Symmetry in quantum mechanicsSymmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsQuantum mechanics and Lorentz symmetryGenerators of a certain symmetry in Quantum MechanicsEquivalence of symmetry and commuting unitary operatorConcrete example that projective representation of symmetry group occurs in a quantum system except the case of spin half integer?Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsWhat is the definition of parity operator in quantum mechanics?Symmetry of Hamiltonian in harmonic oscillatorDifference between symmetry transformation and basis transformationSymmetries in quantum mechanicsWhat happens to the global $U(1)$ symmetry in alternative formulations of Quantum Mechanics?

Filling an area between two curves

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

extract characters between two commas?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Map list to bin numbers

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?

Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol

Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?



Symmetry in quantum mechanics


Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsQuantum mechanics and Lorentz symmetryGenerators of a certain symmetry in Quantum MechanicsEquivalence of symmetry and commuting unitary operatorConcrete example that projective representation of symmetry group occurs in a quantum system except the case of spin half integer?Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsWhat is the definition of parity operator in quantum mechanics?Symmetry of Hamiltonian in harmonic oscillatorDifference between symmetry transformation and basis transformationSymmetries in quantum mechanicsWhat happens to the global $U(1)$ symmetry in alternative formulations of Quantum Mechanics?













8












$begingroup$


My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$



Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    8












    $begingroup$


    My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$



    Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      8












      8








      8


      2



      $begingroup$


      My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$



      Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$



      Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?







      quantum-mechanics operators symmetry hamiltonian commutator






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 14 hours ago









      Qmechanic

      107k121991239




      107k121991239










      asked 16 hours ago









      SimoBartzSimoBartz

      947




      947




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14












          $begingroup$

          In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.



          In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
          $$
          ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
          tag1
          $$

          We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
          $$
          Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
          tag2
          $$

          If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
          $$
          ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
          tag3
          $$

          which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.




          For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see



          Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
            $endgroup$
            – SimoBartz
            15 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            12 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
            $endgroup$
            – Vectornaut
            7 hours ago


















          0












          $begingroup$

          What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
          Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
          endalign*

          If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
          $left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
          then also
          $$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
          This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.



          Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
          beginalign*
          [A, P]=0
          endalign*

          for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471292%2fsymmetry-in-quantum-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            14












            $begingroup$

            In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.



            In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
            $$
            ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
            tag1
            $$

            We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
            $$
            Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
            tag2
            $$

            If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
            $$
            ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
            tag3
            $$

            which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.




            For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see



            Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
              $endgroup$
              – SimoBartz
              15 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
              $endgroup$
              – Chiral Anomaly
              12 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
              $endgroup$
              – Vectornaut
              7 hours ago















            14












            $begingroup$

            In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.



            In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
            $$
            ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
            tag1
            $$

            We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
            $$
            Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
            tag2
            $$

            If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
            $$
            ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
            tag3
            $$

            which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.




            For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see



            Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
              $endgroup$
              – SimoBartz
              15 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
              $endgroup$
              – Chiral Anomaly
              12 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
              $endgroup$
              – Vectornaut
              7 hours ago













            14












            14








            14





            $begingroup$

            In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.



            In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
            $$
            ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
            tag1
            $$

            We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
            $$
            Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
            tag2
            $$

            If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
            $$
            ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
            tag3
            $$

            which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.




            For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see



            Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.



            In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
            $$
            ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
            tag1
            $$

            We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
            $$
            Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
            tag2
            $$

            If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
            $$
            ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
            tag3
            $$

            which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.




            For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see



            Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 16 hours ago









            Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly

            13.4k21745




            13.4k21745







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
              $endgroup$
              – SimoBartz
              15 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
              $endgroup$
              – Chiral Anomaly
              12 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
              $endgroup$
              – Vectornaut
              7 hours ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
              $endgroup$
              – SimoBartz
              15 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
              $endgroup$
              – Chiral Anomaly
              12 hours ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
              $endgroup$
              – Vectornaut
              7 hours ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
            $endgroup$
            – SimoBartz
            15 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
            $endgroup$
            – SimoBartz
            15 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            12 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            @SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
            $endgroup$
            – Chiral Anomaly
            12 hours ago





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
            $endgroup$
            – Vectornaut
            7 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @SimoBartz, what does the word "symmetry" mean to you? Have you encountered it in other contexts, such as classical mechanics or geometry?
            $endgroup$
            – Vectornaut
            7 hours ago











            0












            $begingroup$

            What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
            Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
            endalign*

            If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
            $left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
            then also
            $$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
            This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.



            Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
            beginalign*
            [A, P]=0
            endalign*

            for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
              Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
              endalign*

              If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
              $left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
              then also
              $$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
              This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.



              Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
              beginalign*
              [A, P]=0
              endalign*

              for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
                Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
                endalign*

                If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
                $left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
                then also
                $$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
                This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.



                Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
                beginalign*
                [A, P]=0
                endalign*

                for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
                Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
                endalign*

                If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
                $left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
                then also
                $$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
                This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.



                Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
                beginalign*
                [A, P]=0
                endalign*

                for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 16 hours ago









                LeviathanLeviathan

                747




                747



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471292%2fsymmetry-in-quantum-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單