The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicitiesEntire function interpolation with control over multiplicities/derivativesPolynomials having a common root with their derivativesPolynomial roots and convexity$pm1$-polynomials with a maximal non-real rootPolynomials with more than one common rootPolynomials with all but one root inside the unit discPolynomials with no multiple root
The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicities
Entire function interpolation with control over multiplicities/derivativesPolynomials having a common root with their derivativesPolynomial roots and convexity$pm1$-polynomials with a maximal non-real rootPolynomials with more than one common rootPolynomials with all but one root inside the unit discPolynomials with no multiple root
$begingroup$
Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.
For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.
Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.
Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.
For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.
Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.
Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.
For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.
Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.
Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials
$endgroup$
Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.
For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.
Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.
Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials
edited 9 hours ago
Joe Silverman
asked 9 hours ago
Joe SilvermanJoe Silverman
33.1k1 gold badge97 silver badges168 bronze badges
33.1k1 gold badge97 silver badges168 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.
For a general study see:
- J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.
- J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.
- H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.
For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts. - A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.
There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.
The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.
Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.
Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f342725%2fthe-locus-of-polynomials-with-specified-root-multiplicities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.
For a general study see:
- J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.
- J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.
- H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.
For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts. - A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.
There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.
The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.
Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.
Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.
For a general study see:
- J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.
- J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.
- H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.
For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts. - A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.
There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.
The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.
Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.
Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.
For a general study see:
- J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.
- J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.
- H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.
For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts. - A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.
There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.
The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.
Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.
Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.
$endgroup$
I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.
For a general study see:
- J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.
- J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.
- H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.
For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.
- A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts. - A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic sets of equations for the variety with rectangular partition, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideal. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.
There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.
The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz" Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p.
Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.
Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Abdelmalek AbdesselamAbdelmalek Abdesselam
12.1k1 gold badge29 silver badges78 bronze badges
12.1k1 gold badge29 silver badges78 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f342725%2fthe-locus-of-polynomials-with-specified-root-multiplicities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
3 hours ago