Smallest PRIME containing the first 11 primes as sub-stringsSmallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-stringsThe tilted labyrinth - Can you find the fastest path in this 3D-puzzle? (Simulator now included.)The magic of the primesWhat is the smallest rectangle containing the squares of 1 through 100?Professor Halfbrain and the prime numbersA Number Game for your SoulTo Plunder Treasure IslandsFind 93 using first 4 prime numbersMake $1,dots,15$ using $3, 9, 9, 9$Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings

What can Thomas Cook customers who have not yet departed do now it has stopped operating?

Maximize assigned tasks to each worker

What is this end portal thingy?

Why do some modern glider wings like the Schleicher 29 have a tadpole shape rather than a teardrop shape?

Which altitudes are safest for VFR?

Is population size a parameter, or sample size a statistic?

Why isn't there armor to protect from spells in the Potterverse?

Question about a degree 5 polynomial with no rational roots

GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?

Top off gas with old oil, is that bad?

Pushing the e-pawn

Is there a relationship between prime numbers and music?

split 1 column input into 5 column bed file

Can I build a half bath without permits?

Convert a string of digits from words to an integer

Selection Sort Algorithm (Python)

Can I target any number of creatures, even if the ability would have no effect?

Speed and Velocity in Russian

What's the hidden joke/meaning behind "Don't drink and park - accidents cause people"?

My machine, client installed VPN,

How much horsepower to weight is required for a 1:1 thrust ratio

Sci-fi movie with one survivor and an organism(?) recreating his memories

Why is Pelosi so opposed to impeaching Trump?

A famous scholar sent me an unpublished draft of hers. Then she died. I think her work should be published. What should I do?



Smallest PRIME containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings


Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-stringsThe tilted labyrinth - Can you find the fastest path in this 3D-puzzle? (Simulator now included.)The magic of the primesWhat is the smallest rectangle containing the squares of 1 through 100?Professor Halfbrain and the prime numbersA Number Game for your SoulTo Plunder Treasure IslandsFind 93 using first 4 prime numbersMake $1,dots,15$ using $3, 9, 9, 9$Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


In Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings, @Alconja successfully found the smallest number which contains the first eleven primes (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31) as concatenated sub-strings. This inspired me to propose the following followup:



What is the smallest prime which contains each of the first eleven primes as a sub-string?



Obviously the answer is at least




113,171,923,295,




but that's not prime. How much further do we need to go?



Disclaimer: I don't know the answer myself. I'm hoping it won't need a computer to find ...










share|improve this question









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems like it will be very difficult to do without a computer
    $endgroup$
    – Cruncher
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you find any prime greater than the spoiler value without using a computer?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane I compared my guesses to an already calculated List of primes. It was probably done with a computer, but not by me.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman I know (and have used) similar lists but didn't know they went that far.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We should calculate the first N of these and submit it to the OEIS. I'll start: 2, 23, 253, 2357, 211573, 511327, 1135217... (trial and error on these, might not be all correct)
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    7 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


In Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings, @Alconja successfully found the smallest number which contains the first eleven primes (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31) as concatenated sub-strings. This inspired me to propose the following followup:



What is the smallest prime which contains each of the first eleven primes as a sub-string?



Obviously the answer is at least




113,171,923,295,




but that's not prime. How much further do we need to go?



Disclaimer: I don't know the answer myself. I'm hoping it won't need a computer to find ...










share|improve this question









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems like it will be very difficult to do without a computer
    $endgroup$
    – Cruncher
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you find any prime greater than the spoiler value without using a computer?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane I compared my guesses to an already calculated List of primes. It was probably done with a computer, but not by me.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman I know (and have used) similar lists but didn't know they went that far.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We should calculate the first N of these and submit it to the OEIS. I'll start: 2, 23, 253, 2357, 211573, 511327, 1135217... (trial and error on these, might not be all correct)
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    7 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


In Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings, @Alconja successfully found the smallest number which contains the first eleven primes (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31) as concatenated sub-strings. This inspired me to propose the following followup:



What is the smallest prime which contains each of the first eleven primes as a sub-string?



Obviously the answer is at least




113,171,923,295,




but that's not prime. How much further do we need to go?



Disclaimer: I don't know the answer myself. I'm hoping it won't need a computer to find ...










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




In Smallest number containing the first 11 primes as sub-strings, @Alconja successfully found the smallest number which contains the first eleven primes (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31) as concatenated sub-strings. This inspired me to propose the following followup:



What is the smallest prime which contains each of the first eleven primes as a sub-string?



Obviously the answer is at least




113,171,923,295,




but that's not prime. How much further do we need to go?



Disclaimer: I don't know the answer myself. I'm hoping it won't need a computer to find ...







mathematics optimization number-theory






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Rand al'ThorRand al'Thor

76.2k15 gold badges250 silver badges501 bronze badges




76.2k15 gold badges250 silver badges501 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems like it will be very difficult to do without a computer
    $endgroup$
    – Cruncher
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you find any prime greater than the spoiler value without using a computer?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane I compared my guesses to an already calculated List of primes. It was probably done with a computer, but not by me.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman I know (and have used) similar lists but didn't know they went that far.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We should calculate the first N of these and submit it to the OEIS. I'll start: 2, 23, 253, 2357, 211573, 511327, 1135217... (trial and error on these, might not be all correct)
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    7 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems like it will be very difficult to do without a computer
    $endgroup$
    – Cruncher
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you find any prime greater than the spoiler value without using a computer?
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane I compared my guesses to an already calculated List of primes. It was probably done with a computer, but not by me.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DarrelHoffman I know (and have used) similar lists but didn't know they went that far.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We should calculate the first N of these and submit it to the OEIS. I'll start: 2, 23, 253, 2357, 211573, 511327, 1135217... (trial and error on these, might not be all correct)
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    7 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
This seems like it will be very difficult to do without a computer
$endgroup$
– Cruncher
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
This seems like it will be very difficult to do without a computer
$endgroup$
– Cruncher
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
How do you find any prime greater than the spoiler value without using a computer?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
How do you find any prime greater than the spoiler value without using a computer?
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
8 hours ago













$begingroup$
@WeatherVane I compared my guesses to an already calculated List of primes. It was probably done with a computer, but not by me.
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@WeatherVane I compared my guesses to an already calculated List of primes. It was probably done with a computer, but not by me.
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@DarrelHoffman I know (and have used) similar lists but didn't know they went that far.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
@DarrelHoffman I know (and have used) similar lists but didn't know they went that far.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
8 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
We should calculate the first N of these and submit it to the OEIS. I'll start: 2, 23, 253, 2357, 211573, 511327, 1135217... (trial and error on these, might not be all correct)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
We should calculate the first N of these and submit it to the OEIS. I'll start: 2, 23, 253, 2357, 211573, 511327, 1135217... (trial and error on these, might not be all correct)
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
7 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9














$begingroup$

So I can't yet prove this is the smallest, but it's at least an upper bound:




113,175,192,329




Reasoning:




Obviously, we have to get that 5 away from the last digit or else it's a multiple of 5. But we can't break up the 29, 23, or 19 or we lose those primes. So I tried moving the 5 back a few digits. ‭113,171,923,529‬ is divisible by 7. 113,171,952,329 is divisible by 337. But 113,175,192,329 is prime. Might be able to improve on that with some other permutations...







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    8














    $begingroup$

    Shuffling the sequence of 5 and the non- overlapping 19, 23, and 29 by trial and error produces:




    113,172,923,519







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
      $endgroup$
      – Darrel Hoffman
      7 hours ago


















    2














    $begingroup$

    The answer is




    113,171,952,923




    I wrote a Java program to find it:




    The program uses brute force by starting with the lower bound obtained in the previous question (113,171,923,295) and finding the next prime that contains the required primes as substrings. It turns out that we only need to check 29628 possibilities, which is not many. Here is the program: https://pastebin.com/XQL6VGnc







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "559"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89448%2fsmallest-prime-containing-the-first-11-primes-as-sub-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      9














      $begingroup$

      So I can't yet prove this is the smallest, but it's at least an upper bound:




      113,175,192,329




      Reasoning:




      Obviously, we have to get that 5 away from the last digit or else it's a multiple of 5. But we can't break up the 29, 23, or 19 or we lose those primes. So I tried moving the 5 back a few digits. ‭113,171,923,529‬ is divisible by 7. 113,171,952,329 is divisible by 337. But 113,175,192,329 is prime. Might be able to improve on that with some other permutations...







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        9














        $begingroup$

        So I can't yet prove this is the smallest, but it's at least an upper bound:




        113,175,192,329




        Reasoning:




        Obviously, we have to get that 5 away from the last digit or else it's a multiple of 5. But we can't break up the 29, 23, or 19 or we lose those primes. So I tried moving the 5 back a few digits. ‭113,171,923,529‬ is divisible by 7. 113,171,952,329 is divisible by 337. But 113,175,192,329 is prime. Might be able to improve on that with some other permutations...







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          9














          9










          9







          $begingroup$

          So I can't yet prove this is the smallest, but it's at least an upper bound:




          113,175,192,329




          Reasoning:




          Obviously, we have to get that 5 away from the last digit or else it's a multiple of 5. But we can't break up the 29, 23, or 19 or we lose those primes. So I tried moving the 5 back a few digits. ‭113,171,923,529‬ is divisible by 7. 113,171,952,329 is divisible by 337. But 113,175,192,329 is prime. Might be able to improve on that with some other permutations...







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          So I can't yet prove this is the smallest, but it's at least an upper bound:




          113,175,192,329




          Reasoning:




          Obviously, we have to get that 5 away from the last digit or else it's a multiple of 5. But we can't break up the 29, 23, or 19 or we lose those primes. So I tried moving the 5 back a few digits. ‭113,171,923,529‬ is divisible by 7. 113,171,952,329 is divisible by 337. But 113,175,192,329 is prime. Might be able to improve on that with some other permutations...








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Darrel HoffmanDarrel Hoffman

          2,69911 silver badges26 bronze badges




          2,69911 silver badges26 bronze badges


























              8














              $begingroup$

              Shuffling the sequence of 5 and the non- overlapping 19, 23, and 29 by trial and error produces:




              113,172,923,519







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
                $endgroup$
                – Darrel Hoffman
                7 hours ago















              8














              $begingroup$

              Shuffling the sequence of 5 and the non- overlapping 19, 23, and 29 by trial and error produces:




              113,172,923,519







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
                $endgroup$
                – Darrel Hoffman
                7 hours ago













              8














              8










              8







              $begingroup$

              Shuffling the sequence of 5 and the non- overlapping 19, 23, and 29 by trial and error produces:




              113,172,923,519







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Shuffling the sequence of 5 and the non- overlapping 19, 23, and 29 by trial and error produces:




              113,172,923,519








              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 7 hours ago









              collapsarcollapsar

              3931 silver badge6 bronze badges




              3931 silver badge6 bronze badges














              • $begingroup$
                I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
                $endgroup$
                – Darrel Hoffman
                7 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
                $endgroup$
                – Darrel Hoffman
                7 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
              $endgroup$
              – Darrel Hoffman
              7 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I figured it could go smaller, just didn't have time to play around with it anymore...
              $endgroup$
              – Darrel Hoffman
              7 hours ago











              2














              $begingroup$

              The answer is




              113,171,952,923




              I wrote a Java program to find it:




              The program uses brute force by starting with the lower bound obtained in the previous question (113,171,923,295) and finding the next prime that contains the required primes as substrings. It turns out that we only need to check 29628 possibilities, which is not many. Here is the program: https://pastebin.com/XQL6VGnc







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



















                2














                $begingroup$

                The answer is




                113,171,952,923




                I wrote a Java program to find it:




                The program uses brute force by starting with the lower bound obtained in the previous question (113,171,923,295) and finding the next prime that contains the required primes as substrings. It turns out that we only need to check 29628 possibilities, which is not many. Here is the program: https://pastebin.com/XQL6VGnc







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2














                  2










                  2







                  $begingroup$

                  The answer is




                  113,171,952,923




                  I wrote a Java program to find it:




                  The program uses brute force by starting with the lower bound obtained in the previous question (113,171,923,295) and finding the next prime that contains the required primes as substrings. It turns out that we only need to check 29628 possibilities, which is not many. Here is the program: https://pastebin.com/XQL6VGnc







                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The answer is




                  113,171,952,923




                  I wrote a Java program to find it:




                  The program uses brute force by starting with the lower bound obtained in the previous question (113,171,923,295) and finding the next prime that contains the required primes as substrings. It turns out that we only need to check 29628 possibilities, which is not many. Here is the program: https://pastebin.com/XQL6VGnc








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Dmitry KamenetskyDmitry Kamenetsky

                  9602 silver badges18 bronze badges




                  9602 silver badges18 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89448%2fsmallest-prime-containing-the-first-11-primes-as-sub-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單