Find the number for the question markIQ-test-type question with not satisfying answerWhich number should replace the question mark?Find the missing piece to complete the patternCan you find the value of the question mark$colorred?$Reasoning - Find Missing NumberWhich two numbers replaces the question mark?Can you find the next number in the following series?What is the missing number in the question mark?What is the missing number, can anyone solve this? My original puzzleWhat is the pattern in the question box?

Is there a difference between historical fiction and creative non-fiction?

In 1700s, why was 'books that never read' grammatical?

How to realize Poles and zeros at infinity??especially through transfer function?

I've been fired, was allowed to announce it as if I quit and given extra notice, how to handle the questions?

I'm made of obsolete parts

Proof of bound on optimal TSP tour length in rectangular region

A goat is tied to the corner of a shed

What (if anything) are the standards for "generic" part numbers?

Can someone identify this old round connector?

An example of a "simple poset" which does not belong to a convex polytope

SHA3-255, one bit less

Can 35 mm film which went through a washing machine still be developed?

Find the percentage

Fair Use of Photos as a Derivative Work

As a girl, how can I voice male characters effectively?

How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?

"Es gefällt ihm." How to identify similar exceptions?

Is there a penalty for switching targets?

If LPG gas burners can reach temperatures above 1700 °C, then how do HCA and PAH not develop in extreme amounts during cooking?

Spectrometer vs Spectrometry vs Spectroscopy

Is there any way to ward an area against Sending?

Would we have more than 8 minutes of light, if the sun "went out"?

How do I know how many sub-shells deep I am?

Spiral Stumper Series: Instructionless Puzzle



Find the number for the question mark


IQ-test-type question with not satisfying answerWhich number should replace the question mark?Find the missing piece to complete the patternCan you find the value of the question mark$colorred?$Reasoning - Find Missing NumberWhich two numbers replaces the question mark?Can you find the next number in the following series?What is the missing number in the question mark?What is the missing number, can anyone solve this? My original puzzleWhat is the pattern in the question box?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








2












$begingroup$


What is the number for the question mark? (My original puzzle)



3=39



1=3



4=84



5=155



2=14



10=?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$


    What is the number for the question mark? (My original puzzle)



    3=39



    1=3



    4=84



    5=155



    2=14



    10=?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      What is the number for the question mark? (My original puzzle)



      3=39



      1=3



      4=84



      5=155



      2=14



      10=?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      What is the number for the question mark? (My original puzzle)



      3=39



      1=3



      4=84



      5=155



      2=14



      10=?







      pattern






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Deepthinker101Deepthinker101

      19610 bronze badges




      19610 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          $begingroup$


          By noting that each number maps to a multiple of itself:
          $3rightarrow3*13$
          $1rightarrow1*3$
          $4rightarrow4*21$
          $5rightarrow5*31$
          $2rightarrow2*7$

          And that the quotient increases quadratically
          $1:3$
          $2:7=3+4$
          $3:13=7+6$
          $4:21=13+8$
          $5:31=21+10$

          The mapping must be a cubic function.

          The above sequence is equal to $n^2+n+1$, where n is the input.

          The original sequence is multiplied by $n$ again.
          So the function can be described by $n^3+n^2+n$.

          So the final answer is $10^3+10^2+10=1110$.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            It looks like this is it!
            $endgroup$
            – Duck
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Congratulations
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            14 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            7 mins ago


















          4














          $begingroup$

          Note that




          1 x 3 = 3 (3 is the 2nd odd positive number)

          2 x 7 = 14 (7 is the 4th positive odd number)

          3 x 13 = 39 (13 is the 7th positive odd number)

          4 x 21 = 84 (21 is the 11th positive odd number)

          5 x 31 = 155 (31 is the 16th positive odd number)




          Note that




          The nth odd number is being used, where n forms a pattern of 2, 4, 7, 11, 16 — ie. differences increase by one. Then to continue this pattern, we have 22, 29, 37, 46, 56 — this sequence is the triangular numbers plus 1. (Note the triangular Numbers are 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55...)




          So then the answer ought to be




          10 = 1110, as 111 is the 56th positive odd number and 10 x 111 = 1110.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No not the right answer
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            8 mins ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89669%2ffind-the-number-for-the-question-mark%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          $begingroup$


          By noting that each number maps to a multiple of itself:
          $3rightarrow3*13$
          $1rightarrow1*3$
          $4rightarrow4*21$
          $5rightarrow5*31$
          $2rightarrow2*7$

          And that the quotient increases quadratically
          $1:3$
          $2:7=3+4$
          $3:13=7+6$
          $4:21=13+8$
          $5:31=21+10$

          The mapping must be a cubic function.

          The above sequence is equal to $n^2+n+1$, where n is the input.

          The original sequence is multiplied by $n$ again.
          So the function can be described by $n^3+n^2+n$.

          So the final answer is $10^3+10^2+10=1110$.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            It looks like this is it!
            $endgroup$
            – Duck
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Congratulations
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            14 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            7 mins ago















          2














          $begingroup$


          By noting that each number maps to a multiple of itself:
          $3rightarrow3*13$
          $1rightarrow1*3$
          $4rightarrow4*21$
          $5rightarrow5*31$
          $2rightarrow2*7$

          And that the quotient increases quadratically
          $1:3$
          $2:7=3+4$
          $3:13=7+6$
          $4:21=13+8$
          $5:31=21+10$

          The mapping must be a cubic function.

          The above sequence is equal to $n^2+n+1$, where n is the input.

          The original sequence is multiplied by $n$ again.
          So the function can be described by $n^3+n^2+n$.

          So the final answer is $10^3+10^2+10=1110$.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            It looks like this is it!
            $endgroup$
            – Duck
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Congratulations
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            14 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            7 mins ago













          2














          2










          2







          $begingroup$


          By noting that each number maps to a multiple of itself:
          $3rightarrow3*13$
          $1rightarrow1*3$
          $4rightarrow4*21$
          $5rightarrow5*31$
          $2rightarrow2*7$

          And that the quotient increases quadratically
          $1:3$
          $2:7=3+4$
          $3:13=7+6$
          $4:21=13+8$
          $5:31=21+10$

          The mapping must be a cubic function.

          The above sequence is equal to $n^2+n+1$, where n is the input.

          The original sequence is multiplied by $n$ again.
          So the function can be described by $n^3+n^2+n$.

          So the final answer is $10^3+10^2+10=1110$.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$




          By noting that each number maps to a multiple of itself:
          $3rightarrow3*13$
          $1rightarrow1*3$
          $4rightarrow4*21$
          $5rightarrow5*31$
          $2rightarrow2*7$

          And that the quotient increases quadratically
          $1:3$
          $2:7=3+4$
          $3:13=7+6$
          $4:21=13+8$
          $5:31=21+10$

          The mapping must be a cubic function.

          The above sequence is equal to $n^2+n+1$, where n is the input.

          The original sequence is multiplied by $n$ again.
          So the function can be described by $n^3+n^2+n$.

          So the final answer is $10^3+10^2+10=1110$.








          share|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          answered 1 hour ago









          Matthew JensenMatthew Jensen

          3114 bronze badges




          3114 bronze badges




          New contributor



          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




          New contributor




          Matthew Jensen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















          • $begingroup$
            It looks like this is it!
            $endgroup$
            – Duck
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Congratulations
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            14 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            7 mins ago
















          • $begingroup$
            It looks like this is it!
            $endgroup$
            – Duck
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Congratulations
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            14 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            7 mins ago















          $begingroup$
          It looks like this is it!
          $endgroup$
          – Duck
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          It looks like this is it!
          $endgroup$
          – Duck
          1 hour ago












          $begingroup$
          Congratulations
          $endgroup$
          – Deepthinker101
          14 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          Congratulations
          $endgroup$
          – Deepthinker101
          14 mins ago












          $begingroup$
          This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
          $endgroup$
          – El-Guest
          7 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          This was the mathematical way to do what I described in words. Congratulations!
          $endgroup$
          – El-Guest
          7 mins ago













          4














          $begingroup$

          Note that




          1 x 3 = 3 (3 is the 2nd odd positive number)

          2 x 7 = 14 (7 is the 4th positive odd number)

          3 x 13 = 39 (13 is the 7th positive odd number)

          4 x 21 = 84 (21 is the 11th positive odd number)

          5 x 31 = 155 (31 is the 16th positive odd number)




          Note that




          The nth odd number is being used, where n forms a pattern of 2, 4, 7, 11, 16 — ie. differences increase by one. Then to continue this pattern, we have 22, 29, 37, 46, 56 — this sequence is the triangular numbers plus 1. (Note the triangular Numbers are 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55...)




          So then the answer ought to be




          10 = 1110, as 111 is the 56th positive odd number and 10 x 111 = 1110.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No not the right answer
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            8 mins ago















          4














          $begingroup$

          Note that




          1 x 3 = 3 (3 is the 2nd odd positive number)

          2 x 7 = 14 (7 is the 4th positive odd number)

          3 x 13 = 39 (13 is the 7th positive odd number)

          4 x 21 = 84 (21 is the 11th positive odd number)

          5 x 31 = 155 (31 is the 16th positive odd number)




          Note that




          The nth odd number is being used, where n forms a pattern of 2, 4, 7, 11, 16 — ie. differences increase by one. Then to continue this pattern, we have 22, 29, 37, 46, 56 — this sequence is the triangular numbers plus 1. (Note the triangular Numbers are 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55...)




          So then the answer ought to be




          10 = 1110, as 111 is the 56th positive odd number and 10 x 111 = 1110.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No not the right answer
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            8 mins ago













          4














          4










          4







          $begingroup$

          Note that




          1 x 3 = 3 (3 is the 2nd odd positive number)

          2 x 7 = 14 (7 is the 4th positive odd number)

          3 x 13 = 39 (13 is the 7th positive odd number)

          4 x 21 = 84 (21 is the 11th positive odd number)

          5 x 31 = 155 (31 is the 16th positive odd number)




          Note that




          The nth odd number is being used, where n forms a pattern of 2, 4, 7, 11, 16 — ie. differences increase by one. Then to continue this pattern, we have 22, 29, 37, 46, 56 — this sequence is the triangular numbers plus 1. (Note the triangular Numbers are 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55...)




          So then the answer ought to be




          10 = 1110, as 111 is the 56th positive odd number and 10 x 111 = 1110.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Note that




          1 x 3 = 3 (3 is the 2nd odd positive number)

          2 x 7 = 14 (7 is the 4th positive odd number)

          3 x 13 = 39 (13 is the 7th positive odd number)

          4 x 21 = 84 (21 is the 11th positive odd number)

          5 x 31 = 155 (31 is the 16th positive odd number)




          Note that




          The nth odd number is being used, where n forms a pattern of 2, 4, 7, 11, 16 — ie. differences increase by one. Then to continue this pattern, we have 22, 29, 37, 46, 56 — this sequence is the triangular numbers plus 1. (Note the triangular Numbers are 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55...)




          So then the answer ought to be




          10 = 1110, as 111 is the 56th positive odd number and 10 x 111 = 1110.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 mins ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          El-GuestEl-Guest

          26.4k3 gold badges63 silver badges108 bronze badges




          26.4k3 gold badges63 silver badges108 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No not the right answer
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            8 mins ago
















          • $begingroup$
            You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
            $endgroup$
            – Bass
            5 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No not the right answer
            $endgroup$
            – Deepthinker101
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
            $endgroup$
            – El-Guest
            8 mins ago















          $begingroup$
          You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
          $endgroup$
          – Bass
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          You are probably on the right track, but maybe insisting on primes isn't necessary?
          $endgroup$
          – Bass
          5 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
          $endgroup$
          – El-Guest
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Yes, it looks like you’re right — this fits better I think. Thanks for the heads up, @Bass
          $endgroup$
          – El-Guest
          4 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          No not the right answer
          $endgroup$
          – Deepthinker101
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          No not the right answer
          $endgroup$
          – Deepthinker101
          2 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
          $endgroup$
          – El-Guest
          8 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          As it turns out, my process IS right, I’m just a dumdum.
          $endgroup$
          – El-Guest
          8 mins ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89669%2ffind-the-number-for-the-question-mark%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單