Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?Why was the end of Watchmen changed in the movie version?Why was a certain character in The Hunger Games killed?Did Peter Jackson ever explain why he left out the Scouring of the Shire?Why did Harry not repair his wand in the movie?Are there any differences between the Catching Fire movie and book?Why were the trackers necessary in Catching Fire?The Hunger Angst. Why the Arena tech yet the population is subjugated?Why didn't a certain character communicate more to his co-conspirators in Catching Fire?Why didn't the Tributes jump the gun in Catching Fire?Why was Gale edited out of the propos in the movie version?

Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?

Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Add an angle to a sphere

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

Does bootstrapped regression allow for inference?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

How do I create uniquely male characters?



Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?


Why was the end of Watchmen changed in the movie version?Why was a certain character in The Hunger Games killed?Did Peter Jackson ever explain why he left out the Scouring of the Shire?Why did Harry not repair his wand in the movie?Are there any differences between the Catching Fire movie and book?Why were the trackers necessary in Catching Fire?The Hunger Angst. Why the Arena tech yet the population is subjugated?Why didn't a certain character communicate more to his co-conspirators in Catching Fire?Why didn't the Tributes jump the gun in Catching Fire?Why was Gale edited out of the propos in the movie version?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








12















In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 9





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    14 hours ago


















12















In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 9





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    14 hours ago














12












12








12








In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?







adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire






share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









Thunderforge

31.4k23149310




31.4k23149310






New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 15 hours ago









PanchoaPanchoa

616




616




New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 9





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    14 hours ago













  • 9





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    14 hours ago








9




9





why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

– witchy
14 hours ago






why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

– witchy
14 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















19














Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    10 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









19














Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    10 hours ago















19














Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    10 hours ago













19












19








19







Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer















Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 14 hours ago









Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,368723




2,368723







  • 4





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    10 hours ago












  • 4





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    14 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    10 hours ago







4




4





"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

– Thunderforge
14 hours ago





"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

– Thunderforge
14 hours ago




1




1





@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

– Darrel Hoffman
13 hours ago





@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

– Darrel Hoffman
13 hours ago




1




1





I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

– Panchoa
13 hours ago





I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

– Panchoa
13 hours ago




3




3





@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

– Upper_Case
11 hours ago





@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

– Upper_Case
11 hours ago




1




1





@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

– Upper_Case
10 hours ago





@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

– Upper_Case
10 hours ago










Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її