L and epsilon factors of Gelbart-Jacquet liftsHow strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?Equivalent forms of the Grand Riemann HypothesisOverview of automorphic representations for $SL(2)/mathbfQ$?Uniqueness of local Langlands correspondence for connected reductive groups over real/complex field.How is representation theory used in modular/automorphic forms?Axiomatizing Gross-Zagier formulaeHow different can characters be for a sum of modular forms to still be in Gamma_0?Relation between Hecke operators and coefficient of L-functionsHow strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?

L and epsilon factors of Gelbart-Jacquet lifts


How strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?Equivalent forms of the Grand Riemann HypothesisOverview of automorphic representations for $SL(2)/mathbfQ$?Uniqueness of local Langlands correspondence for connected reductive groups over real/complex field.How is representation theory used in modular/automorphic forms?Axiomatizing Gross-Zagier formulaeHow different can characters be for a sum of modular forms to still be in Gamma_0?Relation between Hecke operators and coefficient of L-functionsHow strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?













2












$begingroup$


I would like to understand better the L-function and epsilon factors attached to a Gelbart-Jacquet lift. Does the fact of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift translates into strong properties concerning these objects? In particular I would like to understand, for $pi$ an automorphic representation of $GL(3)$ that is a Gelbart-Jacquet lift :



  • could $varepsilon(1/2, pi)$ be zero, or can all the twists by quadratic characters $varepsilon(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

  • can $L(1/2, pi)$ or $L(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

  • are these situations possible for other automorphic representations, that are not necessarily Gelbart-Jacquet lifts?

Any clue on how to understand Gelbart-Jacquet lifts (computationally and in practice I mean) is welcome!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    I would like to understand better the L-function and epsilon factors attached to a Gelbart-Jacquet lift. Does the fact of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift translates into strong properties concerning these objects? In particular I would like to understand, for $pi$ an automorphic representation of $GL(3)$ that is a Gelbart-Jacquet lift :



    • could $varepsilon(1/2, pi)$ be zero, or can all the twists by quadratic characters $varepsilon(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

    • can $L(1/2, pi)$ or $L(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

    • are these situations possible for other automorphic representations, that are not necessarily Gelbart-Jacquet lifts?

    Any clue on how to understand Gelbart-Jacquet lifts (computationally and in practice I mean) is welcome!










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor



    Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I would like to understand better the L-function and epsilon factors attached to a Gelbart-Jacquet lift. Does the fact of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift translates into strong properties concerning these objects? In particular I would like to understand, for $pi$ an automorphic representation of $GL(3)$ that is a Gelbart-Jacquet lift :



      • could $varepsilon(1/2, pi)$ be zero, or can all the twists by quadratic characters $varepsilon(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

      • can $L(1/2, pi)$ or $L(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

      • are these situations possible for other automorphic representations, that are not necessarily Gelbart-Jacquet lifts?

      Any clue on how to understand Gelbart-Jacquet lifts (computationally and in practice I mean) is welcome!










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor



      Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$




      I would like to understand better the L-function and epsilon factors attached to a Gelbart-Jacquet lift. Does the fact of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift translates into strong properties concerning these objects? In particular I would like to understand, for $pi$ an automorphic representation of $GL(3)$ that is a Gelbart-Jacquet lift :



      • could $varepsilon(1/2, pi)$ be zero, or can all the twists by quadratic characters $varepsilon(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

      • can $L(1/2, pi)$ or $L(1/2, pi, chi)$ be zero?

      • are these situations possible for other automorphic representations, that are not necessarily Gelbart-Jacquet lifts?

      Any clue on how to understand Gelbart-Jacquet lifts (computationally and in practice I mean) is welcome!







      nt.number-theory automorphic-forms






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor



      Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor



      Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      David Loeffler

      20.7k1 gold badge52 silver badges124 bronze badges




      20.7k1 gold badge52 silver badges124 bronze badges






      New contributor



      Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      DamonDamon

      111 bronze badge




      111 bronze badge




      New contributor



      Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Damon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          $begingroup$

          The function $s mapsto epsilon(s, pi)$ has the form $s mapsto A e^Bs$ for some constants $A, B$, so it vanishes nowhere on $mathbbC$. That has nothing to do with being a GJ lift, it's a general property of epsilon factors. Similarly, being a GJ lift doesn't really tell you much about the value at $s = tfrac12$: analytically, the standard L-function of a Gelbart--Jacquet lift doesn't look much different from that of any other automorphic representation of $GL(3)$.



          What really separates the GJ lifts from other kinds of cuspidal auto reps of $GL(3)$ is that they are self-dual; so the Rankin--Selberg L-function of $pi$ with itself, $L(pi times pi, s)$, has a pole at $s = 1$ if and only if $pi$ is a GJ lift (I hope I've remembered that correctly). See also Peter Humphries' excellent answer to this question: How strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Humphries
            6 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );







          Damon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341643%2fl-and-epsilon-factors-of-gelbart-jacquet-lifts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          $begingroup$

          The function $s mapsto epsilon(s, pi)$ has the form $s mapsto A e^Bs$ for some constants $A, B$, so it vanishes nowhere on $mathbbC$. That has nothing to do with being a GJ lift, it's a general property of epsilon factors. Similarly, being a GJ lift doesn't really tell you much about the value at $s = tfrac12$: analytically, the standard L-function of a Gelbart--Jacquet lift doesn't look much different from that of any other automorphic representation of $GL(3)$.



          What really separates the GJ lifts from other kinds of cuspidal auto reps of $GL(3)$ is that they are self-dual; so the Rankin--Selberg L-function of $pi$ with itself, $L(pi times pi, s)$, has a pole at $s = 1$ if and only if $pi$ is a GJ lift (I hope I've remembered that correctly). See also Peter Humphries' excellent answer to this question: How strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Humphries
            6 hours ago















          4














          $begingroup$

          The function $s mapsto epsilon(s, pi)$ has the form $s mapsto A e^Bs$ for some constants $A, B$, so it vanishes nowhere on $mathbbC$. That has nothing to do with being a GJ lift, it's a general property of epsilon factors. Similarly, being a GJ lift doesn't really tell you much about the value at $s = tfrac12$: analytically, the standard L-function of a Gelbart--Jacquet lift doesn't look much different from that of any other automorphic representation of $GL(3)$.



          What really separates the GJ lifts from other kinds of cuspidal auto reps of $GL(3)$ is that they are self-dual; so the Rankin--Selberg L-function of $pi$ with itself, $L(pi times pi, s)$, has a pole at $s = 1$ if and only if $pi$ is a GJ lift (I hope I've remembered that correctly). See also Peter Humphries' excellent answer to this question: How strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Humphries
            6 hours ago













          4














          4










          4







          $begingroup$

          The function $s mapsto epsilon(s, pi)$ has the form $s mapsto A e^Bs$ for some constants $A, B$, so it vanishes nowhere on $mathbbC$. That has nothing to do with being a GJ lift, it's a general property of epsilon factors. Similarly, being a GJ lift doesn't really tell you much about the value at $s = tfrac12$: analytically, the standard L-function of a Gelbart--Jacquet lift doesn't look much different from that of any other automorphic representation of $GL(3)$.



          What really separates the GJ lifts from other kinds of cuspidal auto reps of $GL(3)$ is that they are self-dual; so the Rankin--Selberg L-function of $pi$ with itself, $L(pi times pi, s)$, has a pole at $s = 1$ if and only if $pi$ is a GJ lift (I hope I've remembered that correctly). See also Peter Humphries' excellent answer to this question: How strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The function $s mapsto epsilon(s, pi)$ has the form $s mapsto A e^Bs$ for some constants $A, B$, so it vanishes nowhere on $mathbbC$. That has nothing to do with being a GJ lift, it's a general property of epsilon factors. Similarly, being a GJ lift doesn't really tell you much about the value at $s = tfrac12$: analytically, the standard L-function of a Gelbart--Jacquet lift doesn't look much different from that of any other automorphic representation of $GL(3)$.



          What really separates the GJ lifts from other kinds of cuspidal auto reps of $GL(3)$ is that they are self-dual; so the Rankin--Selberg L-function of $pi$ with itself, $L(pi times pi, s)$, has a pole at $s = 1$ if and only if $pi$ is a GJ lift (I hope I've remembered that correctly). See also Peter Humphries' excellent answer to this question: How strong is the requirement of being a Gelbart-Jacquet lift?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          David LoefflerDavid Loeffler

          20.7k1 gold badge52 silver badges124 bronze badges




          20.7k1 gold badge52 silver badges124 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Humphries
            6 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Humphries
            6 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
          $endgroup$
          – Peter Humphries
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          For what it's worth, I've found Gelbart and Jacquet's paper (doi.org/10.24033/asens.1355) quite useful for computing the local epsilon factors and local $L$-functions, given one knows the local data.
          $endgroup$
          – Peter Humphries
          6 hours ago











          Damon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded

















          Damon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Damon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Damon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341643%2fl-and-epsilon-factors-of-gelbart-jacquet-lifts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480