Were tables of square roots ever in use?Division of the circle and compass constructionsWhat is so mysterious about Archimedes' approximation of $sqrt 3$?Where did Mathematics establish its roots?When did it become understood that irrational numbers have non-repeating decimal representations?Who first introduced the longhand square-rooting method into European mathematics?F. Schoblik's announced ''ausführliche Darstellung": a lost wrong proof of the Four Color Theorem?What evidence is there that the Babylonians used the Babylonain method of estimating square roots?Earliest Instances of a Slope/Direction Field for a First-Order ODEWhy was the 'differential entropy' from information theory so named?Who first defined polynomials as sequences?

Why was this person allowed to become Grand Maester?

Has there been a multiethnic Star Trek character?

Can we completely replace inheritance using strategy pattern and dependency injection?

Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?

Electricity free spaceship

2019 gold coins to share

Does the Nuka-Cola bottler actually generate nuka cola?

Sql Server delete syntax

What STL algorithm can determine if exactly one item in a container satisfies a predicate?

Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?

Prob. 5, Sec. 6.2, in Bartle & Sherbert's INTRO TO REAL ANALYSIS, 4th ed: How to show this function is strictly decreasing using derivative

Is it possible to fly backward if you have really strong headwind?

Can I utilise a baking stone to make crepes?

Is there a DSLR/mirorless camera with minimal options like a classic, simple SLR?

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)

What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?

The origin of the Russian proverb about two hares

Separate SPI data

Possible runaway argument using circuitikz

What does the pair of vertical lines in empirical entropy formula mean?

Varying the size of dots in a plot according to information contained in list

Increase speed altering column on large table to NON NULL

How to befriend someone who doesn't like to talk?

Amplitude of a crest and trough in a sound wave?



Were tables of square roots ever in use?


Division of the circle and compass constructionsWhat is so mysterious about Archimedes' approximation of $sqrt 3$?Where did Mathematics establish its roots?When did it become understood that irrational numbers have non-repeating decimal representations?Who first introduced the longhand square-rooting method into European mathematics?F. Schoblik's announced ''ausführliche Darstellung": a lost wrong proof of the Four Color Theorem?What evidence is there that the Babylonians used the Babylonain method of estimating square roots?Earliest Instances of a Slope/Direction Field for a First-Order ODEWhy was the 'differential entropy' from information theory so named?Who first defined polynomials as sequences?













1












$begingroup$


Before the advent of calculators they had useful ready made tables for the main functions:sines,cosines logs etc..., do you know if tables of square roots were ever produced or in use?



I never heard of it, yet, it would be very easy to produce, since it is enough to find the roots of numbers from 1 to 100.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Before the advent of calculators they had useful ready made tables for the main functions:sines,cosines logs etc..., do you know if tables of square roots were ever produced or in use?



    I never heard of it, yet, it would be very easy to produce, since it is enough to find the roots of numbers from 1 to 100.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Before the advent of calculators they had useful ready made tables for the main functions:sines,cosines logs etc..., do you know if tables of square roots were ever produced or in use?



      I never heard of it, yet, it would be very easy to produce, since it is enough to find the roots of numbers from 1 to 100.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Before the advent of calculators they had useful ready made tables for the main functions:sines,cosines logs etc..., do you know if tables of square roots were ever produced or in use?



      I never heard of it, yet, it would be very easy to produce, since it is enough to find the roots of numbers from 1 to 100.







      mathematics






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 18 hours ago









      user157860user157860

      976




      976




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Pretty much every mathematics textbook (school or college) before the early 1980s (and many even up to the late 1980s), at the algebra level or above, as well as many (most?) chemistry and physics and engineering textbooks, had such a table at the back of the book (as an appendix or something, where "selected answers" and "index" and "glossary" would appear). Often the entries would be for both $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n,$ which was enough to allow you to easily get approximations for any magnitude-size numbers. For example, to find an approximation for $sqrt3880,$ use $n=3.88$ and look in the $sqrt10n$ entries, since



          $$ sqrt3880 ; =; sqrt1000times 3.88 ; = ; 10sqrt10 times 3.88. $$



          There were stand-alone (i.e. as separate books) tables also, such as the following, where square roots from $1.00$ to $9.99$ by increments of $0.01$ are on pp. 16-17 and square roots from $10.0$ to $99.9$ by increments of $0.1$ are on pp. 18-19:



          Mathematical Tables for Class-Room Use by Mansfield Merriman (1915)
          https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltabl00merrrich



          When I was in high school I owned (purchased in 1974) and used the 20th edition (1973) of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. On pp. 71-90 you'll find a table having column entries for $n^2$ and $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n$ and $n^3$ and $sqrt[3]n$ and $sqrt[3]10n$ and $sqrt[3]100n$ from $n=1$ to $n=1000$ by increments of $1.$ In high school I also owned (I no longer seem to have it, however) Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables to Five Places by Kaj L. Nelson (in the well known Barnes and Noble College Outline Series of books), and other people I knew (in college) had the Schaum's Outline Series of Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables by Murray R. Spiegel (1968), which I didn't have a copy of back then but a few years ago I saw and purchased a copy of a later printing (the 1990 printing) at a local used bookstore (square roots are on pp. 238-239). However, in looking at the Schaum's book now, it's more of a handbook of formulas (algebraic, trigonometric, calculus, series, special functions, etc.) than a table of numerical values for computational use.



          For other such books, try this search and similar searches. For tables at the back of textbooks, simple archive.org and google-books searches will give you hundreds (if not thousands) of examples where you'll find square root tables at the back of the book.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
            $endgroup$
            – Rory Daulton
            15 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerald Edgar
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            13 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
            $endgroup$
            – user157860
            11 hours ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The Babylonian clay tablet from around 1700 BC known as YBC7289, since it's one of many in the Yale Babylonian Collection has a diagram of a square with one side marked as having length 1/2. They took this length, multiplied it by the square root of 2, and got the length of the diagonal.



          Given that square roots were in use then, it would have made sense to create a table of such, rather than repeating the labour in calculating the result.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – M. Farooq
            9 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "587"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhsm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9711%2fwere-tables-of-square-roots-ever-in-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Pretty much every mathematics textbook (school or college) before the early 1980s (and many even up to the late 1980s), at the algebra level or above, as well as many (most?) chemistry and physics and engineering textbooks, had such a table at the back of the book (as an appendix or something, where "selected answers" and "index" and "glossary" would appear). Often the entries would be for both $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n,$ which was enough to allow you to easily get approximations for any magnitude-size numbers. For example, to find an approximation for $sqrt3880,$ use $n=3.88$ and look in the $sqrt10n$ entries, since



          $$ sqrt3880 ; =; sqrt1000times 3.88 ; = ; 10sqrt10 times 3.88. $$



          There were stand-alone (i.e. as separate books) tables also, such as the following, where square roots from $1.00$ to $9.99$ by increments of $0.01$ are on pp. 16-17 and square roots from $10.0$ to $99.9$ by increments of $0.1$ are on pp. 18-19:



          Mathematical Tables for Class-Room Use by Mansfield Merriman (1915)
          https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltabl00merrrich



          When I was in high school I owned (purchased in 1974) and used the 20th edition (1973) of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. On pp. 71-90 you'll find a table having column entries for $n^2$ and $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n$ and $n^3$ and $sqrt[3]n$ and $sqrt[3]10n$ and $sqrt[3]100n$ from $n=1$ to $n=1000$ by increments of $1.$ In high school I also owned (I no longer seem to have it, however) Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables to Five Places by Kaj L. Nelson (in the well known Barnes and Noble College Outline Series of books), and other people I knew (in college) had the Schaum's Outline Series of Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables by Murray R. Spiegel (1968), which I didn't have a copy of back then but a few years ago I saw and purchased a copy of a later printing (the 1990 printing) at a local used bookstore (square roots are on pp. 238-239). However, in looking at the Schaum's book now, it's more of a handbook of formulas (algebraic, trigonometric, calculus, series, special functions, etc.) than a table of numerical values for computational use.



          For other such books, try this search and similar searches. For tables at the back of textbooks, simple archive.org and google-books searches will give you hundreds (if not thousands) of examples where you'll find square root tables at the back of the book.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
            $endgroup$
            – Rory Daulton
            15 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerald Edgar
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            13 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
            $endgroup$
            – user157860
            11 hours ago















          4












          $begingroup$

          Pretty much every mathematics textbook (school or college) before the early 1980s (and many even up to the late 1980s), at the algebra level or above, as well as many (most?) chemistry and physics and engineering textbooks, had such a table at the back of the book (as an appendix or something, where "selected answers" and "index" and "glossary" would appear). Often the entries would be for both $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n,$ which was enough to allow you to easily get approximations for any magnitude-size numbers. For example, to find an approximation for $sqrt3880,$ use $n=3.88$ and look in the $sqrt10n$ entries, since



          $$ sqrt3880 ; =; sqrt1000times 3.88 ; = ; 10sqrt10 times 3.88. $$



          There were stand-alone (i.e. as separate books) tables also, such as the following, where square roots from $1.00$ to $9.99$ by increments of $0.01$ are on pp. 16-17 and square roots from $10.0$ to $99.9$ by increments of $0.1$ are on pp. 18-19:



          Mathematical Tables for Class-Room Use by Mansfield Merriman (1915)
          https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltabl00merrrich



          When I was in high school I owned (purchased in 1974) and used the 20th edition (1973) of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. On pp. 71-90 you'll find a table having column entries for $n^2$ and $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n$ and $n^3$ and $sqrt[3]n$ and $sqrt[3]10n$ and $sqrt[3]100n$ from $n=1$ to $n=1000$ by increments of $1.$ In high school I also owned (I no longer seem to have it, however) Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables to Five Places by Kaj L. Nelson (in the well known Barnes and Noble College Outline Series of books), and other people I knew (in college) had the Schaum's Outline Series of Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables by Murray R. Spiegel (1968), which I didn't have a copy of back then but a few years ago I saw and purchased a copy of a later printing (the 1990 printing) at a local used bookstore (square roots are on pp. 238-239). However, in looking at the Schaum's book now, it's more of a handbook of formulas (algebraic, trigonometric, calculus, series, special functions, etc.) than a table of numerical values for computational use.



          For other such books, try this search and similar searches. For tables at the back of textbooks, simple archive.org and google-books searches will give you hundreds (if not thousands) of examples where you'll find square root tables at the back of the book.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
            $endgroup$
            – Rory Daulton
            15 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerald Edgar
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            13 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
            $endgroup$
            – user157860
            11 hours ago













          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Pretty much every mathematics textbook (school or college) before the early 1980s (and many even up to the late 1980s), at the algebra level or above, as well as many (most?) chemistry and physics and engineering textbooks, had such a table at the back of the book (as an appendix or something, where "selected answers" and "index" and "glossary" would appear). Often the entries would be for both $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n,$ which was enough to allow you to easily get approximations for any magnitude-size numbers. For example, to find an approximation for $sqrt3880,$ use $n=3.88$ and look in the $sqrt10n$ entries, since



          $$ sqrt3880 ; =; sqrt1000times 3.88 ; = ; 10sqrt10 times 3.88. $$



          There were stand-alone (i.e. as separate books) tables also, such as the following, where square roots from $1.00$ to $9.99$ by increments of $0.01$ are on pp. 16-17 and square roots from $10.0$ to $99.9$ by increments of $0.1$ are on pp. 18-19:



          Mathematical Tables for Class-Room Use by Mansfield Merriman (1915)
          https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltabl00merrrich



          When I was in high school I owned (purchased in 1974) and used the 20th edition (1973) of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. On pp. 71-90 you'll find a table having column entries for $n^2$ and $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n$ and $n^3$ and $sqrt[3]n$ and $sqrt[3]10n$ and $sqrt[3]100n$ from $n=1$ to $n=1000$ by increments of $1.$ In high school I also owned (I no longer seem to have it, however) Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables to Five Places by Kaj L. Nelson (in the well known Barnes and Noble College Outline Series of books), and other people I knew (in college) had the Schaum's Outline Series of Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables by Murray R. Spiegel (1968), which I didn't have a copy of back then but a few years ago I saw and purchased a copy of a later printing (the 1990 printing) at a local used bookstore (square roots are on pp. 238-239). However, in looking at the Schaum's book now, it's more of a handbook of formulas (algebraic, trigonometric, calculus, series, special functions, etc.) than a table of numerical values for computational use.



          For other such books, try this search and similar searches. For tables at the back of textbooks, simple archive.org and google-books searches will give you hundreds (if not thousands) of examples where you'll find square root tables at the back of the book.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Pretty much every mathematics textbook (school or college) before the early 1980s (and many even up to the late 1980s), at the algebra level or above, as well as many (most?) chemistry and physics and engineering textbooks, had such a table at the back of the book (as an appendix or something, where "selected answers" and "index" and "glossary" would appear). Often the entries would be for both $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n,$ which was enough to allow you to easily get approximations for any magnitude-size numbers. For example, to find an approximation for $sqrt3880,$ use $n=3.88$ and look in the $sqrt10n$ entries, since



          $$ sqrt3880 ; =; sqrt1000times 3.88 ; = ; 10sqrt10 times 3.88. $$



          There were stand-alone (i.e. as separate books) tables also, such as the following, where square roots from $1.00$ to $9.99$ by increments of $0.01$ are on pp. 16-17 and square roots from $10.0$ to $99.9$ by increments of $0.1$ are on pp. 18-19:



          Mathematical Tables for Class-Room Use by Mansfield Merriman (1915)
          https://archive.org/details/mathematicaltabl00merrrich



          When I was in high school I owned (purchased in 1974) and used the 20th edition (1973) of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. On pp. 71-90 you'll find a table having column entries for $n^2$ and $sqrtn$ and $sqrt10n$ and $n^3$ and $sqrt[3]n$ and $sqrt[3]10n$ and $sqrt[3]100n$ from $n=1$ to $n=1000$ by increments of $1.$ In high school I also owned (I no longer seem to have it, however) Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables to Five Places by Kaj L. Nelson (in the well known Barnes and Noble College Outline Series of books), and other people I knew (in college) had the Schaum's Outline Series of Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables by Murray R. Spiegel (1968), which I didn't have a copy of back then but a few years ago I saw and purchased a copy of a later printing (the 1990 printing) at a local used bookstore (square roots are on pp. 238-239). However, in looking at the Schaum's book now, it's more of a handbook of formulas (algebraic, trigonometric, calculus, series, special functions, etc.) than a table of numerical values for computational use.



          For other such books, try this search and similar searches. For tables at the back of textbooks, simple archive.org and google-books searches will give you hundreds (if not thousands) of examples where you'll find square root tables at the back of the book.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 16 hours ago









          Dave L RenfroDave L Renfro

          1,496713




          1,496713







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
            $endgroup$
            – Rory Daulton
            15 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerald Edgar
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            13 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
            $endgroup$
            – user157860
            11 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
            $endgroup$
            – Rory Daulton
            15 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
            $endgroup$
            – Gerald Edgar
            13 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            13 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Dave L Renfro
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
            $endgroup$
            – user157860
            11 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
          $endgroup$
          – Rory Daulton
          15 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          When I was in high school (the early 70's), the CRC book was too expensive for me. I used (and still have) the Schaum Mathematical Handbook, but I mostly used a smaller book that was just tables. It was similar to your Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables book but the cover was different. That was the book I used the most--so much that it fell apart on me a couple of years ago so I had to throw it away. And yes, I did use the table of square roots. +1 from me--thanks for the memories.
          $endgroup$
          – Rory Daulton
          15 hours ago





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
          $endgroup$
          – Gerald Edgar
          13 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          +1 ... I, too, have the CRC book (a prize for a mathematical contest). But now I am considered to be "history" I guess.
          $endgroup$
          – Gerald Edgar
          13 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
          $endgroup$
          – Dave L Renfro
          13 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          @Roy Daulton: I was taking our 4th year math course (essentially trigonometry in the fall, and precalculus math including conics and logarithms and matrices and probability and math induction in the spring) during 1974-1975 (my sophomore HS year), and our teacher was able, I think, to get a special discount for us, so maybe 6 to 8 of us (out of around 30 total in the two 4th year classes) wound up getting a copy in fall 1974. For what it's worth, about 2 years ago, for prosperity purposes, I made a .pdf scan copy of my notes for that class (213 pages).
          $endgroup$
          – Dave L Renfro
          13 hours ago





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
          $endgroup$
          – Dave L Renfro
          12 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Roy Daulton (and Edgar): For more memories, see my answer to Using log table to solve a division problem.
          $endgroup$
          – Dave L Renfro
          12 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
          $endgroup$
          – user157860
          11 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          thanks, do you have any idea when such tables were first produced?
          $endgroup$
          – user157860
          11 hours ago











          1












          $begingroup$

          The Babylonian clay tablet from around 1700 BC known as YBC7289, since it's one of many in the Yale Babylonian Collection has a diagram of a square with one side marked as having length 1/2. They took this length, multiplied it by the square root of 2, and got the length of the diagonal.



          Given that square roots were in use then, it would have made sense to create a table of such, rather than repeating the labour in calculating the result.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – M. Farooq
            9 hours ago















          1












          $begingroup$

          The Babylonian clay tablet from around 1700 BC known as YBC7289, since it's one of many in the Yale Babylonian Collection has a diagram of a square with one side marked as having length 1/2. They took this length, multiplied it by the square root of 2, and got the length of the diagonal.



          Given that square roots were in use then, it would have made sense to create a table of such, rather than repeating the labour in calculating the result.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – M. Farooq
            9 hours ago













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The Babylonian clay tablet from around 1700 BC known as YBC7289, since it's one of many in the Yale Babylonian Collection has a diagram of a square with one side marked as having length 1/2. They took this length, multiplied it by the square root of 2, and got the length of the diagonal.



          Given that square roots were in use then, it would have made sense to create a table of such, rather than repeating the labour in calculating the result.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The Babylonian clay tablet from around 1700 BC known as YBC7289, since it's one of many in the Yale Babylonian Collection has a diagram of a square with one side marked as having length 1/2. They took this length, multiplied it by the square root of 2, and got the length of the diagonal.



          Given that square roots were in use then, it would have made sense to create a table of such, rather than repeating the labour in calculating the result.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 10 hours ago









          Mozibur UllahMozibur Ullah

          469212




          469212











          • $begingroup$
            After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – M. Farooq
            9 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – M. Farooq
            9 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
          $endgroup$
          – M. Farooq
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          After seeing all these antiquities it seems that humans were quite intelligent thousands of years ago. From Mesopotamia to the building of huge pyramids---mysteries are spread everywhere.
          $endgroup$
          – M. Farooq
          9 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to History of Science and Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhsm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9711%2fwere-tables-of-square-roots-ever-in-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її