In the Star Trek: TNG continuity is cloning illegal?What are Guinan's powers from Star Trek: TNG?Who's the best poker player in Star Trek: TNG?Star Trek TOS-TNG crossover novelWho tends the plants on Star Trek TNG?Who made the Dyson's sphere in Star Trek TNG?In Star Trek (TNG), does “original art” even mean anything?Time rift episode on Star Trek TNGAre Federation citizens and/or Starfleet officers allowed to replace healthy organs with bionics if they choose to?In Star Trek: TNG, why was Crusher’s labcoat blue?

The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicities

As a girl, how can I voice male characters effectively?

Successive amplitudes in quantum mechanics

Can something have more sugar per 100g than the percentage of sugar that's in it?

Applying UK Visit Visa Application from AU

How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?

Spectrometer vs Spectrometry vs Spectroscopy

What is the next number in the sequence 21, 21, 23, 20, 5, 25, 31, 24, ...?

What (if anything) are the standards for "generic" part numbers?

How to explain that the sums of numerators over sums of denominators isn't the same as the mean of ratios?

I pay for a service, but I miss the broadcast

difference between $HOME and ~

What kind of nut is this

Is there a penalty for switching targets?

Why is the time of useful consciousness only seconds at high altitudes, when I can hold my breath much longer at ground level?

Transiting through Switzerland by coach with lots of cash

Minimum perfect squares needed to sum up to a target

Spiral Stumper Series: Instructionless Puzzle

Can I voluntarily exit from the US after a 20 year overstay, or could I be detained at the airport?

Why didn't Trudy wear a breathing mask in Avatar?

How to accompany with piano in latin music when given only chords?

What benefits are there to blocking most search engines?

Can/should you swim in zero G?

This fell out of my toilet when I unscrewed the supply line. What is it?



In the Star Trek: TNG continuity is cloning illegal?


What are Guinan's powers from Star Trek: TNG?Who's the best poker player in Star Trek: TNG?Star Trek TOS-TNG crossover novelWho tends the plants on Star Trek TNG?Who made the Dyson's sphere in Star Trek TNG?In Star Trek (TNG), does “original art” even mean anything?Time rift episode on Star Trek TNGAre Federation citizens and/or Starfleet officers allowed to replace healthy organs with bionics if they choose to?In Star Trek: TNG, why was Crusher’s labcoat blue?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









3















The few instances of clones used in the Star Trek series have been seen to have usually negative implications. Added to this is fact of Picard's artificial heart; his original organ was injured in a bar fight while he was in Star Fleet Academy decades before. It was replaced with a bionic organ which seems to be what Picard has been using well into his captaincy.



This bodes the question as to why a new biological organ wasn't replicated. It could be that the bionic organs were simply seen as more efficient... but I suspect it may be possible that cloning organs alone may be frowned upon, let alone cloning a whole person. This may at least be the case within the Federation.



Is there any information to confirm this?










share|improve this question





















  • 1





    There's really no good evidence that the Federation frown on cloning per se. Individuals like Riker don't seem to like it on a personal basis; memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Clone

    – Valorum
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Valorum: ironic since he was cloned, kind of.

    – Wikis
    8 hours ago











  • @Valorum That was a transporter accident, though, not really "Cloning". But it does highlight the point: if the Federation has no real issue with it, why don't we see it done for medical procedures or more spoken off? The only civilization I saw that it was heavily used in was the one that tried to steal Riker and Dr. Polasky's DNA. The crew seemed to respect their culture, but it was inferred that this was still seen as a less than ideal form of continuance for a species/people.

    – Russ Rainford
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @RussRainford While cloning per se might be ok, making clones to harvest them for organs probably is ethically reprehensible as the clones will be sentient beings. Cloning organs on the other hand should be ok, but it's never discussed as far as I remember.

    – Rebel-Scum
    7 hours ago











  • @Rebel-Scum That's exactly what I mean, though! Using a tissue or DNA sample to clone or regrow an organ shouldn't be a major issue, but it makes little sense [unless the tech organs are simply better]. So why then [plot contrivance aside] would a mechanical heart be more used, instead of just "growing him" a new one?

    – Russ Rainford
    6 hours ago

















3















The few instances of clones used in the Star Trek series have been seen to have usually negative implications. Added to this is fact of Picard's artificial heart; his original organ was injured in a bar fight while he was in Star Fleet Academy decades before. It was replaced with a bionic organ which seems to be what Picard has been using well into his captaincy.



This bodes the question as to why a new biological organ wasn't replicated. It could be that the bionic organs were simply seen as more efficient... but I suspect it may be possible that cloning organs alone may be frowned upon, let alone cloning a whole person. This may at least be the case within the Federation.



Is there any information to confirm this?










share|improve this question





















  • 1





    There's really no good evidence that the Federation frown on cloning per se. Individuals like Riker don't seem to like it on a personal basis; memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Clone

    – Valorum
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Valorum: ironic since he was cloned, kind of.

    – Wikis
    8 hours ago











  • @Valorum That was a transporter accident, though, not really "Cloning". But it does highlight the point: if the Federation has no real issue with it, why don't we see it done for medical procedures or more spoken off? The only civilization I saw that it was heavily used in was the one that tried to steal Riker and Dr. Polasky's DNA. The crew seemed to respect their culture, but it was inferred that this was still seen as a less than ideal form of continuance for a species/people.

    – Russ Rainford
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @RussRainford While cloning per se might be ok, making clones to harvest them for organs probably is ethically reprehensible as the clones will be sentient beings. Cloning organs on the other hand should be ok, but it's never discussed as far as I remember.

    – Rebel-Scum
    7 hours ago











  • @Rebel-Scum That's exactly what I mean, though! Using a tissue or DNA sample to clone or regrow an organ shouldn't be a major issue, but it makes little sense [unless the tech organs are simply better]. So why then [plot contrivance aside] would a mechanical heart be more used, instead of just "growing him" a new one?

    – Russ Rainford
    6 hours ago













3












3








3








The few instances of clones used in the Star Trek series have been seen to have usually negative implications. Added to this is fact of Picard's artificial heart; his original organ was injured in a bar fight while he was in Star Fleet Academy decades before. It was replaced with a bionic organ which seems to be what Picard has been using well into his captaincy.



This bodes the question as to why a new biological organ wasn't replicated. It could be that the bionic organs were simply seen as more efficient... but I suspect it may be possible that cloning organs alone may be frowned upon, let alone cloning a whole person. This may at least be the case within the Federation.



Is there any information to confirm this?










share|improve this question
















The few instances of clones used in the Star Trek series have been seen to have usually negative implications. Added to this is fact of Picard's artificial heart; his original organ was injured in a bar fight while he was in Star Fleet Academy decades before. It was replaced with a bionic organ which seems to be what Picard has been using well into his captaincy.



This bodes the question as to why a new biological organ wasn't replicated. It could be that the bionic organs were simply seen as more efficient... but I suspect it may be possible that cloning organs alone may be frowned upon, let alone cloning a whole person. This may at least be the case within the Federation.



Is there any information to confirm this?







star-trek star-trek-tng






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









TheLethalCarrot

78.7k33 gold badges512 silver badges548 bronze badges




78.7k33 gold badges512 silver badges548 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Russ RainfordRuss Rainford

1,4724 silver badges23 bronze badges




1,4724 silver badges23 bronze badges










  • 1





    There's really no good evidence that the Federation frown on cloning per se. Individuals like Riker don't seem to like it on a personal basis; memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Clone

    – Valorum
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Valorum: ironic since he was cloned, kind of.

    – Wikis
    8 hours ago











  • @Valorum That was a transporter accident, though, not really "Cloning". But it does highlight the point: if the Federation has no real issue with it, why don't we see it done for medical procedures or more spoken off? The only civilization I saw that it was heavily used in was the one that tried to steal Riker and Dr. Polasky's DNA. The crew seemed to respect their culture, but it was inferred that this was still seen as a less than ideal form of continuance for a species/people.

    – Russ Rainford
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @RussRainford While cloning per se might be ok, making clones to harvest them for organs probably is ethically reprehensible as the clones will be sentient beings. Cloning organs on the other hand should be ok, but it's never discussed as far as I remember.

    – Rebel-Scum
    7 hours ago











  • @Rebel-Scum That's exactly what I mean, though! Using a tissue or DNA sample to clone or regrow an organ shouldn't be a major issue, but it makes little sense [unless the tech organs are simply better]. So why then [plot contrivance aside] would a mechanical heart be more used, instead of just "growing him" a new one?

    – Russ Rainford
    6 hours ago












  • 1





    There's really no good evidence that the Federation frown on cloning per se. Individuals like Riker don't seem to like it on a personal basis; memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Clone

    – Valorum
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Valorum: ironic since he was cloned, kind of.

    – Wikis
    8 hours ago











  • @Valorum That was a transporter accident, though, not really "Cloning". But it does highlight the point: if the Federation has no real issue with it, why don't we see it done for medical procedures or more spoken off? The only civilization I saw that it was heavily used in was the one that tried to steal Riker and Dr. Polasky's DNA. The crew seemed to respect their culture, but it was inferred that this was still seen as a less than ideal form of continuance for a species/people.

    – Russ Rainford
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @RussRainford While cloning per se might be ok, making clones to harvest them for organs probably is ethically reprehensible as the clones will be sentient beings. Cloning organs on the other hand should be ok, but it's never discussed as far as I remember.

    – Rebel-Scum
    7 hours ago











  • @Rebel-Scum That's exactly what I mean, though! Using a tissue or DNA sample to clone or regrow an organ shouldn't be a major issue, but it makes little sense [unless the tech organs are simply better]. So why then [plot contrivance aside] would a mechanical heart be more used, instead of just "growing him" a new one?

    – Russ Rainford
    6 hours ago







1




1





There's really no good evidence that the Federation frown on cloning per se. Individuals like Riker don't seem to like it on a personal basis; memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Clone

– Valorum
8 hours ago





There's really no good evidence that the Federation frown on cloning per se. Individuals like Riker don't seem to like it on a personal basis; memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Clone

– Valorum
8 hours ago




1




1





@Valorum: ironic since he was cloned, kind of.

– Wikis
8 hours ago





@Valorum: ironic since he was cloned, kind of.

– Wikis
8 hours ago













@Valorum That was a transporter accident, though, not really "Cloning". But it does highlight the point: if the Federation has no real issue with it, why don't we see it done for medical procedures or more spoken off? The only civilization I saw that it was heavily used in was the one that tried to steal Riker and Dr. Polasky's DNA. The crew seemed to respect their culture, but it was inferred that this was still seen as a less than ideal form of continuance for a species/people.

– Russ Rainford
8 hours ago





@Valorum That was a transporter accident, though, not really "Cloning". But it does highlight the point: if the Federation has no real issue with it, why don't we see it done for medical procedures or more spoken off? The only civilization I saw that it was heavily used in was the one that tried to steal Riker and Dr. Polasky's DNA. The crew seemed to respect their culture, but it was inferred that this was still seen as a less than ideal form of continuance for a species/people.

– Russ Rainford
8 hours ago




1




1





@RussRainford While cloning per se might be ok, making clones to harvest them for organs probably is ethically reprehensible as the clones will be sentient beings. Cloning organs on the other hand should be ok, but it's never discussed as far as I remember.

– Rebel-Scum
7 hours ago





@RussRainford While cloning per se might be ok, making clones to harvest them for organs probably is ethically reprehensible as the clones will be sentient beings. Cloning organs on the other hand should be ok, but it's never discussed as far as I remember.

– Rebel-Scum
7 hours ago













@Rebel-Scum That's exactly what I mean, though! Using a tissue or DNA sample to clone or regrow an organ shouldn't be a major issue, but it makes little sense [unless the tech organs are simply better]. So why then [plot contrivance aside] would a mechanical heart be more used, instead of just "growing him" a new one?

– Russ Rainford
6 hours ago





@Rebel-Scum That's exactly what I mean, though! Using a tissue or DNA sample to clone or regrow an organ shouldn't be a major issue, but it makes little sense [unless the tech organs are simply better]. So why then [plot contrivance aside] would a mechanical heart be more used, instead of just "growing him" a new one?

– Russ Rainford
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6
















Bajor is a (potential) member of the Federation. Ibudan, a Bajora, makes a clone in his quarters. Sisko and Bashir don't seem to have any problem with this whatsoever, nor do they seem intent on charging him with 'Felony Clonemaking' along with his murder rap.




ODO: (re: the new clone) What happens to this one?



BASHIR: In about two days, he becomes a living, breathing member of Bajoran society.



DS9: A Man Alone




The Federation is comprised of lots of planets, all with their own laws. From what I can recall, nobody ever raises a complaint about clones or cloning per se, only that they personally don't want to be cloned (as in TNG: Up the Long Ladder). Similarly, an incomplete clone doesn't appear to have any legal rights until it's activated, but once it gains consciousness it has all the rights of a Federation (or in this case, Bajoran) citizen.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220814%2fin-the-star-trek-tng-continuity-is-cloning-illegal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6
















    Bajor is a (potential) member of the Federation. Ibudan, a Bajora, makes a clone in his quarters. Sisko and Bashir don't seem to have any problem with this whatsoever, nor do they seem intent on charging him with 'Felony Clonemaking' along with his murder rap.




    ODO: (re: the new clone) What happens to this one?



    BASHIR: In about two days, he becomes a living, breathing member of Bajoran society.



    DS9: A Man Alone




    The Federation is comprised of lots of planets, all with their own laws. From what I can recall, nobody ever raises a complaint about clones or cloning per se, only that they personally don't want to be cloned (as in TNG: Up the Long Ladder). Similarly, an incomplete clone doesn't appear to have any legal rights until it's activated, but once it gains consciousness it has all the rights of a Federation (or in this case, Bajoran) citizen.






    share|improve this answer





























      6
















      Bajor is a (potential) member of the Federation. Ibudan, a Bajora, makes a clone in his quarters. Sisko and Bashir don't seem to have any problem with this whatsoever, nor do they seem intent on charging him with 'Felony Clonemaking' along with his murder rap.




      ODO: (re: the new clone) What happens to this one?



      BASHIR: In about two days, he becomes a living, breathing member of Bajoran society.



      DS9: A Man Alone




      The Federation is comprised of lots of planets, all with their own laws. From what I can recall, nobody ever raises a complaint about clones or cloning per se, only that they personally don't want to be cloned (as in TNG: Up the Long Ladder). Similarly, an incomplete clone doesn't appear to have any legal rights until it's activated, but once it gains consciousness it has all the rights of a Federation (or in this case, Bajoran) citizen.






      share|improve this answer



























        6














        6










        6









        Bajor is a (potential) member of the Federation. Ibudan, a Bajora, makes a clone in his quarters. Sisko and Bashir don't seem to have any problem with this whatsoever, nor do they seem intent on charging him with 'Felony Clonemaking' along with his murder rap.




        ODO: (re: the new clone) What happens to this one?



        BASHIR: In about two days, he becomes a living, breathing member of Bajoran society.



        DS9: A Man Alone




        The Federation is comprised of lots of planets, all with their own laws. From what I can recall, nobody ever raises a complaint about clones or cloning per se, only that they personally don't want to be cloned (as in TNG: Up the Long Ladder). Similarly, an incomplete clone doesn't appear to have any legal rights until it's activated, but once it gains consciousness it has all the rights of a Federation (or in this case, Bajoran) citizen.






        share|improve this answer













        Bajor is a (potential) member of the Federation. Ibudan, a Bajora, makes a clone in his quarters. Sisko and Bashir don't seem to have any problem with this whatsoever, nor do they seem intent on charging him with 'Felony Clonemaking' along with his murder rap.




        ODO: (re: the new clone) What happens to this one?



        BASHIR: In about two days, he becomes a living, breathing member of Bajoran society.



        DS9: A Man Alone




        The Federation is comprised of lots of planets, all with their own laws. From what I can recall, nobody ever raises a complaint about clones or cloning per se, only that they personally don't want to be cloned (as in TNG: Up the Long Ladder). Similarly, an incomplete clone doesn't appear to have any legal rights until it's activated, but once it gains consciousness it has all the rights of a Federation (or in this case, Bajoran) citizen.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        ValorumValorum

        446k123 gold badges3277 silver badges3451 bronze badges




        446k123 gold badges3277 silver badges3451 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220814%2fin-the-star-trek-tng-continuity-is-cloning-illegal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480