GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?Does using Stanford NER in a website count as distributing it?What do I have to include in the binary package as “corresponding source code” for GPL licensed software?Who owns the copyright to the code which was paid for to write?Of the differences between the GPLv3 and the AGPLv3 texts: what to make of them?Relicensing an MIT licensed project under the GPL that has non code contributions from othersGPLv2 Wordpress Application - SellingUsing iText library with AGPL license to make application open sourcedWho is the copyright holder when GPLv2 project API is used?What widely available software license is appropriate if I want to freely distribute but keep my own right to sell?Commercial license where the code can be seen/edited by others but not monetized by others

I transpose the source code, you transpose the input!

Why is the Common Agricultural Policy unfavourable to the UK?

Installation of ImageMagick software fails with "configure: error: libltdl is required"

"I will not" or "I don't" as an answer for negative orders?

split 1 column input into 5 column bed file

Why is STARTTLS still used?

MaxDetect speed

お仕事に学校頑張って meaning

Does the app TikTok violate trademark?

What does it mean by "my days-of-the-week underwear only go to Thursday" in this context?

Is there a list of world wide upcoming space events on the web?

Sci-fi movie with one survivor and an organism(?) recreating his memories

Is it possible to use && operator in terminal command template loop?

Read-once memory

Why aren't faces sharp in my f/1.8 portraits even though I'm carefully using center-point autofocus?

What in my code changed between MacTeX 2017 and MacTex 2019?

What does `idem` mean in the VIM docs?

What makes learning more difficult as we age?

I reverse the source code, you reverse the input!

Why does it seem the best way to make a living is to invest in real estate?

How far in Advance do I need to book tickets on the West Highland Line in Scotland for a Multi-part Journey?

Can I target any number of creatures, even if the ability would have no effect?

Is it ok if I haven't decided my research topic when I first meet with a potential phd advisor?

Detail vs. filler



GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?


Does using Stanford NER in a website count as distributing it?What do I have to include in the binary package as “corresponding source code” for GPL licensed software?Who owns the copyright to the code which was paid for to write?Of the differences between the GPLv3 and the AGPLv3 texts: what to make of them?Relicensing an MIT licensed project under the GPL that has non code contributions from othersGPLv2 Wordpress Application - SellingUsing iText library with AGPL license to make application open sourcedWho is the copyright holder when GPLv2 project API is used?What widely available software license is appropriate if I want to freely distribute but keep my own right to sell?Commercial license where the code can be seen/edited by others but not monetized by others






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.



But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?










share|improve this question














migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 7 hours ago


This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.



















  • You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago











  • @Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.

    – Stobor
    16 mins ago


















2















I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.



But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?










share|improve this question














migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 7 hours ago


This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.



















  • You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago











  • @Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.

    – Stobor
    16 mins ago














2












2








2








I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.



But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?










share|improve this question














I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.



But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?







licensing gpl distribution






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









AlvaroAlvaro

1193 bronze badges




1193 bronze badges





migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 7 hours ago


This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.











migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 7 hours ago


This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.









migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 7 hours ago


This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.














  • You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago











  • @Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.

    – Stobor
    16 mins ago


















  • You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago











  • @Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.

    – Stobor
    16 mins ago

















You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.

– Brandin
6 hours ago





You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.

– Brandin
6 hours ago













@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.

– Stobor
16 mins ago






@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.

– Stobor
16 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7
















To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.



The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):



  • The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.


  • If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.



  • Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.



    • If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.

    • You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.


  • Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.






share|improve this answer

























  • What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

    – amon
    5 hours ago











  • I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

    – Alvaro
    49 mins ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "619"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8836%2fgplv3-forces-us-to-make-code-available-but-to-who%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7
















To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.



The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):



  • The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.


  • If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.



  • Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.



    • If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.

    • You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.


  • Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.






share|improve this answer

























  • What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

    – amon
    5 hours ago











  • I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

    – Alvaro
    49 mins ago















7
















To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.



The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):



  • The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.


  • If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.



  • Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.



    • If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.

    • You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.


  • Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.






share|improve this answer

























  • What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

    – amon
    5 hours ago











  • I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

    – Alvaro
    49 mins ago













7














7










7









To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.



The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):



  • The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.


  • If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.



  • Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.



    • If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.

    • You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.


  • Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.






share|improve this answer













To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.



The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):



  • The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.


  • If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.



  • Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.



    • If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.

    • You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.


  • Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









amonamon

16k1 gold badge19 silver badges42 bronze badges




16k1 gold badge19 silver badges42 bronze badges















  • What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

    – amon
    5 hours ago











  • I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

    – Alvaro
    49 mins ago

















  • What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

    – Brandin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

    – amon
    5 hours ago











  • I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

    – Alvaro
    49 mins ago
















What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

– Brandin
6 hours ago





What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?

– Brandin
6 hours ago




1




1





@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

– amon
5 hours ago





@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.

– amon
5 hours ago













I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

– Alvaro
49 mins ago





I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.

– Alvaro
49 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8836%2fgplv3-forces-us-to-make-code-available-but-to-who%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її