How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?Why is Donald Trump so popular?How much of the recent jobs growth is Donald Trump responsible for?How much influence has Donald Trump had on current efforts to improve relations with North Korea?How would Donald Trump benefit from a commuted sentence for Rod Blagojevich?How does Donald Trump define the word conservative?How long will a state of emergency need to be declared for Trump to build the wallIf Trump gets impeached, how long would Pence be president?
Scorched receptacle
How do I know how many sub-shells deep I am?
In 1700s, why was 'books that never read' grammatical?
Injection from two strings to one string
Why do personal finance apps focus on outgoings rather than income
Can I pay off my mortgage with a new one?
Are there manual immigration checks for non EU citizens in airports when travelling inside the EU?
Did Joe Biden "stop the prosecution" of his son in Ukraine? And did he brag about stopping the prosecution?
Conveying the idea of "down the road" (i.e. in the future)
Can I return my ability to cast Wish by using the Glyph of Warding spell?
Has Boris Johnson ever referred to any of his opponents as "traitors"?
Why do many websites hide input when entering a OTP
Today I am 20 but next year I will turn 22
Bash-script as linux-service won't run, but executed from terminal works perfectly
Does python reuse repeated calculation results?
Why is my vegetable stock bitter, but the chicken stock not?
Is "Ram married his daughter" ambiguous?
Non-electric Laser
Can 35 mm film which went through a washing machine still be developed?
Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?
Should I be able to see patterns in a HS256 encoded JWT?
Does the DOJ's declining to investigate the Trump-Zelensky call ruin the basis for impeachment?
Are there any tricks to pushing a grand piano?
What's the correct way to determine turn order in this situation?
How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?
Why is Donald Trump so popular?How much of the recent jobs growth is Donald Trump responsible for?How much influence has Donald Trump had on current efforts to improve relations with North Korea?How would Donald Trump benefit from a commuted sentence for Rod Blagojevich?How does Donald Trump define the word conservative?How long will a state of emergency need to be declared for Trump to build the wallIf Trump gets impeached, how long would Pence be president?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
According to fivethirtyeight.com Donald Trump's popularity seems to be rather constant over time in opposition with his predecessors Barack Obama and George W. Bush who suffered a popularity erosion quicker than the current president.
I am wondering how does he manage to maintain his popularity over time.
This article suggests that being more intuitive than analytical is an important factor in explaining his popularity:
A study published in the journal Translational Issues in Psychological
Science suggests that Donald Trump stands out amongst other
politicians, including fellow Republicans and past presidents, as
being exceptionally low in "analytic thinking."
However, this is only one dimension and I sense there are multiple factors that helps him to remain popular.
Question: How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular?
I am particularly interested in articles or studies that provide more insight into this.
united-states donald-trump popularity
|
show 2 more comments
According to fivethirtyeight.com Donald Trump's popularity seems to be rather constant over time in opposition with his predecessors Barack Obama and George W. Bush who suffered a popularity erosion quicker than the current president.
I am wondering how does he manage to maintain his popularity over time.
This article suggests that being more intuitive than analytical is an important factor in explaining his popularity:
A study published in the journal Translational Issues in Psychological
Science suggests that Donald Trump stands out amongst other
politicians, including fellow Republicans and past presidents, as
being exceptionally low in "analytic thinking."
However, this is only one dimension and I sense there are multiple factors that helps him to remain popular.
Question: How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular?
I am particularly interested in articles or studies that provide more insight into this.
united-states donald-trump popularity
To be fair[er], the (latter) article also says there was a trend in that less-analytical direction across presidents over time. Also, it is actually an analysis of their discourse, not really of their thinking.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
2
And given that many speeches involve speech writers, the connection to the thinking of the president is even more questionable. But there's little doubt that trying to appeal to a broad audience by simple messages is increasingly used as a tactic. And it's enabled more and more by focus groups, big data analytics, etc.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
3
Two words: Fox News. They have (give or take) the same percentage of US viewer share than Trump has of approval rate.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
3
@DenisdeBernardy You assume the causal relationship Fox News motivates people to favor Trump. The converse could be true; those that favor Trump like Fox News.
– Drunk Cynic
6 hours ago
1
@DrunkCynic: My assumption is that there's a two way correlation. And FWIW Fox hated Trump until the channel's bosses received the order to promote him extensively.
– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
According to fivethirtyeight.com Donald Trump's popularity seems to be rather constant over time in opposition with his predecessors Barack Obama and George W. Bush who suffered a popularity erosion quicker than the current president.
I am wondering how does he manage to maintain his popularity over time.
This article suggests that being more intuitive than analytical is an important factor in explaining his popularity:
A study published in the journal Translational Issues in Psychological
Science suggests that Donald Trump stands out amongst other
politicians, including fellow Republicans and past presidents, as
being exceptionally low in "analytic thinking."
However, this is only one dimension and I sense there are multiple factors that helps him to remain popular.
Question: How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular?
I am particularly interested in articles or studies that provide more insight into this.
united-states donald-trump popularity
According to fivethirtyeight.com Donald Trump's popularity seems to be rather constant over time in opposition with his predecessors Barack Obama and George W. Bush who suffered a popularity erosion quicker than the current president.
I am wondering how does he manage to maintain his popularity over time.
This article suggests that being more intuitive than analytical is an important factor in explaining his popularity:
A study published in the journal Translational Issues in Psychological
Science suggests that Donald Trump stands out amongst other
politicians, including fellow Republicans and past presidents, as
being exceptionally low in "analytic thinking."
However, this is only one dimension and I sense there are multiple factors that helps him to remain popular.
Question: How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular?
I am particularly interested in articles or studies that provide more insight into this.
united-states donald-trump popularity
united-states donald-trump popularity
asked 8 hours ago
AlexeiAlexei
20.1k23 gold badges112 silver badges213 bronze badges
20.1k23 gold badges112 silver badges213 bronze badges
To be fair[er], the (latter) article also says there was a trend in that less-analytical direction across presidents over time. Also, it is actually an analysis of their discourse, not really of their thinking.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
2
And given that many speeches involve speech writers, the connection to the thinking of the president is even more questionable. But there's little doubt that trying to appeal to a broad audience by simple messages is increasingly used as a tactic. And it's enabled more and more by focus groups, big data analytics, etc.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
3
Two words: Fox News. They have (give or take) the same percentage of US viewer share than Trump has of approval rate.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
3
@DenisdeBernardy You assume the causal relationship Fox News motivates people to favor Trump. The converse could be true; those that favor Trump like Fox News.
– Drunk Cynic
6 hours ago
1
@DrunkCynic: My assumption is that there's a two way correlation. And FWIW Fox hated Trump until the channel's bosses received the order to promote him extensively.
– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
To be fair[er], the (latter) article also says there was a trend in that less-analytical direction across presidents over time. Also, it is actually an analysis of their discourse, not really of their thinking.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
2
And given that many speeches involve speech writers, the connection to the thinking of the president is even more questionable. But there's little doubt that trying to appeal to a broad audience by simple messages is increasingly used as a tactic. And it's enabled more and more by focus groups, big data analytics, etc.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
3
Two words: Fox News. They have (give or take) the same percentage of US viewer share than Trump has of approval rate.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
3
@DenisdeBernardy You assume the causal relationship Fox News motivates people to favor Trump. The converse could be true; those that favor Trump like Fox News.
– Drunk Cynic
6 hours ago
1
@DrunkCynic: My assumption is that there's a two way correlation. And FWIW Fox hated Trump until the channel's bosses received the order to promote him extensively.
– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago
To be fair[er], the (latter) article also says there was a trend in that less-analytical direction across presidents over time. Also, it is actually an analysis of their discourse, not really of their thinking.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
To be fair[er], the (latter) article also says there was a trend in that less-analytical direction across presidents over time. Also, it is actually an analysis of their discourse, not really of their thinking.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
2
2
And given that many speeches involve speech writers, the connection to the thinking of the president is even more questionable. But there's little doubt that trying to appeal to a broad audience by simple messages is increasingly used as a tactic. And it's enabled more and more by focus groups, big data analytics, etc.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
And given that many speeches involve speech writers, the connection to the thinking of the president is even more questionable. But there's little doubt that trying to appeal to a broad audience by simple messages is increasingly used as a tactic. And it's enabled more and more by focus groups, big data analytics, etc.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
3
3
Two words: Fox News. They have (give or take) the same percentage of US viewer share than Trump has of approval rate.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
Two words: Fox News. They have (give or take) the same percentage of US viewer share than Trump has of approval rate.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
3
3
@DenisdeBernardy You assume the causal relationship Fox News motivates people to favor Trump. The converse could be true; those that favor Trump like Fox News.
– Drunk Cynic
6 hours ago
@DenisdeBernardy You assume the causal relationship Fox News motivates people to favor Trump. The converse could be true; those that favor Trump like Fox News.
– Drunk Cynic
6 hours ago
1
1
@DrunkCynic: My assumption is that there's a two way correlation. And FWIW Fox hated Trump until the channel's bosses received the order to promote him extensively.
– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago
@DrunkCynic: My assumption is that there's a two way correlation. And FWIW Fox hated Trump until the channel's bosses received the order to promote him extensively.
– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Here is one take from sociocultural anthropologist Joel Robbins.
The Mysterious Power of Arrogance, 2 FEB 2017
Why do overbearing, obnoxious people so often come out on top? What the story of a local celebrity in the remote highlands of Papua New Guinea reveals about the rise of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.
In the community of Urapmin lives a man named Kinimnok—a boastful, loud, and often angry public figure—whose role in society may help us understand some Americans’ love of those who are supercilious and bombastic.
...
In all societies, just as with the Urapmin, people have to balance values that are not fully compatible with one another. The values that come into conflict differ—in modern democracies some of the key opposed pairs are values like security and freedom, liberty and equality, and the self and the community—but the trick of balancing them remains much the same. Hence, people like Kinimnok, who give up on balance and put all their efforts into achieving a single value, always stand out from the rest, and they often seem to captivate their fellows.
A certain kind of rugged, me-and-mine-first individualism has long been a value in the United States, but it has competed with other values that are concerned with openness, tolerance, and the common good. People usually balance these, compromising on all of them in order to realize a little bit of each. But perhaps because the value of individualism has become harder for most people to realize, even partially, in their current economic circumstances, many Americans recently proved captivated by someone with little interest in values other than individualistic self-promotion. They were joined to a candidate—who went on to become President Donald Trump—by a bond anchored in his ability to express this one value of theirs very fully.
Societies tend to work better when their members struggle to balance conflicting values, and this gives grounds to worry about what leadership devoted to a single value—particularly one such as self-promotion—might be like. Based on my experience in Papua New Guinea, I am not as surprised as I once would have been that many people in the U.S. found themselves attracted to someone who single-mindedly pursues one of their values at the expense of all the rest. But the Urapmin never put Kinimnok at the head of their government, allowing his willfulness to do away with the role of lawfulness in their lives. It remains to be seen how America’s other values will fare in the wake of an election that prioritized one value above the rest.
One of the issues mentioned in this article is compromise.
In 1988, George H. W. Bush said "Read my lips: no new taxes." His popularity with Republicans soared. After a compromise with Democrats in Congress, that resulted in increased taxes, he lost his re-election bid.
President Trump has shown no willingness to compromise; going so far as to attempt repeated end runs around Congress. As long as he continues with that approach, it appears that his popularity (with his base) will remain steady.
add a comment
|
It's actually surprising hard to find surveys that also ask the "why" question of the supporters. I did find one on-line survey by "SuveyMonkey", although I'm not sure of its reliability; even the date is unclear. It used open ended questions.


a large majority of Republicans (85%) approve of the job Trump is doing as president. When asked why, they highlight that he has “kept promises” made during the campaign, “put America first,” “tried to get things done,” and “reversed the last eight years” of Obama administration policies.
Many respondents cite specific campaign slogans (“MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” in some form or another is used by about 8% of all respondents) in their responses.
As the chart above shows, college grads tend to zero in on more tangible goals (top mentioned topic was “reduced regulations”) whereas those without college degrees focus on vaguer ambitions like “making America great again.” Many college grads applaud Trump for “reinvigorating the economy” by removing “intrusive” regulations on business that do more harm than good. This group also advocates another time-tested Trumpism: “Draining the Swamp.” However, the college grads who cited this reason for approving of Trump also acknowledged that while Trump is “trying” to drain the swamp and accomplish his other campaign promises, he is “being blocked by others,” including both Democrats and members of his own party.
One topic that emerged equally from non-college grads and college grads was the feeling that while Trump has “good positions,” he also has a “flawed personality” that does not lend itself to effective communicating or strategizing.
On the other hand, those with less than a college degree praise Trump using some of his more amorphous campaign slogans: “Making America Great Again” and “Putting America First.” These supporters also appreciate Trump for his plain-speaking (“Tells it like it is”) and for the fact that he is “doing his best” despite facing adversity.
There are a lot of papers that try to profile his supporters in one aspect or another, but that's perhaps too long to go over here
add a comment
|
The US economy is doing quite well lately, and unemployment, especially among minorities, is at record lows.
That is a good reason to be popular, especially if one was previously unemployed.
2
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
3
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?
Because in the eyes of many, he says the things that need to be said. And tries to do the things that need to be done.
So it's not unsurprising that in the eyes of those, he's still popular.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46069%2fhow-does-donald-trump-manage-to-remain-so-popular-over-a-rather-long-period-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here is one take from sociocultural anthropologist Joel Robbins.
The Mysterious Power of Arrogance, 2 FEB 2017
Why do overbearing, obnoxious people so often come out on top? What the story of a local celebrity in the remote highlands of Papua New Guinea reveals about the rise of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.
In the community of Urapmin lives a man named Kinimnok—a boastful, loud, and often angry public figure—whose role in society may help us understand some Americans’ love of those who are supercilious and bombastic.
...
In all societies, just as with the Urapmin, people have to balance values that are not fully compatible with one another. The values that come into conflict differ—in modern democracies some of the key opposed pairs are values like security and freedom, liberty and equality, and the self and the community—but the trick of balancing them remains much the same. Hence, people like Kinimnok, who give up on balance and put all their efforts into achieving a single value, always stand out from the rest, and they often seem to captivate their fellows.
A certain kind of rugged, me-and-mine-first individualism has long been a value in the United States, but it has competed with other values that are concerned with openness, tolerance, and the common good. People usually balance these, compromising on all of them in order to realize a little bit of each. But perhaps because the value of individualism has become harder for most people to realize, even partially, in their current economic circumstances, many Americans recently proved captivated by someone with little interest in values other than individualistic self-promotion. They were joined to a candidate—who went on to become President Donald Trump—by a bond anchored in his ability to express this one value of theirs very fully.
Societies tend to work better when their members struggle to balance conflicting values, and this gives grounds to worry about what leadership devoted to a single value—particularly one such as self-promotion—might be like. Based on my experience in Papua New Guinea, I am not as surprised as I once would have been that many people in the U.S. found themselves attracted to someone who single-mindedly pursues one of their values at the expense of all the rest. But the Urapmin never put Kinimnok at the head of their government, allowing his willfulness to do away with the role of lawfulness in their lives. It remains to be seen how America’s other values will fare in the wake of an election that prioritized one value above the rest.
One of the issues mentioned in this article is compromise.
In 1988, George H. W. Bush said "Read my lips: no new taxes." His popularity with Republicans soared. After a compromise with Democrats in Congress, that resulted in increased taxes, he lost his re-election bid.
President Trump has shown no willingness to compromise; going so far as to attempt repeated end runs around Congress. As long as he continues with that approach, it appears that his popularity (with his base) will remain steady.
add a comment
|
Here is one take from sociocultural anthropologist Joel Robbins.
The Mysterious Power of Arrogance, 2 FEB 2017
Why do overbearing, obnoxious people so often come out on top? What the story of a local celebrity in the remote highlands of Papua New Guinea reveals about the rise of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.
In the community of Urapmin lives a man named Kinimnok—a boastful, loud, and often angry public figure—whose role in society may help us understand some Americans’ love of those who are supercilious and bombastic.
...
In all societies, just as with the Urapmin, people have to balance values that are not fully compatible with one another. The values that come into conflict differ—in modern democracies some of the key opposed pairs are values like security and freedom, liberty and equality, and the self and the community—but the trick of balancing them remains much the same. Hence, people like Kinimnok, who give up on balance and put all their efforts into achieving a single value, always stand out from the rest, and they often seem to captivate their fellows.
A certain kind of rugged, me-and-mine-first individualism has long been a value in the United States, but it has competed with other values that are concerned with openness, tolerance, and the common good. People usually balance these, compromising on all of them in order to realize a little bit of each. But perhaps because the value of individualism has become harder for most people to realize, even partially, in their current economic circumstances, many Americans recently proved captivated by someone with little interest in values other than individualistic self-promotion. They were joined to a candidate—who went on to become President Donald Trump—by a bond anchored in his ability to express this one value of theirs very fully.
Societies tend to work better when their members struggle to balance conflicting values, and this gives grounds to worry about what leadership devoted to a single value—particularly one such as self-promotion—might be like. Based on my experience in Papua New Guinea, I am not as surprised as I once would have been that many people in the U.S. found themselves attracted to someone who single-mindedly pursues one of their values at the expense of all the rest. But the Urapmin never put Kinimnok at the head of their government, allowing his willfulness to do away with the role of lawfulness in their lives. It remains to be seen how America’s other values will fare in the wake of an election that prioritized one value above the rest.
One of the issues mentioned in this article is compromise.
In 1988, George H. W. Bush said "Read my lips: no new taxes." His popularity with Republicans soared. After a compromise with Democrats in Congress, that resulted in increased taxes, he lost his re-election bid.
President Trump has shown no willingness to compromise; going so far as to attempt repeated end runs around Congress. As long as he continues with that approach, it appears that his popularity (with his base) will remain steady.
add a comment
|
Here is one take from sociocultural anthropologist Joel Robbins.
The Mysterious Power of Arrogance, 2 FEB 2017
Why do overbearing, obnoxious people so often come out on top? What the story of a local celebrity in the remote highlands of Papua New Guinea reveals about the rise of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.
In the community of Urapmin lives a man named Kinimnok—a boastful, loud, and often angry public figure—whose role in society may help us understand some Americans’ love of those who are supercilious and bombastic.
...
In all societies, just as with the Urapmin, people have to balance values that are not fully compatible with one another. The values that come into conflict differ—in modern democracies some of the key opposed pairs are values like security and freedom, liberty and equality, and the self and the community—but the trick of balancing them remains much the same. Hence, people like Kinimnok, who give up on balance and put all their efforts into achieving a single value, always stand out from the rest, and they often seem to captivate their fellows.
A certain kind of rugged, me-and-mine-first individualism has long been a value in the United States, but it has competed with other values that are concerned with openness, tolerance, and the common good. People usually balance these, compromising on all of them in order to realize a little bit of each. But perhaps because the value of individualism has become harder for most people to realize, even partially, in their current economic circumstances, many Americans recently proved captivated by someone with little interest in values other than individualistic self-promotion. They were joined to a candidate—who went on to become President Donald Trump—by a bond anchored in his ability to express this one value of theirs very fully.
Societies tend to work better when their members struggle to balance conflicting values, and this gives grounds to worry about what leadership devoted to a single value—particularly one such as self-promotion—might be like. Based on my experience in Papua New Guinea, I am not as surprised as I once would have been that many people in the U.S. found themselves attracted to someone who single-mindedly pursues one of their values at the expense of all the rest. But the Urapmin never put Kinimnok at the head of their government, allowing his willfulness to do away with the role of lawfulness in their lives. It remains to be seen how America’s other values will fare in the wake of an election that prioritized one value above the rest.
One of the issues mentioned in this article is compromise.
In 1988, George H. W. Bush said "Read my lips: no new taxes." His popularity with Republicans soared. After a compromise with Democrats in Congress, that resulted in increased taxes, he lost his re-election bid.
President Trump has shown no willingness to compromise; going so far as to attempt repeated end runs around Congress. As long as he continues with that approach, it appears that his popularity (with his base) will remain steady.
Here is one take from sociocultural anthropologist Joel Robbins.
The Mysterious Power of Arrogance, 2 FEB 2017
Why do overbearing, obnoxious people so often come out on top? What the story of a local celebrity in the remote highlands of Papua New Guinea reveals about the rise of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.
In the community of Urapmin lives a man named Kinimnok—a boastful, loud, and often angry public figure—whose role in society may help us understand some Americans’ love of those who are supercilious and bombastic.
...
In all societies, just as with the Urapmin, people have to balance values that are not fully compatible with one another. The values that come into conflict differ—in modern democracies some of the key opposed pairs are values like security and freedom, liberty and equality, and the self and the community—but the trick of balancing them remains much the same. Hence, people like Kinimnok, who give up on balance and put all their efforts into achieving a single value, always stand out from the rest, and they often seem to captivate their fellows.
A certain kind of rugged, me-and-mine-first individualism has long been a value in the United States, but it has competed with other values that are concerned with openness, tolerance, and the common good. People usually balance these, compromising on all of them in order to realize a little bit of each. But perhaps because the value of individualism has become harder for most people to realize, even partially, in their current economic circumstances, many Americans recently proved captivated by someone with little interest in values other than individualistic self-promotion. They were joined to a candidate—who went on to become President Donald Trump—by a bond anchored in his ability to express this one value of theirs very fully.
Societies tend to work better when their members struggle to balance conflicting values, and this gives grounds to worry about what leadership devoted to a single value—particularly one such as self-promotion—might be like. Based on my experience in Papua New Guinea, I am not as surprised as I once would have been that many people in the U.S. found themselves attracted to someone who single-mindedly pursues one of their values at the expense of all the rest. But the Urapmin never put Kinimnok at the head of their government, allowing his willfulness to do away with the role of lawfulness in their lives. It remains to be seen how America’s other values will fare in the wake of an election that prioritized one value above the rest.
One of the issues mentioned in this article is compromise.
In 1988, George H. W. Bush said "Read my lips: no new taxes." His popularity with Republicans soared. After a compromise with Democrats in Congress, that resulted in increased taxes, he lost his re-election bid.
President Trump has shown no willingness to compromise; going so far as to attempt repeated end runs around Congress. As long as he continues with that approach, it appears that his popularity (with his base) will remain steady.
answered 6 hours ago
Rick SmithRick Smith
3,6071 gold badge9 silver badges29 bronze badges
3,6071 gold badge9 silver badges29 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
It's actually surprising hard to find surveys that also ask the "why" question of the supporters. I did find one on-line survey by "SuveyMonkey", although I'm not sure of its reliability; even the date is unclear. It used open ended questions.


a large majority of Republicans (85%) approve of the job Trump is doing as president. When asked why, they highlight that he has “kept promises” made during the campaign, “put America first,” “tried to get things done,” and “reversed the last eight years” of Obama administration policies.
Many respondents cite specific campaign slogans (“MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” in some form or another is used by about 8% of all respondents) in their responses.
As the chart above shows, college grads tend to zero in on more tangible goals (top mentioned topic was “reduced regulations”) whereas those without college degrees focus on vaguer ambitions like “making America great again.” Many college grads applaud Trump for “reinvigorating the economy” by removing “intrusive” regulations on business that do more harm than good. This group also advocates another time-tested Trumpism: “Draining the Swamp.” However, the college grads who cited this reason for approving of Trump also acknowledged that while Trump is “trying” to drain the swamp and accomplish his other campaign promises, he is “being blocked by others,” including both Democrats and members of his own party.
One topic that emerged equally from non-college grads and college grads was the feeling that while Trump has “good positions,” he also has a “flawed personality” that does not lend itself to effective communicating or strategizing.
On the other hand, those with less than a college degree praise Trump using some of his more amorphous campaign slogans: “Making America Great Again” and “Putting America First.” These supporters also appreciate Trump for his plain-speaking (“Tells it like it is”) and for the fact that he is “doing his best” despite facing adversity.
There are a lot of papers that try to profile his supporters in one aspect or another, but that's perhaps too long to go over here
add a comment
|
It's actually surprising hard to find surveys that also ask the "why" question of the supporters. I did find one on-line survey by "SuveyMonkey", although I'm not sure of its reliability; even the date is unclear. It used open ended questions.


a large majority of Republicans (85%) approve of the job Trump is doing as president. When asked why, they highlight that he has “kept promises” made during the campaign, “put America first,” “tried to get things done,” and “reversed the last eight years” of Obama administration policies.
Many respondents cite specific campaign slogans (“MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” in some form or another is used by about 8% of all respondents) in their responses.
As the chart above shows, college grads tend to zero in on more tangible goals (top mentioned topic was “reduced regulations”) whereas those without college degrees focus on vaguer ambitions like “making America great again.” Many college grads applaud Trump for “reinvigorating the economy” by removing “intrusive” regulations on business that do more harm than good. This group also advocates another time-tested Trumpism: “Draining the Swamp.” However, the college grads who cited this reason for approving of Trump also acknowledged that while Trump is “trying” to drain the swamp and accomplish his other campaign promises, he is “being blocked by others,” including both Democrats and members of his own party.
One topic that emerged equally from non-college grads and college grads was the feeling that while Trump has “good positions,” he also has a “flawed personality” that does not lend itself to effective communicating or strategizing.
On the other hand, those with less than a college degree praise Trump using some of his more amorphous campaign slogans: “Making America Great Again” and “Putting America First.” These supporters also appreciate Trump for his plain-speaking (“Tells it like it is”) and for the fact that he is “doing his best” despite facing adversity.
There are a lot of papers that try to profile his supporters in one aspect or another, but that's perhaps too long to go over here
add a comment
|
It's actually surprising hard to find surveys that also ask the "why" question of the supporters. I did find one on-line survey by "SuveyMonkey", although I'm not sure of its reliability; even the date is unclear. It used open ended questions.


a large majority of Republicans (85%) approve of the job Trump is doing as president. When asked why, they highlight that he has “kept promises” made during the campaign, “put America first,” “tried to get things done,” and “reversed the last eight years” of Obama administration policies.
Many respondents cite specific campaign slogans (“MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” in some form or another is used by about 8% of all respondents) in their responses.
As the chart above shows, college grads tend to zero in on more tangible goals (top mentioned topic was “reduced regulations”) whereas those without college degrees focus on vaguer ambitions like “making America great again.” Many college grads applaud Trump for “reinvigorating the economy” by removing “intrusive” regulations on business that do more harm than good. This group also advocates another time-tested Trumpism: “Draining the Swamp.” However, the college grads who cited this reason for approving of Trump also acknowledged that while Trump is “trying” to drain the swamp and accomplish his other campaign promises, he is “being blocked by others,” including both Democrats and members of his own party.
One topic that emerged equally from non-college grads and college grads was the feeling that while Trump has “good positions,” he also has a “flawed personality” that does not lend itself to effective communicating or strategizing.
On the other hand, those with less than a college degree praise Trump using some of his more amorphous campaign slogans: “Making America Great Again” and “Putting America First.” These supporters also appreciate Trump for his plain-speaking (“Tells it like it is”) and for the fact that he is “doing his best” despite facing adversity.
There are a lot of papers that try to profile his supporters in one aspect or another, but that's perhaps too long to go over here
It's actually surprising hard to find surveys that also ask the "why" question of the supporters. I did find one on-line survey by "SuveyMonkey", although I'm not sure of its reliability; even the date is unclear. It used open ended questions.


a large majority of Republicans (85%) approve of the job Trump is doing as president. When asked why, they highlight that he has “kept promises” made during the campaign, “put America first,” “tried to get things done,” and “reversed the last eight years” of Obama administration policies.
Many respondents cite specific campaign slogans (“MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” in some form or another is used by about 8% of all respondents) in their responses.
As the chart above shows, college grads tend to zero in on more tangible goals (top mentioned topic was “reduced regulations”) whereas those without college degrees focus on vaguer ambitions like “making America great again.” Many college grads applaud Trump for “reinvigorating the economy” by removing “intrusive” regulations on business that do more harm than good. This group also advocates another time-tested Trumpism: “Draining the Swamp.” However, the college grads who cited this reason for approving of Trump also acknowledged that while Trump is “trying” to drain the swamp and accomplish his other campaign promises, he is “being blocked by others,” including both Democrats and members of his own party.
One topic that emerged equally from non-college grads and college grads was the feeling that while Trump has “good positions,” he also has a “flawed personality” that does not lend itself to effective communicating or strategizing.
On the other hand, those with less than a college degree praise Trump using some of his more amorphous campaign slogans: “Making America Great Again” and “Putting America First.” These supporters also appreciate Trump for his plain-speaking (“Tells it like it is”) and for the fact that he is “doing his best” despite facing adversity.
There are a lot of papers that try to profile his supporters in one aspect or another, but that's perhaps too long to go over here
answered 2 hours ago
FizzFizz
26.9k3 gold badges69 silver badges156 bronze badges
26.9k3 gold badges69 silver badges156 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
The US economy is doing quite well lately, and unemployment, especially among minorities, is at record lows.
That is a good reason to be popular, especially if one was previously unemployed.
2
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
3
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
The US economy is doing quite well lately, and unemployment, especially among minorities, is at record lows.
That is a good reason to be popular, especially if one was previously unemployed.
2
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
3
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
The US economy is doing quite well lately, and unemployment, especially among minorities, is at record lows.
That is a good reason to be popular, especially if one was previously unemployed.
The US economy is doing quite well lately, and unemployment, especially among minorities, is at record lows.
That is a good reason to be popular, especially if one was previously unemployed.
answered 4 hours ago
tj1000tj1000
8,1517 silver badges29 bronze badges
8,1517 silver badges29 bronze badges
2
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
3
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
2
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
3
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
2
2
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
But does that actually translate into support of Trump from said minorities? I.e. do you have any data to back up the inference? (Not just data on the economy, that's easy as pie to find.)
– Fizz
2 hours ago
3
3
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
"Approval among black Americans has hovered around 10% over the course of Trump’s presidency, according to Gallup polling, with 8% approving in June." apnews.com/009d85b2022a4b46859506a0859c8921
– Fizz
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?
Because in the eyes of many, he says the things that need to be said. And tries to do the things that need to be done.
So it's not unsurprising that in the eyes of those, he's still popular.
add a comment
|
How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?
Because in the eyes of many, he says the things that need to be said. And tries to do the things that need to be done.
So it's not unsurprising that in the eyes of those, he's still popular.
add a comment
|
How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?
Because in the eyes of many, he says the things that need to be said. And tries to do the things that need to be done.
So it's not unsurprising that in the eyes of those, he's still popular.
How does Donald Trump manage to remain so popular over a rather long period of time?
Because in the eyes of many, he says the things that need to be said. And tries to do the things that need to be done.
So it's not unsurprising that in the eyes of those, he's still popular.
answered 4 hours ago
SjoerdSjoerd
3,1511 gold badge11 silver badges21 bronze badges
3,1511 gold badge11 silver badges21 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46069%2fhow-does-donald-trump-manage-to-remain-so-popular-over-a-rather-long-period-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
To be fair[er], the (latter) article also says there was a trend in that less-analytical direction across presidents over time. Also, it is actually an analysis of their discourse, not really of their thinking.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
2
And given that many speeches involve speech writers, the connection to the thinking of the president is even more questionable. But there's little doubt that trying to appeal to a broad audience by simple messages is increasingly used as a tactic. And it's enabled more and more by focus groups, big data analytics, etc.
– Fizz
7 hours ago
3
Two words: Fox News. They have (give or take) the same percentage of US viewer share than Trump has of approval rate.
– Denis de Bernardy
7 hours ago
3
@DenisdeBernardy You assume the causal relationship Fox News motivates people to favor Trump. The converse could be true; those that favor Trump like Fox News.
– Drunk Cynic
6 hours ago
1
@DrunkCynic: My assumption is that there's a two way correlation. And FWIW Fox hated Trump until the channel's bosses received the order to promote him extensively.
– Denis de Bernardy
4 hours ago