The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicitiesEntire function interpolation with control over multiplicities/derivativesPolynomials having a common root with their derivativesPolynomial roots and convexity$pm1$-polynomials with a maximal non-real rootPolynomials with more than one common rootPolynomials with all but one root inside the unit discPolynomials with no multiple root

The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicities


Entire function interpolation with control over multiplicities/derivativesPolynomials having a common root with their derivativesPolynomial roots and convexity$pm1$-polynomials with a maximal non-real rootPolynomials with more than one common rootPolynomials with all but one root inside the unit discPolynomials with no multiple root













8












$begingroup$


Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    3 hours ago















8












$begingroup$


Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    3 hours ago













8












8








8





$begingroup$


Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.







ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago







Joe Silverman

















asked 9 hours ago









Joe SilvermanJoe Silverman

33.1k1 gold badge97 silver badges168 bronze badges




33.1k1 gold badge97 silver badges168 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    1 hour ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f342725%2fthe-locus-of-polynomials-with-specified-root-multiplicities%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    1 hour ago
















5














$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    1 hour ago














5














5










5







$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 2 hours ago









Abdelmalek AbdesselamAbdelmalek Abdesselam

12.1k1 gold badge29 silver badges78 bronze badges




12.1k1 gold badge29 silver badges78 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago



















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f342725%2fthe-locus-of-polynomials-with-specified-root-multiplicities%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480