Is it acceptable to use decoupling capacitor ground pad as ground for oscilloscope probe?TIP-Barrel test of oscilloscopeDecoupling capacitors on the bottom layer?How to identify if noise is coming from circuit or scope?How do you attach an oscilloscope ground spring?Poor man's x100 'scope probeAC->DC Power supply ground and probingOscilloscope probe measure squarewaveOscilloscope Probe Noise and SafetyDecoupling capacitor placementMaking 2 layer board, using ground pour when I already use ground plane?Oscilloscope probe pF values

Statistical tests for benchmark comparison

What is the origin of the "being immortal sucks" trope?

How to make my “custom integer type” perform better?

How to draw a Venn diagram for X - (Y intersect Z)?

Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register

how to know this integral finite or infinite

What does the "capacitor into resistance" symbol mean?

Why is it called a stateful and a stateless firewall?

Persuading players to be less attached to a pre-session 0 character concept

Very lazy puppy

How clean are pets?

What was the ultimate objective of The Party in 1984?

Updating without Composer

Other than good shoes and a stick, what are some ways to preserve your knees on long hikes?

Madrid to London w/ Expired 90/180 days stay as US citizen

What does the Free Recovery sign (UK) actually mean?

How do we know that black holes are spinning?

Amortized Loans seem to benefit the bank more than the customer

Unpredictability of Stock Market

What does this Blight Tower UI mean?

Why does JavaScript convert an array of one string to a string, when used as an object key?

Is it appropriate to CC a lot of people on an email?

What is this WWII four-engine plane on skis?

Why is the car dealer insisting on a loan instead of cash?



Is it acceptable to use decoupling capacitor ground pad as ground for oscilloscope probe?


TIP-Barrel test of oscilloscopeDecoupling capacitors on the bottom layer?How to identify if noise is coming from circuit or scope?How do you attach an oscilloscope ground spring?Poor man's x100 'scope probeAC->DC Power supply ground and probingOscilloscope probe measure squarewaveOscilloscope Probe Noise and SafetyDecoupling capacitor placementMaking 2 layer board, using ground pour when I already use ground plane?Oscilloscope probe pF values






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


If one were to probe with an oscilloscope using the short ground spring clip attachment, and use the ground pad of a decoupling capacitor as the ground, would the measurement be thrown off at all by currents moving to ground through the capacitor? Or is something like a test point pad on the top layer ground pour required for peak accuracy? Say I'm probing a pin on an IC and using a local decoupling cap ground pad as the ground as shown in the pic, would this measurement be free of any noise from the cap? If not then what would be the best practice method to do this? Thanks.



enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You should show the relevant schematic as well as the complete PCB layout. Noone can guess the frequency that decoupling cap is subjected to. Moreover, the little part of the PCB layout suggests the cap is grounded to the ground plane, but if the ground plane is cut and causing ground loops...
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It looks like the pin above the to-be-probed pin also seems connected to ground. You could use such setup
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


If one were to probe with an oscilloscope using the short ground spring clip attachment, and use the ground pad of a decoupling capacitor as the ground, would the measurement be thrown off at all by currents moving to ground through the capacitor? Or is something like a test point pad on the top layer ground pour required for peak accuracy? Say I'm probing a pin on an IC and using a local decoupling cap ground pad as the ground as shown in the pic, would this measurement be free of any noise from the cap? If not then what would be the best practice method to do this? Thanks.



enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You should show the relevant schematic as well as the complete PCB layout. Noone can guess the frequency that decoupling cap is subjected to. Moreover, the little part of the PCB layout suggests the cap is grounded to the ground plane, but if the ground plane is cut and causing ground loops...
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It looks like the pin above the to-be-probed pin also seems connected to ground. You could use such setup
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


If one were to probe with an oscilloscope using the short ground spring clip attachment, and use the ground pad of a decoupling capacitor as the ground, would the measurement be thrown off at all by currents moving to ground through the capacitor? Or is something like a test point pad on the top layer ground pour required for peak accuracy? Say I'm probing a pin on an IC and using a local decoupling cap ground pad as the ground as shown in the pic, would this measurement be free of any noise from the cap? If not then what would be the best practice method to do this? Thanks.



enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




If one were to probe with an oscilloscope using the short ground spring clip attachment, and use the ground pad of a decoupling capacitor as the ground, would the measurement be thrown off at all by currents moving to ground through the capacitor? Or is something like a test point pad on the top layer ground pour required for peak accuracy? Say I'm probing a pin on an IC and using a local decoupling cap ground pad as the ground as shown in the pic, would this measurement be free of any noise from the cap? If not then what would be the best practice method to do this? Thanks.



enter image description here







ground oscilloscope probe






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









wdbwbd1wdbwbd1

961 silver badge5 bronze badges




961 silver badge5 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    You should show the relevant schematic as well as the complete PCB layout. Noone can guess the frequency that decoupling cap is subjected to. Moreover, the little part of the PCB layout suggests the cap is grounded to the ground plane, but if the ground plane is cut and causing ground loops...
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It looks like the pin above the to-be-probed pin also seems connected to ground. You could use such setup
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    You should show the relevant schematic as well as the complete PCB layout. Noone can guess the frequency that decoupling cap is subjected to. Moreover, the little part of the PCB layout suggests the cap is grounded to the ground plane, but if the ground plane is cut and causing ground loops...
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It looks like the pin above the to-be-probed pin also seems connected to ground. You could use such setup
    $endgroup$
    – Huisman
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
You should show the relevant schematic as well as the complete PCB layout. Noone can guess the frequency that decoupling cap is subjected to. Moreover, the little part of the PCB layout suggests the cap is grounded to the ground plane, but if the ground plane is cut and causing ground loops...
$endgroup$
– Huisman
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
You should show the relevant schematic as well as the complete PCB layout. Noone can guess the frequency that decoupling cap is subjected to. Moreover, the little part of the PCB layout suggests the cap is grounded to the ground plane, but if the ground plane is cut and causing ground loops...
$endgroup$
– Huisman
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
It looks like the pin above the to-be-probed pin also seems connected to ground. You could use such setup
$endgroup$
– Huisman
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
It looks like the pin above the to-be-probed pin also seems connected to ground. You could use such setup
$endgroup$
– Huisman
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














$begingroup$

In general you want to minimize the loop area when probing fast signals. So, as a rule of thumb, you should select the ground connection that minimizes the loop area.



Now this is only in general. There may be good reasons to use the capacitor ground. This is due to the resonances in the ground plane. Your ground plane will not be zero volts everywhere for all frequencies. It will look something like this:



ground plane



source



This shows the voltage of the ground plane at a specific frequency. What’s worse is that this can change dynamically depending on the power consumption of the ICs. If you select a ground reference near a resonant mode, high frequency noise can enter your probe, due to the fact that the ground plane reference will be oscillating at the resonant frequency.



The thing about decoupling capacitors is that they suppress the resonances in the power planes. In fact this is how you prevent unwanted resonant modes near your frequency of operation. However this all depends on the geometry of the planes, the value of the capacitor (the smaller the better), power consumption of the ICs, frequency of the ICs etc.



So it all depends on your specific situation. As I said, try to minimize the loop area as a general first approach.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    2














    $begingroup$

    Your assumption is correct to use this pad.

    But consider what rise time you expect and ringing error to occur from the probe if looking at <5ns rise time.



    The criteria for analyzing a bad choice of gnd. Is V=LdI/dt. Where f-3dB=0.35/dt (10~90%) and L=~0.5nH/mm the distance of the shared ground current of the observed square wave rise time. The probe capacitance also results in a resonant frequency from this L including the probe spring length and if kept short should permit a flat response to a 200MHz BW , the limit of many good high Z 10M probes. By contrast , a typical 200MHz probe with a long ground clip wire will resonate near 30MHz due to L of the ground clip and probe capacitance.



    Beyond this requires a better understanding of geometry where 50 Ohm AC probes work best and 50 Ohm geometry has a ratio of signal width to gnd gap near 0.5 and length becomes irrelevant. This reduces the Q of the parallel Resonance and extends the BW into the GHz range.



    Generally a good design with DFT will have paired test points for short spring probe contacts on critical test signals including Vdd with an AC coupled 50 Ohm load for direct coax connection or high Z spring Probe. This is a desirable way to measure supply ripple accurately at source and loads for comparison using the 50 Ohm AC coupled load. Ideally the 50Ohm is selected on the DSO or SA input with AC mode to prevent power loading using high freq high quality coax , if you want >1GHz BW.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
      $endgroup$
      – analogsystemsrf
      1 hour ago













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458630%2fis-it-acceptable-to-use-decoupling-capacitor-ground-pad-as-ground-for-oscillosco%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    $begingroup$

    In general you want to minimize the loop area when probing fast signals. So, as a rule of thumb, you should select the ground connection that minimizes the loop area.



    Now this is only in general. There may be good reasons to use the capacitor ground. This is due to the resonances in the ground plane. Your ground plane will not be zero volts everywhere for all frequencies. It will look something like this:



    ground plane



    source



    This shows the voltage of the ground plane at a specific frequency. What’s worse is that this can change dynamically depending on the power consumption of the ICs. If you select a ground reference near a resonant mode, high frequency noise can enter your probe, due to the fact that the ground plane reference will be oscillating at the resonant frequency.



    The thing about decoupling capacitors is that they suppress the resonances in the power planes. In fact this is how you prevent unwanted resonant modes near your frequency of operation. However this all depends on the geometry of the planes, the value of the capacitor (the smaller the better), power consumption of the ICs, frequency of the ICs etc.



    So it all depends on your specific situation. As I said, try to minimize the loop area as a general first approach.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      4














      $begingroup$

      In general you want to minimize the loop area when probing fast signals. So, as a rule of thumb, you should select the ground connection that minimizes the loop area.



      Now this is only in general. There may be good reasons to use the capacitor ground. This is due to the resonances in the ground plane. Your ground plane will not be zero volts everywhere for all frequencies. It will look something like this:



      ground plane



      source



      This shows the voltage of the ground plane at a specific frequency. What’s worse is that this can change dynamically depending on the power consumption of the ICs. If you select a ground reference near a resonant mode, high frequency noise can enter your probe, due to the fact that the ground plane reference will be oscillating at the resonant frequency.



      The thing about decoupling capacitors is that they suppress the resonances in the power planes. In fact this is how you prevent unwanted resonant modes near your frequency of operation. However this all depends on the geometry of the planes, the value of the capacitor (the smaller the better), power consumption of the ICs, frequency of the ICs etc.



      So it all depends on your specific situation. As I said, try to minimize the loop area as a general first approach.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        4














        4










        4







        $begingroup$

        In general you want to minimize the loop area when probing fast signals. So, as a rule of thumb, you should select the ground connection that minimizes the loop area.



        Now this is only in general. There may be good reasons to use the capacitor ground. This is due to the resonances in the ground plane. Your ground plane will not be zero volts everywhere for all frequencies. It will look something like this:



        ground plane



        source



        This shows the voltage of the ground plane at a specific frequency. What’s worse is that this can change dynamically depending on the power consumption of the ICs. If you select a ground reference near a resonant mode, high frequency noise can enter your probe, due to the fact that the ground plane reference will be oscillating at the resonant frequency.



        The thing about decoupling capacitors is that they suppress the resonances in the power planes. In fact this is how you prevent unwanted resonant modes near your frequency of operation. However this all depends on the geometry of the planes, the value of the capacitor (the smaller the better), power consumption of the ICs, frequency of the ICs etc.



        So it all depends on your specific situation. As I said, try to minimize the loop area as a general first approach.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In general you want to minimize the loop area when probing fast signals. So, as a rule of thumb, you should select the ground connection that minimizes the loop area.



        Now this is only in general. There may be good reasons to use the capacitor ground. This is due to the resonances in the ground plane. Your ground plane will not be zero volts everywhere for all frequencies. It will look something like this:



        ground plane



        source



        This shows the voltage of the ground plane at a specific frequency. What’s worse is that this can change dynamically depending on the power consumption of the ICs. If you select a ground reference near a resonant mode, high frequency noise can enter your probe, due to the fact that the ground plane reference will be oscillating at the resonant frequency.



        The thing about decoupling capacitors is that they suppress the resonances in the power planes. In fact this is how you prevent unwanted resonant modes near your frequency of operation. However this all depends on the geometry of the planes, the value of the capacitor (the smaller the better), power consumption of the ICs, frequency of the ICs etc.



        So it all depends on your specific situation. As I said, try to minimize the loop area as a general first approach.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        user110971user110971

        4,0991 gold badge9 silver badges21 bronze badges




        4,0991 gold badge9 silver badges21 bronze badges


























            2














            $begingroup$

            Your assumption is correct to use this pad.

            But consider what rise time you expect and ringing error to occur from the probe if looking at <5ns rise time.



            The criteria for analyzing a bad choice of gnd. Is V=LdI/dt. Where f-3dB=0.35/dt (10~90%) and L=~0.5nH/mm the distance of the shared ground current of the observed square wave rise time. The probe capacitance also results in a resonant frequency from this L including the probe spring length and if kept short should permit a flat response to a 200MHz BW , the limit of many good high Z 10M probes. By contrast , a typical 200MHz probe with a long ground clip wire will resonate near 30MHz due to L of the ground clip and probe capacitance.



            Beyond this requires a better understanding of geometry where 50 Ohm AC probes work best and 50 Ohm geometry has a ratio of signal width to gnd gap near 0.5 and length becomes irrelevant. This reduces the Q of the parallel Resonance and extends the BW into the GHz range.



            Generally a good design with DFT will have paired test points for short spring probe contacts on critical test signals including Vdd with an AC coupled 50 Ohm load for direct coax connection or high Z spring Probe. This is a desirable way to measure supply ripple accurately at source and loads for comparison using the 50 Ohm AC coupled load. Ideally the 50Ohm is selected on the DSO or SA input with AC mode to prevent power loading using high freq high quality coax , if you want >1GHz BW.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
              $endgroup$
              – analogsystemsrf
              1 hour ago















            2














            $begingroup$

            Your assumption is correct to use this pad.

            But consider what rise time you expect and ringing error to occur from the probe if looking at <5ns rise time.



            The criteria for analyzing a bad choice of gnd. Is V=LdI/dt. Where f-3dB=0.35/dt (10~90%) and L=~0.5nH/mm the distance of the shared ground current of the observed square wave rise time. The probe capacitance also results in a resonant frequency from this L including the probe spring length and if kept short should permit a flat response to a 200MHz BW , the limit of many good high Z 10M probes. By contrast , a typical 200MHz probe with a long ground clip wire will resonate near 30MHz due to L of the ground clip and probe capacitance.



            Beyond this requires a better understanding of geometry where 50 Ohm AC probes work best and 50 Ohm geometry has a ratio of signal width to gnd gap near 0.5 and length becomes irrelevant. This reduces the Q of the parallel Resonance and extends the BW into the GHz range.



            Generally a good design with DFT will have paired test points for short spring probe contacts on critical test signals including Vdd with an AC coupled 50 Ohm load for direct coax connection or high Z spring Probe. This is a desirable way to measure supply ripple accurately at source and loads for comparison using the 50 Ohm AC coupled load. Ideally the 50Ohm is selected on the DSO or SA input with AC mode to prevent power loading using high freq high quality coax , if you want >1GHz BW.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
              $endgroup$
              – analogsystemsrf
              1 hour ago













            2














            2










            2







            $begingroup$

            Your assumption is correct to use this pad.

            But consider what rise time you expect and ringing error to occur from the probe if looking at <5ns rise time.



            The criteria for analyzing a bad choice of gnd. Is V=LdI/dt. Where f-3dB=0.35/dt (10~90%) and L=~0.5nH/mm the distance of the shared ground current of the observed square wave rise time. The probe capacitance also results in a resonant frequency from this L including the probe spring length and if kept short should permit a flat response to a 200MHz BW , the limit of many good high Z 10M probes. By contrast , a typical 200MHz probe with a long ground clip wire will resonate near 30MHz due to L of the ground clip and probe capacitance.



            Beyond this requires a better understanding of geometry where 50 Ohm AC probes work best and 50 Ohm geometry has a ratio of signal width to gnd gap near 0.5 and length becomes irrelevant. This reduces the Q of the parallel Resonance and extends the BW into the GHz range.



            Generally a good design with DFT will have paired test points for short spring probe contacts on critical test signals including Vdd with an AC coupled 50 Ohm load for direct coax connection or high Z spring Probe. This is a desirable way to measure supply ripple accurately at source and loads for comparison using the 50 Ohm AC coupled load. Ideally the 50Ohm is selected on the DSO or SA input with AC mode to prevent power loading using high freq high quality coax , if you want >1GHz BW.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Your assumption is correct to use this pad.

            But consider what rise time you expect and ringing error to occur from the probe if looking at <5ns rise time.



            The criteria for analyzing a bad choice of gnd. Is V=LdI/dt. Where f-3dB=0.35/dt (10~90%) and L=~0.5nH/mm the distance of the shared ground current of the observed square wave rise time. The probe capacitance also results in a resonant frequency from this L including the probe spring length and if kept short should permit a flat response to a 200MHz BW , the limit of many good high Z 10M probes. By contrast , a typical 200MHz probe with a long ground clip wire will resonate near 30MHz due to L of the ground clip and probe capacitance.



            Beyond this requires a better understanding of geometry where 50 Ohm AC probes work best and 50 Ohm geometry has a ratio of signal width to gnd gap near 0.5 and length becomes irrelevant. This reduces the Q of the parallel Resonance and extends the BW into the GHz range.



            Generally a good design with DFT will have paired test points for short spring probe contacts on critical test signals including Vdd with an AC coupled 50 Ohm load for direct coax connection or high Z spring Probe. This is a desirable way to measure supply ripple accurately at source and loads for comparison using the 50 Ohm AC coupled load. Ideally the 50Ohm is selected on the DSO or SA input with AC mode to prevent power loading using high freq high quality coax , if you want >1GHz BW.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 7 hours ago

























            answered 7 hours ago









            Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

            80.7k2 gold badges30 silver badges116 bronze badges




            80.7k2 gold badges30 silver badges116 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
              $endgroup$
              – analogsystemsrf
              1 hour ago
















            • $begingroup$
              does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
              $endgroup$
              – analogsystemsrf
              1 hour ago















            $begingroup$
            does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
            $endgroup$
            – analogsystemsrf
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            does Tektronix still sell 500 ohm probes? 450 ohm in probe, plus 50 ohm in scope.
            $endgroup$
            – analogsystemsrf
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458630%2fis-it-acceptable-to-use-decoupling-capacitor-ground-pad-as-ground-for-oscillosco%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480