How to find the determinant of this matrix? (A spherical-Cartesian transformation Jacobian matrix)How to compute the following JacobianCalculating the Jacobian of inverse functionsMatrix calculation with sinusoidsUsing the Jacobian matrix to find surface area without a change of basis.Transforming vector field into spherical coordinates. Why and how does this method work?Compute the determinant of circulant matrix with entries $cos jtheta$Find the rotation/reflection angle for orthogonal matrix AJacobian matrix vs. Transformation matrixFurthest point in direction ellipsoid with Newton's methodCalculate the determinant of this $5 times 5$ matrixWhat is the correct matrix form for transforming spherical coordinate to Cartesian?

Piano - What is the notation for a double stop where both notes in the double stop are different lengths?

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

"My colleague's body is amazing"

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?

Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Lied on resume at previous job

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Is this food a bread or a loaf?



How to find the determinant of this matrix? (A spherical-Cartesian transformation Jacobian matrix)


How to compute the following JacobianCalculating the Jacobian of inverse functionsMatrix calculation with sinusoidsUsing the Jacobian matrix to find surface area without a change of basis.Transforming vector field into spherical coordinates. Why and how does this method work?Compute the determinant of circulant matrix with entries $cos jtheta$Find the rotation/reflection angle for orthogonal matrix AJacobian matrix vs. Transformation matrixFurthest point in direction ellipsoid with Newton's methodCalculate the determinant of this $5 times 5$ matrixWhat is the correct matrix form for transforming spherical coordinate to Cartesian?













5












$begingroup$


I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    15 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    14 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    15 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    14 hours ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!







linear-algebra matrices determinant






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 15 hours ago







Peter Nova













New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 15 hours ago









Peter NovaPeter Nova

284




284




New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    15 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    14 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    15 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    14 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
15 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
15 hours ago





$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
15 hours ago













$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
15 hours ago












$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
14 hours ago





$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
14 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179472%2fhow-to-find-the-determinant-of-this-matrix-a-spherical-cartesian-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 14 hours ago









Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

6,4461317




6,4461317











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
14 hours ago











4












$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 14 hours ago









John HughesJohn Hughes

65.3k24293




65.3k24293











  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    14 hours ago















$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
14 hours ago










Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179472%2fhow-to-find-the-determinant-of-this-matrix-a-spherical-cartesian-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її