            Cauchy's mean value theorem in real analysis, an extended form of the mean value theorem.
            Cauchy's criterion for uniform convergence.



            Which Cauchy's theorem are you referring too?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Several theorems are named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Cauchy's theorem may mean:



            Cauchy's integral theorem in complex analysis, also Cauchy's integral formula
            Cauchy's mean value theorem in real analysis, an extended form of the mean value theorem.
            Cauchy's criterion for uniform convergence.



            Which Cauchy's theorem are you referring too?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            Phinda HlawePhinda Hlawe

            172 bronze badges




            172 bronze badges










            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This should really be a comment...
              $endgroup$
              – Pixel
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
              $endgroup$
              – krtgdl
              8 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
              $endgroup$
              – Phinda Hlawe
              8 hours ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This should really be a comment...
              $endgroup$
              – Pixel
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
              $endgroup$
              – krtgdl
              8 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
              $endgroup$
              – Phinda Hlawe
              8 hours ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            This should really be a comment...
            $endgroup$
            – Pixel
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This should really be a comment...
            $endgroup$
            – Pixel
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
            $endgroup$
            – krtgdl
            8 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            I apologise for the confusion. I thought I had made it clear that I am refering to Cauchy's Integral formula/Cauchy's theorem from Complex analysis.
            $endgroup$
            – krtgdl
            8 hours ago





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
            $endgroup$
            – Phinda Hlawe
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I am not allowed to make comments on posts I did not write I'm still new to this.
            $endgroup$
            – Phinda Hlawe
            8 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3357367%2fis-there-a-theorem-in-real-analysis-similar-to-cauchys-theorem-in-complex-analy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480